DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

Gay in Violence against LGBT people). Shortcuts WP:NEOWP:NEO WP:NOTNEOWP:NOTNEO A neologism is a word that is still in the process of becoming accepted...

December 2023 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:NOTNEO. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 02:38, 26 December...

research. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, appears to be an effort to increase use of a neologism term, which is what...

orphan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Clear violation of WP:NOTNEO Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Keep - May be suitable...

January 2013 (UTC) Snow Delete: Not only that, but it also violates WP:NOTNEO and WP:ONEDAY. I also think that there's a possibility that it might be...

Google search, suggesting term has a very niche and insignficant use. See WP:NOTNEO. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Business people seem to...

WP:MADEUP. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO... also, agreed, Dr. Blofield- that would really let us not have to waste...

the requirements of WP:GNG have been met, and the concerns raised in WP:NOTNEO have been addressed—specifically, the article cites reliable secondary sources...

Lots of hits for holding them. Not a lot for explaining what they are. WP:NOTNEO--Savonneux (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Delete unfortunately and...

generous) it's undue. Roscelese (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per NOTNEO. The article does cite books which use the term, but one of these sources...

nomination is probably more about that side of things if its quoting WP:NOTNEO. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 15:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTNEO. If anything, this is a thinly-veiled advertisement for a conference slated...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The reason for deletion is WP:NOTNEO and WP:NOTDICT. The main coverage of this subject is the Oxford dictionary...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is very much in alignment of WP:NOTNEO. This NPOV-violating article fails GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:27, 24...

outside of the tax industry, it should not have its own article per WP:NOTNEO. Taxology is actually another word for taxonomy - [1][2] used since the...

(talk) 06:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Comment You may want to consider WP:NOTNEO which has to do with the notability of individual words as well. L3X1 (distænt...

for neologisms. Aneirinn (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO and WP:SYNTH (most sources are off-topic). WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:39, 16...

discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 18:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Delete NOTNEO. could be mentioned in Candian law articles. Or get a listing on Mush L3X1...

dictionary coverage)? Alsee (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC) More inclined to delete as...

up. — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Note:...

Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 13:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is...

this fails WP:NOTNEO BrigadierG (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Delete -- per nom. No RS discuss this term, only random blogs. NOTNEO is exactly the...

supposed meaning, "Loud Continuous Wonder". Delete per WP:V, WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. jonkerz ♠talk 02:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Currently sourced by a Wikia and a Youtube ref, and I imagine that's probably...

Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Just a neologism. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Delete As per above, WP:NEO...

words, it is a proprietary concept. Fails notability, WP:PROMOTION, and WP:NOTNEO. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy delete - cut and pasted...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO. Some use on the web (c. 500-600 Google hits), but no clear acceptance or...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO, WP:ONEDAY. Prod removed by Spawnvc, an editor name strikingly similar to...

with no traction. Mangoe (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO, no sources of any kind found. Sam Sailor 10:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Delete...

term in the slightest outside of a TVTropes page, meaning it violates WP:NOTNEO as likely just a neologism someone made up one day. It merits a discussion...

up only links back to or scrapes of this article. Fails WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. Narky Blert (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

others, independently of her usage. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Kelly hi! 21:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTNEO. 99.142.8.205 (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)...

determine. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 13:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. It's worth noting that the creator is still introducing new neologisms...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO. Got deleted via PROD 5 years ago as "subject is a neologism coined by author"...

article grounded in reliable WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Concerns relating to WP:NOTNEO can be addressed by performing a page move to a more appropriate title....

this "50 years" you mentioned. Source? As the policy on this question, WP:NOTNEO, mentions, "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding...

I really have to do this by AfD? This fails Wikipedia:MADEUP, Wikipedia:NOTNEO, WP:V, WP:N, WP:NOTDIC, and does not belong on WP. Fiftytwo thirty (talk)...

by others.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO applies here. I don't see any secondary sources analysing this term, not...

(UTC) @Ahwbof84: The topic of the draft is unsuitable for Wikipedia, see WP:NOTNEO. Worldbruce (talk) 18:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Lincolnspencer (talk ·...

PROD removed. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 10:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO and no evidence of notability. PaintedCarpet (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2011...

field). So the article topic fails WP:GNG and the article fails WP:RS and WP:NOTNEO. Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 19:49, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Delete While TKing is certainly...

12 November 2015 (UTC) Delete per nominator. First source fulfills WP:NOTNEO easily. FrameDrag (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Delete for now until...

07:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Delete Outside of my industry, but I think wp:NOTNEO /NOTDICTIONARY as well as the GNG would cover us here, pending sources being...

did come across this which isn't nothing, but this still seems to fail WP:NOTNEO. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

genre either had their article's deleted, or don't even list the genre. WP:NOTNEO applies as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC) The above...

via Google. --RDavi404 (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. This has purely local interest. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback)...

have caught on. -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTNEO/WP:MADEUP. Roscelese (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

Delete per above. --Kleinzach 08:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO; non-notable made up word. -MrFizyx (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Delete...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable neologism. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Kelly hi! 15:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO This appears to be a term used (meh) by people at times, but evidently in...

TWL) Seems to me like a neologism, so I think it should be deleted per WP:NOTNEO Ducknish (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC) This term has been in common parlance...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. It's worth noting that the creator is still introducing new neologisms...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDICT, WP:NOTNEO, no evidence that this abbreviation even exists in the wild. Prod removed...

proven not to be possible. Reyk YO! 09:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO WP:INUNIVERSE-only topic. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:15, 15 May...

discussions. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO and WP:NOTNEWS. A phrase that appeared in a one or two day news cycle is...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The definition of a term fails WP:NAD and WP:NOTNEO. Does not meet WP:GNG. Ochiwar (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Strong delete...

Wikipedia to increase usage of a neologism is a clear violation of policy (WP:NOTNEO). Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so this article should not be in Wikipedia...

(UTC) Delete per Cullen. Ansh666 02:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO, both Google Scholar and Google Books turn up zero hits for the term. Both...

08:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Delete per apparent failure to meet WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEO. -- Trevj (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Delete There are lots of 'C'...

double-PROD. Rationale for deletion: Wikipedia is not a dictionary and per WP:NOTNEO ("An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books...

Éireann 20:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. Falls under the category WP:NOTNEO. Tangurena (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Weak Keep Its a hellish stupid...

