User:Pythoncoder/ACE/2022
 | These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
It's election season once again on Wikipedia, and that means it's time for the 2022 edition of my ArbCom voting guide. As I said last year and the year before, I have no idea if anyone will read or care about this, but I was going to end up making something like this for myself anyway, so I might as well post it publicly on the off-chance that it’s useful to other voters.
Note: if you want to see symbols next to the support/oppose/neutral text in this table, may I recommend my Vote Symbols userscript?
All my ArbCom voting guides: 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019
12 candidates running for 8 seats:
| Candidate | Vote | Other comments |
|---|---|---|
| Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) | Support | Current arb, no issues |
| BoldLuis (talk · contribs) | Oppose | WP:NOTQUITEYET |
| CaptainEek (talk · contribs) | Support | Current arb, no issues |
| GeneralNotability (talk · contribs) | Neutral | Some concerns about past temperament [1] (made under previous username Creffett) but not enough to put me in oppose. |
| Guerillero (talk · contribs) | Support | More active this year — activity was one of my main concerns last year. |
| L235 (talk · contribs) | Support | Current arb, no issues |
| Moneytrees (talk · contribs) | Weak support | Has arb clerking experience so that's a plus, though they resigned while still a trainee. |
| Primefac (talk · contribs) | Support | Current arb, no issues |
| Robert McClenon (talk · contribs) | Oppose | I regretfully oppose all non-admins running for ArbCom because I feel that adminship represents a minimum level of community trust that I look for in arbitrator candidates. |
| SilkTork (talk · contribs) | Support | Current bureaucrat, and has experience for the job as a former arbitrator. |
| Sdrqaz (talk · contribs) | Neutral | No serious issues but I'd like to see at least a year of admin experience before promotion to arbitrator. |
| Tamzin (talk · contribs) | Weak oppose | Concerns were raised on the discussion page about this candidate being too controversial and confrontational, then their responses proved that point. Also recently went through a particularly contentious RfA — maybe wait a couple years for the dust to settle before running again. |
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.