DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

user conduct disputes policy. Shortcuts WP:RFCOPENWP:RFCOPEN WP:RFCSTWP:RFCST WP:RFCTPWP:RFCTP You create an RfC by starting a discussion which typically...

you can open a wp:request for comment, following the instructions at WP:RFCST. It is preferred that you have a discussion on article talk first though...

The Economist on trans topics). That would violate WP:RFCNEUTRAL and WP:RFCST, and is in no way a reason to close anything procedurally. The RFC was indeed...

edit. TrangaBellam (talk) 05:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC) The rules are clear WP:RFCST. Include a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue in the...

so big on reading instructions it's strange you missed where it says WP:RFCST says Create a new section at the bottom of the talk page). You can't expect...

whatsoever, and the first timestamp is in the "Agree" section. Please read WP:RFCST carefully, taking note of WP:RFCBRIEF, and try again. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk)...

it shows there, there isn't even a meaningful statement, contrary to WP:RFCST. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 10:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Because it is a technical...

write “a brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue” per WP:RFCST, so it’s on you. —Michael Z. 23:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC) Hm. I see I was...

This is an invalid RfC - there is no statement and no timestamp, see WP:RFCST. If it's related to Template talk:Infobox artist#Template-protected edit...

about the issue immediately below the {{rfc}} tag, in accordance with WP:RFCST and WP:RFCBRIEF. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC) @Redrose64:...

impartiality on this matter and poisons the question (see WP:RFCBEFORE and WP:RFCST). SMcCandlish's also framing how he wants responses to be made (referencing...

(UTC) I already explained this. The RfC statement needs to abide by WP:RFCST and WP:RFCBRIEF. The RfC statement is everything from the {{rfc}} tag (exclusive)...

timestamp, it copies these to the RfC listing page. So, as advised at WP:RFCST and WP:RFCBRIEF, you need to include a brief, neutral statement of the issue...

2019 (UTC) It's not real. First, this does not meet the requirements of WP:RFCST, it's just Legobot (talk · contribs) picking up whatever text lies between...

turn this discussion into an RfC, please follow the instructions at WP:RFCST, and use a brief and neutral statement as the first signed comment in the...

turn this discussion into an RfC, please follow the instructions at WP:RFCST. — Newslinger talk 09:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC) Sorry this is my first time...

between the {{rfc}} tag and the timestamp. Both of these are required by WP:RFCST, and their omission had this effect. In the second one, you again omitted...

turn this discussion into an RfC, please follow the instructions at WP:RFCST, and use a brief and neutral statement as the first signed comment in the...

is your "brief, neutral statement of or question about the issue" per WP:RFCST? You added almost 5000 bytes before your signature, which means the advertisement...

discussion into a formal request for comment, please follow the directions at WP:RFCST and then restore "RfC" to the section heading. — Newslinger talk 00:13,...

WP:V (a policy) and WP:RS (a guideline). Outside of the instructions in WP:RFCST, declaring whether an RfC format is or isn't "normal behaviour" for other...

22 July 2020 (UTC) ​Could you please also follow the instructions at WP:RFCST? You'll need to write a brief and neutral statement at the top of the discussion...

Chesapeake77 (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC) You can see how to do so at WP:RFCST, after starting a new section on this talk page. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please...

pressured to amend an RfC, as long as it is compliant with the rules in WP:RFCST. — Newslinger talk 18:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC) ​Oh I see. I was just flustered...

have fully thought out my actions. As far as I can tell, I followed WP:RFCST. If you want to give me open feedback on how the process is supposed to...

—⁠andrybak (talk) 20:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC) Since WP:RFCSIGN works, as do WP:RFCST, WP:RFCBEFORE, WP:RFCCAT, WP:RFCEND, and others, what's the problem? --Redrose64...

pages, you should first check that WP:RFCST was observed in full. If it was, wait one hour (as advised at RFCST) in case Legobot hasn't run yet. If the...

{{rfc}} template to this discussion according to the instructions at WP:RFCST and add "RfC:" back to the section heading. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 21:58...

ready to put to the broader community, transfer it to WP:VPP observing WP:RFCST. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC) Yeah today's been a bad...

apply the {{rfc}} template immediately under the section header per WP:RFCST, and place a copy of your signature immediately after the four options to...

--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 18:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC) @Nythar: See WP:RFCST: you have not provided a statement, nor a timestamp/signature. Because of...

content @Black Kite: I always sign with just a timestamp, as permitted by RFCST, because I believe perceptions of the opener can influence perceptions of...

RfC's listing. Per Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Creating an RfC (WP:RFCST), the RfC statement is the text between the {{rfc}} tag and the first signature...