DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

to do it manually instead, follow this process: Shortcuts WP:MULTIAFDWP:MULTIAFD WP:BUNDLEWP:BUNDLE If nominating similar articles for deletion or merging...

the grouping of articles does not appear to meet the guidelines at WP:MULTIAFD. While created by the same user, the subjects differ enough such that bundling...

it is possible to do a MULTIAFD with Twinkle Mikeycdiamond (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC) Nevermind, I thought a multiAFD required a different template...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Please note that this page will be used for WP:MULTIAFD for all articles in Category:Lists of international cricket five-wicket...

manufactured products. As such, bundling the articles violates the WP:MULTIAFD guideline: "For the avoidance of doubt, bundling should not be used to...

Softlavender (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Comment - Please see WP:MULTIAFD, Softlavender. I created the AfD, then added the related page, as per guidelines...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

Tolba. Next time User:Ibrahim.ID, please consolidate similar AFDs per WP:MULTIAFD. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

and go for WP:MULTIAFD. ImmortalWizard(chat) 20:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) @ImmortalWizard: Just to clarify, I am not suggesting MULTIAFD, but for improvements...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

the nomination as well. To bundle, the instructions can be found at WP:MULTIAFD. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Note:...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

Procedural keep all - these articles do not appear to be related per WP:MULTIAFD, although all of the articles appear to have been created or improved during...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

individual AfDs, per the If you're unsure, don't bundle it warning in WP:MULTIAFD. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC) Daniela Carrandi (edit | talk |...

". Most of them were furious because I did MULTIAFD. Some suggested to AFD individually instead of MULTIAFD, and here am I. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat)...

into a bundled nomination for you and closed the other 4 AfDs. See WP:MULTIAFD. Natg 19 (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Delete. No source. The album...

do that? ACB Smith (talk) 13:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC) Acbsmith go here: WP:MULTIAFD. Just replace the AfD template on the top of all the other pages with the...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

combined into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD. (non-admin closure) — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

February 2016 (UTC) Yes, it's deliberate, I bundled the nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. And yes, if there is enough in terms of WP:RS for the company, information...

09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) '@ChrisTheDude: I think it's best to do WP:MULTIAFD. ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Note - this nomination...

reference, instructions on creating an AfD for multiple articles are at WP:MULTIAFD. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC) Delete as not notable...

(talk) 09:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

apparently. These should have been discussed in one AFD, i believe, per wp:MULTIAFD. Commenters here should consider commenting there, too, for efficiency...

AfDs, consider in the future combining AfDs of multiple articles per WP:MULTIAFD. This seems to have been a prime candidate in this case.—Bagumba (talk)...

Procedural keep all - the articles do not appear to be related, per WP:MULTIAFD, although many appear to have been created or improved during Women in...

mentioned in !votes, but they were not formally added to the nomination per WP:MULTIAFD, and the !votes referred to "per nom", with minimal reference to the others...

02:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Comment 151.54.141.47, I suggest you go to WP:MULTIAFD and scroll down to the section Notifying substantial contributors to the...

views) (capital G), both created by the same user, for deletion per WP:MULTIAFD as well. CaradhrasAiguo (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Delete Original...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep per my comments on Group A. Next time please use WP:MULTIAFD so people don't have to post their comments 4 times. BLAIXX 15:06, 23 April...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

18:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC) Hey, this should be discussed as part of a wp:multiafd. Add this to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University)...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed) Mangoe (talk) 16:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 16:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

in itself. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Please read WP:MULTIAFD. Onel5969 TT me 15:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Keep Precedent with the other...

they point to the correct discussions. For a bundled AFD, following WP:MULTIAFD, only one deletion discussion should be created. Twinkle can't really be...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

@Yoblyblob I think these types of pages are good candidates for WP:PROD or WP:MULTIAFD so AfD doesn't get too cluttered. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2025...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

(programming language) or Christophe de Dinechin. No objection to delete. Per WP:MULTIAFD should we also be considering XL (programming language) (possible dab?)...

discussion instead of nominating individual articles separately (see WP:MULTIAFD for instructions). Also, I’d advise you to give a more specific reason...

grouped together two articles. Multiple article AfDs are allowed see WP:MULTIAFD--Rusf10 (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Under which critieria as stated...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

(talk) 17:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC) I think it would be beneficial. See WP:MULTIAFD for a guide. I'd do it but i'm not sure if I'm allowed to do it for you...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

cross-reference them. It seemed to me that this would save time, per WP:MULTIAFD. ubiquity (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC) KEEP - until these are...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed) Mangoe (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

18:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC) This is, by the way, the advice given at WP:MULTIAFD. Bondegezou (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Keep. Though above all I...

