This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance). Apps Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Computer security: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with: How you can help: Add to your watchlist the project talk page! Post there for help with articles or to suggest articles that need work. Request editing suggestions on your talk page by entering WikiProject_Computer_security into this template. Check the article alerts to participate in deletion discussions, review Good Article nominees, and review draft articles. Edit any articles that interest you. Recommended: Most popular articles that need the most work (last refreshed 1 August 2026) Popular articles (monthly top articles by views) High-importance stub-quality articles High-importance start-quality articles Mid-importance stub-quality articles Mid-importance start-quality articles Unknown-importance stub-quality articles Unknown-importance start-quality articles Review changes to popular articles or changes to talk pages. Replace deprecated archival service links. Recategorize articles in Category:Security to more specific categories Fix something on the list of articles that need cleanup, including: Clarification needed Rewrite needed Expansion needed Style editing needed Update needed Orphaned (add links from other articles to these articles) Conflict of interest Original research Promotional tone Biographies of living persons (BLP) articles lacking sources Cites no sources Cites unreliable sources Review unreviewed articles, if you're a new pages patroller. Of the 3629 articles in this project 2011 or 55% are marked for cleanup, with 4098 issues in total. Editing resources: WikiProject Technology "generally reliable sources" list Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Technical language Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Computer science Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance). Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Freedom of speech Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If you want to see the full link, mouse over the hyperlink. No need to put it all on the page. Also, the other two links, code and market, are important for open source and android software, respectfully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teeks99 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, and thus they are listed at the bottom in the 'external links' section and thus should also added in the infobox. The infobox is a summary of hard facts. mabdul 12:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think the Orbot article could be merged with Tor (network), under the "Implementations" section. Orbot is just a Tor client for Android, so it could have a brief mention there instead of the current stub. Sunmist (talk) 08:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have a slight preference for keeping them separate, though I could definitely be convinced otherwise. Unlike Tor Browser, Orbot isn't developed by Tor Project, and makes design decisions that Tor Project has been expressly opposed to (e.g., the user-facing ability to filter exits by geoip). I also think that the Tor article is already kind of unwieldy, and someone unfamiliar with the space could easily get lost in details (it's been on my todo list for far too long now to clean the article up). Basically, I'd like the Tor article to be kept to things that are relevant to someone who is curious about this Tor thing they've heard about and decided to, well, look it up in an encyclopedia. Adding details about specific Tor front-ends seems to cross that line a bit, IMO. But again, I could be convinced otherwise, and while I think that the "Implementations" section of the Tor article is in need of pruning, it's nowhere near as bad as all the theoretical "attacks" on that article or the arduous "Reception, impact, and legislation" section.—Tga (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

• Do Not Merge - This article should better clarify how Orbot and Guardian project are separate from and related to The Tor Project. Maybe the infobox should not say Developers: The Tor Project. It needs improving, but merging is not the way, IMO. -- Yae4 (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the feedback! My opinion has changed; between Orbot being developed by the Guardian Project and the design differences Tga.D (talk · contribs) mentioned, I agree that merging into the (already quite large) Tor (network) article wouldn't be the best solution. Sunmist (talk) 01:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply