Recent AfDs:    Today    Yesterday      June 2 (Tue)      June 1 (Mon)      May 31 (Sun)     More... Media   Organisations   Biography   Society   Web   Games   Science   Arts   Places   Indiscernible  Unsorted

Purge server cache

Chandra Kafle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content primarily serves promotional and commercial purposes and lacks significant independent contribution Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Endrabcwizart (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Icon (Megadeth album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Megadeth discography#Compilation albums because the article fails WP:NALBUM. 1 short AllMusic review is not enough to establish notability. Mika1h (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and California. Mika1h (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Storey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brand new company with no evidence of meeting WP:NCORP through significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JTtheOG (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:47, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Added some more sources. Seems to have been covered across numerous local major media outlets, and assumedly likely to continue to do so, considering its parent company, and the growing market it's entered. Husskeyy (talk) 10:27, 18 May 2026 (UTC+2)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Spar (South Africa) – No relevant/independent evidence beyond from the sales network, the sources presented are merely accounts of the franchise purchases and advertisements. Svartner (talk) 05:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopened per WP:REOPEN, and relisting for more opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 12:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1957 (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reviews during my WP:BEFORE search. Subject fails WP:NFILM Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Ghana. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kyekyeku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Available sources are mostly routine coverage and interviews, with no in-depth analysis. The subject does not meet NACTOR/NCREATIVE as 1957 (film), in its current form, does not pass NFLIM Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Ghana. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agnes Sui-Yin Chan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NPROF. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably delete. It has proved very difficult to find out enough of her reputation to make a clear judgement. Searching at Google Scholar for AS Chan (or other ways of writing her name) yields nothing of interest, but searching for LT Maloney does show Chan et al. (1993) as having 267 citations -- not nothing, but not a very impressive total either. I don't know how to interpret this, and maybe someone better than I am at searching can do better, but for the moment it doesn't seem that she can be regarded as a notable scientist. Athel cb (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Education, Psychology, and Hong Kong. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aerocancun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about an unremarkable short-lived charter airline, unlikely to have any wide coverage. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Mexico. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• I'm not finding much non mill coverage:
  • There's the like of Berman, Dave (20 December 1989). "AeroCancun Starting Monthly Local Flight". The Post-Standard. pp. C-6 & C-7., detailing local routes their opening (although this one briefly touches on the wider operations)
  • And then there's a 1990 near air accident by one of their planes reported in a great many papers (Williams, Corey (30 January 1990). "Takeoff aborted as jet's engine fails". Rochester Times-Union. pp. A1 & A8.)

I'm therefore leaning Delete, so far. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 12:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Eisner Award for Best Writer/Artist–Nonfiction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Eisner Award for Best Writer because there is very little coverage of this award and it fits in the other page. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Comics and animation, Awards, and United States of America. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 11:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of nurse-politicians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I want a discussion of this because I am unsure whether the group meets WP:PEOPLELIST, or is rather a WP:CROSSCAT failing WP:NOT. It seems unconstructive to have List of X-politicians for every profession, being that most or all politicians have held a job or profession before entering politics. Could this be better served by a category? Category:Politicians by occupation concentrates on more spectacular combinations where the occupation is perceived as further removed from politics: actor, sportsperson, musician, astronaut - whereas teacher, engineer, jurist or nurse are more traditional entryways to politics. For the record, I clearly lean towards the opinion that this list does fail WP:NOT, but there are probably lots of arguments for both positions. Geschichte (talk) 10:17, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Politics, and Lists. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The relevant criteria is whether or not it meets NLIST. A quick check for possible sources (which I will add) indicates that it does. Rublamb (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Killing of Martin Nitzken Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to have WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Law, Police, United States of America, and Kentucky. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Avalanche (Timber Falls Adventure Park) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with very little WP:SIGCOV. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks, Entertainment, and Wisconsin. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Abu al-Hasan al-Karaji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this biography fails to meet Wikipedia's core criteria under WP:NOTABILITY. The article relies entirely on primary historical documents and medieval polemical texts to highlight the subject as a rare Shafi'i scholar who rejected Ash'arism in his era. While this theological stance is noted in primary records, a comprehensive search yields a complete absence of reliable, independent secondary sources providing detailed, analytical, or comprehensive biographical coverage of Abu al-Hasan al-Karaji. Under WP:PRIMARY and WP:NOTORIGINAL, extracting a historical figure's name from isolated polemic or primary creedal mentions to construct a standalone biographical entry constitutes original research. Because the subject lacks significant, sustained coverage in modern academic historical scholarship, the article should be deleted. Ayaltimo (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The page is merely a translation of the page from the Arabic wiki. I did not find any substantial evidence of Karaji denouncing Ash'aris either. But go ahead and delete the page. I've already saved the page in the Internet Archive machine anyways. There are also tons of articles about scholars that have literally lesser sources than this, but hey, go ahead.User:M. Adrian Jurhami (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. Please note that this nomination is not personal, nor is it about theological stances or biases. It is strictly a routine administrative process based on Wikipedia’s core content standards.

