Talk:Sixty-fourth note

British Name

Does one know how common those british names are today? Has something of a tongue-twister… --.rhavin (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which is probably why Charles Schulz threw it in to this "Peanuts" strip: http://www.gocomics.com/peanuts/1980/03/04 A2Kafir (and...?) 02:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They're used so rarely that it doesn't really matter that the name is difficult to pronounce. 88.104.247.101 (talk) 16:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Usage

Does anyone know of any instances where notes like these have actually been used? I've been playing the piano for 14 years (albeit sporadically), and I've never come across these, just heard of 'em. TrianaC 14:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It all depends on tempo, at 50 bpm it's 1/64 = 0.075s; quite playable… --.rhavin (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been playing piano for five years and I see them far to often. For the most recent example I've played, look at page 14 hereof[[1]]. The next value down is in the first movement of Beethoven's 8th piano sonata, to give the first examlpe I can think of.Quendus 12:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity I asked a chorister of long experience whether choral music composers use 64th notes? Her reply: "No possible way can they use 64th notes. 32nd is the very most & even that's stretching it."
(I realize that the human voice and a piano are very different instruments.)Wanderer57 (talk) 21:14, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, that depends on how fast the piece is. At quarter note = 48, 32nds and 64ths would not be too much of a problem. Double sharp (talk) 02:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only use I can think of is in a trill. 88.104.243.200 (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Practicality

Does this really need its own page? This should just be part of List_of_musical_symbols#Instrument-specific_notation Supuhstar * § 05:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.