Wikipedia draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO made up terms that have no traction. You can make others up like Covidology;...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. The sources just refer to it being a new word. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:36...

neologism: most of the internet sources out there are self-published. Fails WP:NOTNEO and GNG. Altamel (talk) 20:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - A search for sources...

discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO, as in my original PROD nomination. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:42, 16 April 2012...

real phobia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Delete: as WP:NOTNEO. No references for a novel usage of a term. Don't see why it makes sense...

make a transition from a neologism to a widely circulated word. Read WP:NOTNEO. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 06:16, 7 October 2015...

about the term or concept ("not just sources that use the term", per WP:NOTNEO) are straightforward to find, such as news providers [1], [2] and books...

or reliable. Mkdwtalk 09:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Snow Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Source searches are providing zero coverage in reliable sources for this...

of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Delete: per WP:NOTNEO. DrStrauss talk 12:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

soup appears to be sourced entirely to the book that invented the term (WP:NOTNEO) and the blog posts and press releases of the author promoting it (WP:SPIP...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO - this simply hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources....

19:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Delete - Not a recognized genre. Potential WP:NOTNEO issue. Not meeting the WP:GNG regardless. Sergecross73 msg me 20:04, 30...

expansion. Basically just a neologism, which should be avoided for articles (WP:NOTNEO). A redirect would placate the people behind traffic to this term and semi-protection...

Yeah, this probably could have been speedy deleted but it should go for WP:NOTNEO anyway. Ducknish (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Delete As per WP:NOTNEO. It is just a political slogan with passing mentions in news articles. Keep...

18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage. Plus per WP:NOTNEO. SITH (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

HOAX that is being perpetuated by the internet. In any case, it fails WP:NOTNEO as not being used ANYWHERE ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:28, 25 April 2018...

was added at 20:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC). Comment: This falls under WP:NOTNEO for neologisms. It doesn't matter how widely or not-widely it's used. It's...

neologism that violates Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Per WP:NOTNEO "Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull...

discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Appears to be made up genre by a musician who uses it to describe his own...

this, nothing came up. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTNEO. A meta-neologism of sorts, repurposing 'chauvinism' to apply to a different...

articles here (although Summers might be notable enough for inclusion). WP:NOTNEO, WP:OR Zingarese talk · contribs 03:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC) Delete the article...

unreferenced.TheLongTone (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)...

notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 16:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)...

page documents an unnotable tumblr/twitter hashtag neologism (WP:NOTDIC/WP:NOTNEO), seemingly to promote the term. A relevant issue notice has been present...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTNEO. It's a term bandied about in the last day or so, and likely to never be...

Thanks, ✗plicit 11:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTNEO. The sources used are primarily tied to an independent blog that seemed...

JSTOR · TWL) The term Oprahization is clearly a neologism. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. 4meter4 (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Comment: True, it is a neologism...

(G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTNEO. Lack of reliable sources, the list of games that are included is WP:OR...

Contested PROD. The article violates the Wikipedia policy on neologisms WP:NOTNEO. There are not may reliable sources that use the term, and I could find...

https://www.techradar.com/opinion/total-experience-a-trend-for-future-business WP:NOTNEO implies at least three sources are needed, and I couldn't find two others...

Wikipedia to increase usage of the term "cultured resonance", contrary to WP:NOTNEO and/or to promote one author's view/usage of the term, contrary to WP:NOTPROMOTION...

enlighten me. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTNEO was what I was thinking of. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:32, 14 August...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Fails WP:NOTNEO and WP:NOTDICT... Wikipedia is not a dictionary and not the place for neologism...

it thattaway. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO. I also have doubts about the veracity of the article: the NY Times ref...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEO. The cited sources are passing mentions without significant coverage. Daask...

reliable source that actually uses this term. Delete as per WP:V and WP:NOTNEO Rusf10 (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC) The links in the article seem reliable...

fall under WP:NEO SYSS Mouse (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTNEO. Ducknish (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

regardless of potential hoax status the article should be deleted based on WP:NOTNEO since it seems to claim that the term is a rather recent invention. Ducknish...

Time Warp (song). Guy (Help!) 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Delete As per WP:NOTNEO. For a neologisms to be included it needs to be discussed and defined extensively...

― Padenton|✉   21:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A11, also WP:NOTNEO. This "phobia" isn't even listed at phobialist.com (not RS of course, but...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced. Fails WP:NOTNEO and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

significant discussion about the term, is not suitable for Wikipedia per WP:NOTNEO. /wia /tlk /cntrb 15:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Delete - Discrimination against...

it notable" (which reeks of circular reasoning). Please read WP:N and WP:NOTNEO. Tigraan (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Delete - even if the internet-famous...

Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. The author (who has a conflict of interest) would be advised to digest...

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Obvious failure of WP:NOTNEO. I can make up words and post them on my personal website too. Not even...

Delete Don't seem to be WP:RS that take this away from WP:FRINGE amd WP:NOTNEO. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Delete not-notable, also...

AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and possibly WP:NOTNEO. Where's the beef? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC) The...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTNEO, WP:PROMO ― Padenton|✉   01:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

links tidied.--Shirt58 (talk) 04:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Either that or redirect to Blithering idiot. Merge to List of Mitt Romney...

discussed as a a term in scholarly literature. It appears to fall under WP:NOTNEO and, even if it weren't a neologism, it would be barred through WP:DICTDEF...

Astrophysics Data System yields nothing of substance. In my opinion, the WP:NOTNEO test for neologisms applies here, and in 2023 that test is not passed. As...

WP:GNG, WP:DICDEF applies here. Given lack of sources, I'd also go for WP:NOTNEO on this one - one man's use of a word doesn't a word make. Alexandermcnabb...

use-mention distinction, a stated prerequisite in relevant policy like WP:NOTNEO. So it would make sense to delete/merge this one and keep the other one...

nominator seems to be have mistaken as the article is clearly WP:NOTNEO because WP:NOTNEO states that To support an article about a particular term or concept...

share their belief this was an intentional hoax.) Also seems to breach WP:NOTNEO. Having hunted around, few sources seem to use the phrase at all, and no...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. If its proven to be an important term that's used frequently, I guess it...

dictionary. Natureium (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Delete Per nom. Notneo it is. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Comment: I'll...

discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:NotNeo GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC) If it were in English...

hand, I believe "porn groove" is a protologism and would fall under WP:NOTNEO. Even the article's single source doesn't mention the term. Moreover, there...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possible violation of WP:NOTNEO. Unable to find any sources other than patents that even describe any concept...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTNEO. This subject does not in itself have enough notability to justify the existence...

independent of the subject. 93 (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO "NOTSENILOGISM" or possibly merge to Glossary of Star Trek terms, if there...

