DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

their opinions on Wikipedia policy via essays. Shortcuts WP:NOTSCANDALWP:NOTSCANDAL WP:NOTDRAMAWP:NOTDRAMA Scandalmongering, promoting things "heard through...

Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTSCANDAL Hkfilmbuff (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Keep, WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSCANDAL are not the excuses to delete...

Jaque Hammer (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Comment This person...

been difficult to find much encyclopedic content that is more than WP:NOTSCANDAL about Ali or related to her various allegations against a variety of other...

self-evident, uses biased sources using loaded language themselves, infringes WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SOAP, uses loaded quotes from random people who have no relevance...

the politician's article is the most coverage it should get with RS. WP:NOTSCANDAL applies here. Article written based on gossip and "scandal" of a person's...

Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56...

person. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC) Speedy Delete WP:NOTSCANDAL — Maile (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also agree...

Ovinus (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Delete, per WP:BLP and WP:NOTSCANDAL, e.g. Articles must not be written purely to attack the reputation of...

long lasting effects, have a place on Wikipedia. See WP:CRIME and WP:NOTSCANDAL. As such, I think deletion may be in order. Note that I created this article...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTNEWS. Per the WP:EVENT guideline, notability for this event...

America. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTSCANDAL. This is nothing more than childish name calling. — Maile (talk) 02:48...

content is centered on her divorce. On the note of the divorce, see WP:NOTSCANDAL. The only thing it doesn't have is notability. --Mpen320 (talk) 16:12...

Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Speedy Delete - WP:NOTSCANDAL "Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially...

problematic behaviors that need to be monitered more closely such as WP:NOTSCANDAL; WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND and WP:LIBEL and due to the limited and identical...

premise of "look how awful foo are behaving" are simply violations of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SOAPBOX. Having this as a standalone article is also a breach of...

(talk) 15:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP1E, WP:TABLOID and WP:NOTSCANDAL. No way this event meets the criteria at WP:Notability (events). Referencing...

articles. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL, part of WP:NOT, one of Wikipedia's core policies, which states that Wikipedia...

UtherSRG (talk) 12:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NRVE and WP:NOTSCANDAL. A search on Google yields results of mainly netizen opinion and gossip...

think you need to redirect this. See WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:NTEMP, WP:1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. This woman had sex with a royal and had a child out of wedlock. There...

commercial, political, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise. WP:NOTSCANDAL Scandal mongering, promoting things "…Articles and content about living...

"WP:NOT#NEWS WP:NOTSCANDAL") 22:02, 19 April 2011 (edit summary: "WP:NOT#NEWS WP:NOTSCANDAL") 22:05, 19 April 2011 (edit summary: "WP:NOT#NEWS WP:NOTSCANDAL") 22:08...

yer-in-legal-services-for-sex-scandal-probed-for-mishandling-money WP:NOTSCANDAL says that we should not promote things heard through the grapevine. The...

legit article. —МандичкаYO 😜 11:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL. The article is a WP:POVFORK of several other articles and serves no apparent...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSCANDAL the news paper citations comes under one time event as per WP:BLP1E Shrikanthv...

which is falsely presenting itself as a college...") fails WP:OR and WP:NOTSCANDAL, rather than editing it in this way it would have been better, IMO, to...

Wikipedia is being used as a grapevine broadcast vehicle contrary to WP:NOTSCANDAL. Whether those inserting the inappropriate material are working in concert...

events which never happened don't give subject an encyclopedic value. WP:NOTSCANDAL also applies here. Hitro talk 05:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Delete This...

Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL, — Maile (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC) @Maile66 That says "promoting...

07:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC) Comment How do those sources overcome WP:NOTSCANDAL? There does appear to be WP:BASIC/WP:GNG notability without an WP:UNDUE...

WP:SENSATION--Ben Ben (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Comment: Forgot to mention WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:ADVOCACY--Ben Ben (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Comment' WP:JUSTAPOLICY...

Delete Per WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:RECENTISM Simonm223 (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC) At a minimum, there's no way that WP:NOTSCANDAL can apply. It's...

scandal related to him and low-profile living people, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL, which is what I attempted to link to above in the first WP:NOT policy...

news coverage could later cause the article to skew towards failing WP:NOTSCANDAL. I suppose this concern of mine could be putting the cart before the horse;...

covered at all. James500 (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTSCANDAL - Not sure why Wikipedia should have an article that details sexual offences...

(UTC) Strong Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:SENSATION, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTSCANDAL. This is Wikipedia, not the Encyclopedia of Sensationalist News. To those...

that is clearly not going to happen. I would suggest a review of WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Leatherstocking (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC) Comment Wrong. As...

violates WP:NPA, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTANARCHY, WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:DISRUPT because it undermines the needed atmosphere of civility...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTSCANDAL This article lacks any verifiable biographical information because it...

written purely to attack the reputation of another person.”    ---WP:NOTSCANDAL ↜ (‘Just M E ’here , now) 23:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Keep He has played...

contentious content in the article appears to be based on scandal or gossip. WP:NOTSCANDAL The user who created this article was invited to gain consensus for new...

violates WP:NPA, WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTANARCHY, WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:DISRUPT because it undermines the needed atmosphere of civility...

notability as well as a neutral and balanced article according to WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:BLP policies support deletion at this time. Beccaynr...

pointed that out. You cited WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NOTSCANDAL. When is the last time you re-read NOTSCANDAL? It has five numbered points. So which of those...

and this appears to be an article that should be excluded per e.g. WP:NOTSCANDAL (which links to BLP policy), and WP:PROMO (what seems to remain after...

no neutral academic discourse on the subject, WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:OR, WP:NOTSCANDAL --Armatura (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Cullen328 (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. The allegations are well-sourced, so I don't know that this demands speedy...

this is WP:NOTNEWS. Sionk (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Merge - WP:NOTSCANDAL - Certainly not worthy of a stand-alone article. A big uproar so both...

utterly forgotten 2012 memoir"). I have also reviewed sources with WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:BLP policies in mind, and it does not seem possible to write a...

always vying for an interview with Modi's "secret" wife. Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL Redtigerxyz Talk 14:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

for and in addition: (10) Violates WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTANARCHY and WP:NOTSCANDAL undermining the needed atmosphere of civility and co-operation. And talk...

to SPEEDY DELETE: WP:ATTACK PAGE, and at minimum fails WP:COATRACK, WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:RECENTISM, and WP:NEGATIVESPIN. The following diffs support the aforementioned...

supported by brief bursts of tabloid-style coverage, but in a BLP, WP:NOTSCANDAL requires us to meet an especially high standard. I mentioned WP:MINORASPECT...

claims not being reflected with WP:NPOV in the body. (2) Violates WP:NOTSCANDAL / WP:NOTOPINION, giving undue weight and rehash upon rehash of the topic...

attack against a living person. WP:NOTSCANDAL. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTSCANDAL seeks to prohibit the use of Wikipedia...

John_Edwards_extramarital_affair and tell me that this scandal passes WP:NOTSCANDAL. John Edwards was just indicted by a federal grand jury. His name yields...

WP:DUEWEIGHT suggests that some mention should be given in the biography, but WP:NOTSCANDAL suggests that this type of content falls short of our goal of being a...

movement website. Is not really a "controversy" we have to remember WP:NOTSCANDAL. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC) I see...

important legal precedent, but was sadly a routine application of the law. WP:NOTSCANDAL/WP:NOTNEWS applies here. 4meter4 (talk) 07:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC) To...

policies such as WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, WP:NOTTEMPORARY, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:NOTSCANDAL to turn this clickbait material into Wikipedia articles. Crabtree's article...

from Alexandermcnabb) of BLP policy; and whether according to NOTNEWS, NOTSCANDAL, or NOTPROMO, the short burst of attention, the basis for that attention...

remotest resemblance to sensationalism or scandal mongering or gossip WP:NOTSCANDAL. It is neither 'infotainment' nor 'churnalism'. It is not the least bit...

expansion on the talk page. Resolute 20:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTSCANDAL applies here. Note that the policy for avoiding scandal mongering specifically...

Hasteur (talk) 04:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC) I think WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSCANDAL apply. Any attempt to add these allegations to Obama's article would fall...

Policies and guidelines that are violated in these diffs: WP:POV, WP:LR, WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:NEWSBLOG, and WP:TEND. It is evident that Loomspicker's purpose here...

reliable source, and such material is anyway inappropriate per WP:UNDUE, WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:BLP. Don't repeat such edits. Fences&Windows 00:29, 8 March 2010...

policies? is that content meets WP:NPOV, WP:CRIT, WP:NOTOPINION and WP:NOTSCANDAL? Is that acceptable to accusing the whole project's volunteers that they...

