Wikipedia:Metacoverage

Metacoverage is coverage of coverage. On Wikipedia, it refers to article text that explicitly describes the simple, obvious fact that a given subject had been mentioned in sources or a particular type of source, sometimes without necessarily mentioning what those sources have said about that subject. If a subject has received only trivial mentions in independent, reliable sources, an editor (or AI chatbot) might use metacoverage in an attempt to mask its non-notability.

Examples

Uncontroversial statements

X markN Fastened Loose Holdings was profiled in media outlets like The Foo Chronicle and Raw Bar Digest, which reported that it had earned over $15 million in the third quarter.[1][2]

checkY Fastened Loose Holdings was reported to have earned over $15 million in the third quarter.[1][2]

  1. ^ a b Doe, J. "Fastened Loose Makes $15 Million Within Just a Few Months" The Foo Chronicle
  2. ^ a b Wright, Edsel "HOLDINGS, FASTENED LOOSE: Corporate Earnings Report - Q3 2025" Raw Bar Digest

Sources should be used to support statements about the subject itself, not necessarily the simple fact that it had received coverage in those sources at all. If reliable sources disagree on what is true, each side of the disagreement should be given due weight based on the proportion of coverage in reliable sources, whereas if reliable sources agree on what is true, it would be neutral to state such propositions as facts in Wikipedia's voice.

In-text attribution

X markN The Case of the Suit was reviewed by critics from publications such as Literature Lodge and The Foo Chronicle, which highlighted the novel's ability to captivate readers.[1][2]

checkY Paige Turner of Literature Lodge described The Case of the Suit as "a page-turner". In an op-ed for The Foo Chronicle, Hank Yu said it was "difficult to put down" in an op-ed for The Foo Chronicle.[1][2]

  1. ^ a b Turner, Paige "'The Case of the Suit' - Book Review" Literature Lodge
  2. ^ a b Yu, Hank "OPINION: You Should Pick Up 'Case of the Suit'" The Foo Chronicle

Although it is appropriate to attribute reviews to sources, article text should summarize what the critics who made those reviews have said, not just name-drop the employers of the critics who reviewed it.

See also

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.