The subject has some existence but miserably fails WP:GNG. Also per WP:NOTNEO, WP:DESCRIBE. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 07:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Nomination...

Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:OR. I note too that this might fall under WP:NOTNEO as well. I also wonder whether the term "Nationalist Conservative" might...

Tosey is cited by 47. Both PURE and CLEAR date back to at least 1996, so NOTNEO does not apply either. Courtesy ping GermanJoe. Sam Sailor 07:11, 2 July...

North America1000 00:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:NOTNEO, & WP:NOTKNOWYOURMEME - GretLomborg (talk) 03:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Keep...

which this fails. If we look it as a definition of a neologism, then WP:NOTNEO applies, which states: "Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there...

referenced WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I should've been more specific and cited WP:NOTNEO (but that felt a bit too WP:BITE-y). If you have sources that I don't have...

2011 (UTC) Delete and Merge to 2011 Philadelphia Phillies season Per WP:NOTNEO, "articles on neologisms are commonly deleted ... To support an article...

2009, and despite searches, is clear that it is hardly used as yet. WP:NOTNEO does not completely forbid articles on neologisms - however, they would...

Neologism that has attracted some mainstream sourcing. As an exception to WP:NOTNEO "Merge" would be to "use the term within other articles". I have reservations...

content.) Roscelese (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO and Comment Data Cube and Juno are likely socks of article creator Pewterschmidt...

things. - GretLomborg (talk) 04:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOR and WP:NOTNEO apply here. DrStrauss talk 06:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

September 2017 (UTC) Delete While it is an interesting subject, I believe NOTNEO applies here. If a lot more people would write papers on the subject so...

"pogging" was invented yesterday, so this isn't a viable article either, per WP:NOTNEO. John of Reading (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2012 (UTC) The above is preserved...

both each other and the article ([1][2][3][4]). The topic seems to meet WP:NOTNEO, and point 6 of WP:DEL-REASON. I suggest replacing with a redirect to Pet#Domesticated...

published within a day of each other earlier this month. This makes WP:NOTNEO a valid reason for deletion. But, the existence of the trend might be a...

August 2012 (UTC) Keep and move to curb trading - "On the curb" raises WP:NOTNEO issues, but curb trading is more descriptive of the topic. Redirect New...

article about a neologism, these are commonly deleted, as is explained at WP:NOTNEO - Arjayay (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC) My business Page was by the...

Engineering. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Everything salvageable in this article is already covered in the Nanotechnology...

Synthesis Shrikanthv (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO: To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite...

Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per above, and WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 16:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Redirect. Could this be...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTNEO. "Safetyism" is a term coined by the authors of a 2018 book The Coddling...

--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 16:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Keep but rename per WP:NOTNEO. - The topic -- the Senator with the longest continuous service -- meets...

Tosey is cited by 47. Both PURE and CLEAR date back to at least 1996, so NOTNEO does not apply either. Courtesy ping GermanJoe and Nosebagbear. Sam Sailor...

to these events. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTNEO: Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull...

2009, and despite searches, is clear that it is hardly used as yet. WP:NOTNEO does not completely forbid articles on neologisms - however, they would...

neutral point of view. The article creator has a history of creating such NOTNEO articles. This[4] shows most of the pages created by the editor are on massacares...

because it is a WP:DICDEF. The other two might be true but run afowl of WP:NOTNEO. Suggest redirecting to Professional degree per WP:PAGEDECIDE/ WP:ATD.4meter4...

2016 (UTC) Redirect to Chinese American For the following reasons Per WP:NOTNEO No scholarly work even uses the term "Hokkien American" and "Hoklo American"...

that Biafran education is referred to as "Biafranedu"? Quoting from WP:NOTNEO, "Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments...

JSTOR · TWL) This stub-length definition of a supposed neologism fails WP:NOTNEO, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Sourcing is primarily student publications (see WP:RSSM)...

WP:SUSTAINED and WP:DEPTH as well as WP:SIGCOV with a possible detour into WP:NOTNEO. I strongly disagree with HumanxAnthro's characterisation of WP:NTEMP in...

deleted article) 1. The article was deleted as it is a neologism, per WP:NOTNEO. 2. Some admins may email you deleted articles, but this is unlikely if...

coined a new term"). The remainder of the guideline, and the policy WP:NOTNEO, explain why the article content and title are inappropriate, and I believe...

this are eith not reliable or not independent. E.g. this. Delete per WP:NOTNEO, WP:GNG, and bordering on WP:HOAX. Cbl62 (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)...

Thanks. JoseRolles (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) @JoseRolles: From WP:NOTNEO: Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull...

the term "cinematic television" does not have significant usage. Fails WP:NOTNEO. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC) You misunderstand,...

term (and so are the Sun and CNA linked above), so this falls under WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC) According to your notes above...

moving these days, this term has already passed the stage cautioned in WP:NOTNEO, while having reached the inclusion criteria: "To support an article about...

Should be either renamed "Conspiracy theories in the United States" per WP:NOTNEO (note that Wikipedia has no article on "Conspiracism" -- it's a redirect...

Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NOTNEO. The article is principally built from editorial pages and opinion pieces...

articles from 2011 when this phrase was used. Recommending delete per WP:NOTNEO. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

straightforward. Strikehold (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, "articles on neologisms are commonly deleted ... To support an article...

the literature. See use-mention distinction, as required in the policy WP:NOTNEO. बिनोद थारू (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Keep you can't suggest...

mainstream reporting. It may just not have caught on yet but even so WP:NOTNEO could also apply. Cheers. DN (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per...

not show long-term notability, and therefore is not in compliance with WP:NOTNEO. This seems appropriate for urbandictionary, not here. Their rationale on...

it will not be published, as it is not an encyclopedic article. Per WP:NOTNEO we generally don't host articles about neologisms, unless there is significant...

found at Anti-Zionism. Tarc (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTNEO. It's a neologism and there's no justification for inclusion. Ducknish (talk)...

viable search terms.--NØ 22:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom as WP:NOTNEO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per above points...

be different. Bmcollier (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO. This is a neologism which was first publishedpopularised in the NYT by...

speedy deletion? Thegreatluigi (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Delete. Not valid even...

pointed out by the "keeps" discuss the term itself in detail. (From WP:NOTNEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite...

notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO, which is policy. Cullen328 (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) The above...

support deletion don't appear to be applicable to redirects, including WP:NOTNEO, WP:COMMONNAME, and MOS:SUBMARINE. The main argument for deletion is that...

request of the nominator on my talk page, for what it's worth. These fail WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms that have little or no usage in reliable sources...

other than his publicity of the term, it would fall into a neologism WP:NOTNEO. "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite...

reliable sources. jmcw (talk) 08:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO. Jmcw37's keep comment above goes against WP:NOTE which says "articles should...

under this name hasn't been in included in the scientific discourse (WP:NOTNEO). Unless this specific formulation of the spectral method is covered by...

