DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

entirely unless WP:TALKCENT applies. Shortcuts WP:TARGETWP:TARGET WP:RSECTWP:RSECT Most redirects are untargeted, i.e. they lead simply to a page, not to any...

faith and fair. I would only add that I think, if possible, a courtesy WP:RSECT at the sections of the targets the bot links to would be useful (this is...

redirect target. More specifically, China–United States trade war#2025, per WP:RSECT. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...

I agree with a partial merge (as I said above), and would suggest a WP:RSECT to avoid a WP:SURPRISE. ComplexRational (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)...

I have several qualifications basically I should expect to see WP:RSECT i.e. provide courtesy note at the target, as any human editor should do...

target as a {{section link}} in the "See also" section and commented per WP:RSECT and MOS:LINK2SECT, and I've marked the R as {{R to section}} for now. Si...

the "Breakaway groups" section, where the journal is mentioned, per WP:RSECT. Sal2100 (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

IMAX films. The film is a table entry in the target, not a section, so an RSECT is impossible. Owen× ☎ 22:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

{{R to section}} to the page, and courtesy comment at the target per WP:RSECT. Si Trew (talk) 04:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

as Rabbi James Wax as {{R to section}}, and put a courtesy note per WP:RSECT at the target, but usually a rabbi's style includes his first name, doesn't...

both R's to reflect that, and left a courtesy comment at the target per WP:RSECT. Si Trew (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

and added {{R from episode}} to the redirect and left a comment per WP:RSECT at the target, as usual without prejudice to this discussion. Si Trew (talk)...

section}} as suggested, and added a courtesy comment at the target per WP:RSECT. (non-admin closure) by 85.67.32.244 (talk) 16:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)}}...

many redirects point to this section, per MOS:BROKENSECTIONLINKS and WP:RSECT. Place Clichy (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is...

None marked as {{R to section}} nor sections marked as incoming per WP:RSECT. But I'm probably wrong. I played as XIth man and scoreboard runner in a...

the R as {{R to section}} and placed a comment it at the target per WP:RSECT. I emphasise, this is without prejudice to this discussion. I do that even...

confusing, indeed, intriguing (why must it be square?) so WP:REDLINK it. (WP:RSECT anyone?) Si Trew (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC) Retarget to Square division...

argument for changing a section name, for example, which is why we have WP:RSECT and MOS:LINK2SECT, although they don't seem to be widely followed. If external...

Dávila#Discography as {{R from work}}{{R to section}} and will leave a WP:RSECT courtesy note. Just these two are redundant bordering on WP:RFD#D2 confusing...

What's the problem with the proposed {{R to section}}? It is usual under WP:RSECT to leave a courtesy note at the section that it is thus marked, if you are...

renamed, so I've fixed these and added an anchor and courtesy note per WP:RSECT at the target. Si Trew (talk) 12:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC) @SimonTrew: I've...

the DAB then they would still be broken). I've left courtesy notes per WP:RSECT in the election results articles to which I refer from the infobox. Si Trew...

Estocin (FFG-15)#TCG Göksu (F 497) leaving a courtesy comment there per WP:RSECT. This ship was sold to the Turks and renamed, a fairly normal procedure...

retarget (section) to Fish#Finfish. I've left a courtesy comment there per WP:RSECT, and I've marked this and FinfishFinfish as {{R to section}}. (non-admin...

I agree with a partial merge (as I said above), and would suggest a WP:RSECT to avoid a WP:SURPRISE. ComplexRational (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)...

the "Breakaway groups" section, where the journal is mentioned, per WP:RSECT. Sal2100 (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

IMAX films. The film is a table entry in the target, not a section, so an RSECT is impossible. Owen× ☎ 22:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC) Chang Jiang: The Great...

redirect target. More specifically, China–United States trade war#2025, per WP:RSECT. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 20:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...