Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers
| Main page | Discussion | Guidelines | Content | Assessment | Article Alerts | Participants |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, several other WikiProject Numbers talk pages redirect here. |
We should "adopt" the pages on square roots of integers.
There exist pages, containing information that demonstrates notability, for the square roots of 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7. These should be incorporated into Wikipedia project numbers, they are clearly within our realm of interest. We should consider whether lists of square root values would make sense. Riverskip (talk) 18:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely, but I thought they were already included? Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:52, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Is bullet point style or paragraph structure better for list articles?
Currently the short descriptions of numbers from 301 to 399 on the 300 page is organized into sentences, while the 400 and 500 pages have lists. While I am generally a fan of paragraph style, some of the factoids, especially if they involve equations, are confusing in paragraphs. I also think that there should be consistancy with the lists at least up through 900. The lists for 600, 700, 800, and 900 are very confusing and I am happy to update them, but I don't know whether the 300 page or 400 and 500 page format is preferred. Riverskip (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- Clarification, I mean the lists on the 400 and 500 pages have a list of bullets for each number. Riverskip (talk) 23:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
- IMO, I would say paragraph style is better, with line breaks for certain equations. Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
needed discussion of article creation criteria
Please consider contributing to the following discussions of article creation criteria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(numbers)#h-Friedman_is_not_a_good_justification_for_an_article-20260724211800 Riverskip (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
discussion of routine facts explanations
Please consider contributing to the following discussion
Wikipedia talk:Notability (numbers)#c-Riverskip-20260806195600-Can a list of specific routine facts be added? Riverskip (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:161#Requested move 9 August 2026
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:161#Requested move 9 August 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Certes (talk) 16:14, 20 August 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.