@MarkH21:I agree your point and they did not have in-depth coverage. But WP:NOTNEO is written that "To support an article about a particular term or concept...

Widefox; talk 17:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:LASTING and WP:NOTNEO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC) Even better. Widefox;...

does not even need to be used (although others say it is used), per WP:NOTNEO policy, as long as it clearly describes the topic. However, some of the...

the phrase. Thryduulf (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC) Delete per nom WP:NOTNEO. Was expecting to see some kind of product but no such thing. AngusWOOF...

18:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Do you think nominating this redirect for WP:NOTNEO makes sense then? 209.237.105.108 (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC) Delete...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article violates WP:NPOV, WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEO. Article is a partisan attempt to take a factual admission and inject pov...

article.[1] Neologisms require more to justify a Wikipedia article. WP:NOTNEO provides requirements, such as wide use, which Malamanteau lacks. Even the...

01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia policy is clear on this, per WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted"; the policy goes on to state...

WP:NEO. Aneirinn (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO. - Amigao (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Keep per ProgramT. Might...

"what does this word mean?"-type sites. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDICT and WP:NOTNEO. Narky Blert (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

violation of policy. Jojalozzo 21:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO and WP:OR, unless someone can add real references from some medical publications...

 (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  WP:NOTNEO. I don't mind slang terms being used for redirects, but this is overdoing...

needs to be overcome is meeting the inclusion criteria set forth by WP:NOTNEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite...

are examples. Anarchangel (talk) 10:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO: "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books...

luck. Echoedits67 (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTNEO. This was essentially a neologism that never caught on.4meter4 (talk) 06:11...

type of air pollution level back in 2010, so needs to be evaluated for WP:NOTNEO standards. [1] [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:36, 14 May 2018 (UTC) It...

May 2020 (UTC) Delete. CrazyBoy826 18:14, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC) Delete It's such a specific...

Based on what you presented, I do not see an indication that this passes WP:NOTNEO: A neologism is a word that is still in the process of becoming accepted...

WP:RS. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:56, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Delete as failed WP:NOTNEO neologism or foreign moniker. There are also non-notable people with this...

(UTC) Delete - For a number of reasons, the best of which is probably WP:NOTNEO. NickCT (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Weak Keep - After taking a closer...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ]  Redirect target doesn't match title meaning, WP:NOTNEO, WP:NOT#DICT #3, Google News search produces absolutely zero hits, google...

the requirements of WP:GNG have been met, and the concerns raised in WP:NOTNEO have been addressed—specifically, the article cites reliable secondary sources...

means that it's not a common enough term in the grand scheme of things. (WP:NOTNEO) Wikipedia isn't a way to increase usage of this term. It's just not really...

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC). Delete all per WP:NOTNEO. TSventon (talk) 08:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC) Keep them. They are used by...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete Per WP:NOTURBANDICT and WP:NOTNEO. There is no mention of this term in reliable sources or academic literature...

isn't in the article. –Davey2010Talk 19:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO unless it has regular usage on Coulter's show to be mentioned like The Rush...

and summarize the underlying concepts. So IMHO, it's not just case of NOTNEO, but also NOTDICT as it applies to synonyms. I'll also note that — due to...

outside Wikipedia (and sites that get their content from Wikipedia). WP:NOTNEO-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC) The two terms were created here:...

engines. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom as WP:NOTNEO. Revisit if PewDiePie makes it his catchphrase beyond a handful of mentions...

2016 (UTC) Redirect to Chinese American For the following reasons Per WP:NOTNEO No scholarly work even uses the term "Hakka American". When we have intersections...

this "50 years" you mentioned. Source? As the policy on this question, WP:NOTNEO, mentions, "An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding...

means at best this is a neologism, which is also not allowed as per WP:NOTNEO--Rusf10 (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Try this: A neologism is a relatively...

 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Delete all as above WP:NOTNEO. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Speedy Delete all These...

finding any results for it on third party search engines. Suspecting WP:NOTNEO issue with this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC) D=lete...

confusing redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:15, 2 May 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete - This is...

There is no standard definition, so we dealing with a neologism, and WP:NOTNEO. Definitions range from 1) being similar to a bug triage where new bugs...

(talk) 17:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC) The more specific advice on Neologisms is WP:NOTNEO - Arjayay (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC) Hi, I checked this video with...

Mangoe (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC) It is hard to support WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTNEO, or WP:NTEMP claims that it has a half-life of maybe a week when the meme...

Tosey is cited by 47. Both PURE and CLEAR date back to at least 1996, so NOTNEO does not apply either. Courtesy ping GermanJoe. Sam Sailor 07:11, 2 July...

is very obvious. Ca talk to me! 15:56, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Usage anywhere seems very sparse (only really found one outside source...

others, independently of her usage. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Kelly hi! 21:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTNEO. 99.142.8.205 (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)...

2018 (UTC) You're only making the issue worse with these neologisms WP:NOTNEO. Now you have to show references that each of the seasons are referred to...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | Stub breaks WP:NOTNEO; it should be a Wikitionary entry, not an article. The exception would be...

use this as a shortcut for Metroid Prime 3? I want to make sure it's WP:NOTNEO There could be a weak retarget to Triple prime which redirects to Prime...

article. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO and not mentioned. The neologism could be interpolated indefinitely; Santa...

forgotten to add this. This should be deleted per WP:NOTURBANDICT and WP:NOTNEO. I don't see coverage in reliable sources that this is a commonly accepted...

pointless creation. –Davey2010Talk 00:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO as "Covfefe Missile Crisis". AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:29, 14 March 2018...

or reliable. Mkdwtalk 09:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Snow Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Source searches are providing zero coverage in reliable sources for this...

Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 21:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Like I said in the last discussion, unless it's a synonym or misspelling...