Spiderone 23:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

(UTC) Please see the technical discussion above. This is exactly what WP:MULTIAFD is designed to manage so that we don't have a daily log full of identical...

read the ANI (now archived), and see Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#MULTIAFD_-_.22near_the_start.22. And please stop with the personal attacks. Oncenawhile...

Gestrid (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Adding Htaw Me' Bah FC per WP:MULTIAFD. — Gestrid (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

J947 02:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC) This is discussed at WP:BUNDLE (WP:MULTIAFD), which IMO gives two different reasons why this AfD should not be changed...

made to this page. The result was Procedural close because in this WP:MULTIAFD editors are unlikely to reach consensus. In this nomination 5 editors favored...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

didn't take - none of them are tagged. You'll want to have a look at WP:MULTIAFD for instructions on how to nominate those articles. UltraExactZZ Said ~...

the other example. If I had known that earlier, I would have went for MULTIAFD. Even if they were produced together, I don't see any point of FORKing...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

Stadium, which actually reached consensus. Also, the SNOW was because of the MULTIAFD complex. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 23:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC) Note:...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

Spiderone 23:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University), instead, as a wp:MULTIAFD. I was proposing there mergers to a combo list-article. Hope this can be...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed — too many inclusions) Mangoe (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2021...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed due to formatting issues) Mangoe (talk) 22:23, 19 March...

article appears to be part of a series of season articles, but per WP:MULTIAFD I am suggesting one (the first one I came across) for deletion now to see...

dependent on the parent topic article and should have been bundled (see WP:MULTIAFD). postdlf (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC) List of recipients of Ten...

apart from that. scope_creep (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC) I think a WP:MULTIAFD would be a good idea here. Marquardtika (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep per my comments on Group A. Next time please use WP:MULTIAFD so people don't have to post their comments 4 times. BLAIXX 15:07, 23 April...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

(UTC) Reply - @[email protected]:, @Onel5969:, @Gongshow:, @Bejnar:, WP:MULTIAFD, WP:RELIST. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep per my comments on Group A. Next time please use WP:MULTIAFD so people don't have to post their comments 4 times. BLAIXX 15:07, 23 April...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list removed - too many template transclusions. 18th March log page...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

these AfDs the proper way might have been a more sensible option (see WP:MULTIAFD). BilletsMauves€500 16:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC) So I'm supposed to read...

software doesn't do it automatically, you have to follow instructions at WP:MULTIAFD and take it from there. @Sergecross73:, what if these were withdrawn and...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

but due to similarity they are included in the same nomination, per WP:MULTIAFD. This has also been stated above. – Rhain ☔ 06:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)...

add the other airline destination lists to this AfD? That's what the WP:MULTIAFD guideline sets out for multi-page deletions anyway. By the sounds of it...

@Pppery: As a procedural note, have you considered making a broader WP:MULTIAFD (or for that matter, even a more general "Software comparisons on the wiki"...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

@Liz:: It's supposed to lead here :-) It's a multiple nomination. See WP:MULTIAFD —МандичкаYO 😜 21:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC) Sorry, I missed the listing of...

is clearly how its supposed to be done as per WP:MULTIAFD. Just because you do not like the multiAFD process does not mean I cannot use it.--Rusf10 (talk)...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). Brimslade Lock Heathy Close Lock Cadley Lock Bedwyn Church Lock Burnt...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

Premonition, appears to be notable. Given the range of notabilities, a WP:MULTIAFD is not appropriate here. It should be unbundled and renominated.4meter4...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

--Odie5533 (talk) 06:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC) @ViperSnake151: See WP:MULTIAFD steps IV and V. I think the other pages needs to be tagged {{subst:afd1|Giant...

individually. I would urge that they be combined, pronto, into one. Per WP:MULTIAFD. Having multiple discussions of the same issue would waste everyone's time...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

views) Domdeparis (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC) @Domdeparis: Per WP:MULTIAFD, bundling AfDs should occur only at the start or near the start of the...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

don't know whether he/she just being ironic tho. I suggest to make it a WP:MULTIAFD that encompases all of those lists as pointed out by MarkZusab above. I...

