DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

CS1 error on I F P

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page I F P, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AllEvents/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:AllEvents/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Hello Parasbm. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Parasbm. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Parasbm|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 12:22, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AllEvents (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AllEvents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parasbm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:08, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bonadea,

You mentioned that the article needs

The company is independently mentioned by some of the big websites like Microsoft, Google, Ahref, Semrush, etc. It's a 13 years old company closely working with a lot of very famous artists (which themselves are on Wikipedia) using the services of these companies.

Please help me with how can I improve these mentions, when I feel the current provided info is already very great. A lot of other wikipedia pages cite this website too. Parasbm (talk) 07:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
446	The Streets (talk)	Add sources
48	Workspace (talk)	Add sources
27	Mumbai International Film Festival (talk)	Add sources
777	React (software) (talk)	Add sources
220	Coworking (talk)	Add sources
59	Skyharbor (talk)	Add sources
64	Indian rock (talk)	Cleanup
52	Shivendra Singh Dungarpur (talk)	Cleanup
332	Skindred (talk)	Cleanup
652	United States Department of Energy (talk)	Expand
8,596	Salesforce (talk)	Expand
1,427	WeWork (talk)	Expand
16	Reykjavík International Film Festival (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24	Sebastián Cordero (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26	Culture of Bengaluru (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
68	Papaya Global (talk)	Merge
256	Niantic, Inc. (talk)	Merge
90	Limited-run series (talk)	Merge
64	Kajabi (talk)	Wikify
262	Music of India (talk)	Wikify
531	Truecaller (talk)	Wikify
11	Antariksh (talk)	Orphan
4	WillCall (talk)	Orphan
4	The Office Pass (talk)	Orphan
15	David Siegel (executive) (talk)	Stub
18	Ticketfly (talk)	Stub
22	Music of Gujarat (talk)	Stub
5	Pingalshi Meghanand Gadhvi (talk)	Stub
34	Convoy (company) (talk)	Stub
9	Kankaria Carnival (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:36, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AllEvents (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven were: