DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

Wikipedia works by building consensus. When conflicts arise, they are resolved through discussion, debate and collaboration. While not forbidden, polls...

anymore discussion). I'm also disregarding one contribution because of WP:NOTAVOTE. I don't believe a third re-list would give this debate a clearer consensus...

"Notmindspillage", who commented that she would "enthusiastically cast notavote for notacandidate, whose notleadership and notdirection will serve the...

00:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Someone should delete NOTAVOTE as it is only ever quoted by...

familiarize with the above-mentioned policies along with WP:RfC and WP:NOTAVOTE before participating in the RfCs.) If no coverage or only ROUTINE coverage...

2017 (UTC) Comment Not sure where these IPs have come from but I added {{notavote}} to the top. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:14, 20 November 2017...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:NOTAVOTE applies; the arguments in favor of retaining the article are stronger than...

CSD category. Shadowjams (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTAVOTE (that was a joke btw). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete...

edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. I am invoking NOTAVOTE here and discounting several fairly obvious sock votes. The WP:PAG based...

(talk) 21:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC) delete per previous discussion and WP:NOTAVOTE Hhkohh (talk) 22:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC) Delete for performance reasons...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep vote above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:18, 28 November...

result was delete. This is not the strongest consensus but invoking WP:NOTAVOTE, I believe the weight of WP:PAG based argument comes down in favor of deletion...

September 2019 (UTC) Keep. MacCready (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:48, 18 September...

(UTC) Delete and salt jesus, not again. To expand on my rationale since NOTAVOTE- the company is, despite the extensive past efforts of marketing companies...

elections, 2008 Ijanderson977 (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC) As this is WP:NOTAVOTE, so could you explain you reasoning for why this fails the WP:N notability...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. I am invoking WP:NOTAVOTE here. While the !votes are pretty much tied the weight of argument, especially...

of the discussion was jailify." The wikilawyer jumps from his chair. "NOTAVOTE!" The judge shakes her head: "CONSENSUS has been reached." "REVERT!" exclaims...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Taking into account WP:NOTAVOTE, the arguments for deletion are stronger than those for keeping the page...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:NOTAVOTE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Swings-N-Things (edit | talk |...

2016 (UTC) Keep. Gryffindor (talk) 22:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:NOTAVOTE. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 23:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. Does not seem...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Invoking NOTAVOTE on this one. The weight of argument clearly comes down in favor of deletion...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete per WP:NOTAVOTE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Big Brother New Zealand (edit |...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep vote above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:18, 28 November...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. This is a NOTAVOTE close. IMO the weight of argument lies with the Keep and analysis of sources...

be left (kkeep)?--Apega71 (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC) Again, WP:NOTAVOTE. That, and I don't know how their opinion could be construed in any way...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Per WP:NOTAVOTE the weight of WP:PAG based arguments clearly favor deletion. Most of the...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Considering WP:NOTAVOTE, the arguments for deletion are far stronger than those in favor of retaining...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:NOTAVOTE; I've determined that the keep "votes" provide stronger arguments than...

Dingley (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Are you aware that AfD are WP:NOTAVOTE and you are supposed to provide a valid rationale? --Piotr Konieczny aka...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep votes above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:17, 28 November...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. I'm invoking NOTAVOTE here. Based on strength of WP:PAG based argument I believe there is rough...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep votes above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:15, 28 November...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Per WP:NOTAVOTE. The weight of WP:PG based argument and examination of sources comes down...

12:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Please add a rationale to your vote per WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:29, 28 April 2020...

this page.‎ The result was Keep. Majority of delete !votes ignored per WP:NOTAVOTE; no attempts to counter sources put forward by Rikster during the course...

notability) which makes it a strawman argument~and the rest leaves just pure WP:NOTAVOTE... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 25 August...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:NOTAVOTE; delete arguments prove to be the strongest here. –Juliancolton | Talk...

2019 (UTC) Keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Closing editor is reminded that votes with no rationale are generally...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Invoking WP:NOTAVOTE here. The weight of WP:PAG based argument and analysis of sources seems...

July 2020 (UTC) @Govvy: er WP:ITSNOTABLE, please justify your view. WP:NOTAVOTE, after all. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:22,...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. With WP:NOTAVOTE in mind, it seems that overall, consensus indicates this individual is...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Invoking WP:NOTAVOTE here. Under-weighting numerous spa votes which were generally light in...

canvassing problems on this topic in the past, for the record, this is WP:NOTAVOTE. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

consensus. The keep arguments at the end are somewhat weak; one is WP:NOTAVOTE, and the other does not provide a valid reason for retention. As for merging...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. This is a prime example of WP:NOTAVOTE. By strength of arguments, consensus is that this topic is not encyclopedically...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep votes above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 28 November...

eet / delete it! cygnis insignis 20:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC) Check out WP:NOTAVOTE. North America1000 08:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC) It bothers me that users...

editors and not the article). This is neither constructive, nor, per WP:NOTAVOTE, even helpful in this AfD at all. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

out who's naughty and nice..." Warden (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. What's your rationale? You've been here long enough to know this. Ansh666...

they're not at variance with the consensus from other editors and it's WP:NOTAVOTE anyway. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC) Keep. Having an "interesting...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep votes above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 28 November...

Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC) @Jtbobwaysf: it is WP:NOTAVOTE anyway, so there is no counting taking place... ---Ysangkok (talk) 01:54...

(UTC) Weak Keep. --AuthorityTam (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Per WP:NOTAVOTE, could you please express a reason for your statement? If not, your opinion...

(talk) 16:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC) Aside from the fact that AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE, the closing admin should consider this user's contribution history, which...

(UTC) Comment. While the irony is not lost on me I have to wonder if the {{notavote}} tag is needed. Aside from the name of this article is there any evidence...

familiarize with the above-mentioned policies along with WP:RfC and WP:NOTAVOTE before participating in the RfCs.) If no coverage or only ROUTINE coverage...

and given that it occurred as recently as two weeks ago, I'm adding the NOTAVOTE tag. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Delete Obviously...

--Claritas (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Comment: AfD discussions are WP:NOTAVOTE. Inniverse (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Indeed. Hence the ! in !vote...

also like to state beforehand that AfDs are not decided on a vote. (WP:NOTAVOTE) Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Textbook case of WP:NOTAVOTE. I mostly ignored the votes by SPAs which all failed arguments to avoid...

general literature. Intothatdarkness 13:31, 29 November 2024 (UTC) AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, please include valid sources instead of claiming they exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)...

for notability. When you're on Wikipedia, that's what applies. It's WP:NOTAVOTE, you've got to give a valid argument on your stance. Sergecross73 msg me...

🍸(talk) 20:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC) @Sir Joseph: As you know, this is WP:NOTAVOTE - if you can't advance even one argument don't bother commenting. AusLondonder...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was DELETE. AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE, but unsupported, unexplained opinions that an article should be kept are...

WP:BEFORE, ignoring past convention, ignoring WP:ATD, and ignoring WP:NOTAVOTE. Why any of these oddball seasons for mostly fully-professional teams wouldn't...

2016 (UTC) Strong keep. Gryffindor (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:44, 8 February...

the required guidelines (i.e. WP:GNG and/or WP:SPORTBASIC). AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and so the copied and pasted keep arguments which make no reference to...

notability) which makes it a strawman argument~and the rest leaves just pure WP:NOTAVOTE... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 25 August...

structured search. I initially just shrugged, tagged everything with SPA and "notavote", and move on, but I've noticed that there are a LOT of IPs coming on and...

March 2023 (UTC) Comment 2 users above voted without valid argument. WP:NOTAVOTE to the closure. GlatorNator (talk) 12:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC) Suitskvarts...

defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. I am invoking NOTAVOTE here. While the Keep !votes are more numerical I am unimpressed by the...

strong consensus but after two relists, we are where we are. See also WP:NOTAVOTE. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:NOTAVOTE and another brand new account that figured out how to vote in AFD's. CommanderLinx...

