DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

this spammy and non-neutral article for two reasons. Reason 1: WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was created through undisclosed paid editing by Alexandra...

(talk!) 20:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Slow-delete or incubate per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or WP:G11. APerson may think the article can be easily fixed, but...

This would be most unwise, for one major reason. The article fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; so it should be deleted, not merged. It reads like a puff piece created...

inclusion criteria. I doubt that CBM met them either. Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and per our general notability guideline. (Dear non-Wikipedian visitors:...

article was forbidden when created, and is still forbidden today, per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Article was first created by a man who is a secret paid advocate (a...

M4DU7 (talk) 03:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Looks like an undisclosed paid PR piece. —Unforgettableid (talk) 04:43...

Draft:Axcient (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION, appears to have been written by a WP:UPE, and continues to be unilaterally...

self-promotion. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or WP:G11. There's a reasonable chance that clinic itself is notable...

it is under deletion or it is already deleted. Possible reason WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Hypergio (talk) 03:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 04:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. I suspect that the subject of the article was never notable. —Unforgettableid...

company and lacks any valid RS. I requested a speedy deletion as to WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Tyros1972 Talk 10:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Delete. The only link that...

admins: Please delete the Comindware Tracker article per WP:NOPAY and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Reason 2: ISTM that this product fails WP:AUD, which says that "attention...

not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2...

appears to be written for promotion and/or advertisement according to WP:NOTFORPROMOTION Tyros1972 Talk 01:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

owner of this 46-employee company. Please delete because it fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. (I suspect it also fails WP:AUD.) —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:14, 23...

this spammy and non-neutral article for two reasons. Reason 1: WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was created through undisclosed paid editing by Alexandra...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I nominate this puff piece for deletion per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION, which disallows the writing of promotional articles, and per WP:NOPAY...

articles, not press releases. Please delete, or at least draftify, per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. B) It doesn't matter if Andersen is the biggest US window manufacturer...

is forbidden on Wikipedia. Please delete per the others and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

MurielMary (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom,...

not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2...

Thailand. It seems to me that these five unbalanced articles all fail WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and WP:NPOV and so should be deleted. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:55...

without what can be considered as promotion according to Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. Galobtter is right there are not much sources for MetaShare on the...

not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2...

there are two possible reasons to delete this article: WP:RS and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Let me first quote from what User:Stalwart111 wrote about a sister...

deletes it. It's time for us to delete the article. Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or per WP:IAR. Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:31, 20 August...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. TimothyJosephWood 23:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Dream Focus is mistaken; a mention in the old weekly version of Scientific...

specific problem points, please email me privately. Please delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. And now, a note for the Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION.. Of course, it's still a single-primary-source topic, so it should...

Response*Campaigning section is promotional and in breach of Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION above, heightened by it being largely (if not entirely) unsourced -...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. See Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for the policy on this. A7. No indication of importance (individuals...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION (per WP:G11). Colin M (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC) fwiw, I...

Draftification would be inadequate here. Please delete per WP:ORG and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. If deletion is impossible, let's merge our article into Broward County...

WP:NOTPROMOTION --Lenticel (talk) 00:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Delete per NOTFORPROMOTION. This parody is not officially tied to the series in any way or form...

coverage not found. Please delete [edit: or draftify] per WP:NCORP and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Thank you! [Edit: The article was created by User:Justincone's single-purpose...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION" therefore keeping advertising even if Draftspace is not negotiable...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION" (emphasis in original), and I really don't see that at all - it's...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

articles, not press releases. Please delete, or at least draftify, per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. B) It doesn't matter if Andersen is the biggest US window manufacturer...

under CSD G11, for being too promotional. The relevant policy is WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. That mention of their name will have alerted the deleting administrator...

this spammy and non-neutral article for two reasons. Reason 1: WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was created through undisclosed paid editing by Alexandra...

subjective claim of WP:G11, but the policy on this is on Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for which there are five subtopics. I assume the objection here is...