@Padenton:.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC) @Tomwsulcer: Per WP:NOTNEO it's not enough if the term is used by media sources, it's what the sources...

2016 (UTC) Redirect to Chinese American For the following reasons Per WP:NOTNEO No scholarly work even uses the term "Hokkien American" and "Hoklo American"...

appears that WP:NOTNEO may also apply. GoingBatty (talk) 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC) How will we escape the Matrix if there's WP:NOTNEO? Oiyarbepsy (talk)...

Google search, suggesting term has a very niche and insignficant use. See WP:NOTNEO. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Business people seem to...

Synthesis Shrikanthv (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO: To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite...

the internet signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is...

there should be a new deletion criteria for db-essay or db-term per WP:NOTNEO which stops wasting people's time and deletes them on the spot if google...

nomination is probably more about that side of things if its quoting WP:NOTNEO. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 15:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...

does not accept Neologisms. You may want to try Wiktionary instead. See WP:NOTNEO RudolfRed (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC) @R.E. Cloninger: Whilst...

(talk) 06:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Comment You may want to consider WP:NOTNEO which has to do with the notability of individual words as well. L3X1 (distænt...

[1][2][3][4] -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, even if it is used to describe authentic Mexican food. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:38...

Wikipedia usually should not have articles on neologisms and the like (WP:NOTNEO), unless they are of high notability, which could not be shown in this case...

discussions. Babymissfortune 15:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Delete DicDef, NotNeo. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 23:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This...

coverage in reliable sources 1B: No specific guideline - but comes under WP:NOTNEO, which is a specific policy forbidding this sort of article Disagree - A...

independent of the subject. 93 (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO "NOTSENILOGISM" or possibly merge to Glossary of Star Trek terms, if there...

than here. Chamaemelum (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 00:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Weak merge or weak keep....

Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. The author (who has a conflict of interest) would be advised to digest...

Lots of hits for holding them. Not a lot for explaining what they are. WP:NOTNEO--Savonneux (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Delete unfortunately and...

occurrences were made up by the authors with different intended meanings. Note WP:NOTNEO. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Thank you for clarifying...

(G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Currently sourced by a Wikia and a Youtube ref, and I imagine that's probably...

research. — Charles Stewart (talk) 12:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, appears to be an effort to increase use of a neologism term, which is what...

of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — Delete: per WP:NOTNEO. DrStrauss talk 12:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

nominator seems to be have mistaken as the article is clearly WP:NOTNEO because WP:NOTNEO states that To support an article about a particular term or concept...

significant discussion about the term, is not suitable for Wikipedia per WP:NOTNEO. /wia /tlk /cntrb 15:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Delete - Discrimination against...

"what does this word mean?"-type sites. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDICT and WP:NOTNEO. Narky Blert (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO and WP:NOTNEWS. A phrase that appeared in a one or two day news cycle is...

be different. Bmcollier (talk) 06:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO. This is a neologism which was first publishedpopularised in the NYT by...

up. — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Note:...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Possible violation of WP:NOTNEO. Unable to find any sources other than patents that even describe any concept...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Fails WP:NOTNEO and WP:NOTDICT... Wikipedia is not a dictionary and not the place for neologism...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. It's worth noting that the creator is still introducing new neologisms...

was added at 20:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC). Comment: This falls under WP:NOTNEO for neologisms. It doesn't matter how widely or not-widely it's used. It's...

Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOT, namely, WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 00:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Again, this is not a...

outside of the tax industry, it should not have its own article per WP:NOTNEO. Taxology is actually another word for taxonomy - [1][2] used since the...

WP:MADEUP. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO... also, agreed, Dr. Blofield- that would really let us not have to waste...

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Obvious failure of WP:NOTNEO. I can make up words and post them on my personal website too. Not even...

neutral point of view. The article creator has a history of creating such NOTNEO articles. This[33] shows most of the pages created by the editor are on...

Time Warp (song). Guy (Help!) 14:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC) Delete As per WP:NOTNEO. For a neologisms to be included it needs to be discussed and defined extensively...

precisely, some people have tried this, and have all failed). Please see WP:NOTNEO for more information. --ColinFine (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Hi...

generous) it's undue. Roscelese (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per NOTNEO. The article does cite books which use the term, but one of these sources...

discussions. Babymissfortune 15:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Delete DicDef, NotNeo. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 23:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This...

via Google. --RDavi404 (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. This has purely local interest. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback)...

this, nothing came up. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTNEO. A meta-neologism of sorts, repurposing 'chauvinism' to apply to a different...

links tidied.--Shirt58 (talk) 04:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Either that or redirect to Blithering idiot. Merge to List of Mitt Romney...

2016 (UTC) Redirect to Chinese American For the following reasons Per WP:NOTNEO No scholarly work even uses the term "Hakka American". When we have intersections...

TWL) Seems to me like a neologism, so I think it should be deleted per WP:NOTNEO Ducknish (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC) This term has been in common parlance...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO, WP:ONEDAY. Prod removed by Spawnvc, an editor name strikingly similar to...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO. Some use on the web (c. 500-600 Google hits), but no clear acceptance or...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTNEO, WP:PROMO ― Padenton|✉   01:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

by others.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO applies here. I don't see any secondary sources analysing this term, not...

straightforward. Strikehold (talk) 21:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOTNEO, "articles on neologisms are commonly deleted ... To support an article...

published within a day of each other earlier this month. This makes WP:NOTNEO a valid reason for deletion. But, the existence of the trend might be a...

that refutes your comment. This has been mentioned above. [27] I think WP:NOTNEO is the most relevant part of policy here. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 14:25, 10...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:NOTNEO. If anything, this is a thinly-veiled advertisement for a conference slated...

things. - GretLomborg (talk) 04:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOR and WP:NOTNEO apply here. DrStrauss talk 06:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDICT, WP:NOTNEO, no evidence that this abbreviation even exists in the wild. Prod removed...

it thattaway. Bearian (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO. I also have doubts about the veracity of the article: the NY Times ref...

have caught on. -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTNEO/WP:MADEUP. Roscelese (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

Wikipedia usually should not have articles on neologisms and the like (WP:NOTNEO), unless they are of high notability, which could not be shown in this case...

neologism: most of the internet sources out there are self-published. Fails WP:NOTNEO and GNG. Altamel (talk) 20:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Delete - A search for sources...

Wikipedia to increase usage of a neologism is a clear violation of policy (WP:NOTNEO). Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so this article should not be in Wikipedia...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. The sources just refer to it being a new word. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:36...

expansion. Basically just a neologism, which should be avoided for articles (WP:NOTNEO). A redirect would placate the people behind traffic to this term and semi-protection...

(UTC) Delete - For a number of reasons, the best of which is probably WP:NOTNEO. NickCT (talk) 17:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Weak Keep - After taking a closer...

articles from 2011 when this phrase was used. Recommending delete per WP:NOTNEO. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

@MarkH21:I agree your point and they did not have in-depth coverage. But WP:NOTNEO is written that "To support an article about a particular term or concept...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO This appears to be a term used (meh) by people at times, but evidently in...

discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 18:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Delete NOTNEO. could be mentioned in Candian law articles. Or get a listing on Mush L3X1...

18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC) Delete per Squeamish Ossifrage. Plus per WP:NOTNEO. SITH (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

--Anonymous209.6 (talk) 16:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Keep but rename per WP:NOTNEO. - The topic -- the Senator with the longest continuous service -- meets...

under this name hasn't been in included in the scientific discourse (WP:NOTNEO). Unless this specific formulation of the spectral method is covered by...

January 2017 (UTC) Delete as it seems to me to perhaps qualify under WP:NOTNEO. I don't see anything specifically indicating that the topic has received...

neologism that violates Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Per WP:NOTNEO "Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull...

HOAX that is being perpetuated by the internet. In any case, it fails WP:NOTNEO as not being used ANYWHERE ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:28, 25 April 2018...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NOTNEO. It's a term bandied about in the last day or so, and likely to never be...

Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOT, namely, WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 00:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Again, this is not a...

does not even need to be used (although others say it is used), per WP:NOTNEO policy, as long as it clearly describes the topic. However, some of the...

coined a new term"). The remainder of the guideline, and the policy WP:NOTNEO, explain why the article content and title are inappropriate, and I believe...

I really have to do this by AfD? This fails Wikipedia:MADEUP, Wikipedia:NOTNEO, WP:V, WP:N, WP:NOTDIC, and does not belong on WP. Fiftytwo thirty (talk)...

Thanks. JoseRolles (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC) @JoseRolles: From WP:NOTNEO: Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull...

discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Appears to be made up genre by a musician who uses it to describe his own...

reliable sources. jmcw (talk) 08:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO. Jmcw37's keep comment above goes against WP:NOTE which says "articles should...

the term "cinematic television" does not have significant usage. Fails WP:NOTNEO. -- Wikipedical (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC) You misunderstand,...

discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. If its proven to be an important term that's used frequently, I guess it...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The definition of a term fails WP:NAD and WP:NOTNEO. Does not meet WP:GNG. Ochiwar (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Strong delete...

history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Delete; neologism (WP:NOTNEO). Parent article has been PRODded. The artists mentioned in the deleted...

referenced WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I should've been more specific and cited WP:NOTNEO (but that felt a bit too WP:BITE-y). If you have sources that I don't have...

which this fails. If we look it as a definition of a neologism, then WP:NOTNEO applies, which states: "Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there...

discussions. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTNEO. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

field). So the article topic fails WP:GNG and the article fails WP:RS and WP:NOTNEO. Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 14:05, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia policy is clear on this, per WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted"; the policy goes on to state...

make a transition from a neologism to a widely circulated word. Read WP:NOTNEO. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. --Fauzan✆ talk✉ mail 06:16, 7 October 2015...

unlikely to pass review, none of the sources mention the word. Guidance at WP:NOTNEO. As to your question, see WP:AUTO and WP:MOVE. But as I said, if you move...

found at Anti-Zionism. Tarc (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTNEO. It's a neologism and there's no justification for inclusion. Ducknish (talk)...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO - this simply hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources....

@Padenton:.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 09:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC) @Tomwsulcer: Per WP:NOTNEO it's not enough if the term is used by media sources, it's what the sources...

Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Delete As per WP:NOTNEO. It is just a political slogan with passing mentions in news articles. Keep...

19:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC) Delete - Not a recognized genre. Potential WP:NOTNEO issue. Not meeting the WP:GNG regardless. Sergecross73 msg me 20:04, 30...

Delete per above. --Kleinzach 08:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO; non-notable made up word. -MrFizyx (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC) Delete...

term (and so are the Sun and CNA linked above), so this falls under WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC) According to your notes above...

violation of policy. Jojalozzo 21:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Delete as per WP:NOTNEO and WP:OR, unless someone can add real references from some medical publications...

each other and the article ([28][29][30][31]). The topic seems to meet WP:NOTNEO, and point 6 of WP:DEL-REASON. I suggest replacing with a redirect to Pet#Domesticated...

content.) Roscelese (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO and Comment Data Cube and Juno are likely socks of article creator Pewterschmidt...

enlighten me. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTNEO was what I was thinking of. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:32, 14 August...

JSTOR · TWL) The term Oprahization is clearly a neologism. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. 4meter4 (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC) Comment: True, it is a neologism...

notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 16:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)...

means that it's not a common enough term in the grand scheme of things. (WP:NOTNEO) Wikipedia isn't a way to increase usage of this term. It's just not really...

PROD removed. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 10:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO and no evidence of notability. PaintedCarpet (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2011...

unreferenced.TheLongTone (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)...

Contested PROD. The article violates the Wikipedia policy on neologisms WP:NOTNEO. There are not may reliable sources that use the term, and I could find...

discussions. Scopecreep (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO, as in my original PROD nomination. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:42, 16 April 2012...

2011 (UTC) Delete and Merge to 2011 Philadelphia Phillies season Per WP:NOTNEO, "articles on neologisms are commonly deleted ... To support an article...

proven not to be possible. Reyk YO! 09:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTNEO WP:INUNIVERSE-only topic. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:15, 15 May...

(G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NOTNEO. Lack of reliable sources, the list of games that are included is WP:OR...

page documents an unnotable tumblr/twitter hashtag neologism (WP:NOTDIC/WP:NOTNEO), seemingly to promote the term. A relevant issue notice has been present...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article violates WP:NPOV, WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEO. Article is a partisan attempt to take a factual admission and inject pov...

September 2017 (UTC) Delete While it is an interesting subject, I believe NOTNEO applies here. If a lot more people would write papers on the subject so...

January 2017 (UTC) Delete as it seems to me to perhaps qualify under WP:NOTNEO. I don't see anything specifically indicating that the topic has received...

not show long-term notability, and therefore is not in compliance with WP:NOTNEO. This seems appropriate for urbandictionary, not here. Their rationale on...

respected news websites, and such like. You can read more about this at WP:NOTNEO. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC) You could try submitting...

genre either had their article's deleted, or don't even list the genre. WP:NOTNEO applies as well. Sergecross73 msg me 19:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC) The above...

article.[16] Neologisms require more to justify a Wikipedia article. WP:NOTNEO provides requirements, such as wide use, which Malamanteau lacks. Even the...

with no traction. Mangoe (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO, no sources of any kind found. Sam Sailor 10:44, 6 April 2019 (UTC) Delete...

and summarize the underlying concepts. So IMHO, it's not just case of NOTNEO, but also NOTDICT as it applies to synonyms. I'll also note that — due to...

Éireann 20:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Delete. Falls under the category WP:NOTNEO. Tangurena (talk) 21:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC) Weak Keep Its a hellish stupid...

fall under WP:NEO SYSS Mouse (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOTNEO. Ducknish (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

12 November 2015 (UTC) Delete per nominator. First source fulfills WP:NOTNEO easily. FrameDrag (talk) 19:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Delete for now until...

North America1000 00:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:NOTNEO, & WP:NOTKNOWYOURMEME - GretLomborg (talk) 03:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC) Keep...

The subject has some existence but miserably fails WP:GNG. Also per WP:NOTNEO, WP:DESCRIBE. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 07:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Nomination...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEO. The cited sources are passing mentions without significant coverage. Daask...

Thanks, ✗plicit 11:30, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOTNEO. The sources used are primarily tied to an independent blog that seemed...

better question is, if these sources don't establish notability and WP:NOTNEO what kind of sources do? Valoem talk contrib 20:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)...

that refutes your comment. This has been mentioned above. [48] I think WP:NOTNEO is the most relevant part of policy here. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 14:25, 10...

August 2012 (UTC) Keep and move to curb trading - "On the curb" raises WP:NOTNEO issues, but curb trading is more descriptive of the topic. Redirect New...

did come across this which isn't nothing, but this still seems to fail WP:NOTNEO. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 22:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

hand, I believe "porn groove" is a protologism and would fall under WP:NOTNEO. Even the article's single source doesn't mention the term. Moreover, there...

08:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Delete per apparent failure to meet WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEO. -- Trevj (talk) 09:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Delete There are lots of 'C'...

words, it is a proprietary concept. Fails notability, WP:PROMOTION, and WP:NOTNEO. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC) Speedy delete - cut and pasted...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTNEO. Got deleted via PROD 5 years ago as "subject is a neologism coined by author"...

reliable source that actually uses this term. Delete as per WP:V and WP:NOTNEO Rusf10 (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC) The links in the article seem reliable...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOTNEO. This subject does not in itself have enough notability to justify the existence...

dictionary. Natureium (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Delete Per nom. Notneo it is. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC) Comment: I'll...

Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC) Just a neologism. Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Delete As per above, WP:NEO...

dictionary coverage)? Alsee (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Egsan Bacon (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC) More inclined to delete as...

BrendonTheWizard (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Delete or Merge due to WP:NOTNEO and WP:RECENTISM. There is no evidence this word will be in use in a few...

Wikipedia to increase usage of the term "cultured resonance", contrary to WP:NOTNEO and/or to promote one author's view/usage of the term, contrary to WP:NOTPROMOTION...

better question is, if these sources don't establish notability and WP:NOTNEO what kind of sources do? Valoem talk contrib 20:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)...

supposed meaning, "Loud Continuous Wonder". Delete per WP:V, WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. jonkerz ♠talk 02:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

up only links back to or scrapes of this article. Fails WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. Narky Blert (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Delete Don't seem to be WP:RS that take this away from WP:FRINGE amd WP:NOTNEO. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Delete not-notable, also...

articles here (although Summers might be notable enough for inclusion). WP:NOTNEO, WP:OR Zingarese talk · contribs 03:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC) Delete the article...

based on my searches, it looks to be a reference to some kind of meme. WP:NOTNEO.) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Delete, looks like...

it notable" (which reeks of circular reasoning). Please read WP:N and WP:NOTNEO. Tigraan (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Delete - even if the internet-famous...

07:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Delete Outside of my industry, but I think wp:NOTNEO /NOTDICTIONARY as well as the GNG would cover us here, pending sources being...

double-PROD. Rationale for deletion: Wikipedia is not a dictionary and per WP:NOTNEO ("An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books...

Yeah, this probably could have been speedy deleted but it should go for WP:NOTNEO anyway. Ducknish (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

sources I found (and also suggest that an AfD might be in order per WP:NOTNEO). If I weren't able to find any reliable sources substantiating the existence...

because they are attempts to increase usage of a term (said in policy WP:NOTNEO), and I think for the same rationale it would be inappropriate to add 'macacagate'...

― Padenton|✉   21:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#A11, also WP:NOTNEO. This "phobia" isn't even listed at phobialist.com (not RS of course, but...

regardless of potential hoax status the article should be deleted based on WP:NOTNEO since it seems to claim that the term is a rather recent invention. Ducknish...

04:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC) Comment. Yes, that is entirely true. From WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often...

(UTC) Delete per Cullen. Ansh666 02:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Delete as WP:NOTNEO, both Google Scholar and Google Books turn up zero hits for the term. Both...

Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOTDIC and WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 19:49, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Delete While TKing is certainly...

but newly-invented and not yet established, word like this. See also WP:NOTNEO and WP:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)...

possibly merged into Rachel Dolezal. As many have noted, this fails WP:NOTNEO. There is also no evidence that any attention to this term will extend beyond...

possibly merged into Rachel Dolezal. As many have noted, this fails WP:NOTNEO. There is also no evidence that any attention to this term will extend beyond...

coverage in reliable sources 1B: No specific guideline - but comes under WP:NOTNEO, which is a specific policy forbidding this sort of article Disagree - A...

means at best this is a neologism, which is also not allowed as per WP:NOTNEO--Rusf10 (talk) 22:19, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Try this: A neologism is a relatively...

04:23, 28 July 2011 (UTC) Comment. Yes, that is entirely true. From WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms are commonly deleted, as these articles are often...

(talk) 10:40, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Merge with Light rail. Clearly fails WP:NOTNEO. We don't invent English language terms.4meter4 (talk) 13:54, 22 August...

the grounds that they either did only mention the term (thus failing WP:NOTNEO) or that they didn't meet WP:SIGCOV standards; these points were only weakly...

25 September 2023 (UTC) I'm going to be bold and suggest this fails WP:NOTNEO. There is no doubt that Sagan wrote the "extraordinary claims" statement...

Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 08:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NOTNEO conerns and Northamerica1000.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 01:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)...

BrendonTheWizard (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC) Delete or Merge due to WP:NOTNEO and WP:RECENTISM. There is no evidence this word will be in use in a few...

common usage to refer to sporks in that way, which there isn't. See also WP:NOTNEO for more details. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Weak keep. Meh...

article grounded in reliable WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Concerns relating to WP:NOTNEO can be addressed by performing a page move to a more appropriate title....

Llll5032 (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC) Adding: The PAGs about neologisms, WP:NOTNEO and MOS:NEO (respectively, within the cautionary "Wikipedia is not a dictionary"...

little to no usage in reliable sources are not suitable for inclusion per WP:NOTNEO. Tollens (talk) 19:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC) Delete - You make a good point...

WP:SUSTAINED and WP:DEPTH as well as WP:SIGCOV with a possible detour into WP:NOTNEO. I strongly disagree with HumanxAnthro's characterisation of WP:NTEMP in...

the grounds that they either did only mention the term (thus failing WP:NOTNEO) or that they didn't meet WP:SIGCOV standards; these points were only weakly...

that this article warrants deletion on the basis of "violates WP:NOTNEO" as WP:NOTNEO mentions "To support an article about a particular term or concept...

December 2023 (UTC) Delete Violates WP:NOTNEO. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 02:38, 26 December...

secondary sources then it could pull itself out of WP:NOTNEO. As is, seems like textbook WP:NOTNEO. However, I strongly agree with Lijil that pejorative...

needs to be overcome is meeting the inclusion criteria set forth by WP:NOTNEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite...

May 2023 (UTC) Delete. If anywhere, this is a matter for wiktionary (WP:NOTNEO). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC) Keep: Doesn't match any...

for neologisms. Aneirinn (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO and WP:SYNTH (most sources are off-topic). WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 20:39, 16...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is very much in alignment of WP:NOTNEO. This NPOV-violating article fails GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:27, 24...

JSTOR · TWL) This stub-length definition of a supposed neologism fails WP:NOTNEO, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Sourcing is primarily student publications (see WP:RSSM)...

this fails WP:NOTNEO BrigadierG (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Delete -- per nom. No RS discuss this term, only random blogs. NOTNEO is exactly the...

mainstream reporting. It may just not have caught on yet but even so WP:NOTNEO could also apply. Cheers. DN (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per...

soup appears to be sourced entirely to the book that invented the term (WP:NOTNEO) and the blog posts and press releases of the author promoting it (WP:SPIP...

WP:GNG, WP:DICDEF applies here. Given lack of sources, I'd also go for WP:NOTNEO on this one - one man's use of a word doesn't a word make. Alexandermcnabb...

Neologism that has attracted some mainstream sourcing. As an exception to WP:NOTNEO "Merge" would be to "use the term within other articles". I have reservations...

AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and possibly WP:NOTNEO. Where's the beef? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC) The...

(talk) 10:40, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Merge with Light rail. Clearly fails WP:NOTNEO. We don't invent English language terms.4meter4 (talk) 13:54, 22 August...

discussed as a a term in scholarly literature. It appears to fall under WP:NOTNEO and, even if it weren't a neologism, it would be barred through WP:DICTDEF...

Astrophysics Data System yields nothing of substance. In my opinion, the WP:NOTNEO test for neologisms applies here, and in 2023 that test is not passed. As...

notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO, which is policy. Cullen328 (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) The above...

luck. Echoedits67 (talk) 18:55, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NOTNEO. This was essentially a neologism that never caught on.4meter4 (talk) 06:11...

Engineering. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTNEO. Everything salvageable in this article is already covered in the Nanotechnology...

this are eith not reliable or not independent. E.g. this. Delete per WP:NOTNEO, WP:GNG, and bordering on WP:HOAX. Cbl62 (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)...

Mangoe (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC) It is hard to support WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTNEO, or WP:NTEMP claims that it has a half-life of maybe a week when the meme...

Fails WP:GNG and possibly WP:OR. I note too that this might fall under WP:NOTNEO as well. I also wonder whether the term "Nationalist Conservative" might...

Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per above, and WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 16:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Redirect. Could this be...

https://www.techradar.com/opinion/total-experience-a-trend-for-future-business WP:NOTNEO implies at least three sources are needed, and I couldn't find two others...

use-mention distinction, a stated prerequisite in relevant policy like WP:NOTNEO. So it would make sense to delete/merge this one and keep the other one...

than here. Chamaemelum (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NOTNEO. Sergecross73 msg me 00:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Weak merge or weak keep....

WP:NOTMUISOD WP:NOTMYJOB WP:NOTNAS WP:NOTNAS-ETHNIC WP:NOTNDN WP:NOTNEEDED WP:NOTNEO WP:NOTNEUTRAL WP:NOTNEW WP:NOTNLT WP:NOTNOTABLE WP:NOTNOTBUREAU WP:NOTNOTBUREAUCRACY...

Based on what you presented, I do not see an indication that this passes WP:NOTNEO: A neologism is a word that is still in the process of becoming accepted...

Llll5032 (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC) Adding: The PAGs about neologisms, WP:NOTNEO and MOS:NEO (respectively, within the cautionary "Wikipedia is not a dictionary"...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unsourced. Fails WP:NOTNEO and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

because it is a WP:DICDEF. The other two might be true but run afowl of WP:NOTNEO. Suggest redirecting to Professional degree per WP:PAGEDECIDE/ WP:ATD.4meter4...

protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | Stub breaks WP:NOTNEO; it should be a Wikitionary entry, not an article. The exception would be...

WP:NEO. Aneirinn (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NOTNEO. - Amigao (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2025 (UTC) Keep per ProgramT. Might...

moving these days, this term has already passed the stage cautioned in WP:NOTNEO, while having reached the inclusion criteria: "To support an article about...

the literature. See use-mention distinction, as required in the policy WP:NOTNEO. बिनोद थारू (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC) Keep you can't suggest...

Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NOTNEO. The article is principally built from editorial pages and opinion pieces...

25 September 2023 (UTC) I'm going to be bold and suggest this fails WP:NOTNEO. There is no doubt that Sagan wrote the "extraordinary claims" statement...