DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...

Pleasure in England? (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) WP:NOTAFORUM Toa Nidhiki05 19:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Delete. Not a suitable subject...

pages. Adding WP:FANCRUFT to various TV/anime/cartoon character pages WP:NOTAFORUM violations on talk pages Socks will often name themselves Gabby, Gabriella...

Cunard (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete; violates WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:MADEUP --mhking (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete....

every hour. Original account was blocked indefinitely for multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations in the span of years. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] New account with...

section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows. This page is WP:NOTAFORUM for speculation on any topic (including the meaning or validity of quotations...

this or this is the proper place. I'm sure this may go against Wikipedia:NOTAFORUM. Cwater1 (talk) 15:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC) There's probably a proper...

254.254.156. Both accounts write the same way, delete content citing WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:OR even when it doesnt apply, and HernánCortés1518 has been reverting...

the surgeon who is going to perform the procedure. Beyond that, see WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:DISCLAIMER. μηδείς (talk) 01:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)...

disruptions [1] by Widr. Eihtesham mainly wrote long violations of WP:NOTAFORUM on Talk:Muhammad and Talk:Depictions_of_Muhammad (in fact, that was the...

– (View log) Original research per WP:NOR, personal reflection per WP:NOTAFORUM, barely referenced with unreliable sources per WP:RS, borderline WP:SPAM...

there's not enough here to tell. Delete per WP:NOTABILITY, WP:OR, WP:NOTAFORUM, etc. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Delete per...

preferred interpretations? Jclemens (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:NPA, WP:AGF... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:58...

2023 (UTC) @Dinah5667 Personal attacks are not allowed and this is WP:NOTAFORUM. Bedivere (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Dinah's comment was about...

several of the IPs made some comments that were removed by an admin per WP:NOTAFORUM. The new user User:Enlightened of All then arrived to revert. This is...

{{Notaforum}} exists. There was a consensus not to create show-oriented templates redundant to other ones. This has to be replaced with {{notaforum}}...

@BrDen's. Thank you. 11WB (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2026 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAFORUM. Aneirinn (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2026 (UTC) No, but WP:TPO is a guideline...

Wikipedia:School and university projects, nor with the basic guidelines such as WP:NOTAFORUM. The described activity had nothing to do with Wikipedia as an encyclopedia...

pages for those people who are. --Jayron32 02:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM μηδείς (talk) 02:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Obviously, you have to engage...

a blog article somewhere, but not for wikipedia. Seems to violate WP:NOTAFORUM ("1. Primary (original) research"; "3. Personal essays") and the point...

pronunciations). Again, WP:NOTAFORUM, stick to the sources. AddMore-III (talk) 06:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Refrain from invoking WP:NOTAFORUM without reading what...

2021 (UTC) Please my friends, this is getting pretty clearly into WP:NOTAFORUM territory: this project, including the reference desks, is not a space...

list. Bob the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 00:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC) {{notaforum}} is another one that should be added when needed, maybe even temporarily...

show and anime topics, as seen from the edits of Merrie. A lot of WP:NOTAFORUM violations which Gabby is also known for. Interested in The Loud House...

years. Please understand that the RefDesk, and Wikipedia broadly, are WP:NOTAFORUM for you try to use to argue your metaphysical perspectives on. This desk...

(blether) 23:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC) (edit conflict) OP, please see WP:NOTAFORUM, which applies to these reference desks as much as any other page on this...

(UTC) Boldface words: I don't see how {{metatalk}} and {{notaforum}} are interchangeable. {{notaforum}} = "This is the talk page for the XYZ article. Don't...

posted on the wikipedia? Way to pull up a file list? Saving articles WP:NOTAFORUM Licking county children services and there neglect!!!!!! dicussion-EGLISE...

ISBN 81-203-2427-7.  --Lambiam 15:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Erm... WP:NOTAFORUM (point 1), WP:NOTMANUAL and WP:INDISCRIMINATE would cover it; we aren't...

MOS:IDENTITY, but it is derived from the page which it links to, namely WP:NOTAFORUM. That policy says "Talk pages are not mere general discussion pages about...

the treatment (though by no means perfect) given at Bicycle law. See WP:NOTAFORUM on plea point #5. I would tend to think Wikibooks would be a better place...

2009 (UTC) KveD (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Keep. I note that WP:NOTAFORUM states that "Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome...

16:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Anyway, all that's off topic. And these WP:NOTAFORUM kinds of comments are really irrelevant to the topic's notability. Volunteer...

needed. htom (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC) (At the risk of breaching WP:NOTAFORUM,) WP:AGF "is the assumption that ... most people try to help the project...

principle base your comments on pertinent sources (i.e. avoid contravening WP:NOTAFORUM). And what's with repeatedly calling CMD Jones? What even is that? Well...

desire to have an ideological "conversation" here at all, as this is WP:NOTAFORUM. The reference desk is for providing reference; if the OP has a more specific...

2601:85:C101:C9D0:E84F:38C8:581F:8496 (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. Volunteer Marek 18:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC) And? My point is that Ukraine...

2023 (UTC) @Dinah5667 Personal attacks are not allowed and this is WP:NOTAFORUM. Bedivere (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Dinah's comment was about...

this or this is the proper place. I'm sure this may go against Wikipedia:NOTAFORUM. Cwater1 (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC) @Cwater1: web pages are often...

is removed. No? Is citing WP:NOTAFORUM sufficient justification for removing a user's comment? I agree that WP:NOTAFORUM discourages such comments, but...

interests. --Jayron32 17:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC) Forgive this psuedo-WP:NOTAFORUM divergence, as this is definitely not what the OP was inquiring about...

only about the show itself. I, therefore, removed these comments per WP:NOTAFORUM. El duderino, not logged in with his account but editing unannounced with...

controversial to begin with. Dispute templates include (but are not limited to) {{notaforum}}, {{controversial}}, {{Controversial-issues}}, and {{calm talk}}. Unlike...

talk page of Jesus for months. Almost all of his comments violate WP:NOTAFORUM as he challenges the facts in the article, supported by several academic...

refactoring and now edit warring, under "removed personal attack", "WP:NOTAFORUM" and "Do not presume to practice medicine without a license". Diffs of...

interesting, by the way, that other editors were earlier demonstrating NOTAFORUM violations, but UseThecommandLine only removed mine. See the comment to...

dealing with WP:TEND, etc. A good deal of time is spent dealing with socks, NOTAFORUM, and POV pushers, and just generally trying to understand what IPs are...

April 2018 (UTC)). --Trovatore (talk) 20:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC) Keep. NOTAFORUM (like most of WP:NOT) is mostly about article space. This page implements...

actually looking at BB's contributions he seems to be totally unaware of WP:NOTAFORUM, so I think Legacypac idea has a merit. Someone who is here just to discuss...

carrots→ 00:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC) I don't want to encourage the WP:NOTAFORUM opining further, but in response to that unsourced statement of opinion...

setting a BITE trap. I mean, if there is just so much NOTAFORUM going on, should "talk-(notaforum)" help or something better ? maybe separate links to...

the issue of the deleted text. Please note that User:Hrafn added the {{notaforum}} after I objected to the removal of the comments. MoodyGroove (talk)...

the topic, which is hardly much of a problem though it did violate WP:NOTAFORUM. Several users have explained, over and over again, that we operate by...

sounding like the most morbid (and possibly even insensitive) version of WP:NOTAFORUM, to those without a common frame of reference. Anyhow, best of luck with...

shouldn't be banned based on the above, though he perhaps needs to read WP:NOTAFORUM. — Czello 20:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC) The not-so-coded language here...

editor and myself have been trying to remove this material on BLP and NOTAFORUM grounds, but are being reverted on grounds we don't have the right to...

rehabilitation, I think a WP:NOTHERE block is in order. Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM. -- Softlavender (talk) 02:27, 17 August 2018 (UTC) MPants at work—I see...

a "WP:NOTAFORUM" edit summary is entirely appropriate in such cases and I do that all the time. This is not true deletion because that NOTAFORUM content...

the political stances of the users involved, in blatant violation of WP:NOTAFORUM (as is predictable when Wikipedia editors forget that they are not meant...

whether or not this constitutes edit warring aside, I also feel that WP:NOTAFORUM should be read by Ozzie10aaaa, as several posts in recent times appear...

block for violation WP:NOTAFORUM HurricaneFan25 18:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC) The user has already been notified of NOTAFORUM many, many times. And he's...

considerable concerns with his Ref Desk activity. He does not understand WP:NOTAFORUM and refuses to consider advice to provide better quality answers or not...

Edits in anime, manga, Monster High, and TV show topics, as well as WP:NOTAFORUM violations Gabucho181 2024-05-04 17:29:04 Block evasion and persistent...

controversial to begin with. Dispute templates include (but are not limited to) {{notaforum}}, {{controversial}}, {{Controversial-issues}}, and {{calm talk}}. Unlike...

not helpful to the project at all, and using the excuse you are using (notaforum) is not backed up by the facts. Just stop deleting other editors comments...

fosfor. --DePiep (talk) In accordance with point 4 of WP:FORUM and {{notaforum}}, I twice removed clearly inappropriate discussion Talk:US Airways Flight...

Definitely not a justified !vote per NOTAFORUM, but also not indicating attacking civilians is legitimate. A NOTAFORUM breach does not warrant sanction Again...

thread was opened. Part 6 has now been added: Talk:Jared_Taylor#Part_6:_WP:NOTAFORUM . :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 00:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC) Blocked – 24 hours...

citing NOTAFORUM, BLPPRIMARY and BLPTALK. Hippeus should justify his reasons or else restore my comment. I've commented on the application of NOTAFORUM and...

against TRM now would be purely punitive, and you should be aware of WP:NOTAFORUM as much as anyone. This page is not WP:AE, either, and nothing here is...

users object to Dasuprmastr's section on the grounds of WP:SOAP and WP:NOTAFORUM. This was explained to Dasuprmastr on his talk page [204] and also in...

I think any solution should be focused there. I recently added the {{notaforum}} template to Talk:Global warming controversy after seeing the goings-on...

point out to you, MoritzB, in the form of both talk page notes and {{Notaforum}} warnings, that wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that you are incorrectly...

Comments: This isn't a brand new user. Here they mention the guideline WP:NOTAFORUM, no way a brand new user knows about that. Here they indicate that they've...

of article talk pages, and tagged the article talk page with Template:Notaforum. I'd recommend, from here on, removing without comment any posts which...

July 2020 (UTC) FTR, I endorse Bacondrum's removal of what is a classic NOTAFORUM rant, something which is not at all unusual to find in this subject area...

March 2009 (UTC) Unresolved This single purpose account has violated WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAP at Talk:Aspartame controversy for several days. Essentially...

editor using multiple IPs continues to post and repost incomprehensible NOTAFORUM comments to Talk:Responsibility for the Holocaust. [73], [74], [75], [76]...

More eyes would probably be useful at this festival of sockpuppetry; the votestacking, off-wiki canvassing and accusations are already starting to fly...

But Wikipedia talk pages are not the place to do it: Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM. "In addition, bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss...

hard not getting the impression that this editor seems to be believe WP:NOTAFORUM doesn't apply to him. John Carter (talk) 20:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)...

(talk) 17:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Please read WP:DE, WP:TE, WP:IDHT, WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:CIR, WP:PROFRINGE, and other such policies and guidelines...

of the article, so I would tend to say that you could remove it per WP:NOTAFORUM. Dismas|(talk) 01:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC) Hi, You have Armageddon and...

talk page discussions into general discussion about NLP, contrary to WP:NOTAFORUM. He has been given numerous warnings about this kind of editing behaviour...

03:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) WP:NOTHERE, WP:PROMO, WP:OR, WP:FRINGE, WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:DISRUPTION and WP:TENDENTIOUS (on article talk pages)...

CONTENT policies. This is WP:NOTAFORUM and you don't get to treat it as such (unless of course someone is violating NOTAFORUM). If you think otherwise you...

Fences&Windows 21:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Is it wrong to put this tag {{notaforum}} on an article talk page for the article Fearless Photog created by User:Dream...

and will continue to be handed out. I would also suggest using the {{notaforum}} template on particularly troublesome talk pages and removing posts that...

pages, where a lot of his disruption takes place in the form of TPG and NOTAFORUM guidelines and unsourced disparaging comments about the subject.--Cúchullain...

the intent that it be incorporated into the article, so citations of WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAP in edit summaries when removing it are a non sequitur. Please...

least) are far more disruptive than productive. The long-term general WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:CIVIL snarkiness, disregard for sourcing guidelines, and WP:IDHT problems...

Following some additional WP:NOTAFORUM-type discussion ([50]), and as I had previously reminded the user of WP:NOTAFORUM (e.g., [51]), I pointed him to...

that point, there's still the matter that his repeated violations of WP:NOTAFORUM and the WP:TPG, his unwillingness to get on track despite numerous warnings...

left-wing bias. He is also intent on using talk pages in violation of WP:NOTAFORUM. None of this is acceptable, and if he does not take this thread, and...

editors, such as WP:COI, WP:NOR, WP:SYNTH, WP:A, WP:UNDUE, WP:PROVEIT, WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:TALK, WP:NPA, WP:SOAP, WP:CIVIL, WP:RS, WP:DISRUPTIVE, WP:TALKNO before...

Beeblebrox (talk) 23:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC) Give me a break..the {{notaforum}} banner has been at the top of that talkpage for a long time...if "editors"...

there is no misrepresentation of their status. Keeping WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTAFORUM in mind I disagree with your assessment that they are using the article...

Schwarzenegger in the back, and reverts it back in after it is removed for WP:NOTAFORUM. here he incorrectly (and irrelevantly) inserts the claim that an individual...

Without knowing specifically what you're referring to, WP:SOAPBOX or WP:NOTAFORUM might apply here. Dayewalker (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC) I've...

is unsourced (unsourceable) bigotry and a violation of WP:BLP and WP:NOTAFORUM - this isn't a place to promote original unsourced conspiracy theories...

at this point? Jayjg (talk) 04:48, 31 May 2011 (UTC) I've added the {{NOTAFORUM}} flag to the Talk page to try and forestall disruption. I've also read...

discussions that are not in violation of WP policy or guidelines (like WP:NOTAFORUM, for example). --Born2cycle (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC) I agree...

added by Ancient Astronaut (talk • contribs) 19:32, 28 July 2010 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM might be the justification. The content I saw him remove in the edit which...

after RandomCanadian removed some of his content that was abusing the WP:NOTAFORUM principle, JoseLuisMoralesMarcos removed RandomCanadian's edits in what...