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC) See WP:JUSTAVOTE, WP:NOTAVOTE. North America1000 01:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Delete perhaps and Draft...

--SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC) @SamanthaPuckettIndo: Read WP:NOTAVOTE first, please. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:56...

those arguments can be improved or more delete votes appear. See also WP:NOTAVOTE. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk)...

September 2013 (UTC) Keep Xrt6L (talk) 17:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Why, WP:NOTAVOTE AFD is not a vote? Secret account 01:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete...

bit of canvassing for this discussion so I have added the appropriate notavote tag. CommanderLinx (talk) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC) I'm sure you're canvassing...

disregarded. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC) See also WP:NOTAVOTE. North America1000 16:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Struck content from confirmed...

to a degree of certainty to analyze sources? Importantly, see also WP:NOTAVOTE. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC) Keep – Clearly passes...

8-6 favoring deletion so there is no lopsided clear consensus. Of course NOTAVOTE applies in all cases but after reading this insanely long discussion twice...

March 2024 (UTC) Keep--176.88.141.249 (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE, this has no policy-based reason for keeping. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10,...

November 2019 (UTC) Comment. No rationale given for keep votes above. AfD WP:NOTAVOTE.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:16, 28 November...

(one is a two-sentence mention in passing and the other is irrelevant). NOTAVOTE, etc... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 5 November...

WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTN), any "Per nom" votes above should be dismissed per WP:NOTAVOTE. Darkknight2149 18:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Statements such as this are...

SquarePants characters. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC) AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 17:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Keep. Poor/no reason...

this as "keep" or even "no consensus", despite the numerical majority (WP:NOTAVOTE). Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk)...

AFD is closed. Remember this AFD is about WP:Notability and this is WP:NOTAVOTE: Focus on how this article does or does not meet WP:GNG and/or WP:ENTERTAINER...

2019 (UTC) @Bellerophon5685: What's your rationale for keeping? AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:25, 27 October...

giving zero valid reasons for either is just wasting your own time. It's WP:NOTAVOTE. Stances without valid rationales are just ignored by closers. If you feel...

weigh my point. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Gotta say, NOTAVOTE. One of your first edits in months is to turn up for an AFD? Get an email...

such relistings I think we should have a discussion about deprecating WP:NOTAVOTE, because it clearly isn't being followed. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:38, 7...

keep V. Joe (talk) 19:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC) @Valentinejoesmith: WP:NOTAVOTE, please note your vote is going to be discarded unless you care to provide...

April Fools over here.—cyberpower ChatOnline 00:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE, buster. ;) —Theopolisme (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Seriously though...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS cannot answer this failure of notability. Also, WP:NOTAVOTE. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

(talk) 12:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Also because of socking, I added the {{notavote}} tag. Erpert (let's talk about it) 19:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC) Comment...

8-6 favoring deletion so there is no lopsided clear consensus. Of course NOTAVOTE applies in all cases but after reading this insanely long discussion twice...

(talk) 06:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Delete Faizan 10:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE Ansh666 01:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC) Redirect to gender inequality in China...

consensus. Frietjes (talk) 19:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC) delete per WP:NOTAVOTE Hhkohh (talk) 16:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC) Delete Let's not encourage...

Lawrence § t/e 08:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Note to closing admin - If WP:NOTAVOTE#Deletion, moving and featuring ever applied . . . --JustaHulk (talk) 20:12...

(talk) 13:52, 6 May 2026 (UTC) No, the consensus is clearly 'keep' here. WP:NOTAVOTE but it's 7 vs 2 (ignoring the OP).... GiantSnowman 20:58, 6 May 2026 (UTC)...

Perhaps you've missed the target of my pointed comment - please see WP:NOTAVOTE? How would this ever be a delete, and not a redirect to Labrador Party#Second...

ensure that you read over our guidelines for notability (WP:NACTOR), WP:NOTAVOTE, and sourcing (WP:RS). In particular I'm talking about the part of the...

Keep or Delete? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE Andrew🐉(talk) 17:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Keep For a reasonable demonstration...

21:36, 17 July 2025 (UTC) @Hyperbolick Can you provide a rationale? WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:ILIKEIT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:06, 18...

Keep--JuntungWu (talk) 13:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Please refer to WP:NOTAVOTE.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 13:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Comment  Please...

understand how Wikipedia works, so allow me to suggest that you read WP:NOTAVOTE and WP:GNG, and understand that while your comment may be true, it is necessary...

WP:GNG AusLondonder (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC) @AusLondonder: WP:NOTAVOTE and WP:ITSNOTABLE (not a valid argument). You have to explain how it does...

07:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Suggest the editors above read WP:NOTAVOTE. The WP:BLP1E issue has been addressed and rejected. AusLondonder (talk)...

2008 (UTC) The nomination counts as a "vote" already, but really it's WP:NOTAVOTE it's a discussion. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted...

(UTC) KEEP Interop99 (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC) @Interop99: it is WP:NOTAVOTE, you must provide a reason. --Ysangkok (talk) 00:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)...

April 2020 (UTC) Comment. I'd like to remind the closing admin that WP:NOTAVOTE and I am appalled that not a single argument above is policy based (WP:KEEPPER...

doesn't get much coverage. I would like to remind the closer that AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE, and there isn't a strong policy based argument to keep the article at...

just stats directory. LibStar (talk) 07:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. But from WP:NSEASONS: "In cases where the individual season notability...

than quoting WP:JUSTAPOLICY and slagging off the nominator as AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE. Maybe you should directly concern yourself with the arguments brought...

admin "Keep" votes without evidence should be completely ignored per WP:NOTAVOTE policy. Daranios was the first one to advance an actual argument. The sources...

 Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 18:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC) Comment. Closer should remember WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:KEEPER (to avoid a deletion review...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

15:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC) This is not a valid AfD rationale. AFD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 10 January...

scope_creepTalk 18:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Scope creep, Friendly reminder: WP:NOTAVOTE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:01, 30 April 2021...

stunningly awful the above conversation probably qualifies as a Delete per NOTAVOTE. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC) I actually did a bit...

any actual evidence to support their assertions of notability. Per WP:NOTAVOTE the strength of arguments has to be taken into account in determining consensus...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. This is a textbook case of WP:NOTAVOTE. Naturally, I all but discounted the votes from SPAs that were clearly...

Seems notbale to me.*Treker (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC) *Treker:WP:NOTAVOTE and WP:Clearly notable KDS4444Talk 13:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Fine. I don't...

Otherwise focus on this article and what makes it notable. After all, it's WP:NOTAVOTE.Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:COMMONSENSE...

somehow, but I have to point out that WP:ITSNOTABLE with no argument (WP:NOTAVOTE) is not an argument, but a baseless assertion. WHY do you think this is...

in the light of WP:PAG. I would encourage the reviewing admin to keep NOTAVOTE in mind when closing this discussion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:27, 7 April...

matters is whether it's a suitable subject for a Wikipedia list, AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, it relies on evidence and consensus.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:41, 18 November...

about the 1967 catalogue. Fram (talk) 08:28, 28 July 2021 (UTC) Per WP:NOTAVOTE, these are not votes and that why they are conventionally called !votes...

October 2018 (UTC) On what grounds are you advocating either? It’s WP:NOTAVOTE - you need a reason to back your stance. There currently aren’t the reliable...

reviewers are usually more restrictive. WP:NOTAVOTE doesn't say that polling is prohibited, rather WP:NOTAVOTE says that polling is not to be used as a...

(UTC) Delete or merge. While there are some really bad votes here (WP:NOTAVOTE, also WP:KEEPPER and WP:ITSNOTABLE) I wan to commend User:Sariel Xilo for...

09:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Comment. Closing admin is reminded that WP:NOTAVOTE, given that effectively all keep but the first one arguments so far seem...

to. See WP:BLUDGEON. — Toughpigs (talk) 23:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. If your comment here doesn't go beyond a WP:NPA, I don't see what is its...

stuff, but actual reliable source types of stuff. Excluding the WP:SPA WP:NOTAVOTE !votes left above since they are not going to help resolve anything, I'd...

2014 forward). I am expressing no view on this AfD, but have added the notavote banner. Hasteur (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Delete Seems to not have...

ryoung122 is encouraging 110 club users to vote 'keep'. I have added the notavote tag. CommanderLinx (talk) — CommanderLinx (talk • contribs) has made few...

"vote" stand (with no pretense that its truly a !vote), but this is WP:NOTAVOTE, and nostalgic calls for days when this was a much less thorough work or...

opinion. Not having hard and fast rules doesn't equal "anything goes". WP:NOTAVOTE explains that " "Votes" without reasoning may carry little to no weight...

reliable sources and the previous Deletion discussions being diluted by NOTAVOTE, I'm disinclined to continue providing hosting for this. Hasteur (talk)...

further debate (after hopefully discarding the poorly arguments per WP:NOTAVOTE). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:58, 15 September...

closer please consider the strength of the arguments in your close per WP:NOTAVOTE; in particular acknowledging issues relating to WP:BLP1E and WP:SUSTAINED...

such as Europe I'm fine with that too. I appreciate someone adding the NOTAVOTE tag as the two above keeps votes clearly know each other on the 110 club...

and familiarize with WP criteria such as WP:GNG, WP:RS, WP:N, etc. WP:NOTAVOTE explains that AfD discussions are passed on WP based arguments and not...

rendered moot, although given the controversial nature I'd keep the {{notavote}} template at the top. — EF5 19:39, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Delete Redirect to...

in the same venue). Whilst AFD is not a vote (and I've put the usual notavote template at the top of this page to emphasise that) note that this AFD...

say "keep, good sources" and move on. Closing admin should be wary of WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:06, 11 April 2020...

2016 (UTC) Perhaps you can explain why keep per WP:DISCUSSAFD? This is WP:NOTAVOTE and your comment is likely to be discarded without any supporting reasons...

understand the positions of those who disagree with us. {{Afd}} is WP:NOTAVOTE. Respondent above asserts the subject "lacks 'significant coverage'". Over...

Kite and BWilkins. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE Dr. WTF (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC) And how much better was your...

has also charted. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 14:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And regardless of your own interpretations, keep...

TravellingCari Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Good job it's WP:NOTAVOTE then. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I've participated...

whoever closes this. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 11:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE anyway Andy Dingley (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC) If it's listed twice...

before doesn't mean you shouldn't participate in the debate (this is WP:NOTAVOTE) if anything it is a reason for you to participate since you would be more...

18:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC) And I would question your addition of the {{notavote}} template, which prejudices the discussion. Do you have any evidence of...

attempting to discount almost half the votes in the AFD; perhaps using the NOTAVOTE tag would have been more appropriate. What's he going to do next, say I...

Obviously, I know that the convention is that polling in processes is WP:NOTAVOTE, and that they should be regarded as a solicitation of views from editors...

in the case you've cited was due to no consensus being reached per WP:NOTAVOTE, while the matter of WP:NOTEARLY was really secondary for me. In general...

2016 (UTC) Keep. Bwrs (talk) 06:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC) @Bwrs: per WP:NOTAVOTE, you need to explain your opinion. Otherwise it may very well be ignored...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

February 2018 (UTC) Support provided all features are preserved. Remember WP:NOTAVOTE by the way. Nuke (talk) 02:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Support no need for...

June 2016 (UTC) Keep Almafeta (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAVOTE - arguments without any rationale are not taken into consideration. Sergecross73...

(UTC) If you're such an expert on policy, I won't have to remind you of WP:NOTAVOTE Andy Dingley (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Merge and redirect Would...

of the discussion was jailify." The wikilawyer jumps from his chair. "NOTAVOTE!" The judge shakes her head: "CONSENSUS has been reached." "REVERT!" exclaims...

wikipedia. AlfaRocket (talk) 12:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC) AlfaRocket, see WP:NOTAVOTE, your cut-and-paste commentary is not helpful. Frietjes (talk) 13:19, 9...

voting record has any relevance here, but I can certainly defend it: WP:NOTAVOTE Reiterating previously made points or not giving a reason is therefore...

@Calliopejen1: it is misleading to use the word "vote", since it is WP:NOTAVOTE. --Ysangkok (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Comment, Ysangkok (talk ·...

17:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Wikipedia is not a democracy. See also WP:NOTAVOTE. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Comment—This...

(UTC) Delete I would like to remind the deleting admin that AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and comic book fans ganging up to stop an AfD simply by voting keep without...

August 2018 (UTC) keep Nice4What (talk) 08:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Keep as creator of ye template...

canvassing problems on this topic in the past, for the record, this is WP:NOTAVOTE. Newshunter12 (talk) 09:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

honoured).Doug Mehus (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC) @Dmehus: AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, the strength of arguments is what matters rather than the number of editors...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

Woerich (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC) I won't withdraw it, per WP:NOTAVOTE. A bunch of keep votes with no evidence backing them up is just that. Refbombing...

(UTC) Comment The above SPA editors should read WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS and WP:NOTAVOTE. In addition, none of their arguments are relevant to policy and they would...

themselves. пﮟოьεԻ 57 20:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Comment As this is WP:NOTAVOTE I would note that most of those who have argued for merging or deletion...

January 2008 (UTC) Keep - Doma-w (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE Wizardman 01:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I studied the discussion above for...

(UTC) Keep per the others. FrankTobia (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Keep - Dungeons and Dragons media...

dab per WP:DABMENTION. The article AfD has a proper note to closing {{notavote}} (now added here) and that suffers from NEO proponents, whereas here reaction...

page.‎ The result was delete. This is one of those rare cases where WP:NOTAVOTE earns its keep. The arguments for deletion assert that the subject is not...

little impact on the overall consensus. Please remember that AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and that the final decision will be made based upon the arguments posed...

17:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC) For what it's worth, these discussions are WP:NOTAVOTE. You can't just add up the numbers and because more people were in favor...

on article talk page: [diff] Comments: Argument seems to stem over the "notavote" template that is added to deletion discussions, I am not sure what Mark...

Wikipedia anymore? Perhaps I just violated this standard by saying MfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and that we're not actually "voting" here. Anyways, I'm going to !vote...

(UTC) Note to closing admin This would appear to be a discussion where WP:NOTAVOTE should be born in mind. I would encourage the closing admin to read the...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

Garchy (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Please remember that AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE count election, it's based in argument considering guidelines and policy...

--CosmicAdventure (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Please remember WP:NOTAVOTE, if you cant explain why the policy applies here towards redirecting then...

14:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Comment: please note that this discussion is WP:NOTAVOTE, and placing comments twice will not sway the discussion in your favor...

discretionary range, or editors who show up in a debate that has the {{notavote}} template at the top. Just because something unusual happens doesn't automatically...

so far voted keep--Fightloungemike (talk) 13:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Also, the same group of singlepurpose MMA deletion only accounts we see...

Ikip, DGG, and Fisher.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. If you don't have any thoughts of your own to contribute, don't post....

Notable enough. Hyperbolick (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Why? see WP:NOTAVOTE--Rusf10 (talk) 02:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC) Why? because the seismicity of...

discussion was: Delete. On the numbers, this is split evenly (3:3), but WP:NOTAVOTE. Closers are obliged to weigh arguments rather than just count votes, and...

2019 (UTC) Not can, have to - if you want your vote to be counted. WP:NOTAVOTE, and votes without rationale are not relevant. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

2023 (UTC) It is probably better to add your reasoning here, given WP:NOTAVOTE. What "it" is, and the grounds on which you find it "ridiculous" would...

hope the closing admin weighs this evidence accordingly and follows WP:NOTAVOTE. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 19:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC) For the sake of additional...

DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) To clarify, AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE. As the guideline says "A "vote" that doesn't seem to be based on a reasonable...

together seem like enough. Absurdum4242 (talk) 14:49, 7 January 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. GiantSnowman 21:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC) Well, yes, that was rather my...

closing admin Please disregard the votes from some editors above. Per WP:NOTAVOTE it is the quality, not quantity of the argument that matters, of course...

who voted for a different outcome will go apoplectic and cry "zOMG! WP:NOTAVOTE!". Instead, weigh the relative arguments (and the number of people making...

––FormalDude talk 04:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC) I must endorse the WP:NOTAVOTE claims; I don't feel I am supporting or opposing any specific written proposal...

nothing else, which I find intellectually lazy and against the spirit of WP:NOTAVOTE. Some were just plain silly, like More popular than Jesus (what? okay....

simple to snout count. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ But Wikipedia is WP:NOTAVOTE, and an issue like this doesn't even need support/oppose !voting the panda...

20 February 2021 (UTC) Why 60%? Why not 50%? Why not 75%? Why not WP:NOTAVOTE. GiantSnowman 21:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC) RFA has numeric thresholds...

support are not just over-hyped, imprecise math, they are contrary to NOTAVOTE. NOTAVOTE at it's most basic means you do not tally the bolded words, you read...

Belandi76 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC) Note: AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE. I'm suspecting some keep votes above have been canvassed to this discussion...

on the strength of the arguments rather than a mere vote count per WP:NOTAVOTE. 4meter4 (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Comment. I am copy pasting my...

––FormalDude talk 04:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC) I must endorse the WP:NOTAVOTE claims; I don't feel I am supporting or opposing any specific written proposal...

Dingley (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC) Are you aware that AfD are WP:NOTAVOTE and you are supposed to provide a valid rationale? --Piotr Konieczny aka...

contribs) pretends to take an impartial view on this but consensus is WP:NOTAVOTE. The edit in question is an "attempt" to subvert POV by falsely attributing...

editors voting for Delete, because the closer does what is suggested by WP:NOTAVOTE and considers that the arguments don't support deletion, is DRV the remedy...

) Soulsinsync (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC) Comment - I have place a notavote template above as this AfD has been publicized outside on Twitter.Icewhiz...

many, in fact, that we might wind up in the unfortunate situation where NOTAVOTE goes out the window (i.e. in theory a single !vote should be able to swing...

single ship article. Calidum 19:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC) I don't see how NOTAVOTE could justify a finding of consensus despite the lack of any clear majority...

film. Wheelchair Epidemic (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC) I added {{notavote}} to the top, hopefully they'll get it. But IPs and new users are allowed...

and 61 Oppose !votes. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC) ...said everyone who...

another editor, totaling 4 against him now. His argument is that it's a WP:NOTAVOTE. People are at arms about his behavior but it just keeps getting passed...

and all similar non-policy based comments per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS and WP:NOTAVOTE. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC) How will sourcing...

The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC) NOTAVOTE, but here are some numbers: 79 editors have weighed in 31 "yes", 30 "no"...

(talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) I should remind you that this is WP:NOTAVOTE and while there are a number of editors expressing a preference for keeping...

The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC) {{notavote}} has failed us here's number six The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 22:06...

(talk) 18:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC) Comment. Closer is reminder that WP:NOTAVOTE, and that some accounts here seem like WP:SPA and/or likely to have been...

articles about any org with such scant coverage. And a majority vote (WP:NOTAVOTE) isn't sufficient for an IAR jusitification either. Now, at least some...

future reference, probably could have avoided this blowout by using {{notavote}} instead. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC) Quite possibly...

the personal abuse,, and making up a fake quote. And clearly ignoring WP:NOTAVOTE. The closer will know how to weigh that. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)...

{{notavote}} tag at the top of the AfD should suffice. Even so, although I am neutral about the subject's notability, I don't know if the {{notavote}}...

9-5 means no consensus for the change in my book, although this is WP:NOTAVOTE, so "majority" doesn't matter - strength of arguments does (✉→BWilkins←✎)...

that template is. --King Öomie 17:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC) I added the {{notavote}} template, although that's usually for off-wiki canvassing. -Atmoz (talk)...

not allowed to make a comment on the vote. This entirely contravenes WP:NOTAVOTE and despite efforts to tell them this it is falling on deaf ears. The originator...

Keep Routine accident? whao! Elmao (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. MickMacNee (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Keep per Lugnuts. --Ser...

(talk) 20:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC) FYI: Oppose= 32 / Support = 23 WP:NOTAVOTE. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2014 (UTC) That the people...

Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 16:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC) Here we go again. WP is WP:NOTAVOTE. The discussion is still on-going. It's actually 5 that oppose the third...

in the AFD where it belongs if you really want to remind people of WP:NOTAVOTE. Rd232 talk 02:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC) And you would be edit warring...

editors supported. -Darouet (talk) 04:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Per WP:NOTAVOTE I don't really care what the margin is, and bludgeoning this discussion...

who have stated their intent to disrupt the process in the AfD. Tagged notavote. DarkAudit (talk) 19:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Yes, but I didn't even open...

that early results in a discussion mean it's already over, but AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE. SUSTAINED applies to most articles, not just people and events. It simply...

Wiki-life to worry about. An admin reversed your earlier actions of WP:NOTAVOTE, so that right there speaks volumes about your particular behavior in this...

properly, in the context of the evolving situation and taking into account WP:NOTAVOTE. Rd232 talk 00:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC) (e/c) The en:wiki notion of "consensus"...

(UTC) I've watchlisted it. No need to take any action besides adding the "notavote" template, which has been done. Every single admin knows that the unhelpful...

cunning enough to seize it. --fvw* 12:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Added notavote templates to this and also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Marshall...

it'd invariably lead to non-notable articles being kept. Yes, AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, but the people who have created and spent hours editing these articles...

refreshed after a nice Wikibreak. If voting were not evil I would set up a notavote on it right now, but anyway, that's what I think. Guy (Help!) 17:41, 8...

discussion. Organizing them by head count is not only nonconducive to WP:NOTAVOTE but also serves to polarize the discussion into yes/no camps. It is against...

see best. Thank you! -O.R.Comms 20:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC) I added the {{notavote}} template on the page as a start. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:49, 16 March...

to say, "But you failed by 69/31%," there is someone wanting to say, "Notavote! I am elect." In other words, the wording is very important and highly...

thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: @Brad101: WP:NOTAVOTE Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 04:38...

The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC) {{notavote}} has failed us here's number six The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 22:06...

section. The result of the discussion was delete, noting that this is WP:NOTAVOTE. -- Tavix (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Previous RfDs for this redirect...

contrary, it was all about merits of policy vs. practice, and principles of NOTAVOTE. I'm not really requesting that you reverse that close, but I find it....

closing this particular AFD. –MuZemike 00:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC) Added {{notavote}}. Closing admins routinely disregard meatpuppet votes. Nothing more need...

awhile until you get consensus. Also, people have forgotten that this is NOTAVOTE...if you have better policy but fewer votes, you still have a better argument...

it's a notable place. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC) {{notavote}} AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/TV Tropes Wiki Articles...

about using the committee members as a decision-making panel, to avoid WP:NOTAVOTE issues. When there's concern that an admin with no misconduct issues isn't...

wish, no one would have a voice here. Besides, you know that this is WP:NOTAVOTE. It's Spotter 1's editing that is being discussed, and it's not the number...

(talk) 06:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Tagged them all with SPA tags, placed {{notavote}} on the AfD. No real point in blocking them unless they're actively disruptive...

although I do agree it'll probably get kept. I did, however, stick a {{notavote}} on it, which I believe also qualifies as the near universal signal of...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

their reasoning for their opposition (going against the principle of WP:NOTAVOTE). SuperMarioMan 13:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC) Oppose. I'm afraid I can't...