As per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, the existence of other poorly sourced articles does not justify creating new ones that do not meet guidelines. Furthermore, translation from another language edition does not automatically grant a subject notability if the underlying references do not meet the English Wikipedia's strict requirements for independent, modern secondary scholarship (WP:NOTABILITY). Because we both agree that there is a lack of substantial secondary source evidence for a detailed biography, deletion is the standard encyclopedic procedure to maintain site quality. Respectfully, Ayaltimo (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of the Arabic Wikipedia, can you contribute their as you do here to correct creeds in that Wikipedia? As many if not most of the scholars that you edited or listed their creeds here as Ash'aris in this Wikipedia such as al-Daraqutni, al-Sulami, Abu Uthman Al-Sabuni, al-Baghawi and others are all listed as "Atharis" in that Arabic Wikipedia since a long time ago. So can you do something to finally fix that?! ~2026-33182-39 (talk) 08:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Wildworld Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCONCERT --woodensuperman 09:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. --woodensuperman 09:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:09, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak merge or redirect. The topic is more likely to be notable in the future, but it currently relies on announcement coverage, and Wikipedia:CRYSTAL applies. Merging this to the main artist page (KATSEYE) until the tour begins and receives independent coverage. Mcrst.sean (talk) 13:58, 19 May 2026 (UTC) [reply]
• Weak keep: I think it will be notable this concert tour. Although, the dates has been announced and we should wait if this is will be develop. ROY is WAR Talk! 10:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: if merging, the content is better suited to List of Katseye live performances instead of the artist's page. orangesclub 🍊 15:58, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Support the comment of orangesclub. Cyanii (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify: WP:TOOSOON applies here. The group is popular and this will probably be a notable tour as there will be coverage at each stop that can be used to expand the article, but it doesn't need to be in mainspace right now. MidnightMayhem (talk) 02:54, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree with draftifying ~2026-13653-92 (talk) 01:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I am also in agreement that this should be draftified rather than fully deleted and we can reopen the discussion for full deletion when the event becomes current and no significant coverage is provided. Michanpyon (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Since they have already been on tour and their discography has charted in many countries, I'd say Katseye are notable enough to have an article about their upcoming tour. Gulf of Carpentaria (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Have you read WP:NTOUR? --woodensuperman 07:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cat-fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSPECIES (given that this animal does not appear to represent a new taxon) or WP:GNG (given that this animal was spotted in 2003, identified in 2006, but was not the subject of WP:SUSTAINED coverage since then). The term "cat-fox" should probably redirect to Corsican wildcat. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 09:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, though I think part of the article's content might have a place on the Aeromys thomasi article. It was after all pretty widely publicised in the news for a moment and some people might be curious about the subsequent academic debate. Maybe a section titled "Misidentification as carnivore" or something like that. Boylarva99 (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping All Over the World Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG, especially since 2 of 3 sources are self-published. Perhaps could be merged into Jumping All Over The World, but would need better sourcing. Mariamnei (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Events, Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, and Switzerland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• These kind of concerts always attract media attention. You just need to search better. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I did a very quick search and found a review: https://taz.de/Scooter-live/!5178066/. And, as I've said. you just need to search better, you'll find more. --Moscow Connection (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or at least Merge to the album it supported. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• There's nothing at all about this tour on Swissdox. The one review found above is impressive, but nothing else in the article is usable and I haven't been able to find anything elsewhere. I am not convinced that notability has been established. The few sentences that are actually relevant can be merged to Jumping All Over the World. Toadspike [Talk] 14:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A last relist...if someone can't find more sources, this one's getting merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland Central railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not provide sufficient references and/or citations for what it states. On top of this, the contents of this page could be merged into the better sourced Cleveland railway station page LachlanTansey (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 June 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Australia. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 09:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think there is some merit in keeping pages for former stations that share names with current stations (not withstanding this station was also "West Cleveland" and "Cleveland Central") if they're distinct enough generally (thinking location etc); would also strongly prefer a merge to an outright deletion if the outcome of this discussion was deletion Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shenlong (spacecraft) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Chinese reusable experimental spacecraft because clearly very overlapping program, Reusable Experimental Spacecraft is redirecting here when it should be there, very old article, this is obviously not "currently in development" since 2007 alongside the CSSHQ which is actually launching. Doeze (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Spaceflight, and China. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 08:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bluetickgeng Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid puff piece. All sources are explicitly promotional. Wikipedia is not an advertising agency. CSD tag removed multiple times. This could/should be SALTed for good measure. JTtheOG (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, Internet, Websites, and Nigeria. JTtheOG (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Critically fails WP:ORGCRIT, sources are so promotional that speedy would/should have worked. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete failed AfC but moved to mainspace anyway, legitimate speedy deletion noms deleted by a TA, several editors have already agreed this fails notability. Orange sticker (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmala Convent Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Madhya Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 07:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Found nothing with SIGCOV in additional searches to suggest standalone notability. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dwipannita Kalita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E, WP:GNG, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:MILPEOPLE. All coverage clusters in a ten-month window in 2025–2026 around one milestone (first female paratrooper from Assam, and the resulting feature on the Femina India Independence Day cover honouring ten women officers). Of nine references, four are to the SSBCrack defence-coaching blog ecosystem, three to regional aggregators, and only two are reliable sources, The Sentinel and Northeast Today (both regional, both covering the same event). The rank of Major does not satisfy WP:MILPEOPLE, and the Paratrooper Badge and Maroon Beret are qualification marks rather than awards conferring notability. Xoonkowa (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, Medicine, and Assam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: WP:BLP1E might not be suitable here as this piece by India Today was published just 2 days before. --SatnaamIN (talk) 00:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for the find. Two points. First, indiatodayne.in is the India Today Group's Northeast regional bureau, not the national India Today, so it sits in the same regional tier as The Sentinel and Northeast Today already discussed in the nomination. Second, and more importantly, WP:BLP1E turns on the number of distinct events, not the number of articles about one event. This piece covers the same paratrooper-qualification-and-Femina-cover milestone as everything else, and was published within the same 2025–2026 window. WP:SUSTAINED fails on the same grounds, since it requires coverage spread across time triggered by distinct events. Xoonkowa (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. BLP1E applies even if there were hundreds of articles in a single News cycle. We are not a news organization. Bearian (talk) 15:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Rubin (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A startup owner with routine coverage, mostly about the company. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. - The9Man ^Talk 08:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. - The9Man ^Talk 08:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I tried searching online but couldn’t find any proper detailed articles about this person. Most of the coverage is about the company he runs. AarvexSK (talk) 10:46, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Amaha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A startup with routine coverage. Fails WP:NCORP. - The9Man ^Talk 08:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Companies, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:NORG / WP:ORGDEPTH per review of available sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep coverage makes the article look like Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_Crunchbase including basic discussion of funding round and PR releases. Opposec (talk) 00:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  What do you mean by "coverage makes the article look like Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase"? Geschichte (talk) 10:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Linder (dancer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This reads like a LinkedIn profile. Biruitorul ^Talk 08:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Dance, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Live Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding WP:SIGCOV is secondary sources, appears to fail WP:GNG. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 09:21, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Law, Websites, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- Here are two articles, one in a mass distribution newspaper, discussing litigation against them:

• https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/new-it-rules-kerala-high-court-restrains-centre/article34039353.ece
• https://theleaflet.in/supreme-court/kerala-hc-protects-livelaw-from-coercive-action-by-central-govt-for-non-compliance-of-new-digital-media-rules-asks-ib-ministry-and-meity-to-file-replies-to-petition-challenging-rules

Oblivy (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I came to know about it when I was searching for a judgement. And, a Google search on the name "Live Law" leads to their own news on all the pages of google search. It seems to be notable but I wasn't able to figure out another independent sources so as to confirm the notability. Quikguy43 (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles point to a WP:SUSTAINED issue, which is when an article subject only received notability-eligible coverage for a short time. This company's articles get cited, but I'm not seeing coverage of the company outside of that Kerala court dispute. If there's more out there suggest you identify them here and/or add them to the article (and post here to let us know). Oblivy (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I agree. both not deep coverage problem, and not during a prolonged period of time. two fails Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the coverage is not Sustained and not Deep or original or sigcov. Mozzcircuit (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep As a lawyer, it has been a reliable source of legal news in India for over a decade. It would be better to expand and improve the article rather than deletion. It is one of the only two prominent legal news portals in India, the other one being Bar and Bench. Ar1201u1 (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Draftify as Ar1201u1 points out this is an important site. It has made news in trying to increase access to law. However, it simply does not have the sourcing. I have looked, and I can't find it. If someone can identify relevant sourcing the article will be there for six months, and if not it will be deleted. Seems like the only viable outcome here other than delete. Oblivy (talk) 22:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. It is tricky to access sources for news websites as they themselves fill the pages; so search modifiers have to be used in the Google search (this specific search excludes the Live Law's own website. A subject does not become notable because it's reliable and important (WP:USEFUL and WP:Subjective importance). It still needs to be notable on Wikipedia. Babin Mew (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Arlington Elementary School District (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD was replaced by materially better article but there is still not enough to establish notability. AR/12News only cite the school district in the context of other Maricopa Co districts and even then, only as WP:ROUTINE coverage. Other sources do not assert notability. In contest of prod, author cites nonexistent WP:NGOVT policy, which makes me wonder if AI was used. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC) [reply]

	This LLM-generated text has been collapsed and should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Keep. The article meets WP:NORG through independent, subject-specific coverage. The nomination appears to discount the sources too broadly as routine coverage. Policy frame: For a school district, the relevant standard is WP:NORG/WP:CORPDEPTH, not the notability guidance for individual schools. The question is whether reliable independent sources address the district directly and in some depth. Sources analysis: Arizona Auditor General, Arlington Elementary School District Performance Audit (2016) — an independent state audit report devoted entirely to this district. It discusses district operations, finances, transportation, food service, and administration in substantial detail, constituting significant coverage rather than a directory-style mention. The Arizona Republic (Alltucker, Oct 2025) — covers the district's specific test-score outcomes, not merely the district's existence. 12News (Nov 2025) — covers the district's successful 15% M&O override vote with attribution from election results. This is independent local news coverage of a district-specific funding issue. Calling all county-frame coverage "routine" reads WP:CORPDEPTH too narrowly. These are not mere listings or passing mentions; the sources address the district directly. On the authorship speculation: WP:NGOVT was simply a mistaken shortcut on my part, acknowledged on my talk page. A typo is not evidence of LLM-generated content. Per WP:AGF and WP:ASPERSIONS, the discussion should focus on the article's sourcing and notability rather than speculation about authorship. Sparks19923 (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Was an LLM used to generate this response? Plain clear answer please.

  Audits of a school district strike me as extremely routine. Essentially all school districts do them--it's a legal requirement in many places. This does nothing to demonstrate notability.

  The test score article mentions Arlington once, in one sentence. This is not substantial. In fact "mere listings or passing mentions" is an extremely good description of this source.

  The 12News source is a dead link. I have not further assessed it. M kuhner (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Arizona. Allan Nonymous (talk) 12:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as notability is not shown, and I don't think it can be. Also, contrary to post above, "is it LLM" is a legitimate question (otherwise our new LLM policy could never be enforced) and I think the answer is fairly clear. M kuhner (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and United States of America. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 20:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, revert AI slop Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, school districts qualify under WP:GEOLAND for presumed notability. However the LLM slop is obvious per above, so the article should be reverted to the pre-slop version which is [1]. Jumpytoo Talk 01:18, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails NSCHOOL, NORG and\or GNG. Reverting to a previous (non-LLM-generated) version, even keeping current sources, does not present multiple significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Becker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources consist of passing expert quotes in crypto news articles and low quality promotional outlets and no reliable independent coverage of the subject herself exists. - The9Man ^Talk 07:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Women, Artificial intelligence, and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

See You in Hell, My Darling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no WP:SIGCOV. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 07:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Film-related AfD discussions. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 07:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keisuke Ota (footballer, born 1981) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 1 source for BLP since 2024. The only source is an announcement for retirement. LillaRis87 (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. LillaRis87 (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There are a number of sources present in the article on the Japanese Wikipedia. Aneirinn (talk) 20:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  It would be appreciated if there's source analysis. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Looks notable at face value, but most of the sources are WP:PRIMARY. Among those who are not published by his own employers, [2] is WP:ROUTINE, [3] has no archived version and neither does [4]. Geschichte (talk) 06:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources on ja.wiki and WP:COMMONSENSE, over 300 professional appearances. GiantSnowman 18:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify The article currently does not meet WP:SIGCOV, however, it seems that the player is well established as a professional athlete for several years WP:COMMONSENSE; perhaps it needs to incubate for a little bit longer so that more sources can be found and cited in accordance with WP:GNG. Blubberypancakes (talk) 17:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since this is a BLP and expectations for sportspeople have hardened I'm going to ask those arguing commonsense to look at sources and argue which ones meet our requirements, rather than relying on ja which I vaguely recall has much less developed notability standards.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Karlee Girl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSINGER: I have considered making an article for her in the past but there is very little meaningful coverage of her in media. Her appearance in Building the Band is pretty small and there isn't any reporting on her beyond listing her as a competitor after which she was pretty quietly eliminated. One song of hers has been trending recently but it hasn't even charted on a national chart. There are more citations needed tags than actual references. orangesclub 🍊 07:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Hawaii. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Genevieve Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not WP:INHERITED. Lacks significant independent coverage and falls well short of notability. - The9Man ^Talk 06:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 06:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Her first few Google reviews all seem to be database-type things (IMDB, Discogs) with the notable exception of a Jackson Family fansite. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Darializa Avila Chevalier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Candidate for office who does not appear to have done anything else establishing notability. See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians and judges and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. CambridgeBayWeather (#1 deranged), Uqaqatigijaa (talk), Huliva 06:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Florida, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the notability guidelines linked to by the nominator and the from footnote regarding local politicians: "politician who has received "significant press coverage" has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." I believe such coverage is evident in the sources cited in the article. Tiamut (talk) 09:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ally Lotti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No demonstration of any notability beyond having Instagram followers and previously dating someone famous - WP:NOTINHERITED. orangesclub 🍊 09:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. orangesclub 🍊 09:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Internet, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sources 21, 23 and 24 are RS, as are 10 and 12. Seems to be a notable celebrity/Instagram star (not sure how to describe their job), but we have ample coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 13:20, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Don't you think it's a bit harsh to boot the page? Maybe it might just need more RS (even though it already has some) ReelCosmix (talk) 13:53, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also forgot to mention that notability is based on significant independent coverage, not follower count alone, and there is a bit of coverage beyond that, by the way, for example, the time she got arrested. ReelCosmix (talk) 03:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete : per nom. Sources do describe her mainly as ex girlfriend of Juice Wrld. The argument in favor of WP:NOTINHERITED is strong. Chronos.Zx (talk) 04:36, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. The RS (CNN, Guardian, ABC) are about Juice Wrld, so WP:NOTINHERITED. The newer sources are all low-quality and not WP:RSP: The Sun, TMZ, HotNewHipHop, XXL Mag, vladtv.com - these are all trivial mentions which don't establish notability. She's covered appropriately in the main Juice Wrld article. — Arcaist ^{(contr—talk)} 17:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - but cut out any mention of the latest boyfriend by name, who has not "signed up" for an invasion of his privacy. Bearian (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a fairly straightforward case of NOTINHERITED.-KH-1 (talk) 06:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bibhuti Bhusan Mohanty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t believe the subject of this bio is notable. Neither of the awards he won appear to be notable either. Mccapra (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Mccapra (talk) 07:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - He served as a professor and head of the Department of Audio-Visual Communication at the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, which seems to be the best media education institute in India (as per it's lead). Does this help him pass the #5 criterion of WP:NACADEMIC? BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possibly, though it doesn’t look like a strong case to me. Some more citations of other academics citing his work would help. Mccapra (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 16:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Monira Sharmin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. The subject has never won an election. Does not hold any elected office. She was only nominated for women’s reserved seat. The sources do not demonstrate passing WP:GNG. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bangladesh. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 05:11, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Journalism. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect: to Jatiya Nari Shakti#Leadership as per WP:ATD-R. She was nominated for a women's reserved seat in parliament, but was later disqualified, so she does not meet WP:NPOL... — Raihanur (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Circle (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined speedy deletion under WP:A7 no indication of importance, however all references are either marginally reliable (TechCrunch), interviews with the founder or paid advertising.[5]. All content is WP:CORPTRIV and I can't find any sources that show notability per WP:NCORP. The title implies it's a piece of software when it's a company. Orange sticker (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, Software, and New York. Orange sticker (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: for what it's worth, A7 explicitly does not apply to articles about actual software, which easily could have been a decline reason given the disambiguator, but as this is otherwise written to be a company article that exclusion probably would not actually apply here (it's a moot point, as the decliner instead suggested there are indications of significance, but that merely affects A7 eligibility and does not suggest notability on its own). No formal opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced page on a Max-Planck sub-institute. The page was reduced to the current stub on April 8th due to copyvio, even before that the page had major problems with most of it unsourced and the only 4 sources being self-published. When copyvio was done comment by Jdcooper was entirely copyvio from the institution's own website. needs to be completely rewritten with secondary sources, per WP:RS, WP:N and WP:TNT. I added a PROD May 20 as it was clear no rewrite was going to take place. PROD was removed by Cyclopia with claim invalid rationale, which to me makes no sense. Now the extra work of AfD. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Astronomy, Physics, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:58, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The PROD rationale was Page was reduced to almost nothing (TNT) due to copyvio one month ago. Since there appears to be no interest in replacing it with relevant content, time to complete the TNT. This is invalid because it fails deletion policy as in WP:ATD: that in the short span of one month an article has not been edited is not a reason to delete, let alone to PROD an article. That said, there is some secondary sources coverage in German, e.g. [6]; [7]; googling coverage is quite hard because of course it is swamped by mentions/affiliations. --cyclopia^speak! 13:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: to one of the Institutes, there is really only discussions of this entity [8] in connection with the larger Max Planck group of entities. Oaktree b (talk) 15:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Trivially passes WP:GNG and WP:NORG. MPE's director Reinhard Genzel received the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics specifically for work conducted at the institute on the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre. The article was stubbed for copyvio; the remedy is restoring properly-sourced content, not deletion. Onatic (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. When I removed the previous bulk of the article before, it was because it was entirely copyvio and inappropriate. I'm glad some sources have been found above, I'm sure there are others in the literature. I hope this article will expand into what it could be eventually. Jdcooper (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Max Planck Institutes or Merge to Max Planck Society (ATD): Definitly has problems noted by Ldm1954. Failed to find significant coverage in reliable and independent sources, so lacks notability for a stand alone article. The two provided sources are passing mention. The BR source is mainly about the eROSITA X-ray telescope, and the World of Physics article also mentions the subject in passing (Hans Böhringer from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics) twice. There are around 80 such institutes. Many with articles on Wikipedia suffer from a lack of notability (sourcing) like the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (no sourcing), Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence (1 primary source), Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine (4 primary only sources), Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen (one primary source), Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (1 primary source), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (5 primary only), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (No sources, External link only), Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (8 primary sources), Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (zero sources), Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (1 primary source), and the list goes on. Chopping these back may solve copyvio issues, but not notability issues. AFD is not clean up, BUT this is exactly where we arrive to discuss notability. This is the time to produce proof, that we call a WP:HEY, or get off the proverbial pot. -- Otr500 (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  @Otr500, I have no problems with a Redirect. I agree with your comments. The same as any organisation, company or university department there must be independent coverage that is more than a mention. It does not matter who works or worked at the institutions, notability is not inherited. Neither of the two sources mentioned by @Cyclopia are the type of detailed coverage we require, in fact they both look rather like reproductions of articles/press releases from the institution. As always, policy requires verification. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Code of practice for services, public functions and associations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a pretty clear WP:COATRACK. The article nominally claims to be about the EHRC code but then is 98% about the For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers#Subsequent EHRC guidance. Its already covered pretty well at For Women. Either this should be merged in, or alternatively, renamed and rescoped to be about the 2026 update to the definition of sex. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, Politics, and United Kingdom. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This code has existed since 2011 and has, for example, been interpreted in multiple judgments in the UK before 2026. [9] It has also been discussed in academic articles. [10] It just so happens that a big part of recent news on the code has centred around the Supreme Court's ruling and that such content was already on Wikipedia before this. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Phommavanh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PERP for his criminal activity, article created soon after his sentencing. Also fails WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Crime, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --SatnaamIN (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASUKITE 02:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – If he was only an offender, or only an author, I would agree, but it's the fact he is both that makes him notable in my view. Particularly as he targeted a young person. I think the sources are fine.Blackballnz (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  How does he meet WP:PERP or WP:AUTHOR? LibStar (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  When you get past the news of his offending, there are a number of earlier news reports, such as a profile in the Sydney Morning Herald (behind a paywall). He's also mentioned in a book called Australian Children's Authors. As for WP:PERP, the guidelines say "A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." But he's not "known only in connection with a criminal event". If he had only committed the crimes, then he would likely not be notable (sadly, too many people doing that stuff). It's because of the link between the crimes and his work as a children's author that makes him notable (i.e. that's why the media is interested in reporting on him). Also, later on it says "the execution of the crime is unusual", and I think this is true for the same reason. Blackballnz (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Čečiškiai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSETTLEMENT. Coordinates point to the location of "Old cemetery of Čečiškės village" which would explain why the population is listed as 0 in the cited census. –dlthewave ☎ 20:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Lithuania. –dlthewave ☎ 20:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Depending on wherever it was called as Zekiškiai/Zekiszki during the XVII century, I personally think it is mentioned, but I would need confirmation for that. Respublik (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I've added some sources, and the subject meets the two requirements of NSETTLEMENT, in that the village is legally recognized and was populated. With respect to WP:PAGEDECIDE, I'm content that it serves the reader adequately as a short, standalone article; I wouldn't be especially averse to merging the information to the village's parent eldership article if there is one (I haven't searched yet). Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Za humny je drak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and is non-notable in general. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, and Czech Republic. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Sources provided in the Czech version meet WP:GNG. Around 1 in 50 people in Czechoslovakia saw this film in the release window and it continues to be discussed in mainstream media four decades later. C679 09:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keshabpur High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jagriti Hindu Vidyamandir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NSCHOOL and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tarasundari Balika Vidyabhaban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GGN and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Filmssssssssssss You've made a small typo in GNG. Thought you might want to fix it. 🙃 BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC) [reply]

