DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

most cases it would improve the article to add them). Shortcut WP:ORGSIGWP:ORGSIG No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:ORGSIG and even WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication that it meets WP:ORGSIG Derek Andrews (talk) 10:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Other then the fact that the company exists there is no indication of any...

consider in WP:ORGSIG, namely "whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects". According to the source, they have. WP:ORGSIG also says "Arbitrary...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability. See WP:ORGSIG Jschnur (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

sources are cited other than the laws that governed it. This article fails WP:ORGSIG since there is no outside coverage of it. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:09, 28...

believe qualifies for own page, is only notable because brought by Hyatt WP:ORGSIG. I think page should be merged into Hyatt. NZ Footballs Conscience(talk)...

March 2015 (UTC) There is nothing notable about this company as per WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH is marginal given that there are two articles about the...

Ceethekreator (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG ("If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. Completely unsourced, and no coverage outside of the routine...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) not fulfilling requirements for WP:ORGSIG QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:31, 29...

19 October 2021 (UTC) DELETE: Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Also fails to meet WP:ORGSIG.Advait (talk) 08:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

and Argentina. Shellwood (talk) 07:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ORGSIG--Darius (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG which states, "If the individual organization has received no or very little...

Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH. The only reference that covers the organisation...

in multiple reliable secondary sources so does not meet WP:ORGCRIT or WP:ORGSIG - Epinoia (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:GNG...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG; fails WP:ORGSIG "No company or organization is considered inherently notable." - 7 of the...

WP:SIGCOV has been changed, and what I actually meant to link to now is WP:ORGSIG: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider...

things either by the organisation itself or closely related to it. See WP:ORGSIG. ~XyNqtc 15:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

multiple independent reliable sources. Also meets significant impact as per WP:ORGSIG: Subject is demonstrably notable as a pioneer in its space and has had a...

tagged this page two years ago as failing GNG for an organisation per WP:ORGSIG. Since then, there have been no improvements. The page is nothing more than...

discussions. Rogermx (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ORGSIG, as organizations are not inherently notable, and WP:NPOV, as it is written...

no mention of this company in reliable independent sources so fails WP:ORGSIG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --Piotr...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG and appears to be self-promotional NottNott talk|contrib 15:33, 22 February...

There is no "established strong consensus" unless you're referring to WP:ORGSIG, which directly contradicts the speedy keep rationales; not a single "speedy...

Chumbawamba - not notable enough for a stand-alone article - does not meet WP:ORGSIG - therefore, Redirect - Epinoia (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC) The above...

notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 13:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH. No significant coverage outside of the organisation's...

here.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:ORGSIG.- MrX 11:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Delete. Does not meet any notability guidelines...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable corporation, per WP:CORP and WP:ORGSIG. Online reference is fleeting and simply an example of the industry of Oshawa...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article's existence defies WP:ORGSIG. To play devil's advocate, there is coverage in the area in local magazines...

includes a school, and therefore is considered inherently notable as per WP:ORGSIG (being the exception to the rule "No company or organization is considered...

19 October 2021 (UTC) DELETE: Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Also fails to meet WP:ORGSIG.Advait (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

is to the company's own website - not enough significant coverage per WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - Epinoia (talk) 21:41, 26...

Spider) 20:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete – no significant coverage per WP:ORGSIG – the website www.tinizm.com is dead – one of their artists did win an award...

notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:ORGSIG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfp777 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 28...

its does not meet WP:SIRS and there is no inherent notability as per WP:ORGSIG. The article has existed since 2007 but it is a pretty promo article for...

from academic journals, newspapers, and remodeling publications. Per WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGIND, and WP:ORGDEPTH. SWAloha (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)...

Hotel Management Institute, found only a single passing mention.[4]. WP:ORGSIG asks us to consider whether an organization has had any significant or demonstrable...

during my most recent edits to the article. I suggest delete based on WP:ORGSIG or merge with Oculoplastics, although it seems to be well mentioned in that...

no mention of this company in reliable independent sources so fails WP:ORGSIG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is...

coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") or WP:ORGSIG (no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment...

Alex-h (talk) 12:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGSIG. The only two blue linked bands to have recorded on the label are blue links...

seem to establish notability beyond being a franchise and NASCAR. Fail WP:ORGSIG as no company is considered inherently notable. Article contains mostly...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRITE or WP:ORGDEPTH - only local mention - has had no "significant...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. Sourced either to the conference website itself, or directing...

the area (http://amazingmelaka.com/) and a Foursquare check-in. Fails WP:ORGSIG. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely from DJ Mag which is a single source. Wikilover3509...

coverage, including an in-depth article in Der Spiegel. Seems notable under WP:ORGSIG "whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture...

fails WP:NOR. Syndicater (talk) 01:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:ORGSIG ("If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" per WP:ORGSIG - citations are about the take-over by SpartanNash and a crime (one-event...

any other or documents a significant effect it has had. Fails to meet WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:AUD, and WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2016...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. No independent reliable coverage apart from the organisation's...

small business, but with nowhere near the notice that is required per WP:ORGSIG and several other provisions of WP:NCORP. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Likely fails Wikipedia:ORGSIG Lordseriouspig 21:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

04:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG on WP:NCORP, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. Most of the coverage are from PRWeb, which is an online...

certainly a large company, but that does not establish notability by itself (WP:ORGSIG). Fails WP:GNG. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Note:...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Little independent notability. Go D. Usopp (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2025...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable as per WP:ORGSIG Peapod21 (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. WP:ORGSIG states that no organization - including schools - has inherent notability...

TJRC (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Delete - no inherent notability WP:ORGSIG - no significant achievements or innovations or impact - references are...

September 2015 (UTC). There is no default notability for schools. Please see WP:ORGSIG.- MrX 12:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

11:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. Fail to meet WP:GNG on WP:NORG, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. No WP:RS and WP:IS other than some coverage in local media...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The references are PR articles. WP:NPRODUCT can also be applied. Wikilover3509...

notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 13:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH. I've been looking at this article for a while...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I believe this fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG Hardly any significant in-depth coverage. Editor seemed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

however, there is no guideline for such a claim in WP:NORG (specifically WP:ORGSIG) and we must judge on GNG alone. As this is currently a travel-only team...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:59, 17 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Fails WP:ORGSIG. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:27, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per nomination, does...

significant coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT or WP:CORPDEPTH - Epinoia (talk) 21:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)...

conference [3] One sentence in an article about a 2015 tech expo [4] WP:ORGSIG asks us "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please...

trivial coverage or no mention at all. The topic is about a local chapter (WP:ORGSIG) of Liter of Light and it fails WP:ORG.. Initially, I tagged this article...

the many regions outside of Toronto confers inherent notability (see WP:ORGSIG). FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Delete - no indication...

however, there is no guideline for such a claim in WP:NORG (specifically WP:ORGSIG) and we must judge on GNG alone. As this is a travel-only team for the time...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The FT article is an interview with the founder. Wikilover3509 (talk) 6:08...

2024 (UTC) Delete. Lacks WP:SIGCOV and lacks inherent notability as per WP:ORGSIG. Beachweak (talk) 10:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Lack of notability not inherited from its products, with the page lacking...

available online are mostly social media and user generated content. WP:ORGSIG. QEnigma (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. Article discusses non-noteworthy events that are common to educational...

October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO; no indications of notability nor WP:ORGSIG. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...

and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:ORGSIG due to the lack of reliable independent sources. The only source covering...

official website. Govt organizations are not automatically notable (WP:ORGSIG). Gan Favourite (talk) 15:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

WP:GNG and appears to violate WP:PROMO (or at least WP:ORGIND). See also WP:ORGSIG ("No company or organization is considered inherently notable"). Shelbystripes...

they have had a significant effect on culture and entertainment, per WP:ORGSIG, but without the "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:ORGSIG, despite its claims of being the oldest speech and debate team in the United...

31 May 2020 (UTC) Merge and redirect lack of reliable sources, fails WP:ORGSIG, merge to UTC is best option I think. Drat8sub (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2020...

but it's not enough to establish notability per WP:ORG (specifically, WP:ORGSIG). There doesn't appear to be significant coverage, and definitely nothing...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The Telegraph article is about Powwownow and just mentions why they are...

sources to establish Collegium Augustinianum as notable. Also delete per WP:ORGSIG. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...

source. GMGtalk 18:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG or WP:ORGCRIT - it has not been "the subject of significant coverage in...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. This company existed for less than 2 years before it was bought out and...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG; not notable just because it exists WP:ORGSIG ZimZalaBim talk 17:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

topic. Fails GNG, CORPDEPTH, and ORGIND. Also, notability is not inherent (ORGSIG) and not inherited (INHERITORG). Article creation was 2009 so it has had...

coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") or WP:ORGSIG (no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment...

international law firm, but that by itself does also not establish notability (WP:ORGSIG. An internet search has not resulted in what can be considered significant...

• Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:COMPANY (WP:ORGSIG). Ignatzmice•talk 05:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Keep. Notable as it is a North...

(talk) 08:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:NSCHOOL or WP:ORGSIG - "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice...

that is unsourced. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

(UTC) Delete - Fails to have a "demonstrable effect" as mentioned in WP:ORGSIG Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

Notability of an organization is not inherited through its members, per WP:ORGSIG. The new references are simply results of a Facebook search (primary sources...

Mr RD 08:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC) That is not a valid argment per WP:ORGSIG. Notability depends purely on quality/depth of coverage; notability is not...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Delete No inherent notability WP:ORGSIG, thi is a small club (sangam) part of Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham ,Like a...

notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

Arab interest fraternity", that is not enough to keep the article per WP:ORGSIG—"No company or organization is considered inherently notable."BriefEdits...

criteria. As of right now here is a summary of sources: Additionally, WP:ORGSIG states, in part, When evaluating the notability of organizations or products...

finance news pieces and passing mentions. Company is not notable, fails WP:ORGSIG, "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed...

zero independent, reliable, secondary sources have been provided. Per WP:ORGSIG no company or organisations is inherently notable and per WP:INHERITORG...

not enough "Deep or significant coverage" to satify WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:ORGSIG - there are two links in the article to press-release style stories about...

organization fails to meet any of Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:ORGSIG) and it has had these issues since 2007. If anything had happened in the...

its golden jubilee in 2015). Sionk (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC) WP:ORGSIG states "No company or organisation is considered inherently notable. No...

organisation and may be internet marketing activity to pull views against WP:ORGSIG has not also been covered in any secoundary source and is against WP:CORPDEPTH...

it seems that the organization has made an impact in their area. From WP:ORGSIG, --"When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please...

in the twelve years this stub has been dangling around. To quote from WP:ORGSIG: No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

@Mackensen: Thank you for your contribution. You are right. According to WP:ORGSIG a company is not inherently notable for being a stock carbuilder. I could...

inheriently notable. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

fact that its leader was a prominent neo-Nazi but in wikipedia Wikipedia:ORGSIG In fact, it's not even active today, it's been dismantled which means there...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable utility; does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG. Info can conceivably go on Lerwick Power Station article. —МандичкаYO 😜...

sufficient coverage. Government organization has no inherent notability, WP:ORGSIG. Gan Favourite (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

20:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC) - still pretty sketchy - not enough to satisgy WP:ORGSIG, "any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment...

subject meets WP:NGO. Independently notable with media coverage. No WP:ORGSIG & WP:INHERITORG inherit. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 14:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:ORGSIG 195.50.217.92 (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Comment Completing nomination...

embassy doesn not automatically mean WP:N also it fails WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGSIG. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 21:36, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete I agree, fails WP:GNG...

User:UrbanVillager. IMO UV's arguments are contradicted by WP:INHERITORG and WP:ORGSIG: 'it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. All references are associated with the school, except for those documenting...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails ORGSIG, ORGCRITE, SIRS. No independent coverage in acceptable sources. Only available...

12 January 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, especially WP:RS. Also fails WP:ORGSIG. WidgetKid chat me 16:04, 14 January 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. Faila in...

which are used as sources on the page. Per the Wikipedia:Notability WP:ORGSIG page one factor for notability is the impact of the company on culture,...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORGSIG and WP:GNG. I failed to locate any reliable independent sources that explicitly...

in the absence of any significant coverage. An additional criteria in WP:ORGSIG for companies or products is to "consider whether they have had any significant...

notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORGSIG, "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education, see WP:ORGSIG + primary criteria for notability there. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 09:32, 30...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG; most of the contents are taken from company's website and others are from...

inherited notability, but a function of the core activity of that business, and ORGSIG applies. Visible online in-depth coverage is woeful (are there RS Indian...

in Hornberger's byline, the more inclined I am to think that it fails WP:ORGSIG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Delete Lacks significant coverage...

or tell us what to do is COI. Those opposing support a violation of WP:ORGSIG, ie. just because it exists it is notable. They would also claiming WP:INHERITORG...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG & WP:ORGSIG. I am unable to find any sources discussing this newspaper indepth. Darkness...

forum discussions. Thus I'd like to have a conversation and consider: WP:ORGSIG, 'No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization...

He fails even the musician notability requirements. WP:BASIC WP:BAND WP:ORGSIG He is only known for his suicide that led into a recent disbandment of that...

has held seats in parliament does not automatically confer notable (WP:ORGSIG). It does increase the chance that the party will meet WP:GNG, but at this...

a reliable source for WP:GNG. And so also fails WP:SIRS to overcome WP:ORGSIG Shaws username (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Delete this article...

16:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Hmm, I wouldn't say so, per WP:NSCHOOL and WP:ORGSIG. This one fails both primary criteria for organisations and WP:GNG. Timbouctou...

not. Ian Spackman (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC) To begin with, WP:ORGSIG: "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Delete. Does not even fit WP:ORGSIG, with little to no coverage in independent sources as well as the lack of...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No organization is considered inherently notable per WP:ORGSIG. The organization must have a effect on the society in order to consider...

these organizations seem notable enough for stand-alone articles per WP:ORGSIG – Epinoia (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

December 2025 (UTC) Keep, salvageable amount of sources to pass GNG and orgsig from a Google search, especially about their work for Arcade1Up. Go D. Usopp...

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC) Delete: Fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRITE, no valid secondary sourcing. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs)...

article on IARU should justify that we have this entry, which verges on WP:ORGSIG. Although the nominator appears to have withdrawn the nomination after the...

discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ORGSIG. I rescued source 4, and while it mentions Nacsport as being a leader in...

than lists of films. Guy (Help!) 13:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:ORGSIG. Like other small, regional film-critics groups that have been deleted,...

above by the creator and most of them are not even reliable so fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Delete--A...

(UTC) Delete - On it's own it doesn't meet established guidelines for WP:ORGSIG notability. There exists, however, some precedent for small schools to be...

14:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Are you sure about that? According to WP:ORGSIG, not organization inherits notability, even schools. I'm not asking this...

19:58, 8 February 2025 (UTC) Delete as not notable organization as per WP:ORGSIG. As an ATD the organization and one source could be viable (content) at...

media coverage that other organisations in Other continents may have. WP:ORGSIG"However, smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as...

listed as an unaided college) - not notable on its own - does not meet WP:ORGSIG or WP:NGO or WP:NSCHOOL - the "there must be sources" argument is not compelling...

Regardless of the creator—and the wishes of the creator—this has no impact on WP:ORGSIG or WP:INHERITORG. The topic has received minimal coverage, except for trivial...

2020 (UTC) Delete: Elementary schools are typically non-notable; per WP:ORGSIG (no inherent notability). Article also contains original research on instructors...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG - Cwobeel (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG and WP:NORG The Banner talk 08:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

exchange. This guideline in particular says that about inherent notability WP:ORGSIG. Also, notability is not inherited WP:INHERITORG. And, coverage of this...

June 2016 (UTC) Delete per fail of WP:GNG and WP:CORP, specifically WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...If the individual...

anyone says Keep because it is a pageant business, first prove it meets WP:ORGSIG please. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC) Comment. I hear your...

Montreal (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:ORGSIG which states "No company or organisation is considered inherently notable...

WP:DEPS & WP:RSP. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" as per WP:ORGSIG or significant coverage - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 00:33, 23 May...

article? Dfadden (talk) 05:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC) The paragraph of WP:ORGSIG that you partially quote above is about not disfavoring small businesses...

guideline that says that being a registered party makes a group notable? WP:ORGSIG says: No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

faculty members do not contribute to notability per WP:NOTINHERITED WP:ORGSIG. If it is WP:UNDUE to merge then it should be deleted rather than merged...

failing WP:ORGIND. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject lacks the WP:ORGSIG to meet the WP:NCORP. The only source currently in the article only briefly...

"significant...effects on culture, society...history, literature...education." (WP:ORGSIG) - the magazine was edited by bpNichol who won the Governor General's Award...

WP:PSTS. Some editors who removed previous PROD requests may have missed WP:ORGSIG point. It is clearly mentioned: "No company or organization is considered...

satisfies WP:GNG, notabilty is established. Company also satisfies WP:CORP,WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH and is by no means an advertising.--Inlandmamba (talk to...

while you may feel that they are valuable or important in some way, WP:ORGSIG notes that "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." No...

significant coverage in reliable, independent sources - does not meet WP:ORGSIG - cheers, Epinoia (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

therefore the company is notable. Evidence? A few passing mentions. But WP:ORGSIG. (3) Its "renowned" awards, and here the evidence seems to be something...

Wikipedia. AsmodeanUnderscore (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC) Uh... WP:ORGSIG, a policy, dictates that notability isn't inherent for organizations....

secondary sources that are independent of the subject." required per WP:ORGSIG. AusLondonder (talk) 13:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC) Weak Delete because...

sources? Absolutely. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, no organisation is inherently notable. And even if this company's services...

gives them an article outside the normal notability criteria. In fact, WP:ORGSIG claims that all kinds of organizations are held to the same standard. "No...

notability of games is not conferred upon the company that develops them per WP:ORGSIG. There are no mentions in book results. In the web results, there's an interview...

institution, contrary to the current notability guidelines WP:INHERITORG and WP:ORGSIG which have been introduced in WP:ORG since then. 17jiangz1 (talk) 18:10...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education as per WP:ORGSIG? Orange sticker (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2024 (UTC) "Notability" is not...

that just because it exist that it is notable, but that is contrary to WP:ORGSIG. Spshu (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Lack of sources with significant coverage on the company. Go D. Usopp (talk)...

kickboxing. WKA has had a measurable significant impact on sports as per WP:ORGSIG. Lethweimaster (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Notable, but needs...

June 2023 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NCORP, no inherent notability per WP:ORGSIG. WP:NOTADVERTISING. Netherzone (talk) 21:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC) Delete I...

has no established or inherent notability as an encyclopedia topic, WP:ORGSIG. The article should be deleted. Zefr (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC) References...

opening comment above, to avoid "trade press" and to not lose sight of WP:ORGSIG and how important it is that reliable sources independent of the organization...

that it's helped publish. But using that rhetoric almost seems like WP:ORGSIG, so unless someone else wants to comment on this I'll be striking my !vote...

significant seems forthcoming from the 'find sources' above. Not notable per WP:ORGSIG - see note: 'No inherent notability'. Acabashi (talk) 16:42, 29 January...

award although the award itself doesn't have a Wikipedia article. While WP:ORGSIG very much applies here, 2 conglomerates (Ambuja Neotia and IHCL) buying...

and most of WP:NCORP. The one area of NCORP that the topic may fail is WP:ORGSIG. I haven't come across any evaluation of the scope and impact of for example...

standard operating procedure is that no article is inherently notable (WP:ORGSIG), the article as it stands fails WP:N. Even WP:NHS states that high schools...

article, reads like a promotional brochure WP:NOTPROMOTION - does not meet WP:ORGSIG or WP:ORGCRITE - most of the references seem to be about topics covered...

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC) It also falls under WP:ORGSIG which expressly states " No organization is exempt from this requirement...

person does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG, WP:ENT, or WP:ORGSIG. That the article includes statements such as she is "rumored to want body...

company fails to meet any reasonable threshold in the second para of WP:ORGSIG Walkabout14 (talk) 04:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Weak keep The company has...

fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Please see WP:ORGSIG - your apparent argument that five-star hotels are inherently notable is...

very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable..." WP:ORGSIG – it may not even count as a political party as it is not listed at Election...

has been consistently rejected at AfDs you need to get consensus. Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

inclined to invoke WP:IAR here, of course. Also, quoting the guideline WP:ORGSIG: "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Note the related...

(talk) 12:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:COMPANY in particular WP:ORGSIG. MarnetteD|Talk 15:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per Tom and Gestrid.74...

-—Kvng 00:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC) That's true, but I suppose I've taken WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH into account too. Two of those sources (while obviously...

WP:CREATIVE when the author's work has received significant recognition. WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORP in general reiterate again and again that notability is not...

WP:NCORP nor WP:GNG criteria for notability. No inherent notability WP:ORGSIG. It's a run-of-the-mill strip mall, like thousands of others in the U.S...

inherently notable. That assertion is in fact directly contrary to policy, WP:ORGSIG which states "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...

it may fail V. Jclemens (talk) 22:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Delete. Per WP:ORGSIG: No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

Comment. Sure it's a small library in a small county, but according to WP:ORGSIG places with a demonstrable effect on local history, culture, education,...

respect to the claim that valuation makes a company notable per se, WP:ORGSIG notes that No company or organization is considered inherently notable....

when it conflicts with policy or guidelines, to respect the latter. WP:ORGSIG seems to directly contradict it, with "No company or organization is considered...

that is WP:NOTE I have been looking at WP:SPIP - WP:LISTN - WP:NRVE - WP:ORGSIG - and it would appear that all references are to other people and organisations...

meet the relevant notability criteria: it is not inherently notable (WP:ORGSIG), and the coverage (or lack thereof) in reliable sources fails the criteria...

criterion, and doesn't override the requirement for better sources: WP:ORGSIG explicitly says that "No company or organization is considered inherently...

WP:DEPS & WP:RSP. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

Fails GNG. Also, there is no inherent notability or inherited notability WP:ORGSIG. Steve Quinn (talk) 21:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Keep There are two articles...

because of their personal significance seems to be in opposition of WP:ORGSIG, which says that organizations (yes, schools and summer camps included)...

organization, which existed from 2010 to 2018, is simply not notable. It fails WP:ORGSIG. There is no evidence it ever did or achieved anything other than conduct...

WP:PROMO WP:NOTNEWS --Jersey92 (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Keep WP:ORGSIG "smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals...

2012 (UTC) "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." WP:ORGSIG. In the Wikipedia guidelines, the criteria for notability do not appear...

although noting that reliable sources exist mentioning the party, that WP:ORGSIG applies as other similar parties exist that advocate for the same things...

And as we all know, notability is not inherent, even for schools (see WP:ORGSIG and WP:NRVE), so that would make the case for keeping this really week....

them WP:TRIVCOV. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

failing WP:ORGIND. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

The main rationale for the nomination is that this organization fails WP:ORGSIG, specifically: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...

are primarily about a product of the company, the Shakealert app. Per WP:ORGSIG, notability is not inherited. Sources must have independent significant...

for the NES that is a short summary of a YouTube video. Doesn't pass WP:ORGSIG at its current state. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:37, 17 August 2025 (UTC) Note:...

years ago. North America1000 21:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Weak Keep WP:ORGSIG is questionable. Specifically "significant or demonstrable effects on culture...

department talk pages. --Zackmann08 (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2015 (UTC) WP:ORGSIG would seem to apply. If you disagree, I think that the talkpage of WP:N...

the Nestle article. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

above by the creator and most of them are not even reliable so fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Comment...

merging. Deus et lex (talk) 07:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC) That's irrelevant see WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG. But I can't see what you're actually proposing to merge...

Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGSIG. A couple of passing mentions, only in local journals doesn't count as "notability"...

WP:NOTMEMORIAL comes straight to mind. I don't feel WP:BIO has been met. Per WP:ORGSIG: "An organization may be notable, but individual members (or groups of members)...

whole better. --Moana122 (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC Delete per WP:ORGSIG. @Moana122: this organization has not received widespread, significant coverage...

secondary sources, it is not notable by Wikipedia's standards. Please see WP:ORGSIG. SJK (talk) 08:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Keep The seminary is not terribly...

addresses this "schools are inherently notable" argument by noting in WP:ORGSIG that "no company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

count. There's no inherent notability (e.g. for longevity) in WP:CORP - WP:ORGSIG. Are there any "any significant or demonstrable effects on culture.."? If...

WP:3REFS for further guidance) for signicant coverage. Additionally, WP:ORGSIG states that: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products...

Do you have sources please? Chidgk1 (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2025 (UTC) WP:ORGSIG is clear that no organization (of which political parties are included)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGIN, WP:ORGSIG. Reliable sources WP:RS and the article references do not support the extensive...

school has to be more notable than any other" I think you are missing WP:ORGSIG "No inherent notability" Local papers write about local schools, that is...

specific example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. - WP:ORGSIG states that "No company is considered inherently notable". Suggesting that...

to finish? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. WP:ORGSIG. Yes, the topic is significant (AIDS), but that doesn't guarantee that the...

December 2015 (UTC) Just because they exist, does not make them notable WP:ORGSIG. AlbinoFerret 03:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC) Not the applicable policy for...

utterly fail to understand here. Or do I seriously need to quote WP:ORGIN, WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG, all of which are pretty clear cut? Simply existing does...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIRS scope_creepTalk 21:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Note:...

venues are inherently notable. That would, however, be contradictory to WP:ORGSIG (no company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

15:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Only issue is the article needs to pass WP:ORGSIG. An organization doesn't have inherent notability, and while I appreciate...

unique, just a different version of existing services - does not meet WP:ORGSIG, the company has not "had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture...

article, and it also does not have any notability which fails it via WP:ORGSIG. Swordman97 talk to me 01:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

of the subject. No company is inherently notable on Wikipedia - see WP:ORGSIG. Please also read WP:BIGNUMBER. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:42, 9 January...

notability standard, leaving the existing guidelines—including NSCHOOLS and ORGSIG ("No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of...

sources establish that it existed, but that does not make it notable WP:ORGSIG The school does not pass WP:NSCHOOL. . Hmee2 (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2023...

reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it. — WP:ORGSIG (emphasis added) A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion...

Sorry, allow me to elaborate my position. The page is congruent with WP:ORGSIG, especially after the information I've added about their Top Drawer Collection...

rugged cell phones in the Netherlands but this alone is not enough. WP:ORGSIG asks for sources with in depth coverage that show that the company "had...

guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline, or both." As per WP:ORGSIG, schools are not exempt from the "No inherent notability" rule (i.e. it...

Neither of these cover the club in depth; they talk about the shows. WP:ORGSIG requires significant attention from independent sources, and photo captions...

school is not inherent of notability because it was established early per WP:ORGSIG. The school is not inheritable of notability because it has notable alumni...

WP:ORGIND. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources does not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

that sources exist but they cannot or will not be disclosed fails the WP:ORGSIG requirement that sources be demonstrated as opposed to simply being declared...

delete, it still fails GNG. No organizations are inherently notable (WP:ORGSIG). Being the police department of the city does not in any way establish...

argue that Golden Gate Ventures passes the benchmark Notability test WP:ORGSIG). Furthermore, the editor objects to the article on the basis that 'Wikipedia...

articles that are not only poor quality but fail to satisfy WP:GNG, and WP:ORGSIG such as non-notable bars and taverns, restaurants and entertainment venues...

with comprehension. Newimpartial (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG there is no inherent notability standard for companies on the basis of awards...

definition, notable" an argument that is directly in contravention of WP:ORGSIG which says "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...

for demonstrating the notability of an organization Shortcut WP:ORGSIGWP:ORGSIG Large organizations and their products are likely to have more readily available...

coverage. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 09:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ORGSIG. This correctly rules out inherent notability and goes on to state that...

requires that these are published, not that they are cited in the article. WP:ORGSIG: Parse's impact on fields of human endeavour has been documented already...

NSCOOLS (requiring significant coverage in independent, reliable sources) and ORGSIG ("No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

party is not inherently notable because it existed and ran candidates (WP:ORGSIG). Wikipedia is not a database for minor political parties and candidates...

category of sources. As per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, the sources do not establish WP:ORGSIG. In summary, I believe the presented sources does not fulfill WP:SIGCOV...

the activities of Lady Gaga and focus solely on the launch; this fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH as one WP:EVENT with little WP:EFFECT. As there is currently...

and Hole, and that they were spearheading vocational education. Clear WP:ORGSIG — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 12:03...

in good state is not in question nor is its value to the community. WP:ORGSIG says "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." No matter...

multiple independent reliable sources. Also meets significant impact as per WP:ORGSIG: Subject is demonstrably notable as a pioneer in its space and has had a...

the point? TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 08:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization...

has early contribution to humanities as a missionary establishment per WP:ORGSIG. The school is not inheritable of notability because it has notable alumni...

@Tobeme free: Feel free to provide better sources, but read this first: WP:ORGSIG. Ceosad (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC) TY Ceosad I've been busy the last...

cleaned it further. Jytdog (talk) 17:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC) delete perWP:ORGSIG. I don't see anything that makes this notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia...

not change the previous consensus, which, as stated at WP:NSCHOOLS and WP:ORGSIG, is that schools are not presumed notable and must, like most subjects,...

consistently rejected unevidenced and inherent claims of notability (WP:ORGSIG and WP:NRVE). Yet that's what's waved as justification for a lot of the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:ORGSIG and even WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:43, 26 July 2014 (UTC) Note: This...

addresses this "schools are inherently notable" argument by noting in WP:ORGSIG that "no company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

to finish? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2021 (UTC) Delete. WP:ORGSIG. Yes, the topic is significant (AIDS), but that doesn't guarantee that the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. Completely unsourced, and no coverage outside of the routine...

school has to be more notable than any other" I think you are missing WP:ORGSIG "No inherent notability" Local papers write about local schools, that is...

or famous in order to have an article on Wikipedia (which contradicts WP:ORGSIG)?--AirWolf talk 21:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC) @AirWolf: I can not think of...

or all of those mentions are primary quotes, aka not independent per WP:ORGSIG - "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance". Raladic (talk)...

15:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Only issue is the article needs to pass WP:ORGSIG. An organization doesn't have inherent notability, and while I appreciate...

or tell us what to do is COI. Those opposing support a violation of WP:ORGSIG, ie. just because it exists it is notable. They would also claiming WP:INHERITORG...

no mention of this company in reliable independent sources so fails WP:ORGSIG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC) Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --Piotr...

AFD for astrology this is an AFD for an astrological organization, see WP:ORGSIG - astrology being notable doesn't lead to astrological organizations being...

demonstrable effects on culture, society..." according to the section "No inherent notability" aka WP:ORGSIG. Philjones573 (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)...

15:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Only issue is the article needs to pass WP:ORGSIG. An organization doesn't have inherent notability, and while I appreciate...

There is no "established strong consensus" unless you're referring to WP:ORGSIG, which directly contradicts the speedy keep rationales; not a single "speedy...

than lists of films. Guy (Help!) 13:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:ORGSIG. Like other small, regional film-critics groups that have been deleted,...

consider in WP:ORGSIG, namely "whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects". According to the source, they have. WP:ORGSIG also says "Arbitrary...

(talk) 08:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:NSCHOOL or WP:ORGSIG - "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice...

coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") or WP:ORGSIG (no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment...

forum discussions. Thus I'd like to have a conversation and consider: WP:ORGSIG, 'No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization...

are primarily about a product of the company, the Shakealert app. Per WP:ORGSIG, notability is not inherited. Sources must have independent significant...

reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it. — WP:ORGSIG (emphasis added) A company, corporation, organization, school, team, religion...

March 2015 (UTC) There is nothing notable about this company as per WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH is marginal given that there are two articles about the...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication of notability. Fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIRS scope_creepTalk 21:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Note:...

merging. Deus et lex (talk) 07:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC) That's irrelevant see WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG. But I can't see what you're actually proposing to merge...

(talk) 12:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:COMPANY in particular WP:ORGSIG. MarnetteD|Talk 15:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Delete per Tom and Gestrid.74...

sources to establish Collegium Augustinianum as notable. Also delete per WP:ORGSIG. CookieMonster755 (talk) 04:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. Other then the fact that the company exists there is no indication of any...

that just because it exist that it is notable, but that is contrary to WP:ORGSIG. Spshu (talk) 17:00, 22 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

not enough "Deep or significant coverage" to satify WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:ORGSIG - there are two links in the article to press-release style stories about...

finance news pieces and passing mentions. Company is not notable, fails WP:ORGSIG, "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed...

with comprehension. Newimpartial (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG there is no inherent notability standard for companies on the basis of awards...

cleaned it further. Jytdog (talk) 17:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC) delete perWP:ORGSIG. I don't see anything that makes this notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia...

international law firm, but that by itself does also not establish notability (WP:ORGSIG. An internet search has not resulted in what can be considered significant...

WP:SIGCOV has been changed, and what I actually meant to link to now is WP:ORGSIG: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider...

that is WP:NOTE I have been looking at WP:SPIP - WP:LISTN - WP:NRVE - WP:ORGSIG - and it would appear that all references are to other people and organisations...

notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 13:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:ORGDEPTH. No significant coverage outside of the organisation's...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG; fails WP:ORGSIG "No company or organization is considered inherently notable." - 7 of the...

from academic journals, newspapers, and remodeling publications. Per WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGIND, and WP:ORGDEPTH. SWAloha (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2016 (UTC)...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication that it meets WP:ORGSIG Derek Andrews (talk) 10:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education, see WP:ORGSIG + primary criteria for notability there. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 09:32, 30...

while you may feel that they are valuable or important in some way, WP:ORGSIG notes that "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." No...

secondary sources, it is not notable by Wikipedia's standards. Please see WP:ORGSIG. SJK (talk) 08:12, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Keep The seminary is not terribly...

significant coverage in reliable, independent sources - does not meet WP:ORGSIG - cheers, Epinoia (talk) 01:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

guideline that says that being a registered party makes a group notable? WP:ORGSIG says: No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

and Hole, and that they were spearheading vocational education. Clear WP:ORGSIG — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 12:03...

and Argentina. Shellwood (talk) 07:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC) Delete - per WP:ORGSIG--Darius (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

staff and show that it exists. I'm looking at the second paragraph of WP:ORGSIG here, which calls for consideration of whether the company has had "significant...

notability standard, leaving the existing guidelines—including NSCHOOLS and ORGSIG ("No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of...

it seems that the organization has made an impact in their area. From WP:ORGSIG, --"When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please...

notability of games is not conferred upon the company that develops them per WP:ORGSIG. There are no mentions in book results. In the web results, there's an interview...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORG; not notable just because it exists WP:ORGSIG ZimZalaBim talk 17:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Regardless of the creator—and the wishes of the creator—this has no impact on WP:ORGSIG or WP:INHERITORG. The topic has received minimal coverage, except for trivial...

19 October 2021 (UTC) DELETE: Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Also fails to meet WP:ORGSIG.Advait (talk) 08:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

2020 (UTC) Delete: Elementary schools are typically non-notable; per WP:ORGSIG (no inherent notability). Article also contains original research on instructors...

WP:CREATIVE when the author's work has received significant recognition. WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORP in general reiterate again and again that notability is not...

faculty members do not contribute to notability per WP:NOTINHERITED WP:ORGSIG. If it is WP:UNDUE to merge then it should be deleted rather than merged...

however, there is no guideline for such a claim in WP:NORG (specifically WP:ORGSIG) and we must judge on GNG alone. As this is a travel-only team for the time...

16:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Hmm, I wouldn't say so, per WP:NSCHOOL and WP:ORGSIG. This one fails both primary criteria for organisations and WP:GNG. Timbouctou...

the many regions outside of Toronto confers inherent notability (see WP:ORGSIG). FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Delete - no indication...

kickboxing. WKA has had a measurable significant impact on sports as per WP:ORGSIG. Lethweimaster (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2022 (UTC) Keep Notable, but needs...

discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ORGSIG. I rescued source 4, and while it mentions Nacsport as being a leader in...

or famous in order to have an article on Wikipedia (which contradicts WP:ORGSIG)?--AirWolf talk 21:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC) @AirWolf: I can not think of...

trivial coverage or no mention at all. The topic is about a local chapter (WP:ORGSIG) of Liter of Light and it fails WP:ORG.. Initially, I tagged this article...

20:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC) - still pretty sketchy - not enough to satisgy WP:ORGSIG, "any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment...

anyone says Keep because it is a pageant business, first prove it meets WP:ORGSIG please. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC) Comment. I hear your...

its golden jubilee in 2015). Sionk (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC) WP:ORGSIG states "No company or organisation is considered inherently notable. No...

Chumbawamba - not notable enough for a stand-alone article - does not meet WP:ORGSIG - therefore, Redirect - Epinoia (talk) 00:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC) The above...

-—Kvng 00:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC) That's true, but I suppose I've taken WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH into account too. Two of those sources (while obviously...

however, there is no guideline for such a claim in WP:NORG (specifically WP:ORGSIG) and we must judge on GNG alone. As this is currently a travel-only team...

WP:3REFS for further guidance) for signicant coverage. Additionally, WP:ORGSIG states that: "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products...

guideline (WP:ORG) or the general notability guideline, or both." As per WP:ORGSIG, schools are not exempt from the "No inherent notability" rule (i.e. it...

when it conflicts with policy or guidelines, to respect the latter. WP:ORGSIG seems to directly contradict it, with "No company or organization is considered...

User:UrbanVillager. IMO UV's arguments are contradicted by WP:INHERITORG and WP:ORGSIG: 'it is not notable simply because other individual organizations of its...

that is unsourced. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No evidence of notability per WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. Article discusses non-noteworthy events that are common to educational...

WP:GNG and appears to violate WP:PROMO (or at least WP:ORGIND). See also WP:ORGSIG ("No company or organization is considered inherently notable"). Shelbystripes...

September 2015 (UTC). There is no default notability for schools. Please see WP:ORGSIG.- MrX 12:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:ORGSIG 195.50.217.92 (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Comment Completing nomination...

discussions. Rogermx (talk) 15:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:ORGSIG, as organizations are not inherently notable, and WP:NPOV, as it is written...

staff and show that it exists. I'm looking at the second paragraph of WP:ORGSIG here, which calls for consideration of whether the company has had "significant...

includes a school, and therefore is considered inherently notable as per WP:ORGSIG (being the exception to the rule "No company or organization is considered...

has held seats in parliament does not automatically confer notable (WP:ORGSIG). It does increase the chance that the party will meet WP:GNG, but at this...

31 May 2020 (UTC) Merge and redirect lack of reliable sources, fails WP:ORGSIG, merge to UTC is best option I think. Drat8sub (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2020...

person does not meet WP criteria for notability per WP:GNG, WP:ENT, or WP:ORGSIG. That the article includes statements such as she is "rumored to want body...

in good state is not in question nor is its value to the community. WP:ORGSIG says "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." No matter...

Spider) 20:18, 24 January 2021 (UTC) Delete – no significant coverage per WP:ORGSIG – the website www.tinizm.com is dead – one of their artists did win an award...

fixed. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:46, 22 June 2018 (UTC) Please see WP:ORGSIG - your apparent argument that five-star hotels are inherently notable is...

the area (http://amazingmelaka.com/) and a Foursquare check-in. Fails WP:ORGSIG. Liz Read! Talk! 19:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

which are used as sources on the page. Per the Wikipedia:Notability WP:ORGSIG page one factor for notability is the impact of the company on culture,...

very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable..." WP:ORGSIG – it may not even count as a political party as it is not listed at Election...

believe qualifies for own page, is only notable because brought by Hyatt WP:ORGSIG. I think page should be merged into Hyatt. NZ Footballs Conscience(talk)...

in multiple reliable secondary sources so does not meet WP:ORGCRIT or WP:ORGSIG - Epinoia (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom fails WP:GNG...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable corporation, per WP:CORP and WP:ORGSIG. Online reference is fleeting and simply an example of the industry of Oshawa...

