Talk:Resonance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Resonance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Linear systems section is too too long.
Per WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, the section on linear systems should be cut down, I suggest to one example. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agree --ChetvornoTALK 17:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- don't agree, it seems useful as it is to me Omblauman (talk) 11:09, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Minor objection to lead
I really like the current version of the lead reverted to by Binksternet. It is easily understood by general readers
- Resonance is a phenomenon that occurs when an object or system is subjected to an external force or vibration that matches its resonant frequency (or resonance frequency), defined as the frequency that generates the maximum amplitude response in the system. When this happens, the object or system absorbs energy from the external force and starts vibrating with a larger amplitude.
The only objection I have is that many systems have multiple resonant frequencies. Could we make the lead plural?
- Resonance is a phenomenon that occurs when an object or system is subjected to an external force or vibration whose frequency matches a resonant frequency (or resonance frequency) of the system, defined as a frequency that generates a maximum amplitude response in the system.
--ChetvornoTALK 20:03, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Plural makes sense. Binksternet (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
sources in examples
I added sources in the examples section, maybe it's good enough that somebody should move flag to Linear section? WhaleFarm (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
