DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

(MEDical Reliable Source) sourcing is definitely required here (see WP:MEDASSESS). The pills were invented by Dr Archibald Foster and released onto the...

quality of evidence for biological mechanisms, failing WP:SCIASSESS and WP:MEDASSESS, and 4) it has had no substantive edits since 2019, indicating it is a...

study on a small number of subjects", not qualifying for WP:MEDSCI and WP:MEDASSESS. A Cochrane review reference, at that time 14 years old, passed muster...

lowest quality of evidence for biological mechanisms, WP:SCIASSESS and WP:MEDASSESS, 2) sources mainly from one research group (within which Wham2019 appears...

above "diet and longevity" articles has sources strong enough to meet WP:MEDASSESS, indicating there would be few good-quality sources in such an article...

these should not be used because they don't meet WP:MEDASSESS. My position is that WP:MEDASSESS only applies to medical claims. This point is not a medical...

it, of course. However, QuackGuru responded yet again with MEDRS and MEDASSESS, saying that the references were not good enough. I tried once again to...

study each was and how many participants they included? In fact at WP:MEDASSESS--right in the WP:MEDRS guideline itself--Wikipedia provides a hierarchy...

(talk) 13:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Thanks for linking to the Wikipedia:MEDASSESS page. I hadn't been familiar with that Wikipedia guideline, but it directly...

Council but not yet accepted by WP as sufficiently reviewed. Quoting WP:MEDASSESS or WP:NOTADVICE may enable WP to protect itself against negligence suits...

there are exceptions. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC) WP:MEDASSESS and WP:MEDINVITRO generally discourage the use of animal and in vitro...

(UTC) Second thought. Alternately, we might codify your reasoning into WP:MEDASSESS. Something like "if a review is obviously based on too few studies, or...

anybody?). Nevertheless, that still doesn't mean we should exclude it - WP:MEDASSESS simply says that we should give due weight to it, and favour "more reliable"...

lowest quality of evidence for biological mechanisms, WP:SCIASSESS and WP:MEDASSESS, 2) sources mainly from one research group (within which Wham2019 appears...

correct myself here after considering Crossroads' note below. Per WP:MEDASSESS a governmental agency-issued practice guideline is indeed a secondary...

quality of evidence for biological mechanisms, failing WP:SCIASSESS and WP:MEDASSESS, and 4) it has had no substantive edits since 2019, indicating it is a...

misleading statement and at worst simply got it wrong. Please note that WP:MEDASSESS which covers WP:DUE is also covered under WP:RS: "Views that are held...

generally fall below the minimum requirements of reliable medical sources. WP:MEDASSESS Fladrif (talk) 01:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC) I think that may miss the point...

conclusion the author gives makes my skin crawl. It's also exactly what WP:MEDASSESS prohibits: "...editors should determine the quality of the type of study...

than comprehensive reviews, which is reflected in the images under WP:MEDASSESS. I would also like to point out that Chaibi is not a full-time researcher...

though obviously it's not as good as those with formal peer review (WP:MEDASSESS). (As for what kind of opinion it's MEDRS, WP:PARITY applies.) --Middle...

of dietary clinical research, as represented in the left pyramid of WP:MEDASSESS. Observational dietary studies, cohort dietary studies, and even individual...

pretty darn unimpeachable with regard to their type per MEDRS, and per MEDASSESS we cannot go second guessing what they say. I am dismayed by what they...

sourcing, as they are integrated into the pinnacle for sourcing in the WP:MEDASSESS pyramids shown here. Turning to the issue of mercury levels in HFCS -...

but there should not be valid alternatives. See WP:MEDANIMAL and WP:MEDASSESS. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 13:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Novem Linguae and...

anywhere near "expert opinion" to qualify for even the lowest rung on the WP:MEDASSESS scale of "expert opinion." This is not a WP:MEDRS-compliant reliable source...

article's introduction. Familiarity with WP:NPOV, WP:ASF, WP:MEDRS, and WP:MEDASSESS would be helpful. Thanks! Ocaasi (talk) 09:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC) I've...

("Evaluation of curcumin for dermatologic conditions"). WP:MEDASSESS: It's a systematic review, and MEDASSESS says "editors should rely on high-level evidence,...

nonfatal AMI and 478 controls in Milan, Italy, between 1995 and 1999." WP:MEDASSESS has "case-control study" as the lowest form of reference that even qualifies...

Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine)#Assess_evidence_quality (aka WP:MEDASSESS), which is concise and informative for a non-technical editor, but is...

are factually wrong (sample size) or are not relevant according to WP:MEDASSESS (i.e. funding). I am involved in flavan-3-ol research (as I have mentioned...

article's introduction. Familiarity with WP:NPOV, WP:ASF, WP:MEDRS, and WP:MEDASSESS would be helpful. Thanks! Ocaasi (talk) 11:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC) Here's...

January 2022 (UTC) On a pure content level, start with WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDASSESS. Skeptical Inquirer does not meet MEDRS criteria. SFR also raises the...

have to ascertain the medical/scientific consensus per WP:MEDSCI and WP:MEDASSESS. Frontiers journals do have a lower degree of reliability in general,...

Jytdog (talk) 02:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC) I'd say WP:MEDASSESS speaks more to the issue that the type of study and statistical design...

pretty darn unimpeachable with regard to their type per MEDRS, and per MEDASSESS we cannot go second guessing what they say. I am dismayed by what they...

of policy you're thinking of, Tom? As for the overall quality, from WP:MEDASSESS: "The best evidence comes primarily from meta-analyses of randomized controlled...

content going forward -- not only might we need more careful attention WP:MEDASSESS, we may have to deal with more misreporting in the laypress in addition...

here. They are not the publication venue for completed research - the WP:MEDASSESS sources of journals, books or clinical organizations - but rather their...

where a better MEDRS source isn't readily available. This is where WP:MEDASSESS and WP:MEDORG sources are needed; reviewing them proves that Healthline...

should examine to which level it satisfies quality guidelines like WP:MEDASSESS and at least be able explain to the readers if e.g. these are all just...

when the claims they are making are extraordinary. See WP:MEDSCI, WP:MEDASSESS, and WP:MEDPOP. There is no justification to list such sources under the...

above "diet and longevity" articles has sources strong enough to meet WP:MEDASSESS, indicating there would be few good-quality sources in such an article...

preliminary information at the lowest level of evidence-quality - see WP:MEDASSESS, bottom of left pyramid. The article needs better review sources." But...

2023 (UTC) You have a point regarding the expert opinion letter, per WP:MEDASSESS, Low-level evidence (such as case reports or series) or non-evidence (such...

for whatever statement you want and contradict better MEDRS with it" WP:MEDASSESS: Even in reputable medical journals, different papers are not given equal...

journal – nothing special, but not so low as to be concerning.[20] WP:MEDASSESS: Reviews, including narrative reviews, are a good type of source. WP:MEDDATE:...

Groups; it'd almost be like citing Nazi human experimentation." (BTW, WP:MEDASSESS explicitly says that funders are not a reason to prefer weaker source...

(internationally and domestically). Similarly, in the same way that WP:MEDASSESS explains the difference between different kinds of medical papers, a WP:LAWASSESS...

(with low subject numbers) published 11-15 years ago, and ignoring WP:MEDASSESS. At Talk:Theanine, Reflecktor has not addressed the deficiencies of the...

working in good faith to improve the encyclopaedia, as they see it. WP:MEDASSESS warns editors of rejecting (or disparaging) higher level sources in favour...