Sri Ramkrishna Sikshalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 03:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 04:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of hāfu in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is almost unreferenced (just three footnotes). None of the refs suggest a list like this merits WP:NLIST. This is just the usual WP:INDISCRIMINATE, MOS:TRIVIA/WP:IPC failure - the kitchen sink WP:ORish collection of all works that the concept of Hāfu appears in, in some cases in passing (as a secondary character etc.). I don't think there is any value in redirecting this to Hāfu#Hāfu_in_popular_culture, which has no context outside a see also list to this, well, list. Surprisingly, this was created as recently as 2022, but it resembles the poor standards of the early years of Wikipedia. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Fictional elements, Popular culture, and Japan. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Tremayne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was stubbed down to nothing but a lede sentence and then tagged for A7. I am removing the A7 as a misuse of the provision of no credible claim of significance. There was a substantial claim of significance, some of which was unverified, and some of which was attested by unreliable sources. Information that is reported in unreliable sources may be and often is credible, although it is not sufficient to establish notability.

• Procedural nomination at this point - Not yet voting Keep or Delete until reviewing the sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Television, and United Kingdom. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:08, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This subject does not enjoy substantial, in depth biographical coverage by unrelated reliable third party sources. This subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NCREATOR. JFHJr (㊟) 04:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  @Robert McClenon, thank you for the procedural, and I apologize for my misuse. It won't happen again. JFHJr (㊟) 04:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Here's how it looked before I stubbed it. JFHJr (㊟) 05:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  And this is why I stubbed it. JFHJr (㊟) 05:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as poorly sourced BLP. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) — Preceding undated comment added 05:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Not !voting, just trying to find some potential UK newspaper sources (searching 1970-current). The Guardian. Shorter piece on something he said in Evening Gazette. Manchester Evening News covers his taking a new position. Brief Evening Sentinel bit on a talk he gave. Plenty of other pieces with more passing mentions -- him being quoted regarding a program he was involved with, a program he was involved in the production of being the target of a lawsuit, a tax matter regarding a football team that one of his programs revealed, an article by him in the Guardian, a few brief letters to the editor from him, mention of Roger Allam playing him in a docudrama, etc -- but those are the ones that I find that are substantially about him and might point to notability. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The stub contained at least three reliable sources prior to their questionable removal by a short-lived but good-faith account. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Bosley John Bosley. Bearian (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be useful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Takane Ōkubo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only significant coverage is on his works. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Video games, and Japan. Go D. Usopp (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per nom and WP:MILL. Svartner (talk) 23:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How great is the coverage? With points 3. and 4. of WP:NAUTHOR, a creative can be notable by virtue of the notability of their works. EnjoyLightEnjoyTruth (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Central European Jamboree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in the article or my BEFORE suggests this events meets WP:GNG. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Scouting and Europe. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Events-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cybertron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not to be confused with the previous deletion here regarding the fictional planet Cybertron, this is a deletion nomination of the DAB page that replaced it. I believe it should simply be a redirect to Transformers, which would mean deleting the DAB. The other DABmentions are extremely minor in comparison. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Disambiguations. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/redirect per nom. The other meanings here are minor and can be dealt with through other means. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect per nom. The final entry on the list is perhaps the most worthy of being there but it doesn't have an actual article or a reference. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Zitolo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page on an Italian-French scientist which fails notability and had masses of fake claims indicating AI hallucinations or worse. After checking sources, I removed 10 of 15 which either did not exist, were irrelevant or routine. These included a claim that he was nominated as a knight in both France and Italy. There were other invalid claims such as that he is a full professor. Going beyond this his h-factor is 45 with 12K cites, but he is one of many on most of them. The only partial exception are two from his PhD in 2015 & 2017 where he is first author. However, his citations/year have started to drop which is not good. Clear fail of WP:NPROF, no WP:SIGCOV after removal of inappropriate claims. Page was PROD'd by Jimjamjoe5 due to lack of academic notability, which was reverted by Cyclopia with a tag of possible vandalism, I guess the sources were not checked. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Chemistry. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I didn't tag anything for vandalism. --cyclopia^speak! 12:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, France, and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Decent citations, but is listed along with many other co-authors in most/all of the papers in Gscholar. The AI slop is a huge red flag that this is PROMO. I don't see a pass at PROF. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not convinced it's (all) AI slop. The article was created back in 2015, and most of the article's content including the claim he was knighted was already in place by August 2022 [11], before the widespread availability of AI text generation ushered in by ChatGPT in November 2022 (indeed, the knighting claim has been in the article since 2017 [12]). This may just be old-skool fake citations by one of the IP authors of the article, which is still absolutely a red flag that the article has likely been edited for promotional purposes. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I did wonder about fake, which is why I wrote "AI hallucinations or worse" Ldm1954 (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Human-produced fanciful descriptions still don't help show notability, red flag as indicated. Oaktree b (talk) 15:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Reading the page, I think your interventions really helped in making the tone more neutral. Maybe some AI has been used to rephrase some

  sentences over the years, but the page was created as said by @Hemiauchenia a decade ago. I could help in cross-checking some information ensuring notability.

  I added the reference to the “full professor habilitation” status that was claimed in the page - it is easy to verify this information on Italian Public Government open access decisions - but it was removed mentioning “Both peacock and inappropriate citation. Only academics who have a full professor position qualify”. In reality, in Europe (especially in France and Italy), the habilitation to full professor is provided after an examination - which does not mean that you need to be necessarily to work as full professor at University. It is the case of many scientists working for public facilities (e.g. synchrotrons) - they can have this “habilitation” (e.g. allowing them to independently supervise PhDs, for example) but not necessarily working for a University as full professor.

  Google Scholar also presents the profile with an H-Index of 45 and a 11296 citations (which is very high in terms of performance and scientific impact, and is the strongest metrics for a scientific profile of this kind) and publications appear to be on major journals, such as Nature and JACS - however, Google Scholar sometimes “amplifies” KPIs. It will be better to cross-check this information with more reliable sources, for example with Scopus. Riceboxpoulet (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I propose we also consider a comparative approach with other scientific profiles - considering the specificity of this field, it would help. I was looking at Sophie Carenco’s wiky page (e.g. similar employer, similar research topics…) and her metrics are much lower (e.g. ~4030 citations, 40 H-Index). We have to find a way to ensure consistency Riceboxpoulet (talk) 05:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  @Riceboxpoulet, please see WP:WAX. She has 3 peer awards, albeit junior. She could well be nominated for deletion as WP:TOOSOON, but that is tangential to this AfD. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:35, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, revert the AI-generated edits and move on. Also revert the pre-November 2022 edits about knighthood, seems more like a gorilla case or just plain old promo. --gurkubondinn 10:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually the knighthood seems to check out, insofar that it happened. Lacks secondary source though, but it is not a hallucination. --gurkubondinn 11:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  One of the "cites" (was an WP:ELBODY) was just a case of link rot but had been incorrectly marked with {{failed verification}}. I've fixed it: Diff/1357736132. --gurkubondinn 11:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm also not sure why this was reverted as "inappropriate citation": Diff/1356682108. It was obviously retrieved by ChatGPT, and these were bare url references, but as far as I can tell, they do support the claims that were sourced to them.

  The presidenza.governo.it/onorificenze_araldica/onorificenze/documenti/GU175_08072017.pdf document supports the claim that Sergio Mattarella awarded this knighthood. The document says that this is a decree of some sorts by this Sergio person, and Andrea's name is in the list titled Cavaliere di Gran Croce (which seems to be a part of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic).

  But the other source, some sort of a list of candidates, is something that I agree borders on being PEACOCK in the context that it was used. It can be used as a source for something else, but it's sort of pointlessly promotional to say that he "qualifies" as something he (presumably) currently isn't working as. Lost of people quality for lots of things.

  I don't speak Italian though, so I'm relying on Google Translate and I might have missed something. These are also obviously primary sources (and BLPPRIMARY), but I'm not sure that it is correct to say that these are "inappropriate citations", even though proper SECONDARY sources would obviously be preferred. An Italian speaker would probably have better luck than me in digging up a SECONDARY source on this. --gurkubondinn 11:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Restored the first one in Diff/1357739814, used {{cite magazine}} and filled out the parameters. --gurkubondinn 11:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I've also filled out some more references and fixed some MOS issues. --gurkubondinn 12:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Of his hundred or so publications with 2 or more citations, just one has just two authors (and has 16 citations), and there is no single-author publication that I've found. I find it hard to regard him as individually notable. Athel cb (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yusra Ismail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant independent coverage to support a standalone article. The references are majprly around a single incident, which leans to WP:BIO1E. - The9Man ^Talk 08:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 08:02, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime, Syria, and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 16:07, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and Redirect to Collaboration with the Islamic State#Foreign nationals (add a "United States" subsection). WP:BIO1E applies but there is sourced information suitable for that topic. Jfire (talk) 03:14, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pop music in Taiwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pop music in Taiwan has been a stable two-item dabpage linking Hokkien pop and Mandopop since 2013. This has been expanded by User:Heeheemalu into a full article; however, this article makes blatant use of copy-paste with no attribution of elements found said articles. I'd also argue that it WP:CFORKs the content with no real benefit. Recommend to restore the dabpage. 162 etc. (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Taiwan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc. You mentioned that this article is a WP:CFORK from Hokkien pop and Mandopop but it is not the case if you read the article carefully. Yes, there are some overlaps with the two pages, however, these two pages contain significant information from other countries, e.g. Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Singapore, etc.

The article Pop music in Taiwan refers to pop music that are specifically produced in Taiwan and/or associated with Taiwan's music industry since Taiwan under Japanese rule - not "since 2013" as stated by you. Therefore, Pop music in Taiwan is definitely NOT a WP:CFORK. WP:CFORK is defined as "a piece of content (such as an inter-wiki object, a page, or a page section) that has the same scope as another piece of content that predated it, essentially covering the same topic." Rather, Pop music in Taiwan is a standalone article that mentions all genres of popular music that originated in Taiwan throughout history, including Campus folk song, Taiwanese hip hop, Taiwanese Indigenous pop music, Hakka popular music and Taiwanese rock. It clearly details the reason(s) behind the emergence of each genre of music in the history of Taiwanese pop music and how this interweaves with the different periods in the island's unique history. None of this information is represented in whole in any other article. Other articles often only contain fragmentations of information pertaining to the topic of that genre, thus not painting the entire landscape of the history and development of the pop music industry in Taiwan.

Furthermore, your statement is inaccurate: this article is NOT a "blatant use of copy-paste". Instead, relevant information were merely extracted from each article and has been paraphrased, so the issue of non-attribution is not existent. Heeheemalu (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If extracted paraphrased material did not need referencing, we could do away with the verifiability policy. -- Otr500 (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Heeheemalu: 2013 is when this article was created, not when pop music in Taiwan began. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Metropolitan90 I see, I've misunderstood. However, my previous argument still stands. If this article counts as a WP:CFORK, then every summary style article would count as one too. The purpose of this article is to act as a high-level overview of a specific geographic music industry, which is a recognized and standard practice under WP:SUMMARY.

• Regarding Content Forking: This is not a duplicate fork because articles like Hokkien pop and Mandopop are organized by linguistic genres and cover multiple countries (China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore). This article covers a geographic and historical ecosystem, bringing together distinct genres to paint a complete picture of the island's unique musical timeline. None of those individual pages fully capture this shared cultural context.
• Regarding Attribution: @Otr500, I think I may have used the wrong terminology regarding extraction. If any content closely mirrors other pages, it is a licensing issue under WP:COPYWITHIN, not a core verifiability issue. Per WP:ATD, formatting and cleanup issues should be fixed through editing, not article deletion.

Hence, I strongly recommend keeping the article so we can clean up the formatting if there are issues, rather than reducing Taiwan's rich pop music history back to a restrictive two-line disambiguation page. Heeheemalu (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:31, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ali (2025 feature film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mon Je Bojhena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Found no critical reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 06:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chokkor 302 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Found only one TBS review...needs another one to meet the minimum requirement of two critical reviews. If anyone can find it, I won't mind withdrawing. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Makeup (2021 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any critical reviews or anything to consider WP:NFIC. Won't mind withdrawing if someone can find a minimum of two reviews. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Institute for International Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of this organization. Their financial reporting indicates one full-time employee and continued activity until 2023. Brief non-independent description on page iii of this book. Some database context. May be mentioned in this book, which I was unable to access. No obvious redirect target. Note: not to be confused with the Harvard Institute for International Development. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. Suriname0 (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:ORG. Unreferenced. LibStar (talk) 01:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mustapha Abdullahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CEO and an incumbent of a non-notable state energy commission Other career achievements are not notable or breakthrough. Lorraine Crane (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Engineering, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Info - Note on soft closure: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd.

Logs: 2018-03 ✗ PROD

--Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Power Twins (wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, appears to fail WP:NSPORT. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Wrestling, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails notability, including NSPORT criteria. Sourced with a CageMatch personal and career data sheet. Could not find significant coverage in reliable and independent sources to be more than a pseudo biography or resume. Not sure where the unsourced "History" content came from, as it was not on onlineworldofwrestling.com or the "External links" entry. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:38, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DDB Mudra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

However this article has existed since 2012, the current version appears promotional. I am also unable to find any significant coverage. CommanderF1 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies, India, and Maharashtra. CommanderF1 (talk) 12:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly promotional article. SamBordoloi (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OpenAFS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not entirely sure on this one. All sourcing in the article is primary; there's not even a hint of reliable third-party source. Everything I could find was a passing mention or a how-to guide but this is not my area of expertise so it's possible there is coverage out there and I don't know what I'm looking for. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Technology, and Software. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello HJ,

  I'm a contributor for the OpenAFS project and me and our project's core maintainer mmeffie have been committing updates to OpenAFS wikipedia page (albeit slowly, as time permits in our work schedule) to bring OpenAFS wikipedia page up to date.

