DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

discussion Jump to bottom New topic All village pumps Shortcuts WP:VPPWP:VPP WP:VPPOLWP:VPPOL The policy section of the village pump is intended for discussions...

There is no consensus here after a week of discussion. The discussion at VPP may end up generating a new guideline that this article and its cousins would...

change NFCC accordingly, at a more central venue, WP:MCQ perhaps, or WP:VPP, would be a far more effective use of the community's time. Goodraise 14:51...

would like to change this practice, a MFD is not the place to start, try WP:VPP. — xaosflux Talk 03:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Clutter, old, indiscriminate...

pretending to discuss the close with me for forms sake. Let’s set the scene. VPP discussions do not authorise deletion but its not true to say that only arguments...

pages in Category:Chemical data pages, a broader discussion (say, at WP:VPP) is the better place to develop consensus rather than in a one-off AfD discussion...

movie is released, and at which time I also initiated a discussion at WP:VPP#Incubator Portal review.  So this MfD, just as the AfD, are forks of the...

(UTC) Related discussion at VPP predates this; I jumped in given the NORN heading about Rees's as an excellent example of the VPP conversation. The flaws...

unencyclopedic unlink unwatch userfied userfy username UTC verifiability VPI VPM VPP VPR VPT watchlist wiki Wikibooks Wikidata wikify Wikimedia Wikinews Wikipedia...

related ANI discussion. Equazcion •✗/C • 05:27, 3 Mar 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:VPP is the proper spot for this kind of thing. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:48, 3 March...

November: VPT 2012 December: VPP 2013 March: VPT 2013 December – 2014 January: WikiProject Chess talk page 2016 May – 2016 June: VPP Most of these threads have...

Wikipedia. If you want to bring attention to an issue, start a dicussion at WP:VPP. Equazcion •✗/C • 12:41, 12 Apr 2008 (UTC) Delete - Possibly acceptable idea...

wiktionary · sister projects bugzilla · charts · catgraph · 6° · mirror filter vpp · vpr · vpt Key help pages template · user page · watch Wikipedia:cheatsheet...

discussed at WP:VPP, and when we've come up with a list of topics and invited everyone to give their input, we'll go back to WP:VPP to ask for permission...

in sustainability. DonneyC (talk · contribs) -- Interest in EVs, V2G, and VPP; also interested in Sustainability and Renewable energy; and was interested...

that AFD. The 2015 AFD was eight years ago. There is a policy consensus at VPP in 2018 against this article. This should at least count as an additional...

titled "List of... writers/directors/etc." should go. It was discussed in WP:VPP, and it was discussed in the page creator's talk page. One of my mentors...

2017 (UTC) Delete - Whether she meets NSPORTS or not isn't the issue. Per VPP decision, NSPORTS neither replaces nor supersedes GNG. Also, WP:SPORTBASIC...

machine-readable disease codes into more medical articles was raised at VPP A request for help updating Parkinson's disease, which was promoted to FA...

left a discussion on WP:VPP 930913(Congratulate) 14:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC) I guess we will wait and see what happened atp WP:VPP ·addshore· talk to me!...

WP:TROUT for time-wasting. MFD isn't Editor Review Mark II or an offshoot of VPP and isn't the place to discuss your personal interpretation of policy; if...

subst from being used in the signature preferences box (discussed at WP:VPP) may be simpler. It seems clear, however, that the general consensus is to...

Announcements inviting review and comment have typically been placed at: WP:VPP, WT:AC, WP:AC/N, WP:AN, WP:AN/I, WP:CENT and WT:BUR. Because of the broad...

Comment, or (2) through a linkage institution such as the village pump (WP:VPP) or a parent project (e.g. WP:WPMOS) which help editors step through the...

— Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Could someone move this to WT:CFD, WP:VPP, or WP:VPR? KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Withdrawn: Not...

at FFD? I know, because the rules say so. I will ask a stupid question at VPP. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Weak Delete as per...

before it is on the main page and through the day after. A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops...

is another chaos bomb by this IP, all of whose edits (the rest are at WP:VPP) are of the same nonsense in the spaces between spam, o/t, and disruption...

This is what I mean. That's endemic of this entire chat. "VPP did bad?!" > evidence checked > "VPP was right". Look at the link. There is no way this will...

may use their privileged toolset when engaged in disclosed paid editing (VPP RfC and WT:ADMIN RfC). – B By Jytdog A lot of people thought this was a case...

like this need to be kept, and it may be time to open a discussion at WP:VPP. All the best, Miniapolis 23:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC) The policy states "This...

several points that have a general consensus. MFD isn't a good venue for this, VPP, Talk Pages, even an RFC would be more approriate These processes are useful...

Pavilion of Harmony - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation and VPP Piracy in the Indian Ocean[dead link] R&B and soul music[dead link] The North...

that AFD. The 2015 AFD was eight years ago. There is a policy consensus at VPP in 2018 against this article. This should at least count as an additional...

information page), so can this task be advertised to the village pump (maybe WP:VPP) with a description of the task and a link to this BRFA? Would be good to...

low). The conversation petered out without any plan for action. –B On WP:VPP: Should victims of tragedies who would not otherwise have their own articles...

WP:AINB#how do we deal with AI-generated stuff in the Wikipedia namespace? and WP:VPP#On AI-generated essays. thejiujiangdragon T/C 18:57, 2 April 2026 (UTC) Note...

KJV would be disqualified from writing on VPP/non-VPP since this would result in SYNTH/OR and bias against VPP; similarly the same applies to people who...

school is confirmed to exist, so it stays. I would suggest a trip to WP:VPP if you don't like the outcome of this. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:10, 10 August...

(talk) 19:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Procedural Keep until the discussion at WP:VPP is resolved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC) Procedural keep...

to disable it in preferences (Phab:T311023) after a successful RFC at WP:VPP. Shortcut WP:SUBSCRIBEWP:SUBSCRIBE Tracked in Phabricator Task T263820 Notifications...

where; maybe it should be placed in the VPP archives instead... --ais523 12:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Comment: The VPP archives (as linked above) already...

upholding policy until it's changed; the place for that discussion is WP:VPP. (FWIW, I think the WP:F8 criteria should be changed.) Miniapolis 00:18,...

needs to be initiated because we have WP:VPP as well. Thanks. --RaviC (talk) 09:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC) WP:VPP is a very good place to do this, RaviC, if...

investigate · cuwiki · SI). Adding bizarrely byzantine bureaucracy suggestions to VPP [1]. Overall, fits the pattern. Darkspots (talk) 04:00, 10 November 2008...

change NFCC accordingly, at a more central venue, WP:MCQ perhaps, or WP:VPP, would be a far more effective use of the community's time. Goodraise 14:51...

page earler that day). I do spend a lot of time at WP:HD, WP:VPR, and WP:VPP though, so I learn a lot there. I also participate in AFD's, so I'm quite...

threshold. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2). 2018 VPP discussion to allow access to copyviobot flags It was at...

does it). Since the above-mentioned AFD lists a particular discussion on WP:VPP, personally I think this is a limited consensus as the discussion is not...

already have WP:VPR, VPP has a long standing use (over 15 year) with almost 5000 links in. There is also already a navbox at the top of VPP that goes to VPR...

numerical tilt toward keeping, as the wording is admittedly fuzzy. I suggest a VPP discussion sorting this out before future AfDs are attempted. Vanamonde (Talk)...

through the motions again. I'm also considering raising the general issue at VPP, something along the lines of "should unsourced stubs remain in situations...

machine-readable disease codes into more medical articles is still ongoing at at VPP More eyes are needed to review some class-created medical pages; list at...

set criteria. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Bot req VPP VPP Edit period(s): Monthly Estimated number of pages affected: 2 Exclusion...

2017 (UTC) Delete per everyone here; it's clear based on discussion at WP:VPP there's a consensus against keeping articles on candidates whose primary...

2008 (UTC) This discussion is important... it has been made a notice on VPP and is ongoing at Template talk:Reflist#Template:Reflist. (under protest...

community probably needs to be consulted - could you make a post at Wikipedia:VPP, directing people here please? Thanks, Martinp23 11:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)...

links | watch | logs | views) For the genesis of this project, see this 2005 VPP discussion. Seems like an idea that made more sense in 2005 than it does...

(UTC) This question would be better on the Help Desk. However, see WP:PG, WP:VPP and Wikimedia Foundation. Tevildo (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2015 (UTC) @T...

the reliability of a specific source, they should be discussing this at WP:VPP, WP:RSN, etc.—and they know this. But they have never done so, instead preferring...

the history. Disclaimer: I'm not uninvolved here, I made an argument at WP:VPP that I didn't like this direction. I'm opening this MfD because the G7 speedy...

sympathy, but I would much prefer an apology and your participation in the VPP thread about MEDRS over-reach. First you accused me there of writing this...

(UTC) I think we could request a clarification regarding the policy at WP:VPP. Zalaraz (talk) 07:02, 6 October 2025 (UTC) Most guidelines are open to interpretation...

15:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Keep for now. We can hash otu minimums at a VPP or a RFC. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

(policy)#Elimination of Fair Use Rationale in Promotional Photos of Living People, WP:VPP#Deletion of promotional photos, or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fair use#Replaceable...

(talk) 05:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC) Template:VPP-project (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:VPP-bug (talk · history · transclusions ·...

and the reasons it was kept are the same now. It was also discussed at VPP. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC) Firstly, I'd suggest reworking...

separate template. However, the editor who created the template and started the VPP discussion (after a complaint about the quality from another editor at his...

WP:DELREV, WP:WQA, WP:CP, WP:ADCO/RFC, WP:PUF, WP:HD, WP:ITN, WP:VP, WP:VPP, WP:VPT, WP:BN, WP:CJS, WP:BRFA, WP:UW, WP:NAR, WP:EA, WP:ELN, WP:TEA, and...

2007 (UTC) Please describe your participation in policy discussions (at WP:VPP, on policy talk pages, etc.). The Transhumanist   04:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)...

as VPP's abuse of policy when VPP did not instigate the present discussion here. It is also not fair to characterize Chetsford as "someone they [VPP] disagree...

17:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC) Keep. I make a comment in a discussion at WP:VPP about Kiefer Wolfowitz's disruptive editing, and then he "coincidentally"...

of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC) P:VPP → Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)  (links · history ·...

The DRV is the first of what could be many batch deletions per the initial VPP discussion and the ANI discussion. This article would get nominated sooner...

category guideline for gay people there's no reason it couldn't be discussed at vpp or other relevant pages, but it is courtesy to inform the LGBT project esp...

airport articles. The instigating AfD that ultimately led to the most recent VPP RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Airport destination lists 2 was Wikipedia:Articles...

25 March 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per nom, and per the larger discussions at WP:VPP#Scope of "Outline" articles and User talk:Karanacs/Outline RfC draft and...

or from guideline to policy, it will leave an announcement on Wikipedia:VPP. When it notices a page has been downgraded, it will leave a note. So the...

MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages, page history reveals this with edit summary "per VPP discussion", which turns up Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Advertising_...

2009 (UTC) if I knew, I would've went there instead ;p ... perhaps the WP:VPP? –xeno (talk) 20:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Delete or convert to talk page templates...

like the most obvious candidate for forum to me, with notices posted at WP:VPP and WP:VPI. It's worth noting though that those parties who take on the task...

change the policy, you could always start a conversation at WT:ANYBIO or WP:VPP. SITH (talk) 18:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC) "The person has made a widely...

difference between this and WP:VPP. Did I misunderstand? Thanks. Maurreen (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC) For the record, WP:VPP goes to Village Pump Policy;...

17:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC) For the One True Answer, ask User:Mike Godwin. But VPP is probably faster. Anomie⚔ 20:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Unless Judgepedia relicenses...

made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. The linked VPP discussion raied no objection to this being decided here. JohnCD (talk) 20:44...

doesn't establish any sort of policy. Start a policy page, advertise it on WP:VPP, get a consensus on these proposals (if you can) and then apply them.--Osidge...

which is for public computers and automatic editing. I am considering a WP:VPP for the issue of vandalism spaces. If you feel that a SPI is necessary, go...

--cyclopiaspeak! 09:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC) @Cyclopia:, please stop canvassing the VPP proposal, and stop following me around in general. You know I'm not going...

most commonly given barnstar. One can suggest changes in the process at WP:VPP! But, in the current scenario, when giving barnstar is not barred, this essay...

May 2010 (UTC) Not to mention that he destroyed the archiving of VPT and VPP threads. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Note: there is...

2026 (UTC), according to DatBot There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability...

draft or userspace may be a reasonable outcome (see also the current WP:VPP discussion about "AfD culture", which might be relevant here). GermanJoe...

nominating every “Comparison of xyz” article, I suggest opening an RfC at WP:VPP so people can get an input of the state of these type of articles. EvanTech10...

legitimately as sources could be in other languages) then why not take this to WP:VPP. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 21:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC) I've always taken...

[3]. I think it's worth bringing this up for a broader discussion at WP:VPP or something to discuss to see if anybody can source this. Alternatively...

WP:ILIKEIT doesn't entirely apply there since the RfC was advertised on VPP for the latter half of its duration and editors who were not part of the...

could change, but that would have to be through a large discussion at WP:VPP or similar, not the creation of a new template. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 15:17, 6...

or decomisioning should be discussed on it's Talk Page, or perhaps on WP:VPP, not backdoor'ed via MFD. xaosflux Talk/CVU 05:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)...

which in itself seems like a policy suggestion that might do better in WP:VPP. Melmann 21:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC) @Melmann: On the contrary, as I note...

able to create the discussion page anyway. The request was actually made at VPP. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC) So why on earth did you...

made a note at Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)#‎Old VPP decision regarding GNG and subject-specific guidelines about that discussion...

people's database reports for user pages of nonexistent users, like at WP:VPP#Are "users" only human editors and bots?. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:19...

Anyway, the process is at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, not here (WP:VPP). This is not the place to ask for exceptions to the WP:BOTS policy, while...

heritage portals. We need a re-creation review process, but this is not VPP. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Keep and update. Broad enough...

permalink], tho discussion is ongoing). This discussion was notified to WP:VPP[1] and WP:VPR[2]. Previous related discussion: WP:Bots/Requests for approval/BHGbot...

earthquake lights thread was not all one-sided but did you try and listen to what VPP was saying? I hope everyone is listening to what's being said now, especially...

actively disruptive TfD should be speedy closed and the discussion shifted to VPP, where it is currently ongoing. El_C 21:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Keep WP:NOTHERE...

since. He's posted gripes on my talk page, and over at WP:AN, and at WP:VPP. The Transhumanist 23:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Correction: 2 of those threads...

useful fashion. I don't meant to be tedious here, but there is currently a WP:VPP discussion in which a number of editors supported closing down the desks...

At the subpage created to host this discussion (split off from the main VPP thread on the 25th), there are a whopping 400,000 bytes of text. The core...

short to allow that. That said, if this is closed as delete, a message at VPP to discuss a plan to go forward to delete the rest to allow merge time. --MASEM...

mentioned by the participants below: AN "on Twitter" discussion (June 2012) VPP "X on Twitter" discussion (July 2012) @ladygaga RfD (October 2013) ~ Amory...

spent most of his time on project pages like RFA, RFB, BRFA, RFC, RFAr, VPP, etc. (evidence on talk page); the only pages the candidate frequents for...

highway 00:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC) I will request comments on WT:WPAFC and WP:VPP if I will do userspace, since some people are opposed to that. —I-20the highway...

"proposal: lists must be based on objective criteria" in archive 110 of WP:VPP. It may be that my memory of the details of the discussion is not completely...

sockpuppets, as confirmed by CU, throughout the period of December 20 on ANI and VPP. Ottawaman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user ·...

privileges. After the KDS444/OTRS scandal emerged, an RfC was opened at VPP which is getting high level consensus but is vague. That is dealing with...

another discussion to VP. -- GreenC 23:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC) GreenC, VPP discussion closed in favor of the proposal :-) ∯WBGconverse 13:51, 9 January...

arguments. In no event should the outcome of a VPP discussion lead to the deletion of articles. The most a VPP discussion could/should do is create an AfD...

publication, given its representation of the college and prodigious output on VPP, could have some "imputed" notability? Bpc.sg (talk) 02:53, 22 September...

by that standard. Perhaps the nom should propose WP:NSCHOOLPROJECT at WP:VPP and then we can get back to this when that's passed. Chess (talk) (please...

Do not use in the mainspace without a broad discussion at, for example, VPP as doing so violates current policy (WP:NDA). (Leaving the orphaning to others...

article is appropriately sourced. The place to propose policy changes is at WP:VPP, not here. Here we already have an RFC regarding specifically these articles...

and is a WP:DISRUPTIVE example of WP:POINT. If we reach a consensus at WP:VPP, we can get a bot to do it instead of arguing about it.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:33...

establish some sort of consensus on the general notability of libraries, WP:VPP would be the place. So no, I won't be doing that. John from Idegon (talk)...

articles: This AN thread led to this VPT discssion which led to this RfC at VPP (which led to this thread at FAC about keeping the beginnings of articles...

fairly non-visible talkpage. At the very least, it should go through WP:VPP, and there should probably be a very much more visible forum for this type...

discussed a lot in the past, it may be a good idea to start an RfC at WP:VPP or WT:NFC and try to establish some kind of policy or consensus. I don't...

to do. I've been asked often individually. But this is conversation for VPP, surely. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:40, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Why a new noticeboard...

held here and the discussion at RfD can't give consensus. I see that the VPP link comes to here, instead of the RfD as before, which is better. If a previous...

September 2007 (UTC) The WP:POINT argument would seem to be supported by WP:VPP#Fancruft_and_Role_playing_games. This does seem somewhat dodgy. SamBC(talk)...

question. There's nothing in WP:CVBOT (or the bot policy in general), the VPP discussion, or at WP:CRAT that says there must be a discussion prior to approval...

broad consensus is to start with an RFC and notify it widely. Host it at WP:VPP, notify all relevant WikiProjects, and allow it to run for the usual 28 days...

been to block but warn Delta "This appears to be a pattern" and request he VPP what he's doing. A block this fast is just assuming a lot of bad faith when...

muting discussion here or anything, but you probably should head over to WP:VPP for things like this. You'll get a much wider group of editors there. Cheers...

be deleted? – Quadell (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC) I left a note at VPP, but it did not draw much attention. The category itself states that the...

criterion should be created to cover it – you'll want to propose that at WP:VPP. In the meantime, don't scream "speedy keep" when you just mean "I don't...

that this is a controversial issue, as evidenced by the discussion at WP:VPP, and Skyerise should be waiting until that discussion is resolved instead...

explain how the VPP discussion set precedent when we are here because of the result of an AN discussion that actually challenged the VPP outcome? If, whatever...

opposite. The former is an opinion; the latter is a mistake. At any rate, WP:VPP is the place to propose such a wide-reaching change, not within individual...

"Long past done - close eye by me". After I commented on the dispute at VPP, the IP came to my talkpage and confirmed he is Everyme. However, his tone...

Probably VPP first - technically it's an absolute doddle to enact (one line in the right config file by someone with shell access). Get support from VPP then...

Shouldn't this be moved to WP:VPP and this page deleted? Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC) If moving it to WP:VPP is more appropriate, I have...

(UTC) I'm not sure if it's the WMF, the community or both (that Commons:VPP discussion is eye-opening) but it seems like the people making decisions...

concerns. If people disagree with that, then propose it as a guideline on VPP with a proper justification as to how such a guideline would not inherently...

Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 03:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC) @Lightbluerain: VPP is already one of the most viewed pages on the project, so generally putting...

schedule a bit, I decided to do the notifications. I left messages at WP:VPP, WP:VPM, WT:AC and WP:AN. I've also left a note at MediaWiki talk:Watchlist-details...

inferring something not stated (as Jclemens just agreed with me on). The VPP discussion has been fruitful. Though it may also assist with MMA mediation...

the issues at WP:RFPP, and filed RfCs. Update: Also took it to WP:AN, WP:VPP, and finally WP:MEDCAB. 22:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC) What do you expect to...

points to NASTRO. If clarification is needed, a discussion at WT:NASTRO or WP:VPP will be needed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC) Merge/Redirect...

(UTC) I'm the one that set up the RFC and made sure it was announced at WP:VPP and (eventually, thanks to a misfiring bot) onto the RFCPolicy page, but...

30 days. It was just before the tags removal that I posted (twice) on WP:VPP asking for an independent editor to close the discussion. --EpochFail(talk|work)...

(talk • contribs) 15:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC) You've noted this AFD at VPP, I've just added a note at WT:TV. I'm not sure of any other places outside...

that we post some sort of discussion regarding disparaging nicknames to VPP. But if we are to discuss here (and you're more than welcome to copy over...

not allowed to know? DuncanHill 12:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC) WP:VPR, WP:VPP, or the talk page of WP:DFTT would be the most appropriate places. --ais523...

When not editing articles, I spent a lot of time reading up on policy, ANI, VPP and have quite a good grasp of Wikipedia policy and its history. Sometimes...

WP:VPP over WP:VPT personally. VPT, while technical, is mostly about technical issues with templates, modules, the software/html of the site, etc. VPP is...

directions. The long, drawn out battle in the first AfD lead to a lengthy WP:VPP discussion here. The root of this discussion was to figure out notability...

blanked}} code will still be used Following the VPP discussion, the current usage shouldn't be reverted Also per VPP, no parameter needs to (or should) be added...

Person (talk) 22:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC) VPP omits some important details here. Starting on or about 2024-08-25, VPP certainly made a great many edits to...

think semi-protecting WP:VPP now would be trying to lock the barn door after the horse has escaped. If further IP edits to VPP are more clearly harassing...

right place, the Admins actions have confused the matter for folks on the VPP linked above...    AND for the TFD patrollers... so those 'aspects' need...

as the least smart person "in the room." Per @Guettarda:, taking to WP:VPP makes sense to me. WidgetKid chat me 15:46, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Comment...

of the period under discussion, started a discussion on this topic at WP:VPP, and this discussion does not seem to have reached any sort of consensus...

I’m trying to reach here is that having read all the discussions at the VPP, AN, AfD and DR, I feel that both sides have had weighty arguments and interpretations...

(how an RfC at VPP to get wider input on a template being discussed at the template talk page, and following on from an RfC on that same VPP, can be forumshopping...

as well as at the Apteva RFC/U, and at WT:MOS, and at WT:AT, and at WP:VPP, etc. In particular, please note: Wikid77's anti-MOS collusion on Apteva's...

kept for a short while, and digging out a link might be tedious)? In the WP:VPP thread, people seemed to agree with their own version of the proposal – better...

strongly advise you to drop the issue. There appears to be a consensus at VPP that this isn't a problem and it's been de facto accepted as a guideline...

speedy deletion during his new page patrolling. Heavy participation at AN/I, VPP, AFD has further strengthened his grasp on Wikipedia policy as well as inspired...

prefer the emergency election option that's being explored above and at VPP. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC) I'm not going to name names...

low). The conversation petered out without any plan for action. –B On WP:VPP: Should victims of tragedies who would not otherwise have their own articles...

by Ganeshk that occurred relatively shortly (7 months) after the archived VPP discussion linked above). I'm sure we can find many examples of good and...

edits to the comparison article discussion, he then followed me to a WP:VPP discussion in which I had been participating. With the comparison article...

primary question at Wikipedia talk:Article size, so I recommend we close this VPP discussion due to redundancy with that one. JJB 02:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)...

(This is going off on a tangent, though -- maybe better for WT:N or WP:VPP? --— Rhododendrites talk |  12:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC) I would think a slight...

may use their privileged toolset when engaged in disclosed paid editing (VPP RfC and WT:ADMIN RfC). – B By Jytdog A lot of people thought this was a case...

Seems we've hit on a hot topic here. There is an ongoing discussion at WP:VPP if anyone else is interested. I'd like to monitor that discussion until it...

the discussion at the talk page of WP:PROF (also notifying WP:GNG and WP:VPP) and create consensus instead of partisan activities by nominating all Framework...

the discussion and bring in the whole community by posting on WP:CENT, WP:VPP, etc. Personally I keep an eye on a lot of things here, but I never heard...

appears as though your critiques of stature are directed towards policy. WP:VPP may be of service here in resolving your quarrels. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)...

this discussion. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk · contribs) has been disrupting a VPP discussion with tendentious repetition of comments, general incivility, personal...

question might be better at the Help Desk (WP:HD) or the Village Pump (WP:VPP). Tevildo (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC) The Help Desk is about how to...

Wikipedia:VPP#New Commons interpretation of policies regarding sexual content. –xenotalk 15:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC) That link doesn't seem right (Wikipedia:VPP#New...

truly hear what I am actually saying. (2) I will drop this matter at WP:VPP for now. Obviously I was very ill prepared to present a well documented and...

discussion about the VPP proposals because Delta had performed a significant amount of edits for about a day and a half before taking it to VPP. It may not have...

inform the readers of this noticeboard that there is an on-going RfC on WP:VPP#Advertising userboxes on categories which the userbox adds the user to. that...

then WT:TV is the place to go, not VPP where you'll find even fewer TV article editors. If we're going to go to VPP for all decisions on whether we should...

--*Kat* (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC) Hence my proposal not to come to WP:VPP with this issue again prior to reaching a rough consensus with the Wikipedia...

articles/content will need to be decided by community discussion, probably WP:VPP. I can see some argument on both sides but I doubt very much the solution...

already a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Ticker symbols in article leads, WP:VPP, User talk:MZMcBride, and at User talk:UnitedStatesian. Was it really worth...

issue of IPs having access to userfied articles in general, do so at WP:VPP. There's really no point in belaboring either issue in this thread. --Jayron32...

this; if someone feels justified in reverting that, then we can go to WP:VPP and discuss whether that guideline is important enough to be observed even...

but he's also taken upon himself him start discussions, be it at TfD or VPP, which most know should happen, but no one wants to start, so as to not get...

administrator action is required here, so please direct further comments to the VPP thread to keep everything in one place. --ThaddeusB (talk) 13:05, 30 September...

3RR warning: [246] Comments: I have been getting put through the stocks at VPP and ANI since yesterday. I proposed protection from closure debate, for WP:RD...

Let's see if he complies with the eventual results of the discussion at VPP. If he voluntarily agrees to stop, based on community input, then sanctions...

Beeblebrox, If you think I'm advocating for her, check out Wnt's proposal on VPP and m:User_talk:Mbz1#Proposal. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 20:09, 22 February 2012...

about my edit summary here). I believe I picked up the word up from the VPP discussion: Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 57#On moving a page...

September 2010 (UTC) This needs wider discussion. I'll go ahead and post to WP:VPP and WT:AIV. —I-20the highway 01:28, 6 September 2010 (UTC) Also, would this...

at WP:VPP. As far as a trial goes, any specific day you would like to do the live run? — xaosflux Talk 03:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Closed the VPP thread...

community wiki newsletter). This has now been to WP:DRV, my talk page and WP:VPP. Liraz is convinced the deletion means we are an evil deletionist cabal....

multilingual abilities, which would be a policy decision that you need to take to VPP. Attempting to use the MfD process to further that purpose by the back-door...

Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) I came across that user on VPP where I often read policy threads. I clicked on his user page and saw a user...

semi all BLPs at this point? Viriditas (talk) 10:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC) WP:VPP Sædontalk 10:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC) Or WP:RFPP? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:49, 3 July...

but without showing where the synthesis logically arises at any point. The VPP discussion is for the good, and I am happy to wait to see how my input is...

mistaken in that. I invite discussion from all sides. Crossposted at WP:VPP, WT:RFA, WP:AN. Please repost if I have missed anywhere. → ROUX ₪ 06:24,...

discussion has stemmed from this ongoing discussion started by an IP at WP:VPP. D.M.N. (talk) 20:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC) As long as Bishonen is kept as...

--Kralizec! (talk) 16:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Hrm, thanks for the link to VPP, I'll go check it out. Just to clarify my intent here, it is my opinion that...

other reasons. Monty845 15:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC) I've started an RFC at WP:VPP#Removal of Account Creator user right to ask for clarification on the standards...

disagreed with. With respect to WP:HARASS, I've stated my position at WP:VPP#THF, and won't repeat it here. THF 16:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC) I can't speak...

transition? with discussions going on at WP:VPP#Revisiting_MOS:IDENTITY_in_articles_about_transgender_individuals and WP:VPP#Clarifying_MOS:IDENTITY_in_article...

paid editing. The recent site ban of KDS4444 and the ongoing discussion at VPP as to what our guidelines are here when it comes to using advanced permissions...

side or the other. Still, with a lot of ANI shite, a lot of arb shite, a VPP thread about an anti-bullying policy (that got shot down most likely because...

deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:04, 3 April 2017 (UTC) File:VPP Cooperation.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enriko...

Lenticel (talk) 01:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Volumetric Production Payment - VPP → Volumetric Production Payment (links to redirect • history • stats)  Unlikely...

new RFC having closed in this field lately. EDIT: and having checked on VPP, the Aviation project page, and the WP:NOT talk page I also don’t see one...

have raised it. Nemo 07:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC) I've unarchived the VPP discussion back to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) #Issues raised by Citation...

review, and ask that the bot operator open a discussion somewhere (likely VPP or RFC or similar) specifically asking the community if this is something...

talk 12:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC) We have RFC/Policy and we have the WP:VPP. The main problem appears to be that Jeff is working under a different definition...

past vandalism added vandalism that violates BLP. See Talk:Lil Chris and WP:VPP#Vandalism for more. Cheers. – Chacor 05:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC) This article...

really the place for it. WT:V should be fine. If not, you could go to WP:VPP. Or maybe file a request for comment, but that's a bit overkill. jgp TC I...

Editor now knows that it was, indeed, the latter ... and has taken it to VPP as recommended, where it's not going well ES&L 22:16, 17 November 2013 (UTC)...

my userpage as part of his rationale. He stated on User talk:Jouster/open/VPP that he was not on a "crusade" against me, but rather to stop pages from...

document be promoted to a guideline?", and then maybe promote it at WP:CENT, WP:VPP, and if there are relevant wikiprojects in this area (yes, I know, may be...

talk 12:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC) We have RFC/Policy and we have the WP:VPP. The main problem appears to be that Jeff is working under a different definition...

noticeboard (VPP) to a behavioral noticeboard (this). So far it has only served to confuse the issue, since a large part of the discussion at VPP is about...

noting that a few of these AFDs came up in this discussion at the Pump: WP:VPP#Time to get rid of WP is not a dictionary?. --MASEM (t) 02:42, 3 June 2013...

existence to be automatically notable then you would have to go through WP:VPP. This is a discussion for another venue though as it needs to be Wikipedia-wide...

suppose we could solicit considerably more voters in some forum (here, or VPP perhaps), but I'd really like to come up with a general solution for this...

current guidance is wrong. If have asked a question on this issue at WP:VPP. Feel free to comment there. bobblewik 17:11, 9 February 2006 (UTC) As discussed...

centralized page to try to get a response. I'd suggest asking a question at WP:VPP or WP:EAR if all else fails. EdJohnston (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)...

delete well-sourced content, and its implications on the VPP discussion on MEDRS over-reach. The VPP discussion is rife with WP:PA against me and one !vote...

on all the XFD talk pages (WT:TFD, WT:CFD, WT:MFD etc.) as well as on WP:VPP. Regards SoWhy 14:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC) User talk:AAAACCCCDDDDCCCC has...

this were a new thread, and either held at WP:VPP or held as a new thread at WP:AN and advertised at VPP. If it's important enough to do, it's important...

8 February 2022 (UTC) For those who don't also frequent the Teahouse or VPP, the Reply Tool will soon be rolled out to all logged-in and logged-out users...

they will take the community view (on trendlines, as is being conducted at VPP) into account. --qedk (t 桜 c) 21:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC) I believe you...

but a discussion about the underlying practice is best held at VPP or (with a link from VPP) Wikipedia talk:Make technical articles accessible. Joe 06:47...

3RR, and things settled down a little bit, with a discussion opening at WP:VPP. This discussion has drawn large numbers of editors; both Skyerise and I...

taken unaware. I think this might deserve a WP:VPP thread.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2010 (UTC) VPP thread started, here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk)...

wanted was more opinions on the matter, why did you not raise this on WP:VPP or as an WP:RFC? This certainly isn't an administrator-only issue. —Psychonaut...

feedback because it was posted only here, where few people saw it. WP:AN or WP:VPP might be better shots. However, I agree that the development of Mediawiki...

(talk) 14:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Weakish support - I opened the previous VPP thread, but still haven't come to a solid conclusion about the best way forward...

(UTC) Could someone please help me fix a little archive confusion at the VPP? Two bots didn't agree, but I've fixed that. Can someone histmerge Wikipedia:Village...

his proposal has SNOWBALLed there, but will instead just re-start it at WP:VPP, or WP:MOS, or some random article's talk page (he's done that several times)...

breaks out. (BTW, feel free to move this to a more appropriate venue like WP:VPP). —Wknight94 (talk) 23:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC) I would agree with restricting...

issue about how to identify a transgender subject is being discussed at WP:VPP. EdJohnston (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC) @EdJohnston: or anyone else,...

currently), but the only reason I point this out is that if he said, say, over at VPP that he was about to act on this past consensus, we wouldn't be here right...

practice that's existed for a good reason. There's nothing wrong with a VPP policy discussion but the initial state of that discussion should be with...

