DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

ultimate funding sources should always be ascertained. Shortcuts WP:RSSELFWP:RSSELF WP:RS/SPSWP:RS/SPS Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. TikTok is a Chinese social networking service and short-form...

Comment How does this pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG, and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep I should mention two...

(UTC) Comment Unreliable sources as per WP:USERG, and WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Again, as I said on...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. Instagram is an American photo and short-form video...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources do not pass WP:RSSELF, both being self-published webpages. The only other mentions I can find...

August 2020 (UTC) Response since when did autobios establish notability? WP:RSSELF Mztourist (talk) 03:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC) I did not say that. I said...

reliable sources because they are self published sources so it breaks WP:RSSELF JaneciaTaylor (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...

Alexander Yurievich and not as such considered as a WP:RS because as per WP:RSSELF "Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book and claim...

2024 (UTC) Here's the thing. User published sources aren't allowed per WP:RSSELF, even if that information actually is true. I never meant less popular magazines...

AusLondonder (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) SPEEDY DELETE - WP:NOR, WP:RSSELF self published by the World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth. — Maile...

iUniverse Rebel Moms book, which is clearly not a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. My WP:BEFORE search found only a handful of non-independent interviews...

@Rathfelder: Of course, this article have 6 references. But 2 of them are WP:RSSELF, and I think anothers are WP:QUESTIONABLE. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 17:58...

the points of WP:GNG. The sources are mainly self-published sources (WP:RSSELF), and the secondary sources are blog posts (possibly falling under WP:USERG)...

theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Delete per GNG and WP:RSSELF ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Delete: For some reason...

sources (for example discussion forums) are considered self-published. See WP:RSSELF for guidelines on this category of source. I'll search for additional secondary...

covered by WP:FRINGE. While blogposts as a general rule are not accepted as reliable sources, the general guideline at WP:RSSELF admits some special cases....

link. ~ A412 talk! 19:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:RS and WP:RSSELF GoggleGoose (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Merge to Tile-based video...

source is independently published, H Amin has to satisfy the criteria at WP:RSSELF—if he is to be retained in the article, you must provide evidence that his...

Geerken book is self-published so does not meet RS standards as per WP:RSSELF and the section of the book talking about the Free Republic of Nias contains...

the band's own Facebook and YouTube sites are not independent and fail WP:RSSELF, as do the various metal blogs. The only site which would be considered...

does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive coverage on...

state company under the Ministry of Architecture and Construction. Under WP:RSSELF, self-published and government-controlled aren’t treated as independent...

and unsuitable for establishing either the outcome or notability under WP:RSSELF/WP:BLOGS. History Of The Sikh Misals gives no Information about the Battle...

they were written by the authors of Anarchist FAQ miserably botching WP:RSSELF Additionally, Infoshop itself is suspect to being an unreliable source since...

been published by reliable, independent publications" (quoting from WP:RSSELF). Vaden has not published his work in independent publications, and therefore...

considered a reliable source so long as they are not self published as per WP:RSSELF. Dynamique Mag is most definitely not a blog. The PRNewswire article shows...

Kendo Nagasaki [very possibly a fake name], Andy Fairclough) would pass WP:RSSELF... Shazback (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...

AuthorHouse is a self-publishing company, not an acceptable source per WP:RSSELF. Super Jump Magazine is another self-published source, and is another passing...

in reliable sources per the reliable source guideline, which includes WP:RSSELF and WP:RS/MC. There is a logic here: if you can't write anything in an article...

including myself, do not consider blog posts reliable sources on their own (WP:RSSELF), I think these can be valid references owing to the fact that a number...

Delete due to not meeting general guidelines of WP:DEPTH, WP:SYNTH, and WP:RSSELF. Fails in WP:GNG, poorly built narratives using Non-reliable sources of...

shortcomings addressed in a PROD, but their added sources are mostly WP:RSSELF. One citation is from the subject's own magazine. I can find no material...

self-published, which immediately excludes it as a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. The article also takes some of the exaggerated claims in the book as fact...

well-known experts. This applies specifically to sources #11, #12, and #13. WP:RSSELF says: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

(UTC) @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ):That's really bad advice, see WP:RSSELF. Btw, didn't you get in trouble for doing something similar?--Rusf10 (talk)...

any academic sources that could back it up. It fails WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:RSSELF and WP:UGC. Looks more like a personal opinion with the references pointing...

self-published site [4]). Self-published sources are not acceptable on Wikipedia per RSSELF. Your citation list includes other self-published Somali blogs e.g. [5]...

seems plausible, but I haven't been able to confirm it either way), WP:RSSELF says self-published works may be acceptable, depending on the context, if...

credible --Thomasarrango (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Please see WP:RSSELF about reliability measures regarding self-published works. Maggie Hobbs...

way makes you an authority on domestic animal breeds or types, further WP:RSSELF states Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

WP:NACTOR and WP:NCREATIVE dispute by finding WP:RS and removing apparent WP:RSSELF. Notability can also be verified through imdb and Google. JuggrnautTN (talk)...

I agree, though, that it doesn't appear to be a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. Deor (talk) 23:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC) What if there are no backslashes...

degree in history. And I couldn't find the book on the Internet, must be WP:RSSELF. Devlet Geray (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

self-published scientific information against the policy and guideline WP:RSSELF & WP:SPS & WP:USINGSPS that "Self-published expert sources may be considered...

the nominator's explanations it should be deleted per SYNTH sources of RSSELF & lacking in depth-covrage DEPTH. Interestingly it is related to the series...

contribs) 03:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Ref 38 is a self-published work. WP:RSSELF allows this "when its author is an established expert whose work in the...

the sources you mentioned predominantly non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is...

content. By every possible definition, it is a personal hobby blog, WP:RSSELF applies, and it is not RS. The Designers & Dragons reference is fine - I...

as Matt said, but I noted above that it is a self-published book (see WP:RSSELF), and the book is held by a grand total of one library in WorldCat—not an...

"reliable sources". Friends Of The Little Bighorn Battlefield probably fails WP:RSSELF which leaves two remaining sources apparently attesting to nothing more...

be considered as primary sources, and original research. point 5: see WP:RSSELF and WP:SPS on mediamalaysia.net. no one here is denying the notability of...

find. 4 of the seven references listed are unambiguously WP:RSSELF; a fifth is "probably" RSSELF (the probable autobio on nyc.gov); the sixth and seventh...

that the admins will resolve the dispute, I will say this: According to WP:RSSELF: "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

they are user generated content without editorial oversight. Please see WP:RSSELF as blogs and many podcasts will fit in this category. McMatter (talk)/(contrib)...

either published by the figures themselves ([2]; see WP:SELFPUBLISH and WP:RSSELF) or heavily associated with the Electric Universe movement ([3] and [4];...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 1   Inter Press Service (IPS) 1 2 2011 The Inter Press...

now in the article, and is linked in the article. Self-published, so WP:RSSELF, but they can be allowed if Mr. Kendal is deemed an acknowledged expert...

by the same person (company founder/site owner) with few exceptions (WP:RSSELF). Editor consensus holds the site to be generally unreliable and WP:QUESTIONABLE...

Mathvault and Mathworld can be seen as WP:QUESTIONABLE sources or largely WP:RSSELF published sources, and thus lack WP:RELIABILITY. explain how her persistent...

does this article pass GNG? Unreliable sources as per WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:RSSELF. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC) keep Extensive coverage on...

doesn't necessarily mean that it is in and of itself unreliable. Per WP:RSSELF - Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

they were written by the authors of Anarchist FAQ miserably botching WP:RSSELF Additionally, Infoshop itself is suspect to being an unreliable source since...

left-libertarian thought, so here we are. The article on Long could use less WP:RSSELF, but it'll have to do for now while it still gets worked on. @Mazca, Tavix...

Refs 239 and 299: WP has a policy on tweets as reliable sources. See WP:RSSELF, which says: "self-published media are largely not acceptable. Self-published...

way makes you an authority on domestic animal breeds or types, further WP:RSSELF states Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

McGill. That source looks to be self-published; however, based upon WP:RSSELF as she has published an article on McGill in the curated Encyclopedia of...

you are thinking of WP:RSSELF or WP:ABOUTSELF citations, which are different than citing something via WP:RSOPINION. WP:RSSELF requires that the person...

"reliable sources". Friends Of The Little Bighorn Battlefield probably fails WP:RSSELF which leaves two remaining sources apparently attesting to nothing more...

adding inline citations (since your draft has none). Also, please see WP:RSSELF, for information on self-published sources. --The Tips of Apmh 19:44, 9...

to access. The invocation of RSSELF is misguided because it isn't Wilkinson publishing, but the organizer; extending RSSELF in this way would prevent e...

considered a reliable source so long as they are not self published as per WP:RSSELF. Dynamique Mag is most definitely not a blog. The PRNewswire article shows...

find. 4 of the seven references listed are unambiguously WP:RSSELF; a fifth is "probably" RSSELF (the probable autobio on nyc.gov); the sixth and seventh...

(talk) 01:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC) @Queen Kitty Cat: Probably not - see WP:RSSELF. GoingBatty (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC) One possible way forward, Queen...

credible --Thomasarrango (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Please see WP:RSSELF about reliability measures regarding self-published works. Maggie Hobbs...

any academic sources that could back it up. It fails WP:QUESTIONABLE, WP:RSSELF and WP:UGC. Looks more like a personal opinion with the references pointing...

page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. When I read WP:RSSELF, about self-published sources, it seems clear to me that those can't be...

the sources you mentioned predominantly non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is...

Geerken book is self-published so does not meet RS standards as per WP:RSSELF and the section of the book talking about the Free Republic of Nias contains...

site [15]). Self-published sources are not acceptable on Wikipedia per RSSELF. Your citation list includes other self-published Somali blogs e.g. [16]...

either published by the figures themselves ([22]; see WP:SELFPUBLISH and WP:RSSELF) or heavily associated with the Electric Universe movement ([23] and [24];...

not acceptable. If you need more info about references, you can check WP:RSSELF and WP:RELIABLE. Good luck! Darwin Naz (talk) 01:37, 6 August 2019 (UTC)...

reliable sources because they are self published sources so it breaks WP:RSSELF JaneciaTaylor (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...

August 2020 (UTC) Response since when did autobios establish notability? WP:RSSELF Mztourist (talk) 03:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC) I did not say that. I said...

been published by reliable, independent publications" (quoting from WP:RSSELF). Vaden has not published his work in independent publications, and therefore...

theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Delete per GNG and WP:RSSELF ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Delete: For some reason...

Alexander Yurievich and not as such considered as a WP:RS because as per WP:RSSELF "Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book and claim...

content. By every possible definition, it is a personal hobby blog, WP:RSSELF applies, and it is not RS. The Designers & Dragons reference is fine - I...

@Rathfelder: Of course, this article have 6 references. But 2 of them are WP:RSSELF, and I think anothers are WP:QUESTIONABLE. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 17:58...

expected, but not required) if it satisfied one of the exceptions at WP:RSSELF, particularly "Self-published material may sometimes be acceptable when...

in reliable sources per the reliable source guideline, which includes WP:RSSELF and WP:RS/MC. There is a logic here: if you can't write anything in an article...

self-published sources to be problematical, and often unreliable. See Wikipedia:RSSELF. See books on demand site, World Cat entry showing no libraries holding...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources do not pass WP:RSSELF, both being self-published webpages. The only other mentions I can find...

be considered as primary sources, and original research. point 5: see WP:RSSELF and WP:SPS on mediamalaysia.net. no one here is denying the notability of...

(UTC) @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ):That's really bad advice, see WP:RSSELF. Btw, didn't you get in trouble for doing something similar?--Rusf10 (talk)...

May 31 to June 2, 2013. This is allowed under WP:RSP. Secondly, while WP:RSSELF largely does not accept self-published sources, it makes an exception for...

as Matt said, but I noted above that it is a self-published book (see WP:RSSELF), and the book is held by a grand total of one library in WorldCat—not an...

expected, but not required) if it satisfied one of the exceptions at WP:RSSELF, particularly "Self-published material may sometimes be acceptable when...

(UTC) Comment - If this is a blog then isn't it already covered by the WP:RSSELF? Do we really need to RfC every possible source regardless of whether there...

WP:NACTOR and WP:NCREATIVE dispute by finding WP:RS and removing apparent WP:RSSELF. Notability can also be verified through imdb and Google. JuggrnautTN (talk)...

argue satisfy the "established expert on the subject matter" clause for WP:RSSELF. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC) FAO is not a work, Scientific...

including myself, do not consider blog posts reliable sources on their own (WP:RSSELF), I think these can be valid references owing to the fact that a number...

(though it will often be WP:UNDUE, but that depends on the restrictions of WP:RSSELF, which means they can't be cited for exceptional claims or anything about...

either because of the publication source or because they qualify under WP:RSSELF? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) @Nikkimaria: I've removed...

the band's own Facebook and YouTube sites are not independent and fail WP:RSSELF, as do the various metal blogs. The only site which would be considered...

(help!) 08:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC) JzG I was thinking it would fall under WP:RSSELF, although some manual pruning might be necessary if it's being used to source...

100 followers, which by itself is an unacceptable source according to WP:RSSELF. Medium is a platform similar to WordPress or Tumblr - while some editorial...

use self published books or videos, like your 1st and 4th link (see WP:RSSELF), or wikis/forums, 5th and 6th (see WP:RSPWIKIA and WP:RSREDDIT). A quiz...

editorial controls. A blog without those things falls under WP:UGC / WP:RSSELF and is not usable as a source even for statements of opinion - citing a...

They say that Emmanuel Rincón, a self-published author (WP:QUESTIONABLE/WP:RSSELF) who writes for the site, has "a degree in Modern Masterpieces of World...

RS? It seems like it meets the requirements of an expert source under WP:RSSELF, but I'm not sure. This is headed towards WP:GAN; if the sources are dubious...

reliable, secondary sources. At first glance, he seems to qualify under WP:RSSELF.VR talk 15:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC) The book Army 101: Inside ROTC in...

banned", but all Lulu sources are assumed unreliable per WP:SPS and WP:RSSELF, until proven otherwise, through the exceptions given at...

fail it, and Dreadon himself clearly fails to fit the criteria that WP:RSSELF establishes, which seems to be what you're trying to invoke here ("...its...

contribs) currently do. Llemiles (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Looks like WP:RSSELF and WP:BLOGS cover this. I can't find any coverage of it online, apart from...

article about, right? In that case, why wouldn't it already be caught in WP:RSSELF as being a Facebook page? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:51, 2 September 2018...

is fine for attributed opinions and views of the films subjects, per WP:RSSELF and WP:ABOUTSELF, as long as those claims are not contentious. As far as...

Heritage India Magazine and same with Judhajit Bagchi, isn't it pointing to WP:RSSELF. Thank you – GSS (talk) 08:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Having 11 citations...

blog is not a reliable source for anything (see WP:RS, in particular WP:RSSELF) and it's not an appropriate external link to be adding anywhere (see WP:ELNO...

doesn't necessarily mean that it is in and of itself unreliable. Per WP:RSSELF - Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

If Kirmse was a major participant in Peakbagger, then it would pass WP:RSSELF due to Kirmse's domain expertise. Instead, by his own web page, he was only...

for statements of fact? GPinkerton (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC) WP:RSSELF says Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

be treated independently with regards to determining reliability, per WP:RSSELF, as towards whether they count as a WP:SELFSOURCE or could qualify an 'exception'...

is no editorial oversight by a third party; see WP:QUESTIONABLE and WP:RSSELF. All sources mentioned by IranianNationalist have a vested interest in promoting...

itself isn't open to anyone to edit. I think this is borderline (per WP:RSSELF) but it isn't a clear cut absolutely not. It is WP:TERTIARY.Icewhiz (talk)...

concerns are valid because you consistently included this particular WP:RSSELF in almost every article you edited and/or created. What's particularly alarming...

still not peer-reviewed it doesn't mean it is not reliable because per WP:RSSELF & WP:SPS & WP:USINGSPS the "Self-published expert sources may be considered...

evaluation" – and in the context of self-published source treatment with the WP:RSSELF limitations.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC) I don't...

that website will publish anything if they like it and receive 70 quid. WP:RSSELF would seem to rule out use of this website. Or do I misunderstand something...

anywhere near the level of WP:SCHOLARSHIP. As always, the guidance of WP:RSSELF that Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book and...

contribs · IP contribs · WHOIS) repeatedly re-added content that violates WP:RSSELF, refuse to explain his edit at the talk page of WikiProject Mathematics...

or means of promotion"), WP:SELFPUBLISH (that also includes blogs), WP:RSSELF (that includes "Never use self-published sources as independent sources...

expert, therefore his website could not be used as a reliable source, per WP:RSSELF. I just checked, and MD Vaden is still unpublished. famousredwoods.com also...

willing to accept anything Masters writes as an established expert per WP:RSSELF, but he attributes his source as "According to Dr. Phil Klotzbach of Colorado...

to Robert George Mays's article given that it is self-published per WP:RSSELF rather than through a peer-review journal or newspaper? He might be an expert...

and that 'self-published expert sources may be considered reliable' WP:RSSELF. If the decision here is to just ignore the guidelines, then the guidelines...

current quadrupedal Riojasaurus illustration just isn't very good. Per WP:RSSELF, Scott Hartman's remarks on DeviantART can be considered a reliable source...

for instance, are questionable and you can check the details here: WP:RSSELF. Even those sources that sound reliable must also have a reputation for...

self-published works such as the Smith work are not considered reliable. See WP:RSSELF. If the earlier games you mentioned were truly "college football" and truly...

criticism of IPFS cited to someone's personal blog which is a blatant WP:RSSELF violation. Considering he has been editing Wikipedia for over a decade,...

either because of the publication source or because they qualify under WP:RSSELF? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC) @Nikkimaria: I've removed...

seems plausible, but I haven't been able to confirm it either way), WP:RSSELF says self-published works may be acceptable, depending on the context, if...

Refs 239 and 299: WP has a policy on tweets as reliable sources. See WP:RSSELF, which says: "self-published media are largely not acceptable. Self-published...

argue satisfy the "established expert on the subject matter" clause for WP:RSSELF. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC) FAO is not a work, Scientific...

I have read over and over again in WP:RS, WP:PRIMARY, WP:SECONDARY, WP:RSSELF, etc. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources...

contribs) 03:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Ref 38 is a self-published work. WP:RSSELF allows this "when its author is an established expert whose work in the...

in the web ([13]). I kept informing CodeInconnu several times about WP:RSSELF and WP:SELFPUBLISHED, which allow self-published expert sources to be considered...

self-published sources to be problematical, and often unreliable. See Wikipedia:RSSELF. See books on demand site, World Cat entry showing no libraries holding...

would be obvious that this is the case. The sources used are either WP:RSSELF or WP:UGC where they are referencing said self published works. I will spend...

looking him up to confirm his birthplace, but I deleted it as it broke WP:RSSELF. They repeatedly told me to read various guidelines without specifying which...

well-known experts. This applies specifically to sources #11, #12, and #13. WP:RSSELF says: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced...

state company under the Ministry of Architecture and Construction. Under WP:RSSELF, self-published and government-controlled aren’t treated as independent...

(talk) 01:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I think we need to potentially modify WP:RSSELF so that it better delineates between USEBYOTHER and "whose work in the relevant...

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC) Covered by WP:SOCIALMEDIA/WP:RSSELF. --JBL (talk) 19:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) The following...

something, it's not very important. This blog is the very definition of WP:RSSELF. I'm surprised we're having this conversation. A blacklist is needed. Howard...

can be used because we know the author who is a subject expert, see wp:RSSELF. Te ara is an encyclopedia, and at best its articles are tertiary, but not...

don't find it to be that reliable in the slightest and all seem to be WP:RSSELF by a woman named Katheryn. I would also like to ask about Euphoriazine,...

Delete due to not meeting general guidelines of WP:DEPTH, WP:SYNTH, and WP:RSSELF. Fails in WP:GNG, poorly built narratives using Non-reliable sources of...

verified. Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Generally per WP:RSSELF, self-published sources are largely not acceptable. WordPress was deemed...

Kendo Nagasaki [very possibly a fake name], Andy Fairclough) would pass WP:RSSELF... Shazback (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...

2024 (UTC) Here's the thing. User published sources aren't allowed per WP:RSSELF, even if that information actually is true. I never meant less popular magazines...

self-reported data risks inaccuracies, like the refuted claims in Virginia. WP:RSSELF [23] Oiloiloil3 (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2026 (UTC) Being clear, the NAACP...

reports by Ahmed Noorani and he is the person who owns this website, WP:RSSELF is clear about self-published sources that they are generally unacceptable...

team(?) made mistakes, cultivated their data, etc. Also, please read WP:RSSELF. In the interest of not WP:BLUDGEONing the discussion, I'll restrain myself...

has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. (WP:RSSELF) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC) Okay, I checked...

the nominator's explanations it should be deleted per SYNTH sources of RSSELF & lacking in depth-covrage DEPTH. Interestingly it is related to the series...

the points of WP:GNG. The sources are mainly self-published sources (WP:RSSELF), and the secondary sources are blog posts (possibly falling under WP:USERG)...

GREL/GUNREL because the guidelines are clear, they should be treated as WP:RSSELF and so it should not be used when it makes claims about third parties as...

of unsourced or improperly cited material ... warning, with a link to WP:RSSELF in the edit window of the message. Donald Albury 21:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)...

should they be considered a reliable source? or do they fail to pass WP:RSSELF? Scu ba (talk) 23:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC) I don't see any editorial guidelines...

without independent evidence of significance or due weight. WP:RS, WP:RSSELF and WP:NOTDIRECTORY would all seem to suggest requiring independent reliable-source...

use self published books or videos, like your 1st and 4th link (see WP:RSSELF), or wikis/forums, 5th and 6th (see WP:RSPWIKIA and WP:RSREDDIT). A quiz...

iUniverse Rebel Moms book, which is clearly not a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. My WP:BEFORE search found only a handful of non-independent interviews...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 1   Time WP:TIMEMAGAZINE 📌 WP:RSPTIME 📌 1 2 3 4 5...

shortcomings addressed in a PROD, but their added sources are mostly WP:RSSELF. One citation is from the subject's own magazine. I can find no material...

self-published, which immediately excludes it as a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. The article also takes some of the exaggerated claims in the book as fact...

self-published works such as the Smith work are not considered reliable. See WP:RSSELF. If the earlier games you mentioned were truly "college football" and truly...

and unsuitable for establishing either the outcome or notability under WP:RSSELF/WP:BLOGS. History Of The Sikh Misals gives no Information about the Battle...

AuthorHouse is a self-publishing company, not an acceptable source per WP:RSSELF. Super Jump Magazine is another self-published source, and is another passing...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 1   Inter Press Service (IPS) 1 2 2011 The Inter Press...

willing to accept anything Masters writes as an established expert per WP:RSSELF, but he attributes his source as "According to Dr. Phil Klotzbach of Colorado...

AusLondonder (talk) 09:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) SPEEDY DELETE - WP:NOR, WP:RSSELF self published by the World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth. — Maile...

link. ~ A412 talk! 19:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:RS and WP:RSSELF GoggleGoose (talk) 12:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Merge to Tile-based video...

have a Wikipedia page, but many of them I've seen are fleshed out with WP:RSSELF, WP:UGC, WP:SELFSOURCE. How is significant coverage determined? I've found...

source and Wikipedia generally does not regard them as reliable, see WP:RSSELF. The Atlanta Jewish Times has an editor, so it appears to be a stronger...

heavily on your own (self-published) website (which is discouraged per WP:RSSELF), and Facebook. These 'references' would need to be removed before the article...

PDF. It is unlikely to be in wikipedia terms a reliable source, per WP:RSSELF, although if there is evidence that the author has been published by reliable...

degree in history. And I couldn't find the book on the Internet, must be WP:RSSELF. Devlet Geray (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

adding the disputed material only referenced to a questionable source per WP:RSSELF and WP:BLP until there is a consensus that the source is reliable. There...

practice of not using self-reported sources (such as tweets) as seen in WP:RSSELF. Also because of the very changes to Twitter the recent discussion pertained...

reliable and adding an unreliable source is a no-no, per both WP:USERG and WP:RSSELF. The discussion will soon be rendered moot, as I've begun a rewrite of the...

is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 1   Inter Press Service (IPS) 1 2 2011 The Inter Press...