  Apologies for the Infobox edit - I wasn't aware of the rule that external links are prohibited for our Repository.

  Our project's main website is https://www.openafs.org

  The project is still actively used in enterprise and community, so your request for deleting the wikipedia page did not make sense to me - prompting this reply. Is there perhaps a different area where software projects need to be organized on Wikipedia? OpenAFS is a distributed file system. I do see wikipedia pages for projects like Network_File_System and Ceph_(software) exist that we are seeking inspiration from to make our edits.

  I am still new to making edits to wikipedia however, so would like to learn more about what sources you would like me to cite - whether primary, secondary etc (I plan to research the difference for these this week for my own knowledge), so until then I do request that the request for deletion is "reverted?".

  Let me know if you have any questions, will be happy to clarify.

  Thanks!

  -G

  @Gsvolt Gsvolt (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  We need reliable secondary sources: someone else reporting on you. Geschichte (talk) 06:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello HJ and Geschichte,

  I have added a Bibliography section with citations to two books on the topic of OpenAFS which are great secondary sources of information according to: Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_sources

  OpenAFS has been cited in academic papers as well in the past. I plan to include a Papers section soon.

  Thanks!

  -G

  @Gsvolt Gsvolt (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: While the article does need cleanup, and the current list of submitted changes do need some work, OpenAFS is still available and in use. Several Linux distros do include OpenAFS packages (debian/ubuntu, gentoo, arch, etc.). It is a project that has been selected for Google Summer of Code projects. For historical reference, OpenAFS is the open sourced implementation of AFS that was originally developed at CMU and was later marketed by IBM (which opened source it). CheyenneWills (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Glasgow Chronology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Egyptian chronology#Alternative chronologies because it is a near-stub that relies on a single fringe source. This was proposed at Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_109#Glasgow Chronology, but never acted on. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: History and Egypt. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment my only concern about merging would be that it denies adequate space to discuss the merit (or lack thereof!) in this alternative chronology, so it might make it look like a more valid alternative than it is. On the other hand, the current article has no sourcing for its criticism of the Glasgow chronology. Elemimele (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday Next (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crufty rundown of a fictional character which is 90% unsourced, with the remainder sourced to the author's own website. No reason that this can't fit in a few sentences at Jasper Fforde. 162 etc. (talk) 17:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Jasper Fforde for excessive primary sources and no obvious indication of meeting the notability guidelines for fictional characters. Article is almost entirely WP:FANCRUFT and not cited to reliable sources. Gommeh ^{(talk! sign!)} 18:49, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I've noticed a lot of older articles for long-running book series (often children's and/or detective books, compare Jane Turpin) have a character article that acts as something resembling a series article. This article could potentially be reworked into something like Thursday Next (book series), but I'd hesitate to call that a keep !vote as there probably isn't more than a sentence or two of verifiable, non-fancrufty text in this entire article - basically just the lead, really. ScalarFactor (talk) 03:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Successories (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not meet notability guidelines for businesses. A search for new sources showed a lack in WP:SIGCOV. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, Websites, and Florida. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 23:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: given the stricter sourcing standards for NCORP compared to other topic areas that fall under GNG, that this has been tagged as overly reliant on primary and self-published sources since 2010 may be of note. (No opinion as to whether anything better exists.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Significant independent coverage exists across multiple reliable sources: a full editorial profile in NBC News/Entrepreneur.com (2013), a Quartz article crediting Successories with originating the demotivational poster internet meme format, a TIME magazine piece on the cultural parody it inspired, a WGN-TV news segment (2024), and a full entry in the International Directory of Company Histories. The company was also publicly traded on NASDAQ (ticker: SCES). Proposed sourced edits addressing these points have been posted on the article Talk page. Disclosing COI as a Successories employee. NeroVincent (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The Quartz article appears to be a dead link. The NBC News article is an interview with the former CEO. Yahoo Finance is an aggregator and the article is a press release. Encyclopedia.com is also an aggregator so more insight into the original publisher is needed. The company's website is used several times in your request, as well as Know Your Meme and Today I Found Out - neither of which I would consider "reliable". Kusack Crystal would also be a primary source as well in this case, if I'm not mistaken. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Limbic imprint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability outside of use in pseudoscientific claims by the Anti-circumcision movement. I could find no WP:MEDRS or WP:PARITY sources that establish notability. I invite others to look and see if I missed some. Suggestions for a suitable redirect target welcome. Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Behavioural science, Medicine, and Psychology. Guy Macon (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a mixture of WP:OR-riddled banal nothingness and pseudoscience. Nothing to indicate there is an actual notable subject, rather than vacuous woo. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I think it says a lot about this article that a statement about gender differences in the limbic system is sourced to His Brain, Her Brain: How Divinely Designed Differences Can Strengthen Your Marriage. M kuhner (talk) 04:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not pass GNG. - Walter Still not in the Epstein Files Ego 04:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of the Democratic Labour Party (Brazil).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GuesanLoyalist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Would it be possible for this to be deleted? I already moved it on commons instead via commons:File:Logo of the Democratic Labour Party (Brazil).svg. GuesanLoyalist (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Why is the logo considered below the TOO for Brazil? c:COM:BRAZIL notes that "the concept of creativity in Brazil is way more strict and exigent than in the United States, and consequently the threshold of originality is considerably higher than the United States". ―Howard • 🌽³³ 08:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Red River Showdown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: A small category which does not aide navigation. This information and more is already categorized elsewhere. User:Namiba 13:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename Category:Smelters (occupation) to Category:Smelters (people)

• Nominator's rationale In most cases where the term for people doing an occupation is in some way ambiguous we have (people) in parentheses after the name. Thus Category:Publishers (people) and Category:Mechanics (people). Smelter is both the facility where smelting is done and the person who does the smelting so we need some disambiguation. I almost created the target here because it is the expected form of the category name. I think we should Rename to the standard form. Especially since the current form makes one think this will contain articles about aspects or sub-groupins in the occupation of smelting, maybe articles that cover tin Smelters, lead Smelters, iron Smelters, copper Smelters, silver Smelters ect. Instead we have biographies of people who were Smelters so I think the target name would cause less surprise to users.John Pack Lambert (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Draft articles about the Americas to Category:Draft articles about geography

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge unnecessary category layer. The two subcategories cover the entire topic. Mclay1 (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merging of 2 rugby league categories, namely merging ':Category:Cumberland rugby league team players' into ':Category:Cumbria rugby league team players'

@Robinson Drinkald: Please read the instructions at WP:CFD#NOM for how to make a nomination. Mclay1 (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:1411 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1411 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1415 in Portugal (2 C, 2 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1415 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1415 establishments in Portugal (1 C, 5 P) to Category:1410s establishments in Portugal and Category:1415 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1415 in the Portuguese Empire (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1410s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1415 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1410s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1418 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1418 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1419 in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1410s in Portugal and Category:1419 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1421 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1420s establishments in Portugal and Category:1421 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1424 establishments in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1420s establishments in Portugal and Category:1421 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1431 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s in Portugal and Category:1431 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1433 disestablishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s disestablishments in Portugal and Category:1433 disestablishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1434 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s establishments in Portugal and Category:1434 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1437 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1430s in Portugal and Category:1437 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1440 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1440 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1442 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1442 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1445 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1440s in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1445
• Propose merging Category:1446 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1446 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1448 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s establishments in Portugal and Category:1448 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1449 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1440s in Portugal and Category:1449 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1452 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1450s in Portugal and Category:1452 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1458 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1450s in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1458
• Propose merging Category:1458 in the Portuguese Empire (2 P) to Category:1450s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1459 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1450s establishments in Portugal and Category:1459 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1460 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1460 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1464 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1460s in Portugal and Category:1464 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1464 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1464 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1469 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1460s establishments in Portugal and Category:1469 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1471 establishments in Portugal (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1471 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1471 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1471 in the Portuguese Empire (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1470s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1475 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1475 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1475 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1475 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1476 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1476 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1476 establishments in Portugal (2 P) to Category:1470s establishments in Portugal and Category:1476 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1478 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1479 in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1470s in Portugal and Category:1479 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1481 in Portugal (1 C, 2 P) to Category:1480s in Portugal and Category:1481 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1481 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1480s establishments in Portugal and Category:1481 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1482 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (3 P) to Category:1480s establishments in the Portuguese Empire and Category:1482 establishments
• Propose merging Category:1488 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1480s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1489 in Portugal (2 C, 1 P) to Category:1480s in Portugal and Category:1489 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1489 establishments in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1480s establishments in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1493 in Portugal (3 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1493 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1494 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1494 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1494 in the Portuguese Empire (1 P) to Category:1490s in the Portuguese Empire
• Propose merging Category:1496 in Portugal (1 C, 1 P) to Category:1490s in Portugal and Category:1496 in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1496 establishments in Portugal (1 P) to Category:1490s establishments in Portugal and Category:1496 establishments in Europe
• Propose merging Category:1498 establishments in Portugal (3 P) to Category:1490s establishments in Portugal and Category:1498 establishments in Europe