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Dream Focus is mistaken; a mention in the old weekly version of Scientific...

This would be most unwise, for one major reason. The article fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION; so it should be deleted, not merged. It reads like a puff piece created...

notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 04:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. I suspect that the subject of the article was never notable. —Unforgettableid...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION.. Of course, it's still a single-primary-source topic, so it should...

inclusion criteria. I doubt that CBM met them either. Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and per our general notability guideline. (Dear non-Wikipedian visitors:...

admins: Please delete the Comindware Tracker article per WP:NOPAY and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Reason 2: ISTM that this product fails WP:AUD, which says that "attention...

this spammy and non-neutral article for two reasons. Reason 1: WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was created through undisclosed paid editing by Alexandra...

article was forbidden when created, and is still forbidden today, per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Article was first created by a man who is a secret paid advocate (a...

without what can be considered as promotion according to Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. Galobtter is right there are not much sources for MetaShare on the...

Response*Campaigning section is promotional and in breach of Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION above, heightened by it being largely (if not entirely) unsourced -...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION" which is what the CSD guidelines requires. Your first option would...

deletes it. It's time for us to delete the article. Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or per WP:IAR. Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:31, 20 August...

not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2...

M4DU7 (talk) 03:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Looks like an undisclosed paid PR piece. —Unforgettableid (talk) 04:43...

MurielMary (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom,...

it is under deletion or it is already deleted. Possible reason WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Hypergio (talk) 03:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

coverage not found. Please delete [edit: or draftify] per WP:NCORP and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Thank you! [Edit: The article was created by User:Justincone's single-purpose...

Draftification would be inadequate here. Please delete per WP:ORG and WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. If deletion is impossible, let's merge our article into Broward County...

(talk!) 20:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Slow-delete or incubate per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or WP:G11. APerson may think the article can be easily fixed, but...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. TimothyJosephWood 23:01, 8 September 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I nominate this puff piece for deletion per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION, which disallows the writing of promotional articles, and per WP:NOPAY...

subjective claim of WP:G11, but the policy on this is on Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for which there are five subtopics. I assume the objection here is...

Thailand. It seems to me that these five unbalanced articles all fail WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and WP:NPOV and so should be deleted. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:55...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION (per WP:G11). Colin M (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2019 (UTC) fwiw, I...

not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2...

is forbidden on Wikipedia. Please delete per the others and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. See Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for the policy on this. A7. No indication of importance (individuals...

appears to be written for promotion and/or advertisement according to WP:NOTFORPROMOTION Tyros1972 Talk 01:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

specific problem points, please email me privately. Please delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. And now, a note for the Thailand Convention and Exhibition Bureau...

self-promotion. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or WP:G11. There's a reasonable chance that clinic itself is notable...

deletes it. It's time for us to delete the article. Delete per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION and/or per WP:IAR. Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:31, 20 August...

company and lacks any valid RS. I requested a speedy deletion as to WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. Tyros1972 Talk 10:25, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Delete. The only link that...

owner of this 46-employee company. Please delete because it fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. (I suspect it also fails WP:AUD.) —Unforgettableid (talk) 01:14, 23...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." This article might have put too much emphasis on one brand (Bancor)...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION" (as per WP:G11). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2017...

a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. See Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for the policy on this. What is being promoted is clearly a point of...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION"? RoySmith's explanation for the deletion here was "Cryptocurrency...

189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 197. Do either WP:CSD#G11 or Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION require a complete rewrite from scratch? G11 says it should be applied...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

circulation". The article could be merged, though — except that it fails WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. The article reads like a puff piece created by a paid editor. It's...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

requirements for BLP in my opinion. This also is a clear Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION violation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Searine (talk • contribs)...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." This article might have put too much emphasis on one brand (Bancor)...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION" (as per WP:G11). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2017...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. See Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION for the policy on this. What is being promoted is clearly a point of...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced...

would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION"? RoySmith's explanation for the deletion here was "Cryptocurrency...