Fails GNG. Also, there is no inherent notability or inherited notability WP:ORGSIG. Steve Quinn (talk) 21:09, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Keep There are two articles...

the activities of Lady Gaga and focus solely on the launch; this fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH as one WP:EVENT with little WP:EFFECT. As there is currently...

in the twelve years this stub has been dangling around. To quote from WP:ORGSIG: No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

the Nestle article. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

institution, contrary to the current notability guidelines WP:INHERITORG and WP:ORGSIG which have been introduced in WP:ORG since then. 17jiangz1 (talk) 18:10...

above by the creator and most of them are not even reliable so fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Delete--A...

seem to establish notability beyond being a franchise and NASCAR. Fail WP:ORGSIG as no company is considered inherently notable. Article contains mostly...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable as per WP:ORGSIG Peapod21 (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG. This company existed for less than 2 years before it was bought out and...

This is found in the WP:ORGDEPTH section of the diagram. Note that WP:ORGSIG says No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG & WP:ORGSIG. I am unable to find any sources discussing this newspaper indepth. Darkness...

fails WP:NOR. Syndicater (talk) 01:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - as per WP:ORGSIG ("If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

Wikipedia. AsmodeanUnderscore (talk) 23:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC) Uh... WP:ORGSIG, a policy, dictates that notability isn't inherent for organizations....

sources? Absolutely. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 09:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, no organisation is inherently notable. And even if this company's services...

they have had a significant effect on culture and entertainment, per WP:ORGSIG, but without the "Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGIN, WP:ORGSIG. Reliable sources WP:RS and the article references do not support the extensive...

WP:PSTS. Some editors who removed previous PROD requests may have missed WP:ORGSIG point. It is clearly mentioned: "No company or organization is considered...

is to the company's own website - not enough significant coverage per WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRIT, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - Epinoia (talk) 21:41, 26...

from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is": see WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG. It doesn't matter if you like this organization or think...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article's existence defies WP:ORGSIG. To play devil's advocate, there is coverage in the area in local magazines...

delete, it still fails GNG. No organizations are inherently notable (WP:ORGSIG). Being the police department of the city does not in any way establish...

argue that Golden Gate Ventures passes the benchmark Notability test WP:ORGSIG). Furthermore, the editor objects to the article on the basis that 'Wikipedia...

opening comment above, to avoid "trade press" and to not lose sight of WP:ORGSIG and how important it is that reliable sources independent of the organization...

Comment. Sure it's a small library in a small county, but according to WP:ORGSIG places with a demonstrable effect on local history, culture, education,...

inheriently notable. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

Mr RD 08:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC) That is not a valid argment per WP:ORGSIG. Notability depends purely on quality/depth of coverage; notability is not...

zero independent, reliable, secondary sources have been provided. Per WP:ORGSIG no company or organisations is inherently notable and per WP:INHERITORG...

rugged cell phones in the Netherlands but this alone is not enough. WP:ORGSIG asks for sources with in depth coverage that show that the company "had...

for demonstrating the notability of an organization Shortcut WP:ORGSIGWP:ORGSIG Large organizations and their products are likely to have more readily available...

during my most recent edits to the article. I suggest delete based on WP:ORGSIG or merge with Oculoplastics, although it seems to be well mentioned in that...

company fails to meet any reasonable threshold in the second para of WP:ORGSIG Walkabout14 (talk) 04:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Weak keep The company has...

Alex-h (talk) 12:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGSIG. The only two blue linked bands to have recorded on the label are blue links...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:ORGSIG, despite its claims of being the oldest speech and debate team in the United...

specific example of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. - WP:ORGSIG states that "No company is considered inherently notable". Suggesting that...

October 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:PROMO; no indications of notability nor WP:ORGSIG. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No organization is considered inherently notable per WP:ORGSIG. The organization must have a effect on the society in order to consider...

these organizations seem notable enough for stand-alone articles per WP:ORGSIG – Epinoia (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

in alot of news. Mahdiz (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORGSIG: [companies] should not have a stand-alone article in Wikipedia unless reliable...

any other or documents a significant effect it has had. Fails to meet WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:AUD, and WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2016...

whole better. --Moana122 (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC Delete per WP:ORGSIG. @Moana122: this organization has not received widespread, significant coverage...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG, WP:ORGCRITE or WP:ORGDEPTH - only local mention - has had no "significant...

inherited notability, but a function of the core activity of that business, and ORGSIG applies. Visible online in-depth coverage is woeful (are there RS Indian...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article fails WP:ORGSIG 195.50.217.92 (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC) Comment Completing nomination...

—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORGSIG and WP:GNG. I failed to locate any reliable independent sources that explicitly...

because of their personal significance seems to be in opposition of WP:ORGSIG, which says that organizations (yes, schools and summer camps included)...

notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 01:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:ORGSIG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfp777 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 28...

discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails ORGSIG, ORGCRITE, SIRS. No independent coverage in acceptable sources. Only available...

He fails even the musician notability requirements. WP:BASIC WP:BAND WP:ORGSIG He is only known for his suicide that led into a recent disbandment of that...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" per WP:ORGSIG - citations are about the take-over by SpartanNash and a crime (one-event...

significant seems forthcoming from the 'find sources' above. Not notable per WP:ORGSIG - see note: 'No inherent notability'. Acabashi (talk) 16:42, 29 January...

tagged this page two years ago as failing GNG for an organisation per WP:ORGSIG. Since then, there have been no improvements. The page is nothing more than...

14:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Are you sure about that? According to WP:ORGSIG, not organization inherits notability, even schools. I'm not asking this...

2012 (UTC) "Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." WP:ORGSIG. In the Wikipedia guidelines, the criteria for notability do not appear...

exchange. This guideline in particular says that about inherent notability WP:ORGSIG. Also, notability is not inherited WP:INHERITORG. And, coverage of this...

but it's not enough to establish notability per WP:ORG (specifically, WP:ORGSIG). There doesn't appear to be significant coverage, and definitely nothing...

things either by the organisation itself or closely related to it. See WP:ORGSIG. ~XyNqtc 15:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...

organisation and may be internet marketing activity to pull views against WP:ORGSIG has not also been covered in any secoundary source and is against WP:CORPDEPTH...

conference [4] One sentence in an article about a 2015 tech expo [5] WP:ORGSIG asks us "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please...

its does not meet WP:SIRS and there is no inherent notability as per WP:ORGSIG. The article has existed since 2007 but it is a pretty promo article for...

utterly fail to understand here. Or do I seriously need to quote WP:ORGIN, WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG, all of which are pretty clear cut? Simply existing does...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG - Cwobeel (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

• Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:COMPANY (WP:ORGSIG). Ignatzmice•talk 05:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Keep. Notable as it is a North...

topic. Fails GNG, CORPDEPTH, and ORGIND. Also, notability is not inherent (ORGSIG) and not inherited (INHERITORG). Article creation was 2009 so it has had...

athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education" as per WP:ORGSIG or significant coverage - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 00:33, 23 May...

December 2015 (UTC) Just because they exist, does not make them notable WP:ORGSIG. AlbinoFerret 03:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC) Not the applicable policy for...

(UTC) Delete - Fails to have a "demonstrable effect" as mentioned in WP:ORGSIG Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

respect to the claim that valuation makes a company notable per se, WP:ORGSIG notes that No company or organization is considered inherently notable....

standard operating procedure is that no article is inherently notable (WP:ORGSIG), the article as it stands fails WP:N. Even WP:NHS states that high schools...

WP:PROMO WP:NOTNEWS --Jersey92 (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC) Keep WP:ORGSIG "smaller organizations and their products can be notable, just as individuals...

(UTC) Delete - On it's own it doesn't meet established guidelines for WP:ORGSIG notability. There exists, however, some precedent for small schools to be...

definition, notable" an argument that is directly in contravention of WP:ORGSIG which says "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...

@Tobeme free: Feel free to provide better sources, but read this first: WP:ORGSIG. Ceosad (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC) TY Ceosad I've been busy the last...

subject meets WP:NGO. Independently notable with media coverage. No WP:ORGSIG & WP:INHERITORG inherit. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 14:58, 16 October 2019 (UTC)...

deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC) Delete Per WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

not. Ian Spackman (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC) To begin with, WP:ORGSIG: "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGSIG and appears to be self-promotional NottNott talk|contrib 15:33, 22 February...

notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. No independent reliable coverage apart from the organisation's...

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC) It also falls under WP:ORGSIG which expressly states " No organization is exempt from this requirement...

above by the creator and most of them are not even reliable so fails WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGDEPTH. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:50, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Comment...

And as we all know, notability is not inherent, even for schools (see WP:ORGSIG and WP:NRVE), so that would make the case for keeping this really week....

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG which states, "If the individual organization has received no or very little...

satisfies WP:GNG, notabilty is established. Company also satisfies WP:CORP,WP:ORGSIG and WP:CORPDEPTH and is by no means an advertising.--Inlandmamba (talk to...

organization fails to meet any of Wikipedia's notability guidelines (WP:ORGSIG) and it has had these issues since 2007. If anything had happened in the...

Sorry, allow me to elaborate my position. The page is congruent with WP:ORGSIG, especially after the information I've added about their Top Drawer Collection...

from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is": see WP:ORGSIG and WP:INHERITORG. It doesn't matter if you like this organization or think...

June 2016 (UTC) Delete per fail of WP:GNG and WP:CORP, specifically WP:ORGSIG: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...If the individual...

in the absence of any significant coverage. An additional criteria in WP:ORGSIG for companies or products is to "consider whether they have had any significant...

Arab interest fraternity", that is not enough to keep the article per WP:ORGSIG—"No company or organization is considered inherently notable."BriefEdits...

source. GMGtalk 18:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG or WP:ORGCRIT - it has not been "the subject of significant coverage in...

Hotel Management Institute, found only a single passing mention.[73]. WP:ORGSIG asks us to consider whether an organization has had any significant or demonstrable...

Montreal (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:ORGSIG which states "No company or organisation is considered inherently notable...

that sources exist but they cannot or will not be disclosed fails the WP:ORGSIG requirement that sources be demonstrated as opposed to simply being declared...

the point? TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 08:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Per WP:ORGSIG, No matter how "important" editors may personally believe an organization...

NSCOOLS (requiring significant coverage in independent, reliable sources) and ORGSIG ("No company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails notability. See WP:ORGSIG Jschnur (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

The main rationale for the nomination is that this organization fails WP:ORGSIG, specifically: "No company or organization is considered inherently notable...

WP:NOTMEMORIAL comes straight to mind. I don't feel WP:BIO has been met. Per WP:ORGSIG: "An organization may be notable, but individual members (or groups of members)...

consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. WP:ORGSIG states that no organization - including schools - has inherent notability...

@Mackensen: Thank you for your contribution. You are right. According to WP:ORGSIG a company is not inherently notable for being a stock carbuilder. I could...

coverage, including an in-depth article in Der Spiegel. Seems notable under WP:ORGSIG "whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture...

requires that these are published, not that they are cited in the article. WP:ORGSIG: Parse's impact on fields of human endeavour has been documented already...

certainly a large company, but that does not establish notability by itself (WP:ORGSIG). Fails WP:GNG. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Note:...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:EVENTCRIT, WP:ORGSIG and WP:ORGCRIT. Sourced either to the conference website itself, or directing...

gives them an article outside the normal notability criteria. In fact, WP:ORGSIG claims that all kinds of organizations are held to the same standard. "No...

years ago. North America1000 21:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Weak Keep WP:ORGSIG is questionable. Specifically "significant or demonstrable effects on culture...

TJRC (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC) Delete - no inherent notability WP:ORGSIG - no significant achievements or innovations or impact - references are...

that it's helped publish. But using that rhetoric almost seems like WP:ORGSIG, so unless someone else wants to comment on this I'll be striking my !vote...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable utility; does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG. Info can conceivably go on Lerwick Power Station article. —МандичкаYO 😜...

exactly as it would be if the coverage were totally positive. Under Wikipedia:ORGSIG the company does not appear to have had any significant culture, society...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) not fulfilling requirements for WP:ORGSIG QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 14:31, 29...

AFD for astrology this is an AFD for an astrological organization, see WP:ORGSIG - astrology being notable doesn't lead to astrological organizations being...

therefore the company is notable. Evidence? A few passing mentions. But WP:ORGSIG. (3) Its "renowned" awards, and here the evidence seems to be something...

Notability of an organization is not inherited through its members, per WP:ORGSIG. The new references are simply results of a Facebook search (primary sources...

count. There's no inherent notability (e.g. for longevity) in WP:CORP - WP:ORGSIG. Are there any "any significant or demonstrable effects on culture.."? If...

article, and it also does not have any notability which fails it via WP:ORGSIG. Swordman97 talk to me 01:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Ceethekreator (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG ("If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:ORGSIG, "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGSIG and WP:NORG The Banner talk 08:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

consistently rejected unevidenced and inherent claims of notability (WP:ORGSIG and WP:NRVE). Yet that's what's waved as justification for a lot of the...

demonstrable effects on culture, society..." according to the section "No inherent notability" aka WP:ORGSIG. Philjones573 (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)...

that the subject did in fact meet, in my judgement, a subsection of it, WP:ORGSIG. Providing over 500 surgeries for cleft lip and palate deformations plus...