Hello, Amitkumar9918, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article (or draft of an article) about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:52, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Amitkumar9918, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repost promotional content on Wikipedia. New users can be forgiven for doing this initially, but users who continue to post promotional content after being told about Wikipedia's policy against promotion will be shown less leniency. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Amitkumar9918/Sample page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 16:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand that my edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest, advertising, and notability guidelines. I acknowledge that I should not have created or edited biographical content related to a client or political subject. I confirm that I will not engage in promotional or paid editing, and I will not recreate the article in mainspace. If unblocked, I will limit my contributions to neutral, non-controversial areas and will follow the Articles for Creation process only, with independent reliable sources. I respectfully request reconsideration of this block. Thank you for your time.

Decline reason:

Show that YOU understand, not that an AI tool understands. Appeal in your own words. Cabayi (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were promotional in nature. I apologize for this mistake. I will follow Wikipedia's neutral point of view and conflict of interest guidelines in future and will not use Wikipedia for promotion. I request reconsideration of my block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been pending for more than two weeks with no response to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially address these questions.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you Amit Kumar, or are you his representative? 331dot (talk) 10:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Hi there! To help us respond to the request, please do the following:[reply]

1. Review Wikipedia's payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain in your own words how those apply to your block and what you would do differently if unblocked.
2. Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amitkumar9918 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello. I understand that my previous edits may have violated Wikipedia's guidelines, particularly regarding autobiography or conflict of interest. That was not my intention. I sincerely apologize for the mistake. I have now reviewed Wikipedia's policies and understand the importance of neutral and independent sourcing. I assure you that future contributions will strictly follow Wikipedia's content and notability guidelines. I kindly request reconsideration of the block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". The Reply function is imperfect and does not work well in all situations, such as posting at the bottom. I'm still looking for an answer to my question. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]