(talk) 20:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC) @Dxneo follow the instructions at WP:MULTIAFD and you'll have it. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:53, 11 November...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

notable, you could perhaps include Tally Solutions in this nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. Vexations (talk) 14:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Delete It still doesn't change...

because bundling it with the others is grossly inappropriate and violates WP:MULTIAFD. Smartyllama (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2018 (UTC) I'm afraid you'll have...

first few entries. I have not, however, had the confidence to try a WP:MULTIAFD yet, which would perhaps have been the ideal way to present the Meston/Greene/West...

WP:NSPORT. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Carrandi and WP:MULTIAFD. Hmlarson (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) One more: WP:SPORTSPERSON. Hmlarson...

Procedural Keep Given the wide range of notabilities of these articles, a WP:MULTIAFD was inappropriate. Some of these are obviously notable, others obviously...

propagated into WP. MB 21:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Comment - as per WP:MULTIAFD, this multiple nomination does not appear to meet those criteria. Onel5969...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

on the campus. Should have been discussed in one AFD, i believe, per wp:MULTIAFD. Commenters here should consider commenting there, too, for efficiency...

2020 (UTC) Procedural keep. Tinton5's comment makes me think that a WP:MULTIAFD is not a good procedure for these articles as there are multiple articles...

on a per-case basis. While the nomination mentioned multiple pages, WP:MULTIAFD was not followed with notication on only NBL (United States) Rookie of...

(UTC) Please see the technical discussion above. This is exactly what WP:MULTIAFD is designed to manage so that we don't have a daily log full of identical...

Keep All are notable per WP:GEOLAND and this is a blatant abuse of WP:MULTIAFD. Smartyllama (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Procedural Keep as the...

need to list them all here and tag each page with a link here, see WP:MULTIAFD. Strong support a delete/merge all per nom, obviously separate pages listing...

(talk) 19:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC) Procedural Keep Inappropriate WP:MULTIAFD as Blaisdell and Araby are definitely notable and this demonstrates an...

Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Of course there is. See WP:MULTIAFD. There are many mass nominations at AfD, so you are certainly not "forced...

09:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

There's a process for multi-page AfDs and it's not being followed. See: WP:MULTIAFD. It exists for a reason, specifically, to avoid the massive confusion that...

discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Procedural Keep This WP:MULTIAFD was inappropriate given these teams have received vastly different amounts...

not fall for E.M.Gregory's wikilawyers, the nomination complies with WP:MULTIAFD.--Rusf10 (talk) 21:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC) I'm not, I honestly thought this...

–Novem Linguae (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC) I did everything the WP:MULTIAFD process told me to do. I'm not sure what else I had to do to make this...

relations" or similar. Will also note these would be a good candidate for WP:MULTIAFD given their similarity/desire to avoid causing clutter on AfD.Anonrfjwhuikdzz...

referred broadly to such articles. I added all relevant articles to this multiafd - there is no reason why genocide definitions is the first - they are all...

(talk) 00:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Nominator should have considered MULTIAFD. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 00:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC) He did but...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

relations" or similar. Will also note these would be a good candidate for WP:MULTIAFD given their similarity/desire to avoid causing a backlog on AfD. Anonrfjwhuikdzz...

be. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Procedural keep: Poor WP:MULTIAFD nomination. Your interpretation of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

have never been a bundled nomination. None of the examples given at WP:MULTIAFD fit this group of articles. While they are all songs on the same album...

have to go through this in dozens of separate discussions. Why is the WP:MULTIAFD process not being followed when the nomination is exactly the same in every...

though understandably so since the nomination is a less-than-obvious WP:MULTIAFD. Fixing that now... Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,...

or promotional spam, each page should be nominated separately per WP:MULTIAFD – Kjerish (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Yes, I’m sure that would...

the consensus was strong there. I've tried to follow the process for WP:MULTIAFD here, not sure what else I can do. In the spirit of AfD I'll leave open...

as a list. Seems to be the very essence of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. As per WP:MULTIAFD, nominated one first to see consensus. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for...

and go for WP:MULTIAFD. ImmortalWizard(chat) 20:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) @ImmortalWizard: Just to clarify, I am not suggesting MULTIAFD, but for improvements...

with no consensus. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC) WP:MULTIAFD indicates AFDs should be bundled when they are, "A group of articles with...

article at AfD and see how it goes, before listing an entire group (WP:MULTIAFD). If this is deleted, I'll support and nominate for deletion, all 60 articles...

excluded -- can't imagine what it would be, a mall is a mall, but maybe). WP:MULTIAFD gives step-by-step instructions on how to do this. Let's do that, and fine...

for those that do not fail RELIABLE and NGEO. No, it doesn't, because WP:MULTIAFD has not been followed. Only one article has been nominated, only one set...

sources directly from the LDS Church, I think it is more than okay to have a MULTIAFD. ––FormalDude talk 06:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC) @FormalDude would you be opposed...