Nominator's rationale: merge, per WP:OCYEAR, mainly one- or two-articles categories, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge These are too narrow categories to aid navigation.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose renaming Category:Image Epoch games to Category:Imageepoch games

Nominator's rationale: The company name is imageepoch, not Image Epoch _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  The nomination is to rename not delete. Mclay1 (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was meant to be in the section below. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename. This could have been speedied. Mclay1 (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose deleting Category:Organised events in Transvaal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Redundant category layer with only one subcategory, which is already categorised elsewhere in Category:Transvaal. Mclay1 (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Organized events in the Philippines by region (2) to Category:Organized events in the Philippines
• Propose deleting Category:Organized events in the Philippines by province (1)
• Propose deleting Category:Organized events in Cebu (1)

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge/delete unnecessary category layers. Category:Elections in the Philippines by region can purged because it's already in another subcategory of the target. Mclay1 (talk) 03:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Manually merge and delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Knight Commanders of the Exalted Order of Malacca to Category:Recipients of the Order of the Exalted Order of Malacca

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now, underpopulated category ^SMason_Garrison 01:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both These are both cases of categorizing by awards that are not such that they will almost always be mentioned when speaking of the person so they do not fit our guidelines by categorizing by award.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree on that, but then the sibling category should be nominated too. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas, 3rd class to Category:Recipients of the Order of Manas

Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated category, upmerge for now ^SMason_Garrison 01:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge, this is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both These do not meet our limited circumstances under which we categorize by award.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both per Johnpacklambert (or else merge per nom). I will tag the target. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Propose merging Category:Non-renewable resource companies established in 1750 to Category:Companies established in 1750

Nominator's rationale: upmerge for now. underpopulated and isolated category. There is only one page in the entire Non-renewable resource companies established in the 18th century tree ^SMason_Garrison 00:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Just delete, the article is about (the exploitation of) certain coal mines, but nothing is said about the establishment of a company. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article is about coal mines in an area but does not mention a company.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Reylo → Star Wars sequel trilogy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target page. Where should it point instead? Rose Abrams (T C L) 12:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, from judging the face value of one quick search, there might be enough RS for someone to write a standalone article. Rose Abrams (T C L) 12:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this was originally created as a redirect to Kylo Ren, but the term is not mentioned there beyond being in the title of a reference (ping user:(Oinkers42) who retargetted). The name is mentioned at The Love Hypothesis but that wouldn't make a good target as it links to this redirect clearly expecting it to lead to detailed information elsewhere. The last paragraph at Shipping (fandom)#Shipping debates is relevant, but I'm weakly against that as a target as it requires knowledge from earlier in that article to make sense if you aren't familiar with the concept of shipping in the fandom context (and I don't think we can assume everyone using this search term is). The "Naming conventions" section of the same article also mentions this name, but it's just a passing mention as an example and also requires contextual knowledge so is definitely not a good target. Thryduulf (talk) 12:59, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Alert of death → Fork bomb#Alert of death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target and I couldn't find it mentioned in another article. Suonii180 (talk) 10:09, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Content was added to the article by the redirect's creator at about the time the redirect was created and removed without summary by an IP editor a week later. As this was in 2011 and (afaict) it hasn't been re-added it's safe to say the removal stuck. It doesn't seem to be an established term for that either, "alert of death" -Wikipedia gets fewer than 20 hits on google, only 2 of which are in a computing context and neither have this meaning. Thryduulf (talk) 11:37, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Partido Democrat → Democratic Party (Curaçao)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

article says Partido Democraat, which is not this title. ambiguous with Democrat (Brazil) and even Democrat (U.S.), since this title is meant to be words of mixed languages. Dudzcar (talk) 05:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep This is a fairly plausible misspelling of the Papiamento name for the target article and it does get uses [13], [14] (although most commonly in Dutch, which obviously has affinity to Curacao). Most google results though are actually for various parties called Partido Democrático (rendered with or without the diacritic). Thryduulf (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget. There are no parties known by this exact mixed-language title. In addition to Papiamento creole, Partido means party in at least two other languages (Spanish and Portuguese) and there are numerous options on the Democratic Party dab page that could correspond to either Partido Demócrata or Partido Democrático (both of which are equally plausible typos compared to Partido Democraat). That dab would be my preferred target as it favours the English "Democrat" part of the redirect (this is enwiki after all) rather than the Partido Democrático dab which would favour Portuguese over Spanish, and would make it harder to reach the existing Papiamento target. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Hexamastix → Hexamastix coercens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm not entirely sure why this name was redirected to Hexamastix coercens - Hexamastix is a genus with 18 accepted species according to AlgaeBase, so H. coercens is neither the sole or even the type species (which is H. batrachorum). This redirect should either be expanded into an article on the genus or deleted to allow for an article to be created at a later date. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 08:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I created the redirect because Hexamastix had over 40 incoming article links and Hexamastix coercens had been tagged as an orphan article for over 10 years. It seemed like a way to point readers at least to a related article rather than nothing, and possibly help everybody out. To me, a redirect is even easier to turn into an article than a redlink, it definitely wasn't my intention to slow the creation of an article at Hexamastix. I didn't realize this wasn't a good practice so I won't do it anymore. --Here2rewrite (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Athletics at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 3x3 basketball at the 2026 Asian Games → 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games – Women's tournament → Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games – Men's tournament → Kabaddi at the 2026 Asian Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too early for this, can be created closer to the games when more information is available. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Bundled four identical nominations made by the same editor. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:33, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 08:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Solidarity → Wikipedia:WikiProject Anarchism/Participate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This currently redirects to WikiProject Anarchism; should the target be changed to the petition where WP:SOLIDARITY links, at least temporarily? BlaqWiedow (talk) 04:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I should note that I added a hatnote to the top of the petition page, feel free to revert if that is not necessary. BlaqWiedow (talk) 04:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to suggested. No need to have inconsistency in capitalization. --ABx11 (she/they | formerly TheAuroraBorealis | In solidarity) 05:04, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Gosh. This redirect is ancient. It originally must have pointed at a WikiProject Anarchism essay (it was titled something like "solidarity among rogues", if I recall correctly) that's long since gone. Retarget, and no need for the hatnote. In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• CNN Underscored → CNN  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned and potentially misleading redirect. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and previous discussion to delete, which had the same target. When this redirect was created, no mention was added, so I believe this redirect meets WP:G4. Mathguy2718 (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as creator – This redirect is for the |publisher= field in citations that cite CNN Underscored. CNN Underscored is the review division of CNN, analogous to The Athletic vis-à-vis The New York Times, io9 vis-à-vis Gizmodo, or Vulture vis-à-vis New York magazine. Redirects are WP:CHEAP, so there is no benefit to having to pipe the link in every citation template as |publisher=[[CNN|CNN Underscored]]. Of course, I am not opposed to adding some information about CNN Underscored to our main article for CNN, but the lack thereof alone should not be grounds for deletion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a prominently featured category of (rather spammy appearing) content on CNN, which is a major source of information for millions of people (or more than millions). I don't see a good reason to delete it. I also see nothing misleading about it. Are these supposed to be objective reviews or are they just ads? Either way, it's a well-established category of something published by CNN. (By the way, I think that should be used in the |work= parameter, not the |publisher= parameter.) Probably the CNN article should mention it explicitly, because their website promotes a lot of things in that category. They seem to say they use their own judgment about which products they choose to promote, but provide links to where the recommended products can be purchased, and they collect revenue from the sellers when people use those links. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I just added a couple of sentences about it into the CNN article. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for doing that. And yeah, technically, the citation syntax should be |website=[[CNN Underscored]] |publisher=[[CNN]]. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the added mention?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• AviturusAviturus → Giant salamander  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• UlanurusUlanurus → Giant salamander  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• ZaissanurusZaissanurus → Giant salamander  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per reason 10 (...could plausibly be expanded into an article...). The target page does not discuss the redirects beyond simple mentions. Per WP:NSPECIES, all species (and the genera containing them) are considered notable. It is certainly not common practice to redirect genus/species to their parent taxa, as this discourages their creation and/or elaboration (WP:RED; there is currently no indication that the page in question needs to be created). -SlvrHwk (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Plantdrew (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I'm not against deletion, @SlvrHwk, but I have to point out that WP:NSPECIES doesn't cover fossil taxa. Chess enjoyer (talk) 07:06, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• 1-12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2-12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 1/12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2/12cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 1-12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2-12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2/12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 1/12 cav → 12th Cavalry Regiment (United States)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Apparent shorthand for the battalions that comprise the regiment, but this does not appear to be in common use (at least not on Wikipedia), and as redirects these are vague and potentially confusing and ambiguous. No incoming links. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Republic Italy → Italy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Italy Republic → Italy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Odd ungrammatical redirects that aren't helping anyone find our article on Italy. Potentially harmful getting in the way of search results for keywords. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:53, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep for "Republic Italy" as a quite plausible redirect.