14 October 2021 (UTC) Because this IP has been engaging in the same WP:NOTAFORUM type of disruption on and off for at least three years, I have blocked...

at Talk:Azov Battalion#POV pushing edit-a-thon by Azov members as WP:NOTAFORUM, before it gets completely out of hand? Not discussing the article, just...

about Wikipedia policy in general and WP:AGF, WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and WP:NOTAFORUM in specific. However, as a slight mitigating factor, he is a very new...

manner that violates WP:FORUM by some editors. This is why I added {{notaforum}} too, a few days ago. However, most (if not all) of these editors seem...

(UTC) To all as well ... my only question being, will this violation of notaforum lead to trouts, or to the ever-more-popular (they don't mean forever)...

in order to remove completed discussions, out-of-date commentary, or NOTAFORUM material which crowds the page and makes it more difficult for editors...

because I claim that what somebody wrote on a talk page violates the wp:notAForum guideline does not mean that I get to delete what they wrote. (I know...

allowed? (Idot (talk) 10:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)) Broadly, yes, per WP:NOTAFORUM: "Material unsuitable for talk pages may be subject to removal per the...

to this discussion. Drsmoo is warned that their interpretation of WP:NOTAFORUM is seriously flawed and their removal of other editors' comments from...

talk pages of their articles, they would be instantly removed under WP:NOTAFORUM and no one would disagree. But when someone speaks out against harassment...

editing, was to remove another editor's talk page comment, citing WP:NOTAFORUM).[182] An increasing number of reports go down that way. Maybe the admins...

waffle ball league that not notable) The talk page content violated WP:NOTAFORUM I used the wrong terminology as I'm new here with the SPA accusation,...

editor who mention that this really isn't what talk pages are for, per WP:NOTAFORUM. The IP claims their opinion on prosecutor actions will somehow improve...

summary of the conclusions reached follows. Ironically closing per WP:NOTAFORUM. This isn't an incident or an ANI matter Sædontalk 08:07, 26 July 2012...

and now forum-shopping with his false complaints. His claims about WP:NOTAFORUM were wrong, so he attempted to call my edits vandalism. When that failed...

remove the second person's statements that included bigotry, claiming WP:NOTAFORUM, which I read, and no policy seems to exist for censorship of either person...

threads on numerous topics in the past when it appears that if violates WP:NOTAFORUM. I also made some other edits on that page of a purely talk page maintenance...

ignore the rest if no such specificity is forthcoming (with a reminder of NOTAFORUM). Edit warring and the like might, of course lead to edit warring reports...

August 2022 (UTC) The reporter (Ayshdbd) appears to have violated WP:NOTAFORUM in Talk:2022 monkeypox outbreak#Incorrect statistics & Talk:2022 monkeypox...

that his actions are perfectly fine? Not only are they going against WP:NOTAFORUM (irrelevant to a serious article's talk page discussion), but they are...

two women's opinions; hectored other editors for opinions; disputed WP:NOTAFORUM comments; presented a strawman argument; hectored some more; made personal...

contain material that violates WP:BLP, and the edit in question violated WP:NOTAFORUM anyway.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 04:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC) That's an...

in which we weave. El_C 22:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Endorse close per WP:NOTAFORUM. Cullen328 (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Endorse close to quote a wise...

change. Whether it's indefinite or time-delineated, remove talk due to the NOTAFORUM violations referenced above as well as his countdowns. Blocked means you...

2 January 2022 (UTC) I could go on about the other editors doing WP:NOTAFORUM or WP:RIGHTGreatWRONGs, as mentioned in the talk page, but it's pointless...

2016 (UTC) Asking an admin to take a look at his userspace and apply NOTAFORUM at their discretion. John from Idegon (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)...

a one-time instance as far as has been presented (absent a trivial WP:NOTAFORUM violation, but in any event both excuseable in a newer user) and frankly...

time served, let off with a warning; and the warning should be about WP:NOTAFORUM more than about actual threats of violence. Huldra was wasting people's...

[148][149] discussed vandalism [150] discussed COI [151] discussed WP:NOTAFORUM, [152] and questioned the accuracy of a categorisation; [153][154] – all...

made even more explicit in this comment [269] (which I removed per WP:NOTAFORUM). While the user is entitled to have an opinion, they should not be using...

February 2021 (UTC) I agree. I reported this IP at AIV for continuing NOTAFORUM violations after a final warning [220] but it was not acted on. The user...

legal issues involved for wikipedia, and other cases, like enforcing WP:NOTAFORUM when hiding comments is the only real solution. More importantly, it is...

Viriditas (talk) 23:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC) @Rusf10: you wrote, "This is WP:NOTAFORUM, so I refuse to debate such topics as your strongly held belief that the...

Codename Lisa (talk) 17:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Seems a basic WP:NOTAFORUM violation. If they do it again, a 24 hour block should give them a clue...

2013 (UTC) The MKULTRA comments seemed completely legitimate to me. WP:NOTAFORUM is not some absolute prohibition on all comments that do not explicitly...

alleged conduct issues. Secondary concerns are Original research and WP:NOTAFORUM, which the IP has been previously warned about as well. - MrX 15:23, 7...

purpose. The refdesks are a part of Wikipedia, not Reddit and, as such, WP:NOTAFORUM applies there as absolutely as it does on any other space on this project--unless...

is tempting to continue debating them but I shall no longer contravene NOTAFORUM myself. @David Eppstein:. I would just like other eyes on this situation...

September 2020 (UTC) No, it's working as designed. I suggest you read WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:Verifiability before attempting to make further edits. OhNoitsJamie...

is as far as you can go. (There appears to be a new policy allowing WP:NOTAFORUM posts to be removed, but even this would have been considered impolite...

is no issue of free speech or "chilling" discussion here, because WP:NOTAFORUM. Formerip (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Seeing the user involved...

20:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Perfectly revertable (is that even a word), WP:NOTAFORUM. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:59, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Lol, I blocked him. These...

gap have been bindingly found so wanting as to be banned. (See also, WP:NOTAFORUM Wikipedia is not a free speech forum). Every ban is made with the understanding...

elsewhere, unless it's blatantly bad (personal attacks, WP:BLP violations, WP:NOTAFORUM violations), you shouldn't be deleting discussions. Sergecross73 msg me...

DeCausa, please play nicer. At the same time, the user was pointed to NOTAFORUM a number of times, yet they persisted, and when DeCause pointed (or kicked)...

[152] The talk page removals were correct, as they were a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM, with Stonkaments trying to argue numbers to undermine BLM. Stonkaments...

improving the article, what you’re posting there is off-topic per WP:NOTAFORUM (which has been linked to you at least three or four times now). In this...

makes a claim that a Polish one exists]. Shrug. His view is debatable, WP:NOTAFORUM might be invoked and discussion closed if it is irrelevant for encyclopedia...

wrong making those statements. - I have already pointed out to you WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAPBOX and much of the content of your comments fell foul of it...

result in your being blocked from editing. Stop spamming. Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 15:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC) ...and my subsequent...

understandable; 2. A large percentage of the discussion has moved into WP:NOTAFORUM territory; 3. Editors are attacking each other as sockpuppets, to the...

04:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC) Hello, Bitwixen. Are you familiar with WP:NOTAFORUM? Did you really cite Larry Sanger in support of your point of view? Are...

to clean up the talkpage by deleting the offendingnmaterial citing WP:NOTAFORUM and keep doing so until the IP gets the hint. Legacypac (talk) 22:41,...

WP:NOTFORUM applies as well. Nihlus 03:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM does not apply to any of those edits--they all concern policy, content...

polls about WP:TERTIARY > WP:SECONDARY > WP:PRIMARY > WP:OR(!) (wp talk NOTAFORUM, poll 2) went nowhere; I note the negative response by Sandbh showing...

POV pushing is never based on sources, so it's turning the page into WP:NOTAFORUM, which is disruptive on its own. Thank you for your attention. Hamstergamer...

protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Support per notaforum. Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Support, and prefer...

policy at the top of the page. So WP:DISCLAIMER, WP:BLP, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:NOTHOWTO, etc., would still apply. And frankly, we are a lot more...

for him. Classic WP:SPA advancing a WP:FRINGE view in violation of WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAPBOX. This extends back to May, when I soundly debunked them...

is no issue of free speech or "chilling" discussion here, because WP:NOTAFORUM. Formerip (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Seeing the user involved...

Unnecessarily ascribes motivations and beliefs to other editors June 24 WP:NOTAFORUM violation Diffs of previous relevant sanctions, if any N/A Note: @Fish...

if any, pertinence to developing the article. I have linked them to WP:NOTAFORUM on multiple occasions, and yesterday I explained on my talk page the purpose...

(per their interpretation) alleged violations of guidelines such as wp:NotAForum, or their misinterpretation of wp:nor/wp:ver to say that something can...

sources could be found. I consider that a mitigating factor about the NOTAFORUM concerns. Although calling him "buddy" may not have been an insult, I...

repeat offenders; and closing discussion sections that violate WP:TPG, WP:NOTAFORUM, and WP:TEND.--Cúchullain t/c 20:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC) This section...

contested and further argued my point, they said HORSEMEAT, SOAPBOX, NOTAFORUM etc, from the sheer hostility of the talk page, mind you I did not even...

Shrike, only two bother me much, #1 and #2. It's not that he violated NOTAFORUM with #2 so much as it evinces bias. As to #1, I'm very tired of editors...

either. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAFORUM. Either ask a research question or ask elsewhere. Remsense聊 12:07, 18...

with the WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT." [244] "WP:NOTAFORUM|NOTAGODDAMNFORUM" (removed the links to show he swapped NOTAFORUM to well, what he said.) [245] "there...

might be -- in good faith -- missing something very important. PS: WP:NOTAFORUM is disingenuous. WP is a forum, different from the Athenian forum and...

nature of their POV pushing. He has been already warned over WP:UNDUE, NotAForum, bludgeoning in the recent months. However, the activity of Bookku on...

placed at the top of a talk page as a pre-emptive warning – similar to {{Notaforum}}, just relating to the issue of original research. —Sangdeboeuf (talk)...

personal opinion on the Kosovo dispute. He/she needs to understand that WP:NOTAFORUM. IJA (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC) I make the policy point that...

because you're drawing your own conclusions from it. WikiPedia is WP:NOTAFORUM the only thing under discussion in this AfD is whether or not the rationale...

their POV. They also use Talk:Aspartame controversy in violation of WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAP. Just so this doesn't sound like fishing, please note the...

crappy BOB FM. 68.102.42.216 (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, as you should know by now, this is a help desk for editing Wikipedia...

here it is not happening ever, loosening of the WP:BLP guidelines and WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:Talk page guidelines that protect our living subjects is not an...

that. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 13:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I've added {{notaforum}} for you, hopefully that will help bring this rule to people's attention...

allowable reasons. I removed the pertinent section of the talk as WP:NOTAFORUM. The whole page didn't need to be deleted. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 8...

often difficult enough to keep such comments out of talk pages (per WP:NOTAFORUM). Providing a technical means of how to plaster such comments all over...

(Reverting edit(s) by RhondaLange (talk) to rev. 1344844034 by B.J: WP:NOTAFORUM (UV 0.1.6)) Tags: Ultraviolet Undo diffhist Talk:Doug Ford 23:46 +1,416...

in the information war". Another user closed the discussion with "WP:NOTAFORUM",[4] but I suppose the question is of some interest and importance to...

"forums". This is a project to build an encyclopedia. Please read WP:NOTAFORUM. Also see WP:CHEATSHEET for an introduction to the coding we use. Cullen328...

If the spam is on an article talk page then you can remove it per WP:NOTAFORUM. If it's on a user talk page, you should ask the user to remove it. But...

dealing with WP:TEND, etc. A good deal of time is spent dealing with socks, NOTAFORUM, and POV pushers, and just generally trying to understand what IPs are...

orangemarlins reply to this. An attempt at explaining my position reduced to WP:NOTAFORUM and the response to the content of my argument is a curt WP:WEIGHT. Is...

Talk:Brexit? -Inowen (nlfte) 06:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC) 1. Per TPO and NOTAFORUM, posts not geared to improving the article can be removed. Both your threads...

Adding "improvements to" could go a long way toward remedying the WP:NOTAFORUM issues pervasive on talk pages. Ideally, I'd also like to change "content...

resources). Oppose as being overly consuming of server resources, WP:NOTAFORUM, and WP:NOTSOCIAL. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC) I think...

providing relevant information to a notable subject Forums WP:NOTFORUM WP:NOTAFORUM WP:NOT#CHAT Forums or chats (other than discussions on improving the encyclopedia...

not allow non-constructive edits. Furthermore, since talk pages are WP:NOTAFORUM, someone who doesn't know anything about the topic at hand and is just...

topics for the purpose of griping about politics broadly -- please see WP:NOTAFORUM), no there is no equivalent of a right to be forgotten in terms of American...

benefactor to jump in.Camelbinky (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:NOT#ESSAY, WP:NOTSOAPBOX. If there is no actual policy proposal here...

2023 (UTC) Jessamyn, I removed the cheap shot comment on the basis of WP:NOTAFORUM. Cullen328 (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC) Is there any way to look...

up! Ok, all joking aside, OP, you must understand that as this is WP:NOTAFORUM, we can't engage in discussion about what might happen at some far future...

terrible suggestion. --Aquillion (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM is a pretty strong Wiki rule, and this amounts to a forum discussion of...

involved issues. --Clipname (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAFORUM for abstract debate, my friends. The OP's question is arguably too broadly...

routinely remove frivolous and disruptive talk page comments, using WP:NOTAFORUM as an edit summary. Cullen328 (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC) Hello...

possible the OP really even cares about in any real-world sense. This is WP:NOTAFORUM, and by conveniently prefacing their (?) question with "This is not legal...

pronunciations). Again, WP:NOTAFORUM, stick to the sources. AddMore-III (talk) 06:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC) Refrain from invoking WP:NOTAFORUM without reading what...

implication that the other Karen Read is a more notable subject, but this is WP:NOTAFORUM and I would ask you focus future contributions on whether *this article*...

social media has bled into Wikipedia. It's toxic, plain and simple and WP:NOTAFORUM as well as WP:BLP vios are ignored. By editors and admins alike. "other...

at least. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC) {{Notaforum}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Thank you both - I could...

two women's opinions; hectored other editors for opinions; disputed WP:NOTAFORUM comments; presented a strawman argument; hectored some more; made personal...

added by Baseball Bugs (talk • contribs) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM Try to bear in mind that if someone does not (or cannot) follow up your...