2022 (UTC) Comment @WaddlesJP13:, I think you forgot to do step IV in WP:MULTIAFD when you nominated this list, as only Texas Agriculture Code has the AFD...

Oath2order (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Instructions are in the link WP:MULTIAFD. Bri (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks, Bri. This is helpful. I knew...

deletion/Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. This didn't seem to meet MULTIAFD as each of them are at a different level of RS reporting, but the general...

deletion at this time, as I'd like to focus on this discussion first. (WP:MULTIAFD: "for group nominations it is often a good idea to only list one article...

nomination should also have been bundled with the original nomination per WP:MULTIAFD, but the nominator contends that they are separate organisations, despite...

as noted in my original post. I'm using the procedure described at WP:MULTIAFD. List one, see how it goes, and then nominate the rest in the "group"....

its not notable, but clearly that logic doesn't apply. If you read WP:MULTIAFD it says "bundling should not be used to form consensus around policy decisions...

reason to oppose) Isn't the proper process for bundling AfDs to use WP:MULTIAFD? I still haven't figured out why this request is posted here rather than...

relations" or similar. Will also note these would be a good candidate for WP:MULTIAFD given their similarity/desire to avoid causing a backlog on AfD. Anonrfjwhuikdzz...

add additional articles AFTER the discussion was already underway. WP:MULTIAFD makes it pretty clear that there are four categories of articles that may...

WP:MULTIAFD - closed 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Bo Vonk - (3687) - AfD merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD -...

abandoned pages about once-promising startups, I'd be grateful. (See also WP:MULTIAFD for why pages are typically nominated one-by-one.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:25...

2018 (UTC) I see there is a process for "bundling" multiple AfD's: WP:MULTIAFD. We should probably use that. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:46, 1 November...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

11:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Keep (procedural), a ridiculously large multiafd with 36 articles, lets say a perfunctory 5minute search for references...

most of the pages deleted were from bundled nominations. However, at WP:MULTIAFD, it states, "For the avoidance of doubt, bundling should not be used to...

since the guidance at MULTIAFD is not specific as to how to interpret "near the start" (FYI I will propose an amendment at WP:MULTIAFD). I am therefore fine...

similar or identical rationales, the nominations should be bundled (see WP:MULTIAFD). Rebbing 23:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Unfortunately, this is not their first...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

read the ANI (now archived), and see Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#MULTIAFD_-_.22near_the_start.22. And please stop with the personal attacks. Oncenawhile...

(UTC) At the moment they have not been properly bundled as described in WP:MULTIAFD. I'm not sure what @TG-article's plans are for how to proceed, but notice...

America1000 16:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC) See also: WP:TRAINWRECK and WP:MULTIAFD, where it states, "For the sake of clarity, debates should be bundled only...

individual AfDs, per the If you're unsure, don't bundle it warning in WP:MULTIAFD. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC) Daniela Carrandi (edit | talk |...

acceptable to open multiple related AfDs that are not clear-cut cases for WP:MULTIAFD. — MarkH21talk 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC) The Methodist AFD sort of proves...

the grouping of articles does not appear to meet the guidelines at WP:MULTIAFD. While created by the same user, the subjects differ enough such that bundling...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

Softlavender (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Comment - Please see WP:MULTIAFD, Softlavender. I created the AfD, then added the related page, as per guidelines...

different reason and may hence deserve their own AfD discussion (as per WP:MULTIAFD). (list omitted) Mangoe (talk) 15:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Note: I believe...

acceptable to open multiple related AfDs that are not clear-cut cases for WP:MULTIAFD. — MarkH21talk 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Yeah, IMO you have not understood...

". Most of them were furious because I did MULTIAFD. Some suggested to AFD individually instead of MULTIAFD, and here am I. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat)...

is clearly how its supposed to be done as per WP:MULTIAFD. Just because you do not like the multiAFD process does not mean I cannot use it.--Rusf10 (talk)...

J947 02:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC) This is discussed at WP:BUNDLE (WP:MULTIAFD), which IMO gives two different reasons why this AfD should not be changed...

Spiderone 23:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

Procedural Keep Given the wide range of notabilities of these articles, a WP:MULTIAFD was inappropriate. Some of these are obviously notable, others obviously...

have to go through this in dozens of separate discussions. Why is the WP:MULTIAFD process not being followed when the nomination is exactly the same in every...

add additional articles AFTER the discussion was already underway. WP:MULTIAFD makes it pretty clear that there are four categories of articles that may...

manufactured products. As such, bundling the articles violates the WP:MULTIAFD guideline: "For the avoidance of doubt, bundling should not be used to...

Tolba. Next time User:Ibrahim.ID, please consolidate similar AFDs per WP:MULTIAFD. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 22:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

2020 (UTC) Procedural keep. Tinton5's comment makes me think that a WP:MULTIAFD is not a good procedure for these articles as there are multiple articles...

WP:NSPORT. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Carrandi and WP:MULTIAFD. Hmlarson (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC) One more: WP:SPORTSPERSON. Hmlarson...

don't know whether he/she just being ironic tho. I suggest to make it a WP:MULTIAFD that encompases all of those lists as pointed out by MarkZusab above. I...

because bundling it with the others is grossly inappropriate and violates WP:MULTIAFD. Smartyllama (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2018 (UTC) I'm afraid you'll have...

grouped together two articles. Multiple article AfDs are allowed see WP:MULTIAFD--Rusf10 (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC) Under which critieria as stated...

excluded -- can't imagine what it would be, a mall is a mall, but maybe). WP:MULTIAFD gives step-by-step instructions on how to do this. Let's do that, and fine...

09:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

February 2016 (UTC) Yes, it's deliberate, I bundled the nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. And yes, if there is enough in terms of WP:RS for the company, information...

in itself. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Please read WP:MULTIAFD. Onel5969 TT me 15:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Keep Precedent with the other...

Procedural keep all - these articles do not appear to be related per WP:MULTIAFD, although all of the articles appear to have been created or improved during...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

not fall for E.M.Gregory's wikilawyers, the nomination complies with WP:MULTIAFD.--Rusf10 (talk) 21:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC) I'm not, I honestly thought this...

acceptable to open multiple related AfDs that are not clear-cut cases for WP:MULTIAFD. — MarkH21talk 05:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC) The Methodist AFD sort of proves...

dependent on the parent topic article and should have been bundled (see WP:MULTIAFD). postdlf (talk) 02:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC) List of recipients of Ten...

first few entries. I have not, however, had the confidence to try a WP:MULTIAFD yet, which would perhaps have been the ideal way to present the Meston/Greene/West...

deletion at this time, as I'd like to focus on this discussion first. (WP:MULTIAFD: "for group nominations it is often a good idea to only list one article...

referred broadly to such articles. I added all relevant articles to this multiafd - there is no reason why genocide definitions is the first - they are all...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

sources directly from the LDS Church, I think it is more than okay to have a MULTIAFD. ––FormalDude talk 06:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC) @FormalDude would you be opposed...

Spiderone 23:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Keep or Merge Have you never heard of WP:MULTIAFD or are you deliberately being disruptive? My keep reasons are on one of...

(talk) 19:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC) Procedural Keep Inappropriate WP:MULTIAFD as Blaisdell and Araby are definitely notable and this demonstrates an...

on the campus. Should have been discussed in one AFD, i believe, per wp:MULTIAFD. Commenters here should consider commenting there, too, for efficiency...

apparently. These should have been discussed in one AFD, i believe, per wp:MULTIAFD. Commenters here should consider commenting there, too, for efficiency...

discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC) Procedural Keep This WP:MULTIAFD was inappropriate given these teams have received vastly different amounts...

(UTC) Reply - @[email protected]:, @Onel5969:, @Gongshow:, @Bejnar:, WP:MULTIAFD, WP:RELIST. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

cross-reference them. It seemed to me that this would save time, per WP:MULTIAFD. ubiquity (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC) KEEP - until these are...

The problem is you want it both ways. First you ask me to withdraw the multiAfD nomination and now when I do you're saying I'm not allowed to renominate...

02:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Comment 151.54.141.47, I suggest you go to WP:MULTIAFD and scroll down to the section Notifying substantial contributors to the...

Gestrid (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Adding Htaw Me' Bah FC per WP:MULTIAFD. — Gestrid (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

–Novem Linguae (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC) I did everything the WP:MULTIAFD process told me to do. I'm not sure what else I had to do to make this...

Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC) Of course there is. See WP:MULTIAFD. There are many mass nominations at AfD, so you are certainly not "forced...

as a list. Seems to be the very essence of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. As per WP:MULTIAFD, nominated one first to see consensus. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for...

with no consensus. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC) WP:MULTIAFD indicates AFDs should be bundled when they are, "A group of articles with...

discussion). It is likely to be sent to AfD itself soon. In my opinion, a WP:MULTIAFD is needed for most of the articles in Category:Texas A&M University colleges...

@Pppery: As a procedural note, have you considered making a broader WP:MULTIAFD (or for that matter, even a more general "Software comparisons on the wiki"...

article at AfD and see how it goes, before listing an entire group (WP:MULTIAFD). If this is deleted, I'll support and nominate for deletion, all 60 articles...

notable, you could perhaps include Tally Solutions in this nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. Vexations (talk) 14:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC) Delete It still doesn't change...

apart from that. scope_creep (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC) I think a WP:MULTIAFD would be a good idea here. Marquardtika (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)...

propagated into WP. MB 21:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC) Comment - as per WP:MULTIAFD, this multiple nomination does not appear to meet those criteria. Onel5969...

for deletion. You can just add that article to this nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. Aintabli (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC) I know, but I'm using these two...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

though. And that's ok. By the time it was suggested, it was too late. WP:MULTIAFD: For the sake of clarity, debates should be bundled only at the start or...

(talk) 01:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC) It's one possible option; see WP:MULTIAFD. These are similar enough I felt bundling was appropriate. –Deacon...

Keep All are notable per WP:GEOLAND and this is a blatant abuse of WP:MULTIAFD. Smartyllama (talk) 20:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Procedural Keep as the...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University), instead, as a wp:MULTIAFD. I was proposing there mergers to a combo list-article. Hope this can be...

the nomination as well. To bundle, the instructions can be found at WP:MULTIAFD. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:32, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Note:...

made to this page. The result was Procedural close because in this WP:MULTIAFD editors are unlikely to reach consensus. In this nomination 5 editors favored...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

There's a process for multi-page AfDs and it's not being followed. See: WP:MULTIAFD. It exists for a reason, specifically, to avoid the massive confusion that...

though. And that's ok. By the time it was suggested, it was too late. WP:MULTIAFD: For the sake of clarity, debates should be bundled only at the start or...

these AfDs the proper way might have been a more sensible option (see WP:MULTIAFD). BilletsMauves€500 16:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC) So I'm supposed to read...

views) (capital G), both created by the same user, for deletion per WP:MULTIAFD as well. CaradhrasAiguo (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC) Delete Original...

but due to similarity they are included in the same nomination, per WP:MULTIAFD. This has also been stated above. – Rhain ☔ 06:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)...

mentioned in !votes, but they were not formally added to the nomination per WP:MULTIAFD, and the !votes referred to "per nom", with minimal reference to the others...

AfDs, consider in the future combining AfDs of multiple articles per WP:MULTIAFD. This seems to have been a prime candidate in this case.—Bagumba (talk)...

abandoned pages about once-promising startups, I'd be grateful. (See also WP:MULTIAFD for why pages are typically nominated one-by-one.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:25...

do that? ACB Smith (talk) 13:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC) Acbsmith go here: WP:MULTIAFD. Just replace the AfD template on the top of all the other pages with the...

09:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC) '@ChrisTheDude: I think it's best to do WP:MULTIAFD. ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Note - this nomination...

relations" or similar. Will also note these would be a good candidate for WP:MULTIAFD given their similarity/desire to avoid causing a backlog on AfD. Anonrfjwhuikdzz...

(programming language) or Christophe de Dinechin. No objection to delete. Per WP:MULTIAFD should we also be considering XL (programming language) (possible dab?)...

didn't take - none of them are tagged. You'll want to have a look at WP:MULTIAFD for instructions on how to nominate those articles. UltraExactZZ Said ~...

into a bundled nomination for you and closed the other 4 AfDs. See WP:MULTIAFD. Natg 19 (talk) 01:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Delete. No source. The album...

@Liz:: It's supposed to lead here :-) It's a multiple nomination. See WP:MULTIAFD —МандичкаYO 😜 21:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC) Sorry, I missed the listing of...

though understandably so since the nomination is a less-than-obvious WP:MULTIAFD. Fixing that now... Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,...

2022 (UTC) Comment @WaddlesJP13:, I think you forgot to do step IV in WP:MULTIAFD when you nominated this list, as only Texas Agriculture Code has the AFD...

individually. I would urge that they be combined, pronto, into one. Per WP:MULTIAFD. Having multiple discussions of the same issue would waste everyone's time...

nomination should also have been bundled with the original nomination per WP:MULTIAFD, but the nominator contends that they are separate organisations, despite...

2018 (UTC) I see there is a process for "bundling" multiple AfD's: WP:MULTIAFD. We should probably use that. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:46, 1 November...

reference, instructions on creating an AfD for multiple articles are at WP:MULTIAFD. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC) Delete as not notable...

have never been a bundled nomination. None of the examples given at WP:MULTIAFD fit this group of articles. While they are all songs on the same album...

as noted in my original post. I'm using the procedure described at WP:MULTIAFD. List one, see how it goes, and then nominate the rest in the "group"....

its not notable, but clearly that logic doesn't apply. If you read WP:MULTIAFD it says "bundling should not be used to form consensus around policy decisions...

views) Domdeparis (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC) @Domdeparis: Per WP:MULTIAFD, bundling AfDs should occur only at the start or near the start of the...

the other example. If I had known that earlier, I would have went for MULTIAFD. Even if they were produced together, I don't see any point of FORKing...

software doesn't do it automatically, you have to follow instructions at WP:MULTIAFD and take it from there. @Sergecross73:, what if these were withdrawn and...

11:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Keep (procedural), a ridiculously large multiafd with 36 articles, lets say a perfunctory 5minute search for references...

its not notable, but clearly that logic doesn't apply. If you read WP:MULTIAFD it says "bundling should not be used to form consensus around policy decisions...

--Odie5533 (talk) 06:39, 4 December 2016 (UTC) @ViperSnake151: See WP:MULTIAFD steps IV and V. I think the other pages needs to be tagged {{subst:afd1|Giant...

Oath2order (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Instructions are in the link WP:MULTIAFD. Bri (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks, Bri. This is helpful. I knew...

(talk) 00:12, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Nominator should have considered MULTIAFD. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 00:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC) He did but...

article appears to be part of a series of season articles, but per WP:MULTIAFD I am suggesting one (the first one I came across) for deletion now to see...

on a per-case basis. While the nomination mentioned multiple pages, WP:MULTIAFD was not followed with notication on only NBL (United States) Rookie of...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Parish Church Requirements for wp:MULTIAFD may or may not be met. It is NOT wp:CANVASSING to note the commonality...

one article, see how discussion goes, then nominate the rest, per WP: MULTIAFD. This rationale also happens to be WP: OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Can you please...

are in any case not properly included with this AfD nomination (see WP:MULTIAFD for how to do this), I think they need to be dealt with on a case by case...

discussion instead of nominating individual articles separately (see WP:MULTIAFD for instructions). Also, I’d advise you to give a more specific reason...

(talk) 17:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC) I think it would be beneficial. See WP:MULTIAFD for a guide. I'd do it but i'm not sure if I'm allowed to do it for you...

AFDs separately rather than as part of one multiple article AFD (see WP:MULTIAFD). But after asking the deletion nominator of most of these to withdraw...

(talk) 01:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC) It's one possible option; see WP:MULTIAFD. These are similar enough I felt bundling was appropriate. –Deacon...

March 2019 (UTC) @ImmortalWizard: A reminder to be careful if you do a MultiAFD of these bus stations. Some of them may be notable, so you will have to...

and WP:BLUDGEONING by User:E.M.Gregory. He has argued that my use of WP:MULTIAFD is somehow inappropriate. I nominated two articles together about two politicians...

even though the redirects pointed to the articles up for deletion. WP:MULTIAFD is bullshit? —Locke Cole • t • c 19:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Am I missing...

at the AfDs to connect them together since the nominator didn't use WP:MULTIAFD. That was all. I have no opinion on the articles themselves. Anna Frodesiak...

October 2023 (UTC) @AryKun: The instructions for doing that are at WP:MULTIAFD. There it suggests starting with one, then if there's clear consensus on...

The problem is you want it both ways. First you ask me to withdraw the multiAfD nomination and now when I do you're saying I'm not allowed to renominate...

and WP:BLUDGEONING by User:E.M.Gregory. He has argued that my use of WP:MULTIAFD is somehow inappropriate. I nominated two articles together about two politicians...

at the AfDs to connect them together since the nominator didn't use WP:MULTIAFD. That was all. I have no opinion on the articles themselves. Anna Frodesiak...

AfD merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD - closed 04:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Louise van Oosten - (3523) - AfD merged...

even though the redirects pointed to the articles up for deletion. WP:MULTIAFD is bullshit? —Locke Cole • t • c 19:51, 12 April 2020 (UTC) Am I missing...

WP:MULTIAFD - closed 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Bo Vonk - (3687) - AfD merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD -...

WP:MULTIAFD - closed 04:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Bo Vonk - (3687) - AfD merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Lorsheijd per WP:MULTIAFD -...

merge on those two - they're obviously necessary and appropriate. A WP:MULTIAFD seems likely to conclude with a redirect anyway. --tronvillain (talk) 16:26...

relations" or similar. Will also note these would be a good candidate for WP:MULTIAFD given their similarity/desire to avoid causing a backlog on AfD. Anonrfjwhuikdzz...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

April 2023 (UTC) Keep per my comments on Group A. Next time please use WP:MULTIAFD so people don't have to post their comments 4 times. BLAIXX 15:07, 23 April...

it is possible to do a MULTIAFD with Twinkle Mikeycdiamond (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC) Nevermind, I thought a multiAFD required a different template...

or promotional spam, each page should be nominated separately per WP:MULTIAFD – Kjerish (talk) 23:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) Yes, I’m sure that would...

for those that do not fail RELIABLE and NGEO. No, it doesn't, because WP:MULTIAFD has not been followed. Only one article has been nominated, only one set...

add the other airline destination lists to this AfD? That's what the WP:MULTIAFD guideline sets out for multi-page deletions anyway. By the sounds of it...

October 2023 (UTC) @AryKun: The instructions for doing that are at WP:MULTIAFD. There it suggests starting with one, then if there's clear consensus on...

one article, see how discussion goes, then nominate the rest, per WP: MULTIAFD. This rationale also happens to be WP: OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Can you please...

discussion). It is likely to be sent to AfD itself soon. In my opinion, a WP:MULTIAFD is needed for most of the articles in Category:Texas A&M University colleges...

are in any case not properly included with this AfD nomination (see WP:MULTIAFD for how to do this), I think they need to be dealt with on a case by case...

for deletion. You can just add that article to this nomination per WP:MULTIAFD. Aintabli (talk) 22:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC) I know, but I'm using these two...

deletion/Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. This didn't seem to meet MULTIAFD as each of them are at a different level of RS reporting, but the general...

be. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Procedural keep: Poor WP:MULTIAFD nomination. Your interpretation of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad...

the consensus was strong there. I've tried to follow the process for WP:MULTIAFD here, not sure what else I can do. In the spirit of AfD I'll leave open...

AFDs were based on the same prior consensus (they didn't fall under WP:MULTIAFD by my read). So I'm going to make all general comments about evaluation...

@Yoblyblob I think these types of pages are good candidates for WP:PROD or WP:MULTIAFD so AfD doesn't get too cluttered. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:07, 2 May 2025...

(talk) 20:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC) @Dxneo follow the instructions at WP:MULTIAFD and you'll have it. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:53, 11 November...

need to list them all here and tag each page with a link here, see WP:MULTIAFD. Strong support a delete/merge all per nom, obviously separate pages listing...

they point to the correct discussions. For a bundled AFD, following WP:MULTIAFD, only one deletion discussion should be created. Twinkle can't really be...

Theadventurer64 (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC) @Theadventurer64: see Wikipedia:MULTIAFD for how to nominate a group of articles for deletion. Yeshivish613 (talk)...

you're looking for a group nomination at AfD. There are instructions at WP:MULTIAFD. Best, ayakanaa ( t · c ) 02:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC) The notability criteria...

Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC) @Jeraxmoira: There is – see WP:MULTIAFD for the details. Tollens (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC) FYI  – Shungite...

(UTC) At the moment they have not been properly bundled as described in WP:MULTIAFD. I'm not sure what @TG-article's plans are for how to proceed, but notice...