(talk) 16:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC) No idea why we're numbering this cos WP:NOTAVOTE, and shouldn't we wait for the SPI to come back before considering any/all...

the 5 and found a "rough consensus against inclusion". Am aware of WP:NOTAVOTE, but, there were quality opinions all-around. No trolls, no socks, no I-don't-like-it...

right now. Thargor Orlando (talk) 11:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC) 1) it's !notavote. and 2) mere claims of "bias" without identifying specific actionable instances...

tactics to discredit the other voters in the discussion, such as adding the notavote template (diff) when things are not going his way, declaring a user to...

(UTC) Oh come on, you are smart enough to know how things really work. WP:NOTAVOTE mean the numbers are not supposed to matter, but it does not mean the numbers...

poll, the consensus of a discussion is not always a poll option (see WP:NOTAVOTE). Considering the discussion, with some added emphasis to uninvolved editors'...

to just deploy {{subst:spa}} as needed (which others have done), slap {{notavote}} at the top (which I've just done), and trust that the closer is smart...

the OP, it was most clearly not "no consensus", because Wikipedia is WP:NOTAVOTE (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC) The discussion above...

admin is expected to weigh up the discussion in the eyes in of policy (WP:NOTAVOTE and all that). The number of votes are mostly irrelevant. IRWolfie- (talk)...

was ignored, why have a consensus vote if they dont matter anyways? - WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:NOTDEMOCRACY. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)...

alleged. I don't see any error here, it's the proper application of WP:NOTAVOTE. Levivich (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC) It doesn't seem like a...

guideline or policy point of view, or which would make me think that WP:NOTAVOTE needed to be invoked. And as noted by the OP above, the argument about...

effect may be noted so that people are aware, and everyone reminded of WP:NOTAVOTE. Rd232 talk 09:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Rd232, in consideration that this thread...

Contradict[[8]] my opinion !!! StefanWirz (talk) 10:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC) Added {{notavote}} to the top; I agree it has the fragrance of canvasing to me; posting...

on the Talk page (that vote counting is disruptive per WP:NOT#DEM, WP:NOTAVOTE), but other editors are in favour of inclusion. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 15:05...

as default? Sapedder (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Sapedder, WP:NOTAVOTE. Also, you call the IP's comment strident ranting, but what is much of...

errand, here it seems sub nominally a good faith attempt to comply with NOTAVOTE. In the end, all the close did was keep to prior consensus on the matter...

basically, it's been an ongoing issue trying to explain WP:CANVASSING and WP:NOTAVOTE to users from Azwiki. Both of those aren't a thing over there. I know this...

hours after it was opened, on the weekend, as "no consensus"? Obviously WP:NOTAVOTE, but the current situation looks 50/50 after five Oppose votes arrived...

be helpful in a case like this. --Masem (t) 17:17, 7 June 2020 (UTC) {{notavote}} :) — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC) From the responses...

every enthusiast (including Agent00f) reasons. I've already added the {{notavote}}, but I'm betting that we'll be able to drain some of the nonsense. Hasteur...

the discussion agreed on." In any case, I'm sure you're familiar with WP:NOTAVOTE. Despite the strong opposition of one editor, I saw a consensus there from...

2016 (UTC) The first part of your text doesn't support your position. WP:NOTAVOTE. Using WP:WINNEROUTCOMES as keep reason (or worse, as base of consensus)...

sense that you misunderstand very basic things about Wikipedia, such as WP:NOTAVOTE, or how to resolve content disputes (WP:DR), how to evaluate the reliability...

for were stronger than the arguments against. Also, while consensus is NOTAVOTE, the relative proportion of editors for or against something has always...

better reason not to close it in favor of the pre-discussion form. WP:NOTAVOTE, but as I noted above, it's not as if any position is making significantly...

comment is utterly ridiculous, I also have to ask why you are adding the {{notavote}} template to these AfDs. As EMG says, these are normally used where canvassing...

(UTC) @Saff V.: I have tagged the AFD to remind editors that it is WP:NOTAVOTE, but instead strength of argument which applies. If you believe there are...

(Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC) Endorse WP:NOTAVOTE is a thing, and while there might have been a case for a "no consensus...

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC) I've tagged it with {{notavote}} although that is of questionable value. Socking is a real possibility...

noted in the RfC), which in turn came after another user had to add the Notavote template because of ongoing suspicions on widespread off-canvassing ([144])...

consensus by weighing the strength of the arguments--in other words, it's WP:NOTAVOTE. I don't get the idea that there was "more opposition than support"--how...

discount or depreciate the canvassed !votes. I recommend using the template {{notavote}} and tagging all of the canvassed !votes with {{subst:canvassed|username}}...

anywhere near the worst that I've seen, though. There were reasons that {{notavote}} et al. were invented in the first places. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 06:17, 27...

that's part of why I'm not seeing a genuine consensus here to unblock (also notavote, etc.). --Tryptofish (talk) 20:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC) Yes, he is a smart...

oppose at the beginning of each statement. If so, I suggest you read WP:NOTAVOTE. —Kww(talk) 03:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC) If I am not mistaken you are saying...

with no consensus but we can find a "clear consensus" in a 50% here. Yeah NOTAVOTE yadda yadda. Mr Ernie (talk) 14:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC) Again. The...

consensus. Your reading of the situation is the precise reason why WP:NOTAVOTE is a thing. There has been no deliberation or any real discussion other...

maintenance tags without resolving the issue in the hand. 13 February: Adds {{notavote}} despite participation by legitimate editors. 13 February: "Why dont you...

provide SIGCOV then the burden is also on you to explain your reasoning. NOTAVOTE applies both ways. Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)...

like an asshole asking this--especially with this no-grudges-forgiving-notavote-discussion, but these are legitimate questions and I'm seeking a frank...

Only with the benefit of that disclosure can the weight of argument (WP:NOTAVOTE) be determined by a neutral observer. As to the argument about external...

(talk) 01:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Tony the Marine, please remember that WP:NOTAVOTE. You have cited no policy-based reason for your !vote, so the closer is...

~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Please remember Wikipedia:NOTAVOTE. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Keep Notable prior...

since there is no way it can be used less than zero. again, this is WP:NOTAVOTE, so just agreeing with someone else is not helpful. Frietjes (talk) 13:25...

Delete per nominator --Artene50 (talk) 04:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC) See 'if the nominator...

"non-trivial". Jclemens (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC) @Jclemens: Per WP:NOTAVOTE I would ask for you to list which top 3 sources make the article pass GNG...

the talk page. Rlendog (talk) 14:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Oppose per WP:NOTAVOTE. However, I'm all for removing, collapsing, or moving to the talk page...

retarget, per John Vandenberg, as well as the fact that "!vote" implies "NOTAVOTE", a falsehood perpetuated by the community. Joefromrandb (talk) 10:16,...

- saying "keep" without a rationale doesn't mean anything, as it's WP:NOTAVOTE. Sergecross73 msg me 17:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC) Fair point. I guess my...

for keep seem weak and there may be potential outside interest. Added notavote template to clarify how this process works. -- Dane2007 talk 20:56, 2 September...

disregarding our notability policies. Close as "delete", because AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE. This tankie stalinist fanclub of an Albanian dictator is non-notable and...

confusion here. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Just saying. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:20...

how to do this, and so closing admins can safely disregard them per WP:NOTAVOTE. In particularly extreme cases, admins should semi-protect the page as...

weigh the comments here against site policy. Remember, this is not a WP:NOTAVOTE. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Yup, and the...

these things. As other users have said, it is quite difficult to get WP:NOTAVOTE to appear in a search result for !vote, for technical reasons. The hatnote...

Novaseminary (talk) 01:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Fair enough. Revise my notavote to Delete then. me_and 09:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC) The above discussion...

on the basis on consensus, not on vote-counting or majority rule" (WP:NOTAVOTE). Specifically, unsourced WP:IDONTLIKEIT, "it is right to hate Islam" personal...

eBay too, but found only bits of plastic. Comment - additional comment WP:NOTAVOTE Wikipedia is not a vote. The argument of "not news" is not a Wikipedia...

reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments. These AfD discussions are WP:NOTAVOTE, the quality of the arguments presented matter the most. I think editors...

​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC) The AFD has been tagged with {{notavote}} and linked to this page, and !votes by apparent single-purpose accounts...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. This is a NOTAVOTE close. IMO the weight of argument lies with the Keep and analysis of sources...

applies here even if you didn't label this as an RfC. Please also read WP:NOTAVOTE. More generally, please consider spending some more time familiarizing...

request closing adminstrator discount this response as a lapse from WP:NOTAVOTE. Geo Swan (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC) Comment - There has been...

survive. Bermicourt (talk) 10:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC) Bermicourt, WP:NOTAVOTE. If you don't take the time to explain a reason, the closer is obliged...

an innovation. WP:AADD arguments are usually ignored and as this is WP:NOTAVOTE. You make it sound like any editor who expresses valid reasons for why...

forward, if at all. Dicklyon (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2017 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE. Looking over this discussion it is abundantly clear that the Oppose arguments...

weigh my point. --lTopGunl (talk) 18:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Gotta say, NOTAVOTE. One of your first edits in months is to turn up for an AFD? Get an email...

actual rationale to do so. The closer should take that into account, per WP:NOTAVOTE. In the event of a "no consensus" result we still end up with the status...

already weak "discussion-not-vote" consensus process which worries me per WP:NOTAVOTE and meatball:VotingIsEvil. — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)...

when they aren't in line with policy. At the same time those who scream NOTAVOTE every time they are on the "losing" end of the conversation seem to ignore...

(UTC) Comment to closer. Please consider the quality of arguments per NOTAVOTE. We started with the claim there are no good sources. Sources have been...

take note that nobody has given a strong argument for a merger, per WP:NOTAVOTE. Darkknight2149 06:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Keep Appears well-referenced...

notable. If you make bad arguments, expect them to be countered. AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE but a discussion to reach consensus. The list easily meets content requirements...

anymore discussion). I'm also disregarding one contribution because of WP:NOTAVOTE. I don't believe a third re-list would give this debate a clearer consensus...

closer, please consider the strength of the arguments in your close per WP:NOTAVOTE. If you look at the sources, none of the independent references have Irene...

amounts of votes will allow the "inclusionists" to win easily. See WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Don't forget WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS...

(UTC) RFC/U, even more than other discussions on WP, is really, really WP:NOTAVOTE. If you don't agree with a position and no position presented reflects...

Delete. Trumpetrep (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2026 (UTC) @Trumpetrep: WP:NOTAVOTE, can you elaborate? Otherwise your vote will be ignored. --Piotr Konieczny...

CheckUser. If other people get similar emails, might be worth putting {{notavote}} on this, but I'll leave that to the discretion of others. -- Tamzin[cetacean...

should not be accounted for? Regardless of how this template is used, WP:NOTAVOTE exists and should be followed in discussions. Steel1943 (talk) 16:02, 8...

discretionary range, or editors who show up in a debate that has the {{notavote}} template at the top. Just because something unusual happens doesn't automatically...

discussion thus far, they keep !votes should be reminded of WP:VAGUEWAVE and WP:NOTAVOTE. If they don't, the closing admin certainly will... Sergecross73 msg me...

Comment to the closing admin Since Stifle was kind enough to put the big "notavote" template at the top, I thought I should explain this a bit. I asked a...

overinvested in the debate.—S Marshall T/C 02:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE would appear to apply to this; a proposal with a majority against it can...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:NOTAVOTE. Sergecross73 msg me 13:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC) I say Keep. The page itself...

changing its code. 77.183.81.143 (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE. This time let an admin close it Hhkohh (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)...

the sourcing reliability, I would urge the closing admin to consider WP:NOTAVOTE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Keep: This is too much text for a...

meantime, I hope that the closer of this discussion will cling fast to WP:NOTAVOTE, and not facilitate this tag-team's efforts at forum-shopping through shoddy...

see some people talking about it. That's typically the impetus for the {{notavote}} up top. Doesn't mean there isn't sock/meat puppetry going on, but that...

Natureium (talk) 20:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Whatever the reason, I put {{notavote}} at the top. !dave 20:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC) I think we should require...

say "keep, good sources" and move on. Closing admin should be wary of WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:06, 11 April 2020...

in the light of WP:PAG. I would encourage the reviewing admin to keep NOTAVOTE in mind when closing this discussion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:27, 7 April...

this is common sense") is really frowned upon. I know we need to keep WP:NOTAVOTE in mind, but maybe we should be more accepting at Afd (or other venues...

alone a topic that is a mixture of the two. Also, please read over WP:NOTAVOTE. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 6 August 2016 (UTC) I don’t want to make too...

WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTN), any "Per nom" votes above should be dismissed per WP:NOTAVOTE. Darkknight2149 18:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Statements such as this are...

volume of "keep" !votes. But Wikipedia is not a democracy, and AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE. All but two of the keep comments here are "per above" and/or bald assertions...

Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 04:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Check out WP:NOTAVOTE, "most decisions on Wikipedia are made on the basis of consensus, not on...

The closing admin will be aware that consensus can change, and that WP:NOTAVOTE. The closing admin should also note that this is one of several discussions...

TravellingCari Misterdiscreet (talk) 21:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Good job it's WP:NOTAVOTE then. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I've participated...

many, in fact, that we might wind up in the unfortunate situation where NOTAVOTE goes out the window (i.e. in theory a single !vote should be able to swing...

those people). As for the '"lose" an RfC' comment: just see WP:WINNING, WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:NOT#DEMOCRACY, WP:RFC, etc. The purpose of RfCs is to get input from...

article to his organization, he has no independent notability. I'm adding a notavote template as the number of IPs/SPAs leads me to think this has been advertised...

already exists. Slightly more editors preferred keeping the category, but WP:NOTAVOTE. The long-standing wider consensus at WP:OC#AWARD is that award categories...

about the facts of the pool world. It's interesting that you link to WP:NOTAVOTE, but appear to be making a vote-based argument. 10 "keeps" that make little...

to this page. 350z33 (talk) 13:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and re-read the quote from WP:PVS in my previous comment...

Comment to the closing admin Since Stifle was kind enough to put the big "notavote" template at the top, I thought I should explain this a bit. I asked a...

unbolded them, they're not votes and neither are anyone else's. With {{notavote}} at the top here I hope we're all in agreement. --Random832 05:16, 30...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:NOTAVOTE and another brand new account that figured out how to vote in AFD's. CommanderLinx...

(talk|contrib) 13:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Comment about the polling below per WP:NOTAVOTE. AfD is not a majority vote. Straw polls are not encouraged and they are...

—Preceding undated comment added 11:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAVOTE. Stances like this are ignored in coming to a final decision - you must...

endorse GoldenRing... I agree"[21] are not doing any favor either per WP:NOTAVOTE. Ivanvector below fails to define how the topic ban is "justified" but...

advance(Dushan Jugum (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)). Probably, through WP:NOTAVOTE. The closing volunteers can decide to ignore consensus if it would go against...

keep in an AfD is not begging the closer to take your stance. AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, so please make an argument as to why you believe the subject to be notable...

WP:NONAZIS...); there probably should be something done about this. WP:NOTAVOTE is already a fact of life for every other discussion on Wikipedia (and...

be left (kkeep)?--Apega71 (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC) Again, WP:NOTAVOTE. That, and I don't know how their opinion could be construed in any way...

169 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC) @68.234.100.169: It's WP:NOTAVOTE. The point of an RfC is to draw out why people take the positions they...

elections, 2008 Ijanderson977 (talk) 14:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC) As this is WP:NOTAVOTE, so could you explain you reasoning for why this fails the WP:N notability...

@Calliopejen1: it is misleading to use the word "vote", since it is WP:NOTAVOTE. --Ysangkok (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Comment, Ysangkok (talk ·...

has also charted. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 14:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. And regardless of your own interpretations, keep...

07:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC) Alternatively, you should probably read WP:NOTAVOTE - if one fails to cite any valid policy or guideline in their stance, it’ll...

Polyamorph (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC) @Polyamorph: You can add the {{notavote}} template to the AFD to warn editors coming there from off-wiki discussion...

September 2013 (UTC) Keep Xrt6L (talk) 17:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Why, WP:NOTAVOTE AFD is not a vote? Secret account 01:10, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete...

(UTC) Keep per the others. FrankTobia (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC) Keep - Dungeons and Dragons media...

(talk) 19:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC) Note to closing admin Since AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE, any keep vote that doesn't demonstrate the separate notability of this...

(UTC) KEEP Interop99 (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC) @Interop99: it is WP:NOTAVOTE, you must provide a reason. --Ysangkok (talk) 00:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)...

stuff, but actual reliable source types of stuff. Excluding the WP:SPA WP:NOTAVOTE !votes left above since they are not going to help resolve anything, I'd...

AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC) I wouldn't be so sure, WP:NOTAVOTE is a thing; and looking at stuff like this (US) or this (worldwide) shows...

about the 1967 catalogue. Fram (talk) 08:28, 28 July 2021 (UTC) Per WP:NOTAVOTE, these are not votes and that why they are conventionally called !votes...

Lawrence § t/e 08:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Note to closing admin - If WP:NOTAVOTE#Deletion, moving and featuring ever applied . . . --JustaHulk (talk) 20:12...

ensure that you read over our guidelines for notability (WP:NACTOR), WP:NOTAVOTE, and sourcing (WP:RS). In particular I'm talking about the part of the...

list. Daranios (talk) 19:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC) @Rorshacma: AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, so the result is still up in the air if the keep !votes are found to have...

policy-based arguments here are all on the side of those opining for deletion. WP:NOTAVOTE means the newer "but WP:ILIKEIT!" contributions will be disregarded anyway...

mine? Wiki Emoji | Emojiwiki Talk~~ 05:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE. in general, while we have thresholds, RfA is a consensus system here on...

09:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Comment. Closing admin is reminded that WP:NOTAVOTE, given that effectively all keep but the first one arguments so far seem...

above, and it is sad to see that User:Ɱ simply ignores the evidence. WP:NOTAVOTE, a support based on counter-factual assertions should be discounted. --BrownHairedGirl...

 Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 18:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC) Comment. Closer should remember WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:KEEPER (to avoid a deletion review...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC) WP:PERNOM. WP:NOTAVOTE. I have offered civil, meaningful replies to their concerns. I think the...

12:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Please add a rationale to your vote per WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:29, 28 April 2020...

(talk|contrib) 13:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Comment about the polling below per WP:NOTAVOTE. AfD is not a majority vote. Straw polls are not encouraged and they are...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandel17 (talk • contribs) See {{notavote}} (expanded above). And you should really read WP:NOTABILITY, MANY people...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Taking into account WP:NOTAVOTE, the arguments for deletion are stronger than those for keeping the page...

in the same venue). Whilst AFD is not a vote (and I've put the usual notavote template at the top of this page to emphasise that) note that this AFD...

play out with FC Cincinnati's new name change and brand. I've added the notavote template. SportingFlyer talk 23:40, 16 November 2018 (UTC) @SportingFlyer:...

07:15, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Suggest the editors above read WP:NOTAVOTE. The WP:BLP1E issue has been addressed and rejected. AusLondonder (talk)...

July 2020 (UTC) @Govvy: er WP:ITSNOTABLE, please justify your view. WP:NOTAVOTE, after all. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:22,...

(UTC) If you're such an expert on policy, I won't have to remind you of WP:NOTAVOTE Andy Dingley (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) Merge and redirect Would...

scope_creepTalk 18:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Scope creep, Friendly reminder: WP:NOTAVOTE. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:01, 30 April 2021...

2015 (UTC) So WP:ITSUSEFUL? (Reminder to the closing admin: This is WP:NOTAVOTE.) Msnicki (talk) 04:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC) As I said, it's notable for...

Perhaps you've missed the target of my pointed comment - please see WP:NOTAVOTE? How would this ever be a delete, and not a redirect to Labrador Party#Second...

notable. If you make bad arguments, expect them to be countered. AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE but a discussion to reach consensus. The list easily meets content requirements...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Invoking NOTAVOTE on this one. The weight of argument clearly comes down in favor of deletion...

pro-Keep comments were prefixed with the word "Strong." Conceding that AfD is NOTAVOTE, IMHO we are getting very close to the point where this could be reasonably...

little impact on the overall consensus. Please remember that AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and that the final decision will be made based upon the arguments posed...

themselves. пﮟოьεԻ 57 20:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Comment As this is WP:NOTAVOTE I would note that most of those who have argued for merging or deletion...

on the rest....William 01:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Question. Why? WP:NOTAVOTE, so please explain your reasoning based on categorisation guidelines. --BrownHairedGirl...

Otherwise focus on this article and what makes it notable. After all, it's WP:NOTAVOTE.Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep per WP:COMMONSENSE...

(talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WP:NOTAVOTE. Sergecross73 msg me 13:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC) I say Keep. The page itself...

notability) which makes it a strawman argument~and the rest leaves just pure WP:NOTAVOTE... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 25 August...

Keep or Delete? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE Andrew🐉(talk) 17:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC) Keep For a reasonable demonstration...

it's a notable place. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC) {{notavote}} AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/TV Tropes Wiki Articles...

consensus. The keep arguments at the end are somewhat weak; one is WP:NOTAVOTE, and the other does not provide a valid reason for retention. As for merging...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Per WP:NOTAVOTE; I've determined that the keep "votes" provide stronger arguments than...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS cannot answer this failure of notability. Also, WP:NOTAVOTE. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate...

one of those two options. While recognizing that this discussion is WP:NOTAVOTE, the numbers by my count are evenly split 10-10-1. A major argument was...

the required guidelines (i.e. WP:GNG and/or WP:SPORTBASIC). AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE and so the copied and pasted keep arguments which make no reference to...

2017 (UTC) Comment Not sure where these IPs have come from but I added {{notavote}} to the top. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:14, 20 November 2017...

confusion here. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Just saying. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:20...

(UTC) Weak Keep. --AuthorityTam (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Per WP:NOTAVOTE, could you please express a reason for your statement? If not, your opinion...

🍸(talk) 20:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC) @Sir Joseph: As you know, this is WP:NOTAVOTE - if you can't advance even one argument don't bother commenting. AusLondonder...

WP:BEFORE, ignoring past convention, ignoring WP:ATD, and ignoring WP:NOTAVOTE. Why any of these oddball seasons for mostly fully-professional teams wouldn't...

and all similar non-policy based comments per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS and WP:NOTAVOTE. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC) How will sourcing...

that list can be split. Georgia guy (talk) 12:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. You've offered no rationale about why this should be kept. 35.139.154...

often, as in this afd, i precede this with a "comment". ps. my "delete" notavote still stands. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:11, 9 January 2022 (UTC) Delete The...

support keeping the category and those who want to upmerge it. But WP:NOTAVOTE, and both sides made some good arguments which in the end were inconclusive...

consensus, not voting, is a core part of Wikipedia's foundation (see WP:NOTAVOTE) Replacing the current flexible ad-hoc system with a formalized legalistic...

notability) which makes it a strawman argument~and the rest leaves just pure WP:NOTAVOTE... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:34, 25 August...

(talk) 15:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC) I should remind you that this is WP:NOTAVOTE and while there are a number of editors expressing a preference for keeping...

Also the number of keep and delete votes is not consensus as AfD's are WP:NOTAVOTE. Ajf773 (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Yes, you're bludgeoning the process...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Textbook case of WP:NOTAVOTE. I mostly ignored the votes by SPAs which all failed arguments to avoid...

2) garbage given how often it is misused, 3) Against the spirit of WP:NOTAVOTE, since it essentially acts as a bar of involvement by a smaller number...

public know, in case they didn't. PGPirate 04:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. ;) Also, WP:NOTSTATSBOOK might be worth linking to when using "WP is not...

Keep Routine accident? whao! Elmao (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. MickMacNee (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC) Keep per Lugnuts. --Ser...

2019 (UTC) @Bellerophon5685: What's your rationale for keeping? AfD WP:NOTAVOTE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:25, 27 October...

discussion may be closed soon if all the closer sees are several bold keeps. NOTAVOTE, yes, but... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:03, 28...

Garchy (talk) 15:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Please remember that AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE count election, it's based in argument considering guidelines and policy...

also like to state beforehand that AfDs are not decided on a vote. (WP:NOTAVOTE) Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

January 2008 (UTC) Keep - Doma-w (talk) 01:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE Wizardman 01:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC) I studied the discussion above for...

CSD category. Shadowjams (talk) 02:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTAVOTE (that was a joke btw). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Delete...

September 2019 (UTC) Keep. MacCready (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:48, 18 September...

for notability. When you're on Wikipedia, that's what applies. It's WP:NOTAVOTE, you've got to give a valid argument on your stance. Sergecross73 msg me...

--Claritas (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Comment: AfD discussions are WP:NOTAVOTE. Inniverse (talk) 16:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC) Indeed. Hence the ! in !vote...

2019 (UTC) Not can, have to - if you want your vote to be counted. WP:NOTAVOTE, and votes without rationale are not relevant. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:NOTAVOTE; delete arguments prove to be the strongest here. –Juliancolton | Talk...

CheckUser. If other people get similar emails, might be worth putting {{notavote}} on this, but I'll leave that to the discretion of others. -- Tamzin[cetacean...

request closing adminstrator discount this response as a lapse from WP:NOTAVOTE. Geo Swan (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2010 (UTC) Comment - There has been...

--CosmicAdventure (talk) 01:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Please remember WP:NOTAVOTE, if you cant explain why the policy applies here towards redirecting then...

closer, please consider the strength of the arguments in your close per WP:NOTAVOTE. If you look at the sources, none of the independent references have Irene...

for keep seem weak and there may be potential outside interest. Added notavote template to clarify how this process works. -- Dane2007 talk 20:56, 2 September...

Delete per nominator --Artene50 (talk) 04:53, 25 July 2012 (UTC) See WP:NOTAVOTE. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC) See 'if the nominator...

volume of "keep" !votes. But Wikipedia is not a democracy, and AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE. All but two of the keep comments here are "per above" and/or bald assertions...

2008 (UTC) The nomination counts as a "vote" already, but really it's WP:NOTAVOTE it's a discussion. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted...

Template:Navbox Ukraine district 2,400 7155 Template:Noprint 2,400 7156 Template:Notavote 2,400 7157 Template:OEDsub 2,400 7158 Template:Official site 2,400 7159...

to this page. 350z33 (talk) 13:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTAVOTE, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and re-read the quote from WP:PVS in my previous comment...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Considering WP:NOTAVOTE, the arguments for deletion are far stronger than those in favor of retaining...

people to participate in this AfD in order to save the article. Added {{notavote}} header. Cindamuse (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC) This is balloney...

further debate (after hopefully discarding the poorly arguments per WP:NOTAVOTE). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:58, 15 September...

No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. WP:NOTAVOTE applies; the arguments in favor of retaining the article are stronger than...

Seems notbale to me.*Treker (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2016 (UTC) *Treker:WP:NOTAVOTE and WP:Clearly notable KDS4444Talk 13:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Fine. I don't...

(UTC) Comment. While the irony is not lost on me I have to wonder if the {{notavote}} tag is needed. Aside from the name of this article is there any evidence...

of WP:Consensus and WP:Polling is not a substitute for discussion (WP:NOTAVOTE), particularly with respect to WP:Articles for deletion and WP:Deletion...

Pure votes are against WP policy; see WP:CON and the more indepth WP:NOTAVOTE. Lest I be called a hypocrite, I admit to sometimes doing that when I think...

(one is a two-sentence mention in passing and the other is irrelevant). NOTAVOTE, etc... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 5 November...

so far voted keep--Fightloungemike (talk) 13:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Also, the same group of singlepurpose MMA deletion only accounts we see...

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC) See WP:JUSTAVOTE, WP:NOTAVOTE. North America1000 01:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Delete perhaps and Draft...

AllegedlyHuman (talk) 19:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC) I wouldn't be so sure, WP:NOTAVOTE is a thing; and looking at stuff like this (US) or this (worldwide) shows...

07:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC) Alternatively, you should probably read WP:NOTAVOTE - if one fails to cite any valid policy or guideline in their stance, it’ll...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete per WP:NOTAVOTE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC) Big Brother New Zealand (edit |...

June 2013 (UTC) Strong Keep — Maile (talk) 14:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. Ansh666 20:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC) unbundle I looked at one of the articles...

template then nominate it for deletion or start a discussion on the talk of {{notavote}} as opposed to cluttering things up here. Thank you, Mr T(Talk?) (New...

Also the number of keep and delete votes is not consensus as AfD's are WP:NOTAVOTE. Ajf773 (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC) Yes, you're bludgeoning the process...

14:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Delete. Doc talk 04:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE. GreyHood Talk 14:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Fellows, let's be reasonable...

on the strength of the arguments rather than a mere vote count per WP:NOTAVOTE. 4meter4 (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Comment. I am copy pasting my...

the introduction of several new sources to this discussion. Also, per WP:NOTAVOTE, polling is not a substitute for discussion. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:01...

April 2020 (UTC) Comment. I'd like to remind the closing admin that WP:NOTAVOTE and I am appalled that not a single argument above is policy based (WP:KEEPPER...

Kite and BWilkins. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC) WP:NOTAVOTE Dr. WTF (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC) And how much better was your...

2016 (UTC) Keep. Gryffindor (talk) 22:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Wikipedia:NOTAVOTE. ✉cookiemonster✉ 𝚨755𝛀 23:20, 20 July 2016 (UTC) Delete. Does not seem...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:NOTAVOTE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Swings-N-Things (edit | talk |...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. This is a prime example of WP:NOTAVOTE. By strength of arguments, consensus is that this topic is not encyclopedically...

articles about any org with such scant coverage. And a majority vote (WP:NOTAVOTE) isn't sufficient for an IAR jusitification either. Now, at least some...

this is common sense") is really frowned upon. I know we need to keep WP:NOTAVOTE in mind, but maybe we should be more accepting at Afd (or other venues...

matters is whether it's a suitable subject for a Wikipedia list, AfD is WP:NOTAVOTE, it relies on evidence and consensus.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:41, 18 November...

somehow, but I have to point out that WP:ITSNOTABLE with no argument (WP:NOTAVOTE) is not an argument, but a baseless assertion. WHY do you think this is...

canvassing problems on this topic in the past, for the record, this is WP:NOTAVOTE. Newshunter12 (talk) 09:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

an innovation. WP:AADD arguments are usually ignored and as this is WP:NOTAVOTE. You make it sound like any editor who expresses valid reasons for why...

article to his organization, he has no independent notability. I'm adding a notavote template as the number of IPs/SPAs leads me to think this has been advertised...

those arguments can be improved or more delete votes appear. See also WP:NOTAVOTE. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk)...

premature. Yes, there are more people saying keep, but keep in mind it's WP:NOTAVOTE. Many of the "keep" rationales are not really valid, with arguments like...

~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Please remember Wikipedia:NOTAVOTE. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Keep Notable prior...

your comments here or even read any of the sources. Remember AFD is WP:NOTAVOTE. Secret account 03:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC) It only takes a few seconds...

Natureium (talk) 20:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Whatever the reason, I put {{notavote}} at the top. !dave 20:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC) I think we should require...