Search Results: Wikipedia:INTEXT


Wikipedia:Citing sources
Rabu, 2026-05-27 12:17:58

(2005), p. 1; Brown (2007), p. 46; Smith (2005), p. 2. Shortcut WP:INTEXTWP:INTEXT In-text attribution is the attribution inside a sentence of material to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Russian battleship Oslyabya/archive1
Senin, 2015-10-05 06:10:35

attribution per WP:INTEXT. Um, howzabout the the cite immediately following the quote?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Per INTEXT, "in addition...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2018 June 26
Selasa, 2023-03-07 12:45:54

not working for Combo box data whether it selected data or data entered intext field — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.120.17.7 (talk) 10:44, 26...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Elena Delle Donne/archive1
Senin, 2015-08-10 07:07:37

brother might be better paraphrased in lieu of quoting directly with the WP:INTEXT attribution, as WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV (I'm guessing) is unlikely to apply here...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:When to cite
Sabtu, 2026-03-21 16:32:22

an inline citation after the phrase, sentence, or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution whenever you copy or closely paraphrase a source's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Peer review/SHPS
Kamis, 2024-01-04 07:44:10

like it needs inline citations. ShadowHalo 20:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Added intext ref. Thanks for the feedback M-BMor 21:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Please see...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/John Maynard Keynes/1
Selasa, 2024-08-27 01:12:33

prose, and an overreliance on block quotes. Unreliable sources are used as intext citations and the "Cultural representations" section is full of one-sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Algerian Civil War/archive1
Sabtu, 2008-02-16 03:55:27

especially where you have quoted specific numbers and quotes, some already have intext references, but others like the bombing of the Algiers airport claimed 9...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville/Peer review/Announce
Kamis, 2024-01-04 07:40:41

like it needs inline citations. ShadowHalo 20:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Added intext ref. Thanks for the feedback M-BMor 21:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Please see...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautama Buddha (film)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:52:37

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A film (with no intext citations) that fails both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Peace be with Gautama Bonkers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/British House of Commons/archive1
Rabu, 2022-03-23 19:59:29

HTF did this become a FA? Although it is accurate, it has virtually no intext referencing. The prose is repetitive, clunking, full of over-detailed trivia...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dictators (2nd nomination)
Minggu, 2025-12-14 04:01:45

"Dictator" is a value-laden WP:LABEL which is to be used only with WP:INTEXT attribution. This list instead puts it in WP:WikiVoice, which is unacceptable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Battle of the Yarmuk/1
Senin, 2024-09-30 08:00:10

tags from 2011. Many sources listed in the bibliography are not used as intext citations. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Delist. Repeated use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 November 23
Senin, 2022-11-28 23:58:56

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC) Review of sex for fish intext referencing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jab3366 (talk • contribs)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/United States Marine Corps
Senin, 2022-04-04 20:15:54

easily. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 19:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC) It needs more intext citations. "The Marines' most famous action of this period occurred in the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Papian
Jumat, 2024-11-08 02:22:52

issues. Geschichte (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC) DELETE, NOT enough intext citations UzbukUdash (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Lacks adequate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 January 21
Rabu, 2025-02-05 12:33:42

--woodensuperman 16:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC) Delete 2 links are easily placed intext or in "see also" Bagumba (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC) Delete, could...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Scotsman
Jumat, 2026-01-09 20:23:18

culture cat? Julia Rossi (talk) 02:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC) PS added cats and "intext citations needed" tag. Within the delete box there's something about deciding...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Alternative medicine
Senin, 2025-12-01 09:21:51

conventional medicine. Derogatory or disputed labels should normally use WP:INTEXT attribution to identify specific experts or organizations that use that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dogpatch USA/archive 1
Minggu, 2008-02-17 02:53:40

for research? Meelar (talk) July 7, 2005 16:34 (UTC) There are alot of intext sources--Imfinite 8 July 2005 00:59 (UTC) Then they should be properly formatted...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Plagiarism
Senin, 2026-05-25 20:52:43

form of an inline citation after the sentence or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution when you copy or closely paraphrase another author's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Maurice Wilder-Neligan
Selasa, 2022-03-22 22:19:34

putting "most brilliant" in quotes? I don't like unattributed quotes, per WP:INTEXT. Also, we haven't been doing postnominals at TFA for many years, but if...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Villejuif stabbing
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 18:49:08

not familiar with it) is an ideal source for attributing "terrorism" WP:INTEXT (as mandated by MOS:LABEL) and contains useful information on and analysis...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nine Stones, Winterbourne Abbas/archive1
Kamis, 2017-04-13 07:11:10

March 2017 (UTC) "The Nine Stones circle has been described": WP:INTEXT violation. INTEXT has been disputed a bit, but I think we can live with it. If it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Giraffe/archive2
Minggu, 2014-01-19 03:35:54

book is on the giraffe. The page numbers for the specific claim are given intext. LittleJerry (talk) 02:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Comments from Cryptic C62...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2012 July 27
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 01:45:38

2012 (UTC) On Google, preceding a search term with "intext:" forces it to be in the result. intext:"robotix blox" would be the way to search for your given...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Independent sources
Rabu, 2026-04-15 20:31:10

subject, such as "Big Company has 15,000 employees", does not require WP:INTEXT attribution; in fact, in-text attribution in such cases could improperly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:These are not original research
Senin, 2026-03-09 03:32:33

may attribute the conflicting positions directly to the sources with WP:INTEXT attribution: "Famous Expert A says that because inflation has been low,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Blast Corps/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:08:02

quote marks are quoting text, then in-text attribution is needed per WP:INTEXT. But I'll leave this problem for other reviewers. "EGM considered Blast...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/More Hall Annex/archive1
Jumat, 2022-05-06 00:52:00

who are you quoting, and could none of these be paraphrased? See the WP:INTEXT guideline. - Dank (push to talk) 21:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC) I've paraphrased...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Daisy Jugadai Napaltjarri/archive1
Minggu, 2026-02-08 19:00:19

hamiltonstone (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, sorry! I meant WP:INTEXT; i.e. saying who said it in the text: "According to X...". However, not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Slavery in ancient Greece/archive1
Minggu, 2021-04-04 07:16:12

fiction (?) literature of the time mentioning them is OK, but only with intext attribution. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Sure but there...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/August 2021
Selasa, 2021-08-24 07:27:47

List", clarified both in the lead and references list. It completely lacks intext citations, which is a requirement for featured lists. Mattximus (talk) 23:02...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Across The Sky
Minggu, 2023-02-05 11:21:09

material to the article. Needs cleanup. Haven't plugged all the sources into intext citations yet but they are listed in references. M-BMor 16:25, 27 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/HMS Ark Royal (91)
Rabu, 2022-03-23 18:30:59

guideline in mind. The only reason I can see to add the publisher to the intext cite would be to aid in identifying the particular source if there was no...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Marshall Applewhite/archive1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 14:41:09

July 2012 (UTC) Thanks, good comments. I'm not too sure how to handle the intext attribution to academics, in the past I've done things like "Susan Raine...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Halifax Explosion
Senin, 2015-07-06 11:06:46

"became internationally known as a centre for care for the blind".": WP:INTEXT may be a problem here, and more so because the source may not tell us who...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyWorld
Senin, 2025-12-22 08:17:14

addition, the Background section is massively padded with inappropriate WP:INTEXT, and language like "garnered significant attention from notable newspapers"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ormulum/archive1
Jumat, 2026-02-13 15:29:44

"converted intext variations into inline", followed by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) "refs, minor ce", followed by Bob Castle "converted single intext ref",...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/James B. Weaver/archive1
Rabu, 2022-03-16 13:46:11

request above for in-text attribution ... WP:CITE says that's needed (at WP:INTEXT), and Chicago recommends that too, but AFAIK, generalized attribution is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive 3
Rabu, 2025-07-30 21:14:13

August 2008 (UTC) Those are citations. They probablyc ould be coverted to intext tho.—Lendorien (talk) 15:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC) History of Shanghai is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grade I listed buildings in Rhondda Cynon Taf/archive1
Senin, 2020-09-28 06:45:23

1981 For the date listed and the reference number in the table, use an intext citation so it's more obvious where the information is coming from, rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Old Pine Church/archive1
Minggu, 2016-10-09 00:26:12

copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) "have a "minimalist appearance".": Per WP:INTEXT, attribute it or paraphrase it. Support on prose per my standard disclaimer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/FAQ
Jumat, 2026-02-13 12:48:37

is still notable, then it might be reasonable to cite Quackwatch with WP:INTEXT attribution to the POV. Can I cite Chinese studies about Traditional Chinese...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/70th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)
Jumat, 2015-09-25 08:06:42

and you've got your 3 supports, so I'll just leave some comments. See WP:INTEXT. Quoted statements need at least a clue in the text as to where they came...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2016 September 11
Kamis, 2023-11-16 15:21:29

(talk) 19:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC) As for the search, if google, use intext:cougaran as a way of winnowing out those sites which for whatever reason...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jack Verge/archive1
Kamis, 2022-03-10 04:02:28

feel free to revert my copyediting. "a treat to witness" (x2): See WP:INTEXT. Anything in quote marks needs to be attributed in the text ... or paraphrased...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plagiarism
Kamis, 2025-07-03 08:34:07

form of an inline citation after the sentence or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution when you copy or closely paraphrase another author's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Chris Gragg/archive1
Minggu, 2026-01-04 05:48:39

the numbers are anyways not that impressive. The lead does not need WP:INTEXT attribution to Twitter platform, and saying he "was listed as" a graduate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Islands: Non-Places/archive1
Selasa, 2021-09-28 07:06:21

in-text attribution. See the Lancet example at WP:INTEXT. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC) INTEXT also says "In-text attribution should be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/80th Infantry (Reserve) Division (United Kingdom)/archive1
Rabu, 2015-04-29 06:51:51

always, feel free to revert my copyediting. These are my edits. Also: per WP:INTEXT, attribution is needed in the text, not just in the footnotes, for direct...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerebellum
Selasa, 2024-12-31 03:07:41

Harvard form, and link externally, whereas there is a preference on WP for intext notes that link to references, as I understand it. This is not very difficult...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)
Jumat, 2026-06-05 11:46:12

theses but I can appreciate that for local history sourcing is limited. WP:INTEXT citation might be called for here. It's difficult to assess reliability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Operation Infinite Reach/archive1
Senin, 2022-03-07 13:39:25

copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) Hi GAB, welcome to FAC. First up: See WP:INTEXT. All quotes need to be attributed to whoever said them, with a short (sometimes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Bengal famine of 1943
Jumat, 2022-05-20 14:45:46

"Bengal's rice output in normal years was barely enough" (and other quotes): WP:INTEXT has been disputed a bit, but I think we can live with it. If it isn't important...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/5632.com.ua
Rabu, 2021-08-11 15:38:39

!top) - Link: s.5632.com.ua/s/99/section/newsInText/upload/images/news/intext/000/052/170/10_5ed930e48e73d.jpg (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2020-10-03 08:17:00...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SMS Hessen/archive1
Selasa, 2018-07-10 07:07:34

June 2018 (UTC) "During the "Run to the North",": My interpretation of WP:INTEXT is that either the quote marks need to be dropped (and possibly some text...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Good Terrorist/archive2
Jumat, 2025-01-17 21:33:39

to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) "feckless", etc.: See WP:INTEXT: quoted material needs to be attributed in the text. It's especially important...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive181
Senin, 2024-01-22 04:14:32

summary: "/* References */") 21:54, 22 March 2012 (edit summary: "Added intext reference and verification") 21:56, 22 March 2012 (edit summary: "Removed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive180
Rabu, 2025-09-24 03:18:45

Chealer's peculiar and egregiously pedantic “completion” of the url. WP:INTEXT: With the edit summary “Fix attribution of SEP quote”, Chealer merely added:...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bromance (American TV series)
Selasa, 2025-12-16 02:42:06

indiscrimininate information. WP:BURDEN is policy. INCITE, WP:WHYCITE, WP:INTEXT, and Wikipedia:INTEGRITY are guidelines that we use to verify the subject...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moro conflict
Minggu, 2025-11-23 19:39:53

biased opinions by lifting editorials. This is an inappropriate use of an intext attribution : "The Moro National Liberation Front published an open letter...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 94
Jumat, 2025-12-05 09:42:54

that the old edit without intext attribution and qualifiers was clearly a no-go. However the source might be used with intext attribution and qualifiers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Brigham Young University/HIST 221 - Gonzales - The United States Since 1877 (Winter 2019)
Selasa, 2019-04-30 20:31:45

Please use 12 pt. Times New Roman Font and 1-inch margins. Also, please use intext parenthetical citations and include a final works cited page. Do not copy...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 19
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 21:57:10

cheerleaders. I am in the process of building the category bigger based on intext mentions in articles. There is no reason to repurpose the category when...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Yūjirō Motora/1
Kamis, 2020-10-29 15:48:03

however, be aware of any quotations or opinions in the paragraph per WP:INTEXT. So, if there are six sentences and they are all derived from the same page...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1050
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:24:40

just a matter of the user arguing that WP:INTEXT doesn't apply; it's that he/she doesn't even know that WP:INTEXT applies. Bekkers & Schroeter (2020) is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 385
Rabu, 2025-09-24 20:47:35

Editors are expected to leave the interpretations to the journalists and use intext attribution if it's controversial, or we risk an OR vio, especially when...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive932
Sabtu, 2026-05-09 20:21:19

arrived at? In this instance, it's very easy to change the lede by using WP:INTEXT. But some editors seem to believe that the conspiracy theoretic position...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:T1 and T2 debates
Jumat, 2025-10-31 02:42:52

productive to someone seeking a general view of someone, compared to a longer intext description which may not be as recognisable. Graphical presentations (userboxes)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/27 February 2012/Wikipedia:Verifiability/WP:V
Rabu, 2012-07-18 05:09:24

closely paraphrasing a source use an [[WP:INCITE|inline citation]], and [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]] where appropriate. Material that violates the copyrights...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources
Kamis, 2026-05-28 07:02:08

Sneider's self-published reports as a source, they must be accompanied with intext attribution, especially concerning reporting on casting of productions,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Florence Fuller/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 14:54:37

studio art by sketching and painting directly from nature”.”: Do we need intext attribution here for the quote? Have identified it as from the ADB. hamiltonstone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/September 2020
Senin, 2020-09-28 06:46:33

1981 For the date listed and the reference number in the table, use an intext citation so it's more obvious where the information is coming from, rather...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive719
Senin, 2024-11-18 01:56:57

attribution of the quoted text to the Jewish Chronicle (as required by WP:INTEXT). I had assumed that this would be acceptable to Bus stop, but he has for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive797
Rabu, 2023-06-14 00:09:06

become a close paraphrasing issue. It's also a really good idea to use WP:INTEXT attribution when closely paraphrasing your source, to avoid plagiarism....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive499
Minggu, 2023-04-09 01:05:29

—/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 08:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC) If you would like to change/update the intext comment, please feel free to do so. I put it there so there would be any...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive693
Jumat, 2024-11-15 13:40:49

article on. We've got a longer string of single-sentence sources, e.g., WP:INTEXT attributions like "According to several researchers, notably Charles Moser...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive287
Selasa, 2021-05-25 11:08:13

the contentious labels used by clickbait online news sources. We can use intext attribution and quote the source but that should be as far as it goes. Those...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Geoffrey Boycott/archive3
Senin, 2012-02-20 17:00:18

"demonstrating "outstanding ability."": This needs in-text attribution per WP:INTEXT. "he began to have difficulties reading the blackboard": Perhaps too specific;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253
Senin, 2026-04-06 22:10:39