"Reverted to revision 385129137 by Terrillja; per talkpage and discussion on WP:VPP, vertert again and get reported to WP:AN3, also rvt spam el per WP:ELNO....

Ethnicity) after considerable discussion, on the Talk page, on WT:CFD, and WP:VPP. Myriad CfD decisions have been based on the guideline over the years. It...

Village pump policy and proposal forum WP:VPP Most P&G revisions take place on policies' talk pages. To find specific policies and guidelines, see......

is an entirely separate discussion really, too deep to battle out over on VPP. I'd prefer only really to respond to separated, qualified points, on a userspace...

here (that he's tried and failed to get local consensus at projects), this VPP RFC on standardizing hyphens seems pointy, canvassing, and in the face of...

much. Guest9999 (talk) 01:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC) Cross-post from WP:VPP for more eyes -- responses there please. Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee...

If, in fact, it's a sufficiently widespread problem worth discussing at VPP there must be examples from editors that are not parties to the same AC case...

http://www.archive.org/ and replace with https://archive.org/ The above listed WP:VPP discussion already determined that this is a useful endeavor for several...

(UTC) If anyone does want to start a discussion at WT:BAN, this recent WP:VPP discussion (Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_70#Banned_users) might...

about asking here, but if you want to do it by the book, you could try WP:VPP. --barneca (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Yea I was just wanting to...

reason together. 12:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC) I almost put this at WP:VPP, but since admins are most involved in blocks and protections, I thought...

rather than a proposed guideline though, unless you plan on taking it to WP:VPP. Oren0 (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Resolved Resolved  – Although Twiddlebug...

(talk) 21:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC) That's more appropriate to bring up at WP:VPP. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC) With respect...

December 2006 (UTC) Can't vote for someone who I've never seen on WP:ANI, WP:VPP, or any other public board. --Ghirla -трёп- 08:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)...

you to stop making such closes? If you believe the policy to be wrong, WP:VPP is thataway. Fram (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Endorse. As King of Hearts...

background:#ccc; } Anomie⚔ 02:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC) A discussion at Wikipedia:VPP#ALL disambiguation pages to end "(disambiguation)" did not reach any consensus...

this technically possible" to "should we even do this at all". There is a VPP RFC ongoing, and until such time as it is concluded (and the technical possibilities...

2013 (UTC) Perhaps you would want to participate in the RfC I filed at WP:VPP on renaming then? If you're tracking my activity on requested moves, surely...

options to the list, but it should probably be put up for discussion at WP:VPP or somewhere else larger than here. Cheers. lifebaka (talk - contribs) 12:02...

particularly fishy because there currently is a debate on several pages (like WP:VPP, Wikipedia talk:Eras and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers))...

sense that discussion should take place there rather than, say, here on VPP. There are common sense exceptions but we want to encourage editors to keep...

"centered" around 0? This would mean the instantaneous voltage at any time is ±Vpp/2, the diode is forward-biased for one half-cycle and reverse-biased for...

19:13, 8 September 2025 (UTC) @Pppery: ok let's have this discussion in VPP, I don't want to reply twice. —Matrix ping mewhen u reply (t? - c) 19:14...

zillions of kilobytes of arguing would ensue). I don't have the energy for VPP and/or WT:BLOCK or wherever this type of discussion would take place. I'm...

WP:NCORP. If you believe in this differentiation go ahead and propose it at WP:VPP but right now you're just proposing to have local consensus override global...

discourage. -- Ned Scott 12:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC) I'm responding based on the VPP discussion so yes I know what the proposal and template were about. Your...

actionable here, further discussion on the broader issue would be best held at WP:VPP. Thanks for the assistance to all! —Locke Cole • t • c 06:44, 16 December...

term question of whether to keep this list around could be a matter for WP:VPP. See the recent comments on the talk page about the quality of the list....

in part"). I suggested that Anythingyouwant seek guidance at WT:EW or WP:VPP but they declined my advice and instead are trying to game the system by...

Läufer (talk) 00:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC) Then let's start a discussion at the VPP or some place on how to make it consistent.Camelbinky (talk) 00:45, 22 July...

Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) WP:VPM Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) WP:VPP, WP:VP/P Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) WP:VPR Wikipedia:Village pump...

29 October 2017 (UTC) Certainly, at least among some. While I opposed WP:VPP#RfC: Should the Reference Desks be closed?, the comments of those arguing...

the Dutch Wikipedia is self-promotion, just like here. And checking the VPP discussion started by Guido indicates that it has not been confirmed that...

process should end with a Delete result, i will insist on its review via WP:VPP, for the following reasons that AFAIK would each make this case unique on...

about that though. Griswaldo, want to start a discussion somewhere else (WP:VPP, WT:N...?) about this and link it here? LadyofShalott 13:47, 26 September...

(2 days ago). The issues have been raised at WP:RFPP, WP:RFC/POLICIES, WP:VPP, WP:AN and WP:GMN, in that order, without any effective response. For that...

to administrators, and so I would encourage you to raise the issue at WP:VPP (and, with at least a link to the antecedent discussion, at WT:FA). Joe 21:00...

problems with multiple AFDs at the past and made sure that it was announced at VPP and WT:TV. It's result very much should be considered in this AFD. --MASEM...

method of dealing with historic problems such as this. Broad discussion as VPP followed by consensus which then, if necessary, leads to back ups first and...

Let's do some good. --Jorm (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC) @Jorm: I think WP:VPP might be a better place to request/discuss this. (i'll copy this there in...

on Template_talk:Geobox, and an editor brings it to the attention here at VPP, there's nothing wrong with discussing it here. I keep my part of the discussion...

comment action said close, during that meltdown that transpired first on VPP and then here at ANI above. That is to say, before Davey did them the favour...

better venue. x42bn6 Talk Mess 00:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Cross-posted from WP:VPP#Cosprings user page and piracy x42bn6 Talk Mess 00:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)...

but there hadn't been a proper Look At This post on AN or ANI. It was on VPP and the CENT template, however, and spawned out of a thread on AN last week...

(UTC) Hi Diannaa, You sent me a message regarding my wikipedia edit for VPP Wikipedia Draft. The file in question is for a logo fd-io_red_white.png....

July 2016 (UTC) This is something that probably should be addressed at WP:VPP, not in this ANI revolving around one user. Parsley Man (talk) 14:53, 12...

comment. This is surely an admin issue and should be dealt with here, and not VPP... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC) This may be the...

honorofic 'Allama' with the names or not? not the discussion you started on VPP. And why is SMcCandlish's closure of your discussion stopping you from starting...

but there hadn't been a proper Look At This post on AN or ANI. It was on VPP and the CENT template, however, and spawned out of a thread on AN last week...

need outside input, start an RFC or link to the talk page discussion on WP:VPP. Mr.Z-man 02:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Exactly. We do not need this; that's...

(Talk) 11:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC) There's a discussion about it over at WP:VPP#Deletion of userpages. Is this something administrators generally do? Is...

Sidaway 21:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC) *editconflict* Then why don't you go to WP:VPP and try to make it policy! It isn't at the moment FYI. Funpika 21:09, 14...

a bit more civil than Pigsonthewing, adds fuel to the fire. In the same VPP discussion, their first comment calls the opening post "ridiculous", and...

from the main account then you had better propose a change to policy on WP:VPP. If you don't like the use of an account like this in such a manner, I believe...

it - Alison ❤ 02:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Hey, you missed the bit on the WP:VPP. J.delanoygabsadds 02:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Yeah, this edit, too. Celarnor...

If you want a general discussion on when discussions should be closed, WP:VPP is a more appropriate venue. — The Hand That Feeds you:Bite 17:30, 2 August...

could cause the issue you discussed. If you still need more info, try WP:VPP (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC) The template {{Infobox...

even realize it had to first pass consensus for that, and I posted it in WP:VPP as soon as I did. It would be easier for administrators and arbitrators to...

--NeilN talk to me 15:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Is this linked to this at VPP? Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC) @Lugnuts: Yes. Thanks...

he's clearly doing nobody any good, including himself) reverted edits at VPP, and seeing it was the same account repeatedly, I went to his talk page....

unhappy with the way WP:PAIN works, you should bring your crusade to WP:VPP. WP:ANI is not for posting lengthy jeremiads, resolving content disputes...

them disruptive is not helpful. There would be no issue if DG announced at VPP or similar some plan in the future (eg 6 months) of mass pruning deprecated...

the people using it. ansh666 04:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC) @Ansh666: See WP:VPP: that already happened, and the (near?) unanimous consensus was "No, Andrew's...

