This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22

I recently changed the 'gas giant' infobox to 'beige', as well as 'ice giant' to 'lightcyan' - I hope it isn't too bad. I won't be changing anything more, I just felt that the current infoboxes felt too similar to some other ones concerning the Solar System (the TNO 'minor planet' vs the 'ice giants' + the 'comets' vs 'gas giants' maybe). - IvarTheBoneless123 (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I've since changed 'lightcyan' to 'aliceblue' on the 'ice giant' infobox since lightcyan actually looks kind of goofy, but I stand by the 'beige' in regards to the 'gas giant' one. - IvarTheBoneless123 (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@IvarTheBoneless123: Seems reasonable enough to me. Double sharp (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just wanted to know, since we both collaborated on changing these infoboxes in the first place, if I had your backing. - IvarTheBoneless123 (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Enneacontahexagon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 4 § Enneacontahexagon until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 96-gon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 4 § 96-gon until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that you are one of the most active editors of the moons of Jupiter article, you might work on improving it if you have the time. Векочел (talk) 01:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Векочел: Honestly, it might need too much work! See User talk:Nrco0e#Moons of Jupiter for what might be needed. Moons of Neptune is in better shape and I made a GAN for it (being the editor who brought it to FL in the first place last decade). Double sharp (talk) 15:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Moons of Neptune is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Векочел -- Векочел (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen anyone make a symbol for it yet? I know it doesn't exist, but if Vulcan and Antichthon have a symbol then why not? Zenphia1 (talk) 21:07, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zenphia1: Not that I'm aware of. Double sharp (talk) 05:56, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 26 § Base 120 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Moons of Neptune is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Moons of Neptune has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 -- Bgsu98 (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, is 2.34×10¹⁹ years the double beta partial half-life, or the total half-life of ⁹⁶Zr? Thanks! ~2026-33301-33 (talk) 04:57, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't know. The paper where single-beta is discovered for this nuclide only gives the partial half-life for single-beta. Although I suppose since this was only just discovered, does that mean that all previous half-lives listed for ⁹⁶Zr were really double-beta partial half-lives? Double sharp (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. if it really is the double-beta partial half-life, then it should be about 90% double-beta and 10% single-beta. Double sharp (talk) 06:34, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]