Wikipedia policies: [183] - WP:GRAVEDANCING [184] & [185] - WP:BLP(?), WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK I am mainly bringing this here to determine if there...

supposedly thought I was violating BLP. MrX had mentioned: Removed per WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:BLP. Heavy.com is not a reliable source and you can't use Wikipedia...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTSCANDAL. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC) I don't think the article...

Newspapers write information that is often subjective in nature (often WP:NOTSCANDAL - in the manner of how the candidate evaluations are presented in the...

content contrary to our policies and guidelines. The application of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTGOSSIP may also help trim content, and WP:NOTNEWS and its relationship...

have these types of detail-laden articles per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:NOTSCANDAL, but since this is the norm that has been embraced by the Wikipedia community...

cosmetically re-named "Death of Jeremiah Duggan" article runs afoul of WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Leatherstocking (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...

difficult: the article as it is written violates both WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTSCANDAL and to a lesser extent WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. While she's been well-covered...

pointed that out. You cited WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NOTSCANDAL. When is the last time you re-read NOTSCANDAL? It has five numbered points. So which of those...

and recruitment WP:NOTADVOCATE The promotion of a subject Scandals WP:NOTSCANDAL Scandals or gossip Scientific journal, not a WP:NOT PAPER WP:NOT PAPERS...

articles. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL, part of WP:NOT, one of Wikipedia's core policies, which states that Wikipedia...

commercial, political, religious, national, sports-related, or otherwise. WP:NOTSCANDAL Scandal mongering, promoting things "…Articles and content about living...

Delete Per WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:RECENTISM Simonm223 (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC) At a minimum, there's no way that WP:NOTSCANDAL can apply. It's...

Jaque Hammer (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Comment This person...

draft article, and find it to be precisely the sort of violation of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SENSATION that are disparaged by Wikipedia guidelines. I continue...

scandal related to him and low-profile living people, and Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL, which is what I attempted to link to above in the first WP:NOT policy...

edit summary: "remove rumors, anonymous allegations, and innuendo per WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:REDFLAG and WP:BLP" [90] The question here is whether the text is...

been difficult to find much encyclopedic content that is more than WP:NOTSCANDAL about Ali or related to her various allegations against a variety of other...

Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTSCANDAL Hkfilmbuff (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Keep, WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTSCANDAL are not the excuses to delete...

being used for blatant character assassination contrary to WP:BLP and WP:NOTSCANDAL. Andrew D. (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Your article was...

present a negative POV. It smells strongly like WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND and WP:NOTSCANDAL. Furthermore, the act of excluding information and presenting an article...

developing an article, particularly with sensationalized news coverage, the WP:NOTSCANDAL policy should be considered, because content about living people are required...

Wikipedia is being used as a grapevine broadcast vehicle contrary to WP:NOTSCANDAL. Whether those inserting the inappropriate material are working in concert...

events which never happened don't give subject an encyclopedic value. WP:NOTSCANDAL also applies here. Hitro talk 05:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Delete This...

anything but things Wikipedia is not, including: WP:NOTOPINION, WP:SOAP, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and I would also look at WP:NEWSORG to get a better understanding of...

(UTC) Strong Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, WP:SENSATION, WP:RECENTISM and WP:NOTSCANDAL. This is Wikipedia, not the Encyclopedia of Sensationalist News. To those...

anything but things Wikipedia is not, including: WP:NOTOPINION, WP:SOAP, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and I would also look at WP:NEWSORG to get a better understanding of...

cosmetically re-named "Death of Jeremiah Duggan" article runs afoul of WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Leatherstocking (talk) 20:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...

example). ౪ Santa ౪99° 20:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Delete — WP:BADIDEA WP:NOTSCANDAL inconsistent garbage with WP:BLPGOSSIP specious purpose to defame or denigrate...

(talk) 15:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:BLP1E, WP:TABLOID and WP:NOTSCANDAL. No way this event meets the criteria at WP:Notability (events). Referencing...

John_Edwards_extramarital_affair and tell me that this scandal passes WP:NOTSCANDAL. John Edwards was just indicted by a federal grand jury. His name yields...

self-evident, uses biased sources using loaded language themselves, infringes WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SOAP, uses loaded quotes from random people who have no relevance...

07:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC) Comment How do those sources overcome WP:NOTSCANDAL? There does appear to be WP:BASIC/WP:GNG notability without an WP:UNDUE...

premise of "look how awful foo are behaving" are simply violations of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SOAPBOX. Having this as a standalone article is also a breach of...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTSCANDAL This article lacks any verifiable biographical information because it...

content contrary to our policies and guidelines. The application of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTGOSSIP may also help trim content, and WP:NOTNEWS and its relationship...

UtherSRG (talk) 12:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NRVE and WP:NOTSCANDAL. A search on Google yields results of mainly netizen opinion and gossip...

to SPEEDY DELETE: WP:ATTACK PAGE, and at minimum fails WP:COATRACK, WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:RECENTISM, and WP:NEGATIVESPIN. The following diffs support the aforementioned...

Cullen328 (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. The allegations are well-sourced, so I don't know that this demands speedy...

written purely to attack the reputation of another person.”    ---WP:NOTSCANDAL ↜ (‘Just M E ’here , now) 23:39, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Keep He has played...

Ovinus (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC) Delete, per WP:BLP and WP:NOTSCANDAL, e.g. Articles must not be written purely to attack the reputation of...

gossip column (wp:notgossip) or in the business of scandal mongering (wp:notscandal) to garner an audience. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)...

self-evident, uses biased sources using loaded language themselves, infringes WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SOAP, uses loaded quotes from random people who have no relevance...

way. Polemics are contrary to WP:NOTADVOCATE, WP:NOTPROPAGANDA and WP:NOTSCANDAL. Andrew D. (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: So am I right...

WP:DUEWEIGHT suggests that some mention should be given in the biography, but WP:NOTSCANDAL suggests that this type of content falls short of our goal of being a...

movement website. Is not really a "controversy" we have to remember WP:NOTSCANDAL. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC) I see...

think you need to redirect this. See WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:NTEMP, WP:1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL. This woman had sex with a royal and had a child out of wedlock. There...

which is falsely presenting itself as a college...") fails WP:OR and WP:NOTSCANDAL, rather than editing it in this way it would have been better, IMO, to...

problematic behaviors that need to be monitered more closely such as WP:NOTSCANDAL; WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND and WP:LIBEL and due to the limited and identical...

important legal precedent, but was sadly a routine application of the law. WP:NOTSCANDAL/WP:NOTNEWS applies here. 4meter4 (talk) 07:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC) To...

being used for blatant character assassination contrary to WP:BLP and WP:NOTSCANDAL. Andrew D. (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Your article was...

person’s notoriety is due to recent terrorist activity: This violates WP:NOTSCANDAL. Additionally, the only reason for this article seems to be current events...

attack against a living person. WP:NOTSCANDAL. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTSCANDAL seeks to prohibit the use of Wikipedia...

Newspapers write information that is often subjective in nature (often WP:NOTSCANDAL - in the manner of how the candidate evaluations are presented in the...

draft article, and find it to be precisely the sort of violation of WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:SENSATION that are disparaged by Wikipedia guidelines. I continue...

policies such as WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, WP:NOTTEMPORARY, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:NOTSCANDAL to turn this clickbait material into Wikipedia articles. Crabtree's article...

effectively speculates what three individuals discussed over dinner WP:NOTSCANDAL - unless there's some radical story development that makes the content...

Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56...

long lasting effects, have a place on Wikipedia. See WP:CRIME and WP:NOTSCANDAL. As such, I think deletion may be in order. Note that I created this article...

WP:SENSATION--Ben Ben (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Comment: Forgot to mention WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:ADVOCACY--Ben Ben (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Comment' WP:JUSTAPOLICY...

gossip column (wp:notgossip) or in the business of scandal mongering (wp:notscandal) to garner an audience. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 00:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)...

supported by brief bursts of tabloid-style coverage, but in a BLP, WP:NOTSCANDAL requires us to meet an especially high standard. I mentioned WP:MINORASPECT...

have these types of detail-laden articles per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:NOTSCANDAL, but since this is the norm that has been embraced by the Wikipedia community...

legit article. —МандичкаYO 😜 11:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL. The article is a WP:POVFORK of several other articles and serves no apparent...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSCANDAL the news paper citations comes under one time event as per WP:BLP1E Shrikanthv...

remotest resemblance to sensationalism or scandal mongering or gossip WP:NOTSCANDAL. It is neither 'infotainment' nor 'churnalism'. It is not the least bit...

the politician's article is the most coverage it should get with RS. WP:NOTSCANDAL applies here. Article written based on gossip and "scandal" of a person's...

no neutral academic discourse on the subject, WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:OR, WP:NOTSCANDAL --Armatura (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

news coverage could later cause the article to skew towards failing WP:NOTSCANDAL. I suppose this concern of mine could be putting the cart before the horse;...

difficult: the article as it is written violates both WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTSCANDAL and to a lesser extent WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. While she's been well-covered...

contentious content in the article appears to be based on scandal or gossip. WP:NOTSCANDAL The user who created this article was invited to gain consensus for new...

person’s notoriety is due to recent terrorist activity: This violates WP:NOTSCANDAL. Additionally, the only reason for this article seems to be current events...

from biased sources. Wikipedia is not the place to air grievances WP:NOTSCANDAL, even if those involved are part of a class with the clout to have articles...

always vying for an interview with Modi's "secret" wife. Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL Redtigerxyz Talk 14:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

effectively speculates what three individuals discussed over dinner WP:NOTSCANDAL - unless there's some radical story development that makes the content...

from biased sources. Wikipedia is not the place to air grievances WP:NOTSCANDAL, even if those involved are part of a class with the clout to have articles...

way. Polemics are contrary to WP:NOTADVOCATE, WP:NOTPROPAGANDA and WP:NOTSCANDAL. Andrew D. (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) @Andrew Davidson: So am I right...

being a section concerning them and the event in another article. WP:NOTSCANDAL, which refers to BLP, is also relevant to some articles nominated for...

have been made, as in "operation mop-up," those should be included. WP:NOTSCANDAL applies here. --Leatherstocking (talk) 01:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC) I'd...

problems. Collect (talk) 00:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Endorse closure - WP:NOTSCANDAL (this is policy, not an essay like WP:SOLDIER) says "Articles must not...

of being featured in the WP:RS by name, with the exception of the WP:NOTSCANDAL stuff directly related to the identity theft of the human from New York...

(talk) 12:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC) To anyone else, the material is WP:NOTSCANDAL, scandal mongering section, about named people. How is it not a BLP violation...

censorship on the BAPS article [139][140] citing reasons such as "WP:NOTSCANDAL"[141] or claiming the source to be a paid news service in order to censor...

value to the BLP and should probably be removed per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTSCANDAL. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Its a bit backwards...

ungovernable nature of the victims". As such, I have pointed the account to WP:NOTSCANDAL, which states that "articles and content about living people are required...

This might have big consequences if it is confirmed [31]. However, WP:NOTSCANDAL. wumbolo ^^^ 18:47, 12 October 2018 (UTC) Weak oppose on quality only;...

reverted. Please compare the versions and judge which best complies with WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:BLP and other policies. With focus on the scandal vs Minimal coverage...

inaccurate, the section is not not written from a neutral POV and violates WP:NOTSCANDAL, the section has undue weight, and that there is existing consensus to...

(Help!) 12:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Massive issues with WP:NPOV and WP:NOTSCANDAL violation and a concerted effort by multiple editors to turn it into a...

covered at all. James500 (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTSCANDAL - Not sure why Wikipedia should have an article that details sexual offences...

problems. Collect (talk) 00:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Endorse closure - WP:NOTSCANDAL (this is policy, not an essay like WP:SOLDIER) says "Articles must not...

from Alexandermcnabb) of BLP policy; and whether according to NOTNEWS, NOTSCANDAL, or NOTPROMO, the short burst of attention, the basis for that attention...

WP:BLP policy trumps GNG in this case and WP:BLPCRIME (and more broadly WP:NOTSCANDAL) makes the language at CRIME more prescient even than that of GNG.4meter4...

no hard facts only rumors and gossip. I am reverting both them per WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:BLP. I have also posted to the editor's talk explaining all of...

troll tweet notable enough for an article, and when does it violate WP:NOTSCANDAL? This is probably more notable in Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk...

to WP:UNDUE, WP:AGEMATTERS, WP:NOTWEBHOST and possibly WP:LIVING & WP:NOTSCANDAL According to RS, the "subject matter" in Hersh's blog post includes unsubstantiated...

controversy 16:45, 3 October 2010 Senis (Removed tabloid gossip pieces under WP:NOTSCANDAL as they were not objective.) [14] 18:03, 3 October 2010 HiLo48 (Reverted...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Wikipedia is WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:NOTNEWS. Per the WP:EVENT guideline, notability for this event...

yer-in-legal-services-for-sex-scandal-probed-for-mishandling-money WP:NOTSCANDAL says that we should not promote things heard through the grapevine. The...

reliable source whether it applies to BLPs, dead people or corporations. WP:NOTSCANDAL. Pilaz (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC) This error wasn't present or...

content is centered on her divorce. On the note of the divorce, see WP:NOTSCANDAL. The only thing it doesn't have is notability. --Mpen320 (talk) 16:12...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA, and WP:NOTSCANDAL. I'm not sure why this wasn't Speedied. Nfitz (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2024...

and this appears to be an article that should be excluded per e.g. WP:NOTSCANDAL (which links to BLP policy), and WP:PROMO (what seems to remain after...

Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL, — Maile (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC) @Maile66 That says "promoting...

13:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC) [44] Is this addition unreliable per WP:NOTSCANDAL? It is sourced to an interview from the 1990's with a Sikh separatist...

Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC) Speedy Delete - WP:NOTSCANDAL "Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially...

November 2025 (UTC) What I'm also seeing are borderline violations of WP:NOTSCANDAL Scandalmongering, promoting things "heard through the grapevine" or gossiping...

this is WP:NOTNEWS. Sionk (talk) 22:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Merge - WP:NOTSCANDAL - Certainly not worthy of a stand-alone article. A big uproar so both...

America. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:40, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTSCANDAL. This is nothing more than childish name calling. — Maile (talk) 02:48...

claims not being reflected with WP:NPOV in the body. (2) Violates WP:NOTSCANDAL / WP:NOTOPINION, giving undue weight and rehash upon rehash of the topic...

02:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC) [3] Does this addition violate BLP per WP:NOTSCANDAL? It is sourced to an interview from the 1990's with a Sikh separatist...

have driven coverage around an otherwise routine recovery action; WP:NOTSCANDAL applies, and while some sources may be generally reliable, I think it...

previously discussed at the List of Scientologists article Talk page. Also, WP:NOTSCANDAL seems to be relevant in the context of this article - reproducing contentious...

because it’s published? Could this be viewed as a case of WP:SOAP and WP:NOTSCANDAL? While I understand that WP:FRUIT is an essay, does this imply that PR-driven...

utterly forgotten 2012 memoir"). I have also reviewed sources with WP:NOTSCANDAL and WP:BLP policies in mind, and it does not seem possible to write a...

notability as well as a neutral and balanced article according to WP:NOTSCANDAL, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:BLP policies support deletion at this time. Beccaynr...

person. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC) Speedy Delete WP:NOTSCANDAL — Maile (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also agree...

not in the references provided (WP:OR), and surrounding chat rooms (WP:NOTSCANDAL). The issue over libel, surrounds references appearing to contain libelous...

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTSCANDAL. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC) I don't think the article...

developing an article, particularly with sensationalized news coverage, the WP:NOTSCANDAL policy should be considered, because content about living people are required...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA, and WP:NOTSCANDAL. I'm not sure why this wasn't Speedied. Nfitz (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2024...

unless it affects our userbase directly, it shouldn't be. After all, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and we shouldn't be creating one, either. — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 04:40...

indicates that we should wait on the outcome of court cases. The policy WP:NOTSCANDAL also applies. And it's far from clear that this is any more significant...

news for example. As these are just allegations from many years ago, WP:NOTSCANDAL applies. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:36, 21 March 2026 (UTC) Comment: I have started...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA, and WP:NOTSCANDAL. I'm not sure what's to be gained here. At the same time - not here? Look...

article. Until then, Wikipedia articles are not a place for gossip, WP:NOTSCANDAL. TurboSuperA+(connect) 12:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Despite my disagreement...

/ un-cited information being added and runs the risk of violating WP:NOTSCANDAL and/or WP:NOTNEWS. Smallangryplanet (talk) 17:06, 21 September 2024 (UTC)...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA, and WP:NOTSCANDAL, Nfitz (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Could you clarify if you are...

WP:AVOIDVICTIM, WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:CRACKPOT, WP:TABLOID, WP:PROPAGANDA, and WP:NOTSCANDAL, Nfitz (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Could you clarify if you are...