RfA. An editor by the name of JeanLatore had seen comments I made at WP:VPP, saw a user box on my user page at the time that I wanted to be an admin...

administrators. You may wish to go to Wikipedia talk:Pending changes, WP:VPP, Wikipedia talk:Edit filter or somewhere like that. ╟─TreasuryTag►international...

comment over there. Lupo 12:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC) (Also posted at WP:VPP.) Right March.com radio broadcaster Bill Greene, who edits here as User:Profg...

also been unnecessarily combative towards numerous users, such as in the VPP discussion where he is posting links to some blogposts of his that simply...

as you don't have prior consensus for this, you should propose it at WP:VPP or WP:VPR. If the community decides to grant admins ownership of these noticeboards...

above: he just removed my comments. Huldra (talk) Somewhat related: Wikipedia:VPP#Automated creation of stubs, see also the proposal beneath it. –xenotalk...

as off-topic for ANI. This should probably be discussed at WP:NFCC or WP:VPP. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 21:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC) The following...

to everyone where this decision could be made -- Dicklyon has suggested VPP below, does that seem reasonable to you and Pi.1415926535? GorillaWarfare (talk)...

to cast aspersions about racism. Perhaps there should be a discussion at VPP. That would certainly be more useful than just yelling racism. Robert McClenon...

raising the idea of selective restoration for general consideration at WP:VPP next week. Cabayi (talk) 09:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC) 16. As a follow-up...

discussion. This isn't the place to discuss this. A thread has been opened on WP:VPP Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC) (non-admin closure) The following...

venue for dispute resolution, which at this point this is. I don't think VPP or VPR would be appropriate as there is no policy that's trying to be set...

experience with HarryAlffa began with the bot-posted notification at WP:VPP that Harry had marked Wikipedia:Politeness Police as a policy. My comments...

solely a conversation on ANI. I would suggest this needs to be brought to VPP at the very least, to make sure there is a genuine community consensus around...

editor is now CANVASSing for further disruption of the COI/N page on WP:VPP, so administrative intervention would be much appreciated. THF 16:51, 20...

asking people to post at WP:ANI for actions requiring admin assistance, at WP:VPP for general policy discussion. — Carl (CBM · talk) 05:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)...

discussed here. I would ask that this discussion be moved to an WP:RFC, or WP:VPP, or anywhere else, and now. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)  Done...

we're Wikipedians" and "Deletion Policy" categories above (contents in WP:VPP). I think the issue is whether to censor or not. Censorship is something...

WilliamH (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Fluffernutter, I would suggest VPP or Block. VPP is probably best. Since the paid editing issue has been discussed...

of the rest, don't worry. I'll go ahead and include this message on the VPP so others can begin nominating me as well. OK, at the moment I am just 3...

Huggle without the rollback restriction. They did this citing WP:IAR in their VPP post, after being denied rollback permissions three times (1st request, 2nd...

I'm abstaining, but it's It's worth noting that a note at the top of WP:VPP says: If you have a question about how to apply an existing policy or guideline...

match the consensus/agreements. I have asked - of various people, on the VPP thread/on this BRFA/on the 1st-task BRFA - several clear, straight-forward...

game. —Cryptic 06:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC) Should we go to VPP and propose deprecating G6?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)...

intervention"? I think it'd be better suited to WP:VP, more specifically WP:VPP, rather than here. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)...

13:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC) This seems more suitable for WP:AN, but I'm not a VPP regular so I'll hold off on moving this. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:54,...

though. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Posting (trolling) at VPP, RefDesk/Misc and various user talk pages? My money is on this fellow. CIreland...

needed as to whether this would be appropriate. I started a thread at WP:VPP to try to gauge opinion, but got no comments. So, since watchlist notices...

made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. See WP:VPP#THF. 15:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC) I'm curious about why there's such a movement...

both the community and the Foundation. Is this a matter for discussion at VPP or should it go to the calmer space at Meta? LeadSongDog come howl! 16:34...

~Awilley (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Perhaps if you had taken it to WP:VPP, as I counseled you to do at the time, you might have gotten more feedback...

00:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC) Note: It was suggested by another editor at VPP that a talkpage RFC be opened [253], so it's not reasonable to accuse Rationalobserver...

linguistic incompetence as well. I was wondering, and maybe it's the folks at VPP or the technical refdesk who know this, if there's something exciting about...

08:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC) Indeed. And feel free to raise the issue at WP:VPP if you need more feedback. Perhaps just as significant, you're not even talking...

Changing policy on barnstars is clearly outside of the scope of ANI, try WP:VPP. Dennis Brown 2¢ © 12:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC) The following discussion is...

that you've done absolute sweet fuck-all to address them. So head over to VPP and get a consensus to desysop less active admins, and we'll talk. Otherwise...

unclear what is being proposed here... There was strong consensus at WP:VPP, with no opposition, to reduce the threshold to 25. Supporters included at...

seems like a poorly designed way to go forward. I suggest that people use WP:VPP, especially the idea lab area, or at Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic...

action being requested; the proposal would have been better presented on WP:VPP rather then here; and (2) Despite the OP's opinion that "it's a little early...

raised in a concurrent (and apparently unrelated to this TDW issue) at WP:VPP#Fringe, Anti-fringe, and Turning Wikipedia's Values Upside-down. Relevant...

discussing proposed policy changes; if you believe a change is needed, WP:VPP and the policy's talk page are proper venues to propose it. ~ ToBeFree (talk)...

archive tags. NE Ent 02:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC) Time for a discussion on VPP? Blackmane (talk) 03:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC) It doesn't need to be spelled...

for years, and at some point will need a proper forum (probably more like VPP than here) to deal with it. Some of the issues that come to mind (some of...

discussion on an individual editor for unrelated reasons. You can try WP:VPP. Considering that the proposal you linked to, which was much more focused...

WP:POLEMIC needs a review. GoodDay (talk) 04:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC) WP:VPP is thataway. Until it's changed, however, it is consensus policy, and we...

Board is picking up policy-related discussions that arguably belong on WP:VPP or WP:VPR. >Radiant< 16:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Good point. Since it's...

unblock. Ditch ∝ 19:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC) I've started a thread at VPP for some other opinions. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC) If...

backwater page which no-one knew about. Did you link it at WT:NFC? At WP:VPP? At WP:CENT? No, I thought not. As an admin, you should frankly know better...

list idea? -- how do you turn this on 20:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC) It's atWP:VPP, but there are people objecting on either sides, and no one volunteering...

There is no such policy, for good reason. It's been suggested before at WP:VPP and shot down in flames. Every time. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉 Contribs...

Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC) Shouldn't this be on VPP or a subpage of WP:RfC or somewhere that's not ANI? HJ Mitchell | Penny for...

can archive this thread in short order; I'll take the broader issues to WP:VPP when I have time, whenever that might be. Snow let's rap 20:14, 30 August...

violate 3RR. Regarding the forum shopping/VPP incident, I believed that the issue I (tried to) raise on VPP was sufficiently different that it merited...

keep it from archiving. name drops of Venkat at high visibility forums like VPP, in terms that can hardly be described as non-personal vote against him in...

such.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Cross-posted from WP:VPP These are some stats that I cooked up independently of this thread that you...

the notices from the user pages he posted it to, and post it instead at WP:VPP. And following that, if everyone else were smart, they would not waste any...

citation per the then best practices. See a previous discussion on this in the VPP archive. Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2020 (UTC) Further to what...

among other places, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music and WP:VPP. My main concern in this case is civility. Toccata quarta (talk) 15:28, 4...

want to discuss, do you have to? ~ R.T.G 14:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC) The VPP close(s) were appropriate - there was actually no "proposal" per se, just...

breadth of articles and need for a high level of community engagement: WP:VPP. Snow let's rap 09:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC) While I'm moderately hostile to...

without obtaining prior consent of the en-WP community via an RfC here at VPP. The staff of WMF who continued publishing the Wikidata description field...

for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You also advertised at WP:VPP. Between the two, you would've reached most editors who care much about changes...

consensus. The RFC has been added to the RFCpolicy list and announced here at VPP but given the strong divide over the involved editors, it seems we need more...

feedback on the prototype (June 2022) Pre-deployment discussion at the WP:VPP (July 2022) Pre-deployment RfC (September 2022) Post-deployment RfC (January...

Curious: how was the joint closure of NSPORTS "inclusivity" discussion at WP:VPP, Only in death? One person said the joint closure was unnecessary; other...

(talk) 21:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC) That's more appropriate to bring up at WP:VPP. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 02:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC) With respect...

at the other thread on WP:VPP. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:16, 7 July 2014 (UTC) As David pointed out above, this is better handled at VPP, as a fruitful discussion...

the case (rather, being a reference to broader community consensus) but WP:VPP is the forum for making such changes. How does this change things Scottywong...

pages if it is not related to discussion of the article's contents. Also, WP:VPP would probably be a better place for this discussion.  Sandstein  20:09,...

Hesperian 02:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Well let's see here...I posted a notice at WP:VPP when the bot was going through the approvals process, and no one responded...

need ideas from the wider community, so would suggest moving this to WP:VPP. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC) I posted here because...

policy about self promotion”, should be discussed in a venue such as WP:VPP. The question whether Wikitongues is a reliable source should probably be...

10:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC) I have opened up a more specific question at WP:VPP#WP:BMB to suggest a different solution to wholesale deletion in specific...

notice to WT:PERM had it been requested. But I had assumed that a topic at WP:VPP would be deemed sufficient, especially after starting at WT:Autopatrolled...

21 March 2009 (UTC) Perhaps initiating a non-specific discussion at WP:VPP might be the best way to proceed, if you think this should be codified. –xeno...

(talk) 03:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Resolved  – No; also wrong forum (WP:VPP?) --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC) I don't know where to put...

remove them. In any case, this discussion ought to be continued at Wikipedia:VPP#.22Outlines.22. Regards,  Skomorokh  11:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC) This all sounds...

150-per-day rate limit may be loosened by consensus at WT:CSD, WP:VPR, or WP:VPP." What happens if someone wants a U6-deleted page back? You may use Wikipedia:Requests...

avoid public perception of bias. Do others feel this better addressed at VPP? I think current policy allows it, and interpertation of existing behavior...

and the discussion you want should take place elsewhere, I would think WP:VPP, since any consensus reached will probably require a change in the WP:COI...

policy. You may wish to raise this interesting and pertinent issue at WP:VPP or similar community noticeboard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128...

Make a proposal to rename all Criticism articles at WT:NPOV, point to it at VPP, and get consensus there. THF (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC) NPOV violation+BLP=speedy...

wikipedia to be discussed only on the mailing list, with no equivalent of AN/VPP or the policy talk pages. People like baubles. They like barnstars. They...

tagging and disruption [33] as one of four types of tagging behaviour at WP:VPP in this discussion. It is extremely easy to make massive number of edits...

get into it here, is there a centralised forum for discussion on this? WP:VPP/WT:MOSNUM? the skomorokh 16:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC) I absolutely agree...

you would like to change the policy on edit warring, WT:EW ( or even WP:VPP ) would be the place to start. As to the argument about the other editor...

participants in the previous discussion, and one or two other places, such as VPP about the poll, and I think it needs time, maybe a week from first being...

discussion on the article talk pages and on Jimbo's talk page, and there's WP:VPP and/or WT:OR if you really feel yet another new thread on yet another page...

action against Sir Joseph; this discussion is probably better suited for WP:VPP rather than WP:AN. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 14:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC) Definitely no...

without guidance one way or the other, I recommend starting a discussion at WP:VPP to see if we need clarification. --Jayron32 14:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC) The following...

this is not the place to discuss WP:SOCK - that would be WT:SOCK or WP:VPP. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC) We obviously disagree about...

time this ongoing problem with no desire to get it resolved. See above: WP:VPP#New article creation message SunCreator (talk) 00:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)...

MarnetteD|Talk 06:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC) I can move this discussion to WP:VPP if it would be more appropriate there. — Newslinger talk 06:31, 7 April 2019...

its broadest strokes, good spots to solicit broad community input are WP:VPP, WP:CD and, again, WP:NPOVN and certain Wikiprojects. Best of luck in either...

userspace articles seem to be related to User:Ikip/AfD on average day (WP:VPP) (WT:AFD). Flatscan (talk) 04:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC) I removed 3 of the...

regarding ArbCom and the boundaries/contours of its remit, you know where WP:VPP is. But using their stance on the BHG situation as an excuse to launch broadsides...

[[WP:FORUMSHOP|forum shopping]]. This is a duplicate discussion of an existing one at [[WP:VPP]]. If you have something to add, please comment there and not here. There's...

last time I checked? --Dijxtra 08:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC) I suppose WP:VPP is a more appropriate venue for this discussion. And yes, I consider Gene's...

consensus for this change would need to be substantial, eg by listing at WP:VPP and doing an WP:RFC, that kind of thing. And you can't get away from the...

effort to conform themselves to the new expectations (I presume that the WP:VPP discussion on RefDesk reform a few months back, StuRat's banning, and Bugs'...

inclusion in these list articles. Squinge (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC) VPP. These are not lists of educational institutions, but list of articles. Chances...

Rather, I would like to suggest that you move discussion to WP:VP or WP:VPP, or another central discussion space more concerned with general/content...

article/AfD The Squirrel Conspiracy is referring to is still being discussed at WP:VPP#Is it time to place greater restrictions on AfD?. All I did was bring that...

named users in non-emergency situations, so I would gather a specific WP:VPP confirming that we would prefer they hand these off to local checkusers to...

ancillary. Future discussions such as this should take place at WP:VPI, or WP:VPP if there's a proposal to be made, not at AN. BMK (talk) 05:39, 7 June 2015...

exactly what you're referring to, but I just reverted the linking from WP:VPP back to the full name; that didn't seem to serve much of a purpose. Ryūlóng...

(UTC) I think the best solution is to relist the discussion at WT:MOS or WP:VPP. The discussion was taking place at WT:WPSCH/AG, but involved changes to...

welcome them to test that theory with a public discussion (I'd suggest WP:VPP). Simply claiming that such a consensus exists without being able to show...

proposal has been raised before - most recently in a broad general RFC at WP:VPP a few years ago - and rejected as a violation of policy - Aquillion has written...

muting discussion here or anything, but you probably should head over to WP:VPP for things like this. You'll get a much wider group of editors there. Cheers...

goes and violates them again by modifying his edits without discussion at VPP (despite an offer from another user to do the edits themself), and still...

at least 4+ years, and remains an issue (see , for example, this recent VPP discussion. So no, we cannot fault them on how they view NPOV; where we can...

28 March 2010 (UTC) Wrong venue to discuss this, probably better at WP:VPP. Equazcion (talk) 21:44, 28 Mar 2010 (UTC) Err, as I understand it, Village...

Cullen, don't hold back :-) Pointer to an ongoing related discussion at WP:VPP#A valid criticism ... Levivich 17:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC) The main page...

F8). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC) Also see WP:VPP#New Commons interpretation of policies regarding sexual content. and the...

venue, not a matter for administrators. Please express your concerns on WP:VPP or directly to the WMF. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)}}...

for years. If you want to debate that practice, either CHILDPROTECT or WP:VPP is the correct venue, not ANI. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 13:11, 16 April...

BLOCKED & PROTECTED (non-admin closure) IPs blocked and both articles protected by NeilN --Cameron11598 (Talk) 20:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC) The following...

be worked out at the Policy talk page, through RFC, through postings at VPP etc.... not here. 2) May one editor repeatedly revert a change to a policy...

currently doing the same thing: WP:VPP/RfC discussion at WT:NFC, WP:VPP/Renaming to emojis in global rename policy, and WP:VPP/Ongoing dispute re duplication...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached...

administrative intervention), but Category:Wikipedians by profession and WP:VPP could be useful to pursue this further. ╟─TreasuryTag►sundries─╢ 14:13, 29...

against admins are probably good discussions to have. But have it at WP:VPP, not in this thread. This thread, right now, doesn't serve any real purpose...

having a discussion proposing limiting something to admins should be on WP:VPP not in the admin secret hidey-hole club treehouse basement. All the best:...

is a need for a meta discussion WT:CFD or WT:NAC are better venues or WP:VPP if you really must have a wider audience. Spartaz Humbug! 04:43, 6 December...

appropriate way to go about this is to initiate a discussion at a place like WP:VPP or WT:PROD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Again to echo Kuyabribri...

out/defend Hammersoft in that I do not believe he has deleted any comments on WP:VPP; IMHO he improperly moved them, but I have since corrected that. — BQZip01 — talk...