Keep for "Italy Republic" as a slightly less but still plausible redirect. Maxeto0910 (talk) 03:29, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Live on Air → Red Hot Chili Peppers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Live On Air → Red Hot Chili Peppers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. The phrasing of these redirects make them rather ambiguous; not sure (and I weak oppose, but mentioning for WP:BEFORE completeness) if retargeting these to Live broadcast makes sense here since apparently these redirects represent multiple topics, such as apparently a subject related to Bon Jovi. Steel1943 (talk) 07:26, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is evidently the title of multiple unofficial releases (1994 CD, 2007 DVD) compiling material by the band. The same is true for Bon Jovi (2010 CD), among many other artists. I doubt any of these is notable.

@Steel1943: Why do you oppose retargeting to live broadcast? (And would you object to creating live on air as a redirect to live broadcast? I was surprised to see it didn't already exist.) – Scyrme (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Scyrme: I guess my best way of explaining my stance on this is ... I just changed my stance on that option to "weak oppose" since I really don't have a strong opinion about it, but it definitely seems like this title is ambiguous for a lot of unnotable topics, plus there's the off chance that someone might literally think the phrase "live on air" is about something that literally lives (is alive) on air [particles] or something like that. Steel1943 (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt someone would search "live on air" in search of living organisms that inhabit the air, but if it's plausible then a hatnote could deal with that:

"Live on air" redirects here. For organisms that live on air currents, see Aeroplankton.

I suppose "aeroplankton" isn't a widely known word, so maybe someone might search "live on air" for them, but that's really more of a description than a title. Regardless, the overwhelmingly most common use of the expression "live on air" (both on and off Wikipedia) is in reference to live broadcasts, and these various unofficial releases are in-fact all using it in that way too (they're unofficial compilations of live performances). – Scyrme (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroplankton seems like a stretch. And are these the only organisms that fit the, rather vague, description of "lives on air"? Inedia ("breatharianism") seems more likely. But I don't suggest that is a good target for these. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:55, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Breatharianism had also occurred to me, but that's more "people" that "live on air" than "organisms" that "live on air", and the latter better fits the description Steel1943 gave. Regardless, I agree with you that both are a stretch. If others disagree though, and think it's better to be thorough and cover all possible interpretations, I'd prefer a hatnote to a disambiguation page because "live on air" where "live" is the verb, not the adjective, isn't a topic title but is rather a description. Neither Aeroplankton nor Inedia could actually be titled "live on air", even if their topics could be described as "living on air". Regardless, the primary topic for "live on air" is certainly live broadcasting based on overwhelming use. – Scyrme (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lean retarget to live broadcast to match live on air which I've decided to create, as the basic phrase has a very clear primary topic regardless of whether "live" can plausibly be interpreted as a verb or not. I'm not convinced the phrase is especially ambiguous beyond its use in the titles of unofficial compilations of media that was previously only available "live on air". While the capitalisation of these redirects suggests a search for a title, there are no articles or mentions for any of them that I could find. If others think it's plausible at least one of them is notable, Live on Air can be tagged as {{r with possibilities}} and revisited if substantial content is contributed either as a new article or coverage within another article. Only lean towards retargeting as a case could be made for WP:RETURNTORED if one of these titles is notable, but that seems unlikely as the only external search results I saw in relation to these titles were things like Discogs pages and people selling copies on eBay.. – Scyrme (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• DABify the few articles that may be relevant, including potential misspellings / erroneous titles as deemed relevant by editors such as (possibly) On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2, On Air (John Fahey album) (a live recording), Live on the Air, etc. My only concern is that this could become an excessive listing, in particular if editors link to records that don't have their own article and just link to the band's page (as is currently the case with this redirect). Shazback (talk) 07:59, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 ‡ ^edits 01:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tennis tournament seeded players legend final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused legend template. Gonnym (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Portal content pages (header bar 2) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused portal-related template. Gonnym (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Politics of Brazil/styles.css (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 12:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mbabel-WMDC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not a subst template. Seems Template:Mbabel1c is the one used. Gonnym (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Drainage basin succession templates and subpages

I am nominating all of the templates in Category:Drainage basin succession templates (and its subcats) for replacement with {{drainage}}, which I created to centralise all of the 2k templates into one easy-to-update template. This means that if a new drainage basin is needed, a single template can just be edited rather than having to create yet another template. There will be no visible change to any article; code-wise it will simply be changing (for example) {{PAchelous}} to {{Drainage|Achelous}}. Primefac (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've listed them all at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2026 June 4/Drainage basin succession templates. Gonnym (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There are two functionalities that will be lost by replacing the R- and P-templates with this new template. First, the R-templates categorize the articles that use them into a tributaries category, for instance {{RMeurthe}} into Category:Tributaries of the Moselle. Second, the system of interlinked P-templates implies that only one P-template ({{PWeser}}) has to be modified if the Weser article is moved to for instance Weser (river). In the {{Drainage}} template it would have to be changed in 55 places. Markussep ^Talk 07:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm still working on a recursive version to deal with that; will likely be a module, but if not, the new syntax editor allows for really quick find/replace for something like Weser → Weser (river). As far as the Rs go, we have moved away from templates adding content categories to articles, so the R-names should be deprecated anyway. Primefac (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Why? --Joy (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  About moving away from templates adding content categories to articles, could you point me to that guideline? Markussep ^Talk 12:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you create an implementation that confirms this is useful first, and then transclude it from those templates, make sure there's no regressions, and only then start a TfD to replace the call sites in the articles?

I never liked the P* and R* names myself, they seem too obfuscated, but that doesn't mean the functionality is bad. --Joy (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Storey – I reverted the close, reopened and relisted the AfD per WP:REOPEN. Owen× ☎ 12:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Pet Storey (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore) Not the most controversial page around, but a problematic WP:NAC nonetheless. There were three extant opinions voiced in the AFD; the delete of the nominator, a keep and a merge. The discussion was then closed as merge by User:VerdictByLogic, which is problematic for three reasons: (a) the user is inexperienced and currently has slightly more than 2,000 edits (b) the consensus does not appear clear at all (c) the choice to merge looks like a blatant WP:SUPERVOTE since VerdictByLogic argues for this choice, with it being VerdictByLogic's own opinion that the subject "does not require" a standalone article. The user also did so when I first asked about this on the talk page. I suggest that the closure be overturned to relist. Geschichte (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.