Israeli/contemporary Jewish politics? If the latter, please bear in mind WP:NOTAFORUM: we aren't here to engage in open ended discussion, and I'm sure I'm not...

it's appropriate to bring up at an article talk page or WP:GUNS per WP:NOTAFORUM. Any advice would be appreciated. –dlthewave ☎ 18:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)...

the treatment (though by no means perfect) given at Bicycle law. See WP:NOTAFORUM on plea point #5. I would tend to think Wikibooks would be a better place...

--Crackthewhip775 (talk) 03:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC) What content box? Do you mean {{notaforum}}? Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 03:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC) The contents box...

– (View AfD) Original research per WP:NOR, personal reflection per WP:NOTAFORUM, barely referenced with unreliable sources per WP:RS, borderline WP:SPAM...

edit in 2021, what would you do and why? A: The post itself is in WP:NOTAFORUM territory, and is questionable. The username falls under WP:IMPERSONATE...

preferred interpretations? Jclemens (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:NPA, WP:AGF... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:58...

deleted from this article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, this is not the correct place to disscuss that. Also I alredy told you...

(talk) 07:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC) Checking your edits, Mydearpeople, WP:NOTAFORUM seems relevant. Use your social media instead. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...

23:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC) I have added a message box based on Template:Notaforum to the article's talk page ([8]). It could probably use some improvement...

summary: "Removed personal essay not related to improving the article per WP:NOTAFORUM." Yunshui 雲‍水 11:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC) Since our last communication I...

personal opinion on the Kosovo dispute. He/she needs to understand that WP:NOTAFORUM. IJA (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC) I make the policy point that...

(and sometimes necessitate for correction) -- are clear violations of WP:NOTAFORUM. I repeat: we are not here to speculate; this is a reference desk, not...

experienced editor has already reverted the addition on the basis that WP:NOTAFORUM and that the addition was not in English. You can do the same sort of...

Second that. In fact there's yet another policy statement about it at WP:NOTAFORUM which you might looking at which is another section in that 'anti-social'...

Cunard (talk) 04:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy Delete; violates WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:MADEUP --mhking (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Speedy delete....

2601:85:C101:C9D0:E84F:38C8:581F:8496 (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. Volunteer Marek 18:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC) And? My point is that Ukraine...

assertions, to avoid speculation, and generally be as consistent with WP:NOTAFORUM as we would for any other space on the project--or, at the very least...

stop posting here though, since I know the relevant rules, and so WP:NOTAFORUM probably applies to my last couple of posts. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:07,...

a blog article somewhere, but not for wikipedia. Seems to violate WP:NOTAFORUM ("1. Primary (original) research"; "3. Personal essays") and the point...

16:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC) Anyway, all that's off topic. And these WP:NOTAFORUM kinds of comments are really irrelevant to the topic's notability. Volunteer...

WP:NOTAFORUM. This discussion is about the reliability of a website, not the 2nd Amendment OK Folks, Here is the 2nd Amendment. A well-regulated militia...

herring conversation, that threatens to shanghai this AfD, which per wp:notaforum may perhaps not be the right place for this highly general discussion...

the treatment (though by no means perfect) given at Bicycle law. See WP:NOTAFORUM on plea point #5. I would tend to think Wikibooks would be a better place...

←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC) See WP:NOTAFORUM. μηδείς (talk) 02:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Is a "member" of a college at...

ISBN 81-203-2427-7.  --Lambiam 15:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Erm... WP:NOTAFORUM (point 1), WP:NOTMANUAL and WP:INDISCRIMINATE would cover it; we aren't...

doesn't boost the article's credibility; the man's a nutcase. Per WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:COATRACK, WP:FRINGE, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and WP:V, delete. - Biruitorul...

the rich and the poor. 50.4.236.254 (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. Dmcq (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Hi. I visited the Tsuchida Gozen...

and restored them after they were reverted. Certainly a violation of WP:NOTAFORUM and probably several other policies too. MaxBrowne (talk) 03:24, 26 May...

the treatment (though by no means perfect) given at Bicycle law. See WP:NOTAFORUM on plea point #5. I would tend to think Wikibooks would be a better place...

because you're drawing your own conclusions from it. WikiPedia is WP:NOTAFORUM the only thing under discussion in this AfD is whether or not the rationale...

2014 (UTC) I would remind you to be WP:CIVIL, remind you that this is WP:NOTAFORUM, and also state that no, I do not go around induscriminatly inserting...

see that here. Many people seem to be forgetting that AfDs are Template:notaforum, and they're suggesting that because they personally don't like what the...

November 2013 (UTC) Yes I removed them for being WP:POV. Aside from the notaforum bit the template duplicates everything that is in the TW and TM templates...

so. Please stop it, take some time to read WP:NPA, WP:SOAPBOXING, WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:PROMOTION, WP:CIVILITY and WP:NEUTRALITY and then decide if you can...

Contribs 09:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC) What happens if Users disregard WP:NOTAFORUM using article talk, to argue on a topic unrelated to the topic or the...

there's not enough here to tell. Delete per WP:NOTABILITY, WP:OR, WP:NOTAFORUM, etc. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Delete per...

doesn't boost the article's credibility; the man's a nutcase. Per WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:COATRACK, WP:FRINGE, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and WP:V, delete. - Biruitorul...

00:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Delete all per GorillaWarfare and per WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Gamaliel (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC) Comment...

purposes of WP:V judging in context, and it would tend to avoid the WP:NOTAFORUM stuff these open ended queries get. Alanscottwalker (talk) 22:34, 22 July...

and maybe a little bit of extra text to contextualize them. This is WP:NOTAFORUM for you to make your best guess, stitch together scraps of your own knowledge...

wrought by its economic institutions and their successors, but this is WP:NOTAFORUM. ☯.ZenSwashbuckler.☠ 20:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC) It is worth considering...

you may like to paste on top of the talk page before you remove text: {{notaforum|(title)|(additional comments)}} Lova Falk talk 20:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)...

WP:NOTAFORUM. If you have a specific question, feel free to post it, but we don't do "a discussion on the topic itself" here. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite...

deleted from this article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, this is not the correct place to disscuss that. Also I alredy told you...

2014 (UTC) I would remind you to be WP:CIVIL, remind you that this is WP:NOTAFORUM, and also state that no, I do not go around induscriminatly inserting...

more broadly) by indulging in various WP:NOTHERE habits and constant WP:NOTAFORUM propensities for their own self-aggrandizement and hobby-chatting, and...

itself are normally deleted. Relevant policy pages include WP:BLP, WP:NOTAFORUM, and WP:TALKPAGE. Dismas|(talk) 15:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC) I have verbal...

meaningless arguements on idssues that dont matter if WP is to keep out NPA and NOTAFORUM issues, it would be MUCH more productive to go on adding content to pages...

Talk:Bradley Manning about the location of the page at this point. WP:NOTAFORUM, and many of the threads which have cropped up are basically people complaining...

any part of wikipedia where you can communicate openly without the wp:notaforum restrictions? Pass a Method talk 21:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Not really;...

assumptions about editors' motivations? Please review WP:NPA, WP:AGF and WP:NOTAFORUM. Jayjg (talk) 10:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC) A far better better page would...

content on someone else's user space. As a result, I put up this tag {{notaforum}} on both pages. However, no one seems to be responding to the notice...

the topic. General chat type discussion is not permitted. Please see WP:NOTAFORUM for additional guidance. Off topic posts are routinely reverted. Cullen328...

26 October 2023 (UTC) AtypicalPhantom blocked indefinitely for ECR and NOTAFORUM violations. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)...

_for_the_treatment_of_COVID-19 but my concerns were dismissed with WP:NOTAFORUM. I don't think it's a stretch to question a study if the actual abstract...

herring conversation, that threatens to shanghai this AfD, which per wp:notaforum may perhaps not be the right place for this highly general discussion...

Motto of the Day Participants Discussion (Nominations) Guidelines Nominations (New mottos go here) In review + Specials + Decisions Frequently Used Ideas...

needed. htom (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC) (At the risk of breaching WP:NOTAFORUM,) WP:AGF "is the assumption that ... most people try to help the project...

Template:Not verified Template:Notability Template:Notability essay Template:Notaforum Template:Note Template:Now Template:NowCommons Template:Now Commons Template:Now...

17:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete all per GorillaWarfare and per WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Gamaliel (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Delete...

interesting analysis and speculation here, but this is deep, deep into WP:NOTAFORUM territory. The OP was actually one of our minority of initiating parties...

see that here. Many people seem to be forgetting that AfDs are Template:notaforum, and they're suggesting that because they personally don't like what the...

could be listed with the fingers for one hand) who regularly abuse WP:NOTAFORUM and other principles of WP:What Wikipedia is not. They regularly engage...

That's not relevant to this discussion. Please remember that this is WP:NOTAFORUM. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 18:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC) Nobody is...

Edits in anime, manga, Monster High, and TV show topics, as well as WP:NOTAFORUM violations Gabucho181 2024-05-04 17:29:04 Block evasion and persistent...

and b) anything that can be speedily removed can be done so using WP:NOTAFORUM. Borderline T2. Sceptre (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC) Oppose Personally...

(UTC) I have to say, when dubious charges are being flung about, like WP:NOTAFORUM with regard to comments that are clearly about the structure and content...

2015 (UTC) Not meaning to give offense, Wnt, but let's try to keep WP:NOTAFORUM in our sights here; we could spend years comparing the relative merits...

Isn't irony ironic? Objective3000 (talk) 19:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. Please stop trying to disrupt the NPOV Noticeboard discussion (3rd request...

that non-really-a-question. In other words, the whole request was a WP:NOTAFORUM exercise. Which I would be tempted to point out is something that would...

amounted to nothing more than rah, rah, I like your article and breached WP:NOTAFORUM. We don't want to encourage WP:EDITCOUNTITIS and padding of edit counts...

are sometimes used to simply airing ideological views even after the {{notaforum}} has been posted. Also, in some spiteful battles, users will go to article...

Sheldrake. As for NOTAFORUM concerns, in one case it was not inappropriate, as I was responding to another user making comments violating NOTAFORUM and their...

editing. Distortion and misrepresentation of sources, WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, WP:NOTAFORUM all apply, and I'm fairly tired of dealing with it by myself. Some assistance...

of whether the article should have a POV tag as been resolved. This is NOTAFORUM for discussing original research. - MrX 19:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC) You...

(Reverting edit(s) by RhondaLange (talk) to rev. 1344844034 by B.J: WP:NOTAFORUM (UV 0.1.6)) Tags: Ultraviolet Undo diffhist Talk:Republican Party (United...

proceed. Regards, -- Muzhogg (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC) I slapped a {{notaforum}} on there too. Personal attacks and insults should be deleted per WP:BLP...

logs) Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the form of frequent WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SunilNevlaFan✨ 17:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC) Semi-protected...

semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Slow but persistent WP:NOTAFORUM violations ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:44, 17 November 2022 (UTC)...

Theologian81sp (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2021 (UTC) Theologian81sp. Please read WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:16, 6 July 2021...

is right (LOL). – Howard the Duck you are clearly violating under WP:NOTAFORUM, and possibly a disruption on the topic. I understand your arguments here...

March 2012 (UTC) Quinacrine (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Read WP:NOTAFORUM And given the fairly racist crap you wrote it is not surprising it was...

Talk:Bucha_massacre#This_talk_page_is_not_the_place_to_deny_the_massacre_(WP:NOTAFORUM). Nobody even tried to archive or remove problematic discussions, which...

| logs) Temporary semi-protection: Consistent talk page vandalism, WP:NOTAFORUM violations, etc. etc. wizzito | say hello! 00:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)...

to the talk page have been constructive at all. Many violations of WP:NOTAFORUM by various different IPs ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:19, 11 October...

WP:NOTAFORUM The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Young'uns today have short terms for so many things – buttdialing, dancing...

←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. There are plenty of sources which support your interpretation of events...

outcome for the other. I propose redirecting these templates to Template:Notaforum. It's not apparent to me that these TV-specific templates provide any...

2021 (UTC) Declined. I am the admin (not "moderator" — Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM, as stated in my protection summary) who imposed the protection after...

Talk:Mad_Men#Question_about_smoking because he thinks it violates WP:NOTAFORUM. Five times on Dec. 17 [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] twice today: [23] [24]...

Semi-protection: IP with dynamic (all from Finaland ie. same user) adding a WP:NOTAFORUM discussion that violates W:BLP and other policy. GreenC 12:40, 11 September...

[talk] 16:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC) Cessaune Most angry rants are removed as WP:NOTAFORUM or just for the anger. I think the "good" comment was removed because...

Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs restoring comments removed per WP:NOTAFORUM. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period...

request for comment/debate on youtube video, not for references--WP:NOTAFORUM The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Hi. Is...

appropriate to put it in the article, but talking about it (not in violation of NOTAFORUM) that it should not be put in and why (and the discsussions to the contrary)...

to be front and center. -- Avanu (talk) 05:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. The BLP noticeboard is not the place to discuss your views on the subject...

December 2021 (UTC) Not a relevant question for WP per WP:RGW and WP:NOTAFORUM. We follow the WP:RS. That’s it. DeCausa (talk) 10:14, 3 December 2021...

WP:NOTAFORUM The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. I found this video on race and intelligence and would like to know how...

frankly, this is not really the place to be having that discussion per WP:NOTAFORUM. But I will say that Wikipedia's policies on precluding that information...

with multiple comments and no references. I'd remind us all this is WP:NOTAFORUM. SemanticMantis (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Get back to us after...

take it to the talk page for the Boulder shooting. Otherwise, this is WP:NOTAFORUM. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC) The Atlanta shooter...

particularly on the article talk page. I added the {{calmtalk}} and {{notaforum}} to the talk page yesterday, but it doesn't seem to have helped. I would...

wooF 14:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC) So what has this to do with WP, WP:notaforum? My problem is this sort of thing plays into the hands of those who want...

"Closing discussion that is not about improving this article, per WP:NOTAFORUM. Please do not reply to trolling comments from the IP editor in Montreal...

the ones that you and Snoog posted here are (see below). @Snoog: per WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:AGF, please skip your analysis of US politics, editors' motivations...

2012 (UTC) I have removed the rant by Nightowl as a BLP violation and WP:NOTAFORUM.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC) Alvin Curran (edit | talk | history |...

topic of article-improvement that I deleted it on the grounds that WP:NOTAFORUM, although perhaps WP:SOAPBOX or WP:BATTLE would have been more appropriate--he...

yours, in a whole new section, is anything other than WP:SOAP? We are WP:NOTAFORUM. I don't really disagree with anything you said, but I know this is a...

enjoying some banter I'll take the second every time. Also, Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM, and WPO ISAFORUM and sometimes I want to talk about the bed I built,...

Wikipedia:School and university projects, nor with the basic guidelines such as WP:NOTAFORUM. The described activity had nothing to do with Wikipedia as an encyclopedia...

(talk) 23:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC) Albeit getting dangerously close to WP:NOTAFORUM, even if you disregard BBC, DW, AFP, etc as “NATO propaganda,” I suppose...

WP:NOTAFORUM The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. There is a high probability that this is related to a previous question...

produce reliable secondary sources to support your arguing, remember WP:NOTAFORUM. . . dave souza, talk 12:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Also, your "quick look"...

enjoying some banter I'll take the second every time. Also, Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM, and WPO ISAFORUM and sometimes I want to talk about the bed I built,...

talk page. Mann jess (talk · contribs) and I both tried to explain WP:NOTAFORUM and the proper ways to effect change and/or contribute to Wikipedia. Xan81...

[43] As it's just a general complaint I deleted it, gave the editor a notaforum message. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC) This article currently...

tantamount to using Wikipedia as a forum or bulletin board in violation of WP:NOTAFORUM. You could create your own space for doing that at Wikia.  – ukexpat (talk)...

threads that are off-topic, potentially hostile, unproductive, and WP:NOTAFORUM violations. Let me ask this of all parties: If you don't want active editors...

article talk page or project page should be relevant to the topic per WP:NOTAFORUM. The outlier is that April fool's crap. As such, these two templates are...

algebraic fact and therefore cannot be inserted into our articles. Also, WP:NOTAFORUM applies.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC) The following...

and patience. 69.112.128.218 (talk) 22:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC) See WP:NOTAFORUM, as this "general" question seems to have some very specific subtext to...

Talk:Transgender. - Manifestation (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM and frankly no one cares. It is a slur if people use it as a slur; that...

tendentious talk space edits over the past couple of days. He needs to read WP:NOTAFORUM. More than that, I'm getting a little tired of the "I'm a new user" chant...

WP:NOTAFORUM Shantavira has given you good advice, but UK English in my opinion, is always better. Haha. Roxy the dog 17:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC) In my...

following reliable sources. – Herzen (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2014 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM again. Also discussing editors again. Also making serious discussion impossible...

is just his own assumption. I call this particular case WP:OR and WP:NOTAFORUM, but overall, the user has worrying activity. This includes his rhetoric...

for battleground editing, NPOV violations, ECR violations, WP:IDHT, WP:NOTAFORUM violations, WP:RGW. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)...

above is entirely WP:OR, and, were it up to me, would be removed per WP:NOTAFORUM. While you and your opinions have value, they're not what we're after...

for battleground editing, NPOV violations, ECR violations, WP:IDHT, WP:NOTAFORUM violations, WP:RGW. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)...

Semi-tangent Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM but also relevant to Wikipedia, so I think it's not entirely out of place...

Bureau (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Persistent WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SunilNevlaFan✨ 16:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Declined - talk...

noticeboard. I was thinking that creating an edit filter to filter out WP:NOTAFORUM posts to talk pages might be helpful. Something along the lines of the...

that you (and all other editors) remove NOTAFORUM talk page posts on sight, with an edit summary of WP:NOTAFORUM. That's what I do. Cullen328 (talk) 02:24...

Some articles are likely to be subject of disputes during the time their contents are discussed in the political life. A template should be created to...

block. Indeed, I think vast swaths of userboxes violate WP:POLEMIC, WP:NOTAFORUM, and various other policies meant to create a firewall between our personal...

throwing their weight around, because they're too cowardly to quote "NOTAFORUM" to User:ScottishFinnishRadish. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2023...

Semi-tangent Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 14:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM but also relevant to Wikipedia, so I think it's not entirely out of place...

to require a great deal of speculation and may take us firmly into WP:NOTAFORUM territory, but then there are also legitimate references out there discussing...

the ECP user (or an option for them to reinstate). Posts falling to WP:NOTAFORUM are usually quickly deleted or closed, citing the restriction. While perhaps...

my removal of the comments for WP:NOTAFORUM reasons, that very same comment is now collapsed for both WP:NOTAFORUM AND WP:PERSONALATTACK, by someone other...

RumyantsevPolkovodets (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC) Read the policy WP:NOTAFORUM please. You are using our talk pages as forums to promote your WP:POV...

revision 1302288965 by 2601:18C:8183:D410:495:98:E555:831C (talk) WP:NOTAFORUM" Comments: The /64 range has been blocked for 3 months by ScottishFinnishRadish...

20:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Two comments: 1. Many users need to read WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:OTHERSTUFF. This is a discussion of Al Jazeera. Comments about...

17:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC) I reverted this because it was something of a NOTAFORUM outburst. It needs to be expressed more carefully and in line with talk...

20:02, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Could you take it to one of your talk pages? WP:notaforum إيان (talk) 20:10, 3 March 2026 (UTC) Not needed, I will have no further...

discussion and repeatedly into conduct that a) is of a WP:SOAPBOX/WP:NOTAFORUM nature non-conducive to the work of building the encyclopedia, and b)...

WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:NOTHINGPERSONAL. CNC (talk) 20:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC) Unless Skynet gets them first. EEng 22:34, 4 December 2024 (UTC) We all know...

ignore the intermediate source. Zerotalk 05:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:SOAPBOX apply here and it is getting into personal attacks. PackMecEng...

indef, but protection is clearly needed here to attempt to stop the WP:NOTAFORUM-esque comments. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)...

WP:BLPTALK. I see that a few comments this month were deleted under WP:NOTAFORUM, which may apply to some (but only some) of what you're concerned about...

Talk:OpenAI (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: WP:NOTAFORUM violations resumed after previous protection expired. Zoe Trent Fan🎤💍...

is plenty that I could post here, but I avoid doing so because of WP:NOTAFORUM. I would urge others to so the same. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:03, 12 January...

EvansHallBear (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2026 (UTC) EvansHallBear – it is NOTAFORUM. Whether Trump wants to force Iran into whatever or not... is not to discuss...

implication that the other Karen Read is a more notable subject, but this is WP:NOTAFORUM and I would ask you focus future contributions on whether *this article*...

sorts of things happen on them, but one of the biggest issues are WP:NOTAFORUM violations. The main problem that I will be focusing on in this post is...

materialism or Existence precedes essence. Keep those remarks to yourself. WP:NOTAFORUM. And you seem to equivocate between "mystical delirium" and "religious...

anyway) seems futile and unproductive. Basically, it has become a WP:NOTAFORUM, we aren't a website for people to create lists of the most important...

is right (LOL). – Howard the Duck you are clearly violating under WP:NOTAFORUM, and possibly a disruption on the topic. I understand your arguments here...

editor's April 20, 2024 comment at Talk:Project 2025, it had elements of NOTAFORUM but ended with an appeal to protect the article. This was their third...

significant problem with WP:GAME as well, specifically in regards to WP:NOTAFORUM. They profess to know of that, and are likely genuinely aware of it, but...

edit(s) by ~2026-23734-34 (talk) to rev. 1349426400 by OneReaction5890: WP:NOTAFORUM. (UV 0.1.6)) Tags: Ultraviolet Undo diffhist Talk:Reverse racism 15:11...

usage of phrases like "/thread", please realize that Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM (edit: I realize you have been warned against making forum comment several...

vandalism – Ongoing comments about non Wikipedia topics violating WP:NOTAFORUM. IPs and new users continuing to report Facebook scams and attempting...

crimes would this be? MaskedSinger (talk) 12:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. We don't need to have that discussion here. BobFromBrockley (talk) 13:39...

| history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Persistent violations of WP:NOTAFORUM. A page notice was put in place to try to stop the inappropriate discussions...

WP:NOTAFORUM CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC) I've kind of had a recent problem with regular Wikipedia my problem is that I feel like I'm...

distinctly remember the April comments because I (as an IP) ended up getting a NOTAFORUM revert from Ks0stm for making somewhat similar (albeit a little less harsh)...

to what can be considered a potential CoI. מתיאל was blocked for "WP:NOTAFORUM/WP:SOAP, offensive language, and continuing to argue personal views rather...

block user · block log) After a complete set of four escalating warnings for WP:NOTAFORUM violations at Talk:Mini Hatch and Talk:Mini, they just did it a fifth...

fought/attacked/slaughtered outside of Gaza on October 7. Cognizant though of WP:NOTAFORUM, I'll refrain from commenting on the appropriateness of being fair to...

on the article talk page, and the comment was summarily removed per WP:NOTAFORUM. No reliable sources were cited above, just hearsay from a right-wing...

non-constuctive article talk page comments with the edit summary of WP:NOTAFORUM. Cullen328 (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC) Hi All, We are creating...

@BrDen's. Thank you. 11WB (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2026 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAFORUM. Aneirinn (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2026 (UTC) No, but WP:TPO is a guideline...

Lova Falk (talk) 06:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC) Hello, Lova Falk. Per WP:NOTAFORUM, any editor can remove any inappropriate talk page commentary. I recommend...

sanctions are needed here, but this seems well outside the area of WP:NOTAFORUM removals with which I would feel comfortable. Cheers, all. Dumuzid (talk)...

included in the draft and other comments that have veered off-course into WP:NOTAFORUM areas for several months now, and show no sign of ceasing, which is unusual...

enjoying some banter I'll take the second every time. Also, Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM, and WPO ISAFORUM and sometimes I want to talk about the bed I built,...

protect because the disruption is not heavy enough (yet?)...yes, we have notaforum and other activities, but these are spread out over a longer period of...

sanctioning editors. We can create an edit notice for the talk page with {{notaforum}}. Quick and decisive action is the best way to keep it under control...

only complaint filed against me is that I once removed a post as per WP:NOTAFORUM. As Rosguill points out below, it was indeed a "borderline call". I first...

27 October 2024 (UTC) I removed the talk page section in question, per NOTAFORUM, and just noticed this thread. Considering the content of their talk page...

rescue him. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC) This is WP:NOTAFORUM DecafPotato (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Post-posting oppose 1.-Already...

fit the bill? NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 04:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC) "Notaforum" template added. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:27, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Doubt...

--2A00:23C7:4F92:4E01:9C74:2862:F1BB:11D4 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM. ---- RockstoneSend me a message! 06:01, 11 February 2025 (UTC) Wait then...

entire discussion has been removed by Sol505000 under the reason "WP:NOTAFORUM": see the page history of Talk:Voiced alveolar and postalveolar approximants...

August I archived the articletalk ramblings and warned the user about WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:WALLSOFTEXT, WP:PA, WP:OR, WP:BLUDGEON, and WP:NOTESSAY on his usertalk...

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations over the past few weeks. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2023...

comments raise a substantial indication of WP:NOTHERE: in addition to the NOTAFORUM issues, there's pretty continuous WP:RGW, WP:POVPUSHING, and WP:SOAPBOXING...

talkpage, I saw in the history that they had been warned already for WP:NOTAFORUM just days prior to what was removed on Talk:Yasuke, so I used the Level...

(Emicho) which sounds a lot like he is trying to 'befriend' me (against WP:NOTAFORUM) rather than anything contribitional. He also has a habit of inserting...

that I would unblock if they prove they understand and will follow WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:REFB. Sergecross73 msg me 13:47, 14 March 2025 (UTC) The following...

nothing else. And as others have noted, it also at a minimum violates WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAP. And whatever the alphabet soup, it just violates the spirit...

advance the work of the project. If nothing else, the edit summary was a WP:NOTAFORUM violation and had the TA been warned and continued to share their personal...

grief, I'm pretty sure I've lectured Eeng about "one joke too many" / WP:NOTAFORUM here at ANI at least once in the past. What a hypocrite I've become. Well...

nothing else. And as others have noted, it also at a minimum violates WP:NOTAFORUM and WP:SOAP. And whatever the alphabet soup, it just violates the spirit...

moderation efforts at the talkpage (closing random discussions with WP:NOTAFORUM tags... and therefore simultaneously acknowledging that they know I have...

for an obvious WP:BLP violation at Talk: Christopher Langan, plus WP:NOTAFORUM behavior and uncollaborative belligerence. Cullen328 (talk) 19:19, 26...

do not at all count as valid removal targets as being vandalism or WP:NOTAFORUM issues. If anything, such actions represent TPH's battleground stance...

| links | watch | logs) Reason: Persistent disrupting editing per WP:NOTAFORUM 67.187.246.18 (talk) 13:56, 13 August 2025 (UTC) Already protected by...

before someone gets themselves into real trouble. And remember that WP:NOTAFORUM, the talk pages are not for criticizing (or praising) the subject, but...

protection for indefinite: Persistent sockpuppetry and violation of WP:NOTAFORUM. M S Hassan (talk) 11:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC) Already done by administrator...

OP has withdrawn complaint. They know the way to WP:SPI and have been encouraged to make use of it. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC) The following...

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated WP:NOTAFORUM discussions have been perpetuated by various IPs since before this article's...

IPs/temp accounts, and not a single one of them was productive; all were WP:NOTAFORUM violations, blank edit requests, and such. This is a huge percentage of...

have to come to this, but even after multiple lengthy protections about NOTAFORUM matters, every single edit by a TA has been irrelevant to the article...

Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs, same person, ignoring WP:NOTAFORUM. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2025 (UTC) Automated comment:...

| watch | logs) Reason: High level of IP nonconstructive editing. WP:NOTAFORUM; WP:NATIONALISTM; WP:NOTHERE, WP:SPA. Jingiby (talk) 18:09, 14 January...

discussion, I am seeing several unhelpful, possibly WP:BLP / WP:BDP / WP:NOTAFORUM posts by the Mountain of Eden without citing reliable sources. Insisting...

civilians according to Israel[30] or more according to some other sources. is NOTAFORUM, that this The sources used for the death toll in the article aren't all...

a pattern of disruptive editing almost everywhere. There's soapboxing/notaforum, NPOV violation, and adding "Black" to a quote where it was not found...

attractive. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 21:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTAFORUM, WP:ASPERSIONS. Selfstudier (talk) 22:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Endorse...