VOX VOY VOZ VPA VPB VPC VPD VPE VPF VPG VPH VPI VPJ VPK VPL VPM VPN VPO VPP VPQ VPR VPS VPT VPU VPV VPW VPX VPY VPZ VQA VQB VQC VQD VQE VQF VQG VQH VQI...

get more eyes on the page in question. If you make an anouncement at WP:VPP, there are thousands of editors that regularly read that page, and many would...

BRFA(s), of course. –xenotalk 13:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC) Ive posted a note on VPP, and an arbcom request is not needed, just community support. (take a look...

are impartial enough to make the call. A neutrally worded request at WP:VPP/WP:VPR might do the trick. Regards,  Skomorokh, barbarian  16:08, 22 October...

should be made to this discussion. I require more community input at WP:VPP#AfD_nominations_and_de_jure_WP:Banning_Policy, as somehow the discussion...

only WT:RD commenters agreed. Perhaps codification should take place on WP:VPP instead of WT:RD. Anyone want to try to provide persuasive examples? —Cupco...

forum would be best for such a discussion; WP:DRV is one possibility, WP:VPP is another. --barneca (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC) There is nothing...

July 2011 (UTC) Or, as consensus shows at another similar discussion at VPP, we don't say anything and treat things on a case-by-case basis. Eagles 24/7...

07:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC) I have raised a request for community input at WP:VPP#Comment needed: What should we do about processes (such as XfD) created in...

ambassadors to the world. No one reads or much cares about the signpost, VPP, policy talk pages and what-not, so we can be as newbie friendly as we want...

subjects. It also raised project-wide considerations at a local level. At WP:VPP, there is currently a proposal for a specific, targeted discussion on table...

Talk comes and goes. History2007 (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC) WP:VPP may be the best place to start. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:22, 15 September...

more explanation than that, I'd suggest taking this to WP:Helpdesk; or WP:VPP, if you really think people will seriously consider prohibiting all articles...

article names started recently, advertized in relevent places including VPP and CENT, and some users are already trying to compile data, something I've...

Asking for broader review and discussion when INVOLVED, via a thread on AN, VPP or a talk page, is not only acceptably, but recommended. Ivanvector did the...

under strict conditions. Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): VPP here Edit period(s): Continuous Estimated number of pages affected: 50 per...

collateral-damage IP who is affected by the lack of notification. And this, or perhaps VPP, is a fine place for such policy discussions. DES (talk) 18:12, 13 December...

should be made to this discussion. The RfC on secondary school notability at VPP is ready to be closed by one or maybe a team of uninvolved admins. There...

needed] (she|they|xe) 09:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC) Well, five of them in WP:VPP understood rather well, and support my position. This thread is lopsided...

dispute more than anything which doesn't need any admins to step in so WP:VPP might have been my first place to go. tutterMouse (talk) 06:34, 16 July 2014...

MOS's general rule (adopted in 2008, after consensus favored the idea at WP:VPP in 2007). KimvdLinde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log ·...

baleetopedian, and/or All-Round Nice Guy.) Shouldn't we be discussing this at WP:VPP?--Shirt58 (talk) 12:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC) I tend to treat WP:AFD as...

interlanguage links). More information on the interlanguage links can be seen at WP:VPP#Are interlanguage links unnecessary now?, that page also says that it's best...

13 September 2011 (UTC) Sounds like you're proposing something ... so WP:VPP might just be the place. Can't fix it here, and one would have expected that...

Requesting page protection on your version is worse than edit warring. I'll go to VPP to propose that involved editors are not allowed to request protection during...

to know a lot about Wikipedia, extensive edits to a guideline, a post to VPP proposing to get rid of all lists), ultimately I think the changes to that...

21:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC) if you want a broader discussion either try VPP or advertise it in apporpriate places like WP:CENT rather then here. Nil...

their hands were tied), as to rehold an RFC on a more central location like VPP. There is a central issue with how we should consider source review of topics...

previous practice. Also, the RfC was advertised on WT:RFA, WP:AN, WP:VPPR, WP:VPP, WP:CENT, and on the watchlist notices (perhaps I've even forgotten a few...

created by a bot or script, were mass deleted after a discussion (AfD, RfC, VPP, whatever). Can anyone provide me with the link to that discussion please...

implemented by a few WMF devs who were aware of an ongoing discussion at WP:VPP, and arbitrarily decided to ignore it. Thanks WMF!  Swarm  talk  03:22, 27...

behavior is getting tiresome, and seeing the MMA discussion dragged into WP:SS, VPP, AN, ANI, RFC/U has resulted in nothing but more AFDs and more contention...

@Drmies and DGG: my comments here are probably better held at Talk:BLP or VPP or something but since it came up here I'll mention this. The complaint/s...

because he interpreted convention exactly that way. (see this thread at VPP) I daresay he's well acquainted with the convention, such as it is. Choess...

welcome suggestions for other appropriate venues. (I might drop a pointer at VPP, but as this isn't a policy shift but an administrative action, still feel...

is to adopt the editorial standards of specific sources, then perhaps WP:VPP would be a good place to start.- MrX 19:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC) This can't...

there are issues. My own thought, to bounce around, maybe here, maybe at VPP, is: A. Define a privilege for the closing of AFDs. B. Establish that editors...

General policy concerns should be brought up in appropriate forums such as WP:VPP. (non-admin closure) —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 22:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC) The...

that is clearly defined to the larger community at a space that is not AfC (VPP or VPR). TonyBallioni (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2018 (UTC) User:TonyBallioni see...

act on. If the IP remains concerned, they should open a discussion on WP:VPP, since I don't believe there's any policy that forbids any user from contacting...

where there needs to be a general RFC on the topic, maybe a discussion at WP:VPP or something, where we centralize a discussion on the general conventions...

appropriate per NOTDIR; this was clear in the first AFD and in posting to VPP and WT:TV where there was discussion of it. I could have simply done the...

WP:VPP" anywhere recommended on that page); If these steps led to nothing, go to Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship (also there "list at WP:VPP" is...

2011 (UTC) Way off topic here. This should be a discussion for WP:V or WP:VPP. Right now, it's turning into the Hans Adler vs. Sandstein Hour. — The Hand...

rogues. A discussion to make those changes must take place either at the VPP for your second proposal, and for the first proposal the place would be the...

Nick (talk) 15:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC) If you have a proposal, go to WP:VPP and get consensus, or if you just want to talk about your ideas go to WP:VPI...

time. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 23:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC) I've asked at WP:VPP how to do it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC) That probably...

discussion. Not an AN issue, though it does sound like there's a potential WP:VPP discussion to be had about gender norms and neutrality/equality. Primefac...

treat 'religious threats' from a general policy standpoint belongs at WP:VPP or elsewhere. Nil Einne (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Just for the...

people as a part of WP:NPR. Judging by the response to an RfC I started at WP:VPP, perhaps we should formalize a requirement to be a new page reviewer to draftify...

not used in English, then that will definitely need a RfC in a place like VPP as such a change would impact hundreds to thousands of article titles. In...

I would like to inform of an editing situation relating to the article Militia Act of 1903. This involves Billmckern (talk · contribs), Springee (talk ·...

2014 (UTC) Wrong forum as this affects the community-as-a-whole. Maybe WP:VPP? the panda ₯’ 23:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Or WT:DYK... - The Bushranger One...

greater policy question can be handled at another venue (let me suggest WP:VPP) however there was not any consensus for administrator action during the...

well-attended, CENT-advertised RfC would be substantially different to one at say, VPP. – Joe (talk) 07:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC) I'd consider supporting this...

me / Where I've shammed 17:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC) WT:BP, WT:UP, or WP:VPP would seem appropriate. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 17:18, 8 November 2022...

you have said this here. It is surely better placed in the discussion at VPP? - Sitush (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2013 (UTC) OK, you are right. I am now...

making it. I understand that there is a discussion about image use policy on VPP, so I'll be checking into that. Beyond My Ken (talk) 14:42, 9 December 2012...

Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 15:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC) I have left notices at WT:BLP and WP:VPP. Kingsindian ♝ ♚ 04:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC) Oppose revdel. See my reasoning...

"stubs must be deleted" campaign.[108] Did the 10+ pages of discussion at the VPP not mean anything to you?[109] The community soundly rejected that very idea...

in order to make the added information look credible. I took the issue to VPP and asked what the policy was for dealing with sneaky insertion of false...