DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

This subpage of the Manual of Style contains guidelines for writing and editing clear, encyclopedic, attractive, and interesting articles on mathematics...

it to other internet forums, since it continued to be suggested at WP:MOSMATH for years after it was no longer needed. When LaTeX is used in the normal...

consistency with the rest of Wikipedia, other manuals of style (in particular WP:MOSMATH for mathematics and WP:MOSCHEM for chemistry) apply when possible. Exceptions...

(non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC) MOSMATH → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Mathematics  (talk · links · history ·...

idea to spell it out anyway so people can understand the article (see WP:MOSMATH). I would not recommend mixing pseudocode and LaTeX in Wikipedia, the fonts...

revert, both from today by the same editor attempting to assert that the MOSMATH guideline is in conflict with ACCESS. Concretely, what seems to be proposed...

As a results, the article is a terminological pastiche, contravening WP:MOSMATH. 5) Disorganized presentation and tangentiality. Before and after giving...

comments? Thanks, ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 11:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC) WP:MOSMATH and Help:Math deals with that. I would be against extensively changing...

responsible for the "imagine". :-) In any case, WP:MOSMATH is ok with limited usage of this type. If MOSMATH is inconsistent with FA, that's a shame. Feel...

plural forms; User:Declan Davis has made the point repeatedly in our WT:MOSMATH discussion that the plural of "basis" is "bases", not "basises", and no...

material science (if those exist). The only other project MOS I'm aware of is MOSMATH. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Ah, OK. hamiltonstone...

15:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Firstly, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Secondly, WP:MOSMATH says "include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea;...

Comment Everyone can see that it's a clumsily written article, neglecting WP:MOSMATH at every opportunity (not to mention all the incorrectly capitalized initial...

be written by mathies for mathies and unfortunately (and contrary to WP:MOSMATH) that sometimes includes articles that should be (at least partly) understandable...

Comment Everyone can see that it's a clumsily written article, neglecting WP:MOSMATH at every opportunity (not to mention all the incorrectly capitalized initial...

packages to produce TeX. Although, I find it somewhat strange that an WP:MOSMATH-compliant TeX software package hasn't been created (or has it?). Anyways...

more accessible at WP:TECHNICAL. WP:LEAD also has a bit about it and WP:MOSMATH some specifically about maths. Dmcq (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC) We...

15:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Firstly, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Secondly, WP:MOSMATH says "include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea;...

markup?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 15:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Does WP:MOSMATH help? – ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC) For the markup, see...

As a results, the article is a terminological pastiche, contravening WP:MOSMATH. 5) Disorganized presentation and tangentiality. Before and after giving...

responsible for the "imagine". :-) In any case, WP:MOSMATH is ok with limited usage of this type. If MOSMATH is inconsistent with FA, that's a shame. Feel...

material science (if those exist). The only other project MOS I'm aware of is MOSMATH. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Ah, OK. hamiltonstone...

MOS:MATHS (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Mathematics (exists?) No 534 MOSMATH (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Mathematics (exists?) No 535 MOS:MED...