Sturmvogel had to only use it once for me to learn it. Is it referencing and intext citing? WP has done all the explanation you would ever need such that you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:School and university projects/Polytechnic of Namibia/Information Competence, September 2011
Jumat, 2025-12-26 13:03:18

are not clear. Reference list is not properly presented and thre are no intext citations. Reference was made to an existing wikipedia article on rape....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive317
Minggu, 2024-05-19 16:39:46

this is complicated, and let's see how we can build on it. Do we need WP:INTEXT attribution for that database? I think you should try..." WhatamIdoing (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive766
Selasa, 2026-04-21 00:18:15

necessarily the neutral point of view), it should stay in the article but have WP:INTEXT attribution rather than be presented as an uncontentious fact. It should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive975
Senin, 2026-02-09 00:23:02

Musashi miyamoto (talk) 01:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Read WP:PLAGIARISM, WP:INTEXT or, for that matter, any university's code of ethics [344][345]. XOR'easter...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1103
Sabtu, 2024-08-31 00:32:19

doesn't belong in the article unless in compliance with WP:REDFLAG and WP:INTEXT. Atsme 💬 📧 13:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC) OK what is up with this argument...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive900
Kamis, 2026-04-02 21:50:35

the fact that it still violates WP:NFCCP. For one thing, there is no WP:INTEXT attribution and it also fails "no free equivalent" (the sentence could be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive275
Minggu, 2025-01-26 22:45:45

weak, and sometimes even self-contradictory) and proposal that uses WP:INTEXT attribution to say that a particular author calls faith healing pseudoscience...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive881
Senin, 2026-05-04 20:57:34

the article text? I agree there is enough RS for that, especially with WP:INTEXT attribution. Putting it in the infobox is another matter and normally only...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive984
Rabu, 2025-09-24 04:29:57

accused me of "defending Trump's positions" for citing that source using intext attribution; [208] - start of his Russian spy accusations; [209] - MelanieN's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive273
Rabu, 2020-10-28 00:03:52

) The way you did it is even more misleading because you also added an intext reference to The Washington Post while the source you were plagiarizing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive945
Senin, 2026-03-23 06:24:36

sources can be paraphrased with our own words, this should be done as per WP:INTEXT and not at the expense of original word choices, and not in an way that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive102
Rabu, 2026-02-11 04:22:54

absolute wording in favor of the official version of events (preferring to use intext citation) is because that person wants to push the conspiracy theory or...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 August 3
Jumat, 2019-10-18 06:33:35

in text attribution when using the term "TERF" in BLP. Just in case: WP:INTEXT. Pyxis Solitary (yak) 03:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Rename and purge irrelevant...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/St. Elmo (1914 film)/archive1
Minggu, 2015-05-10 05:25:33

"Nevertheless, the 1915 Beulah film was "considered a sequel" to St. Elmo.": See WP:INTEXT. Reworded this to avoid the direct quotation, which wasn't necessary anyway...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Wikipedia:Plagiarism
Selasa, 2023-02-21 23:07:58

form of an inline citation after the sentence or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution when you copy or closely paraphrase another author's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 116
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:19:18

2014 (UTC) And take note that I also reverted Rationalobserver at the WP:Intext-attribution section of the WP:Citing sources guideline; I told him clearly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 14
Selasa, 2021-07-20 07:58:11

I am not sure what I need to do after submitting the required changes (intext citations). Please let me know what I can do to have the page published...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1176
Senin, 2024-04-29 10:37:46

content you summarize from the interview in accordance with MOS:QUOTE, WP:INTEXT and WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV; in other words, you should try and make it as clear...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Science/2014 November 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:51:39

along with the - parameter to remove useless links. I wish I could use "intext" exclusively so that pages with a term in the title (orgasm in this instance)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 160
Kamis, 2023-03-16 19:37:07

Saltybone has even been removing Regnerus from situations that provide WP:INTEXT attribution to Regnerus. In the discussion about Regnerus at the Adolescent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources
Senin, 2026-06-01 01:03:05

extraordinary claims, use Dispatch in conjunction with other sources and use WP:INTEXT attributions when appropriate. 1   The Dong-A Ilbo donga.com donga.com/en...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfection
Rabu, 2025-06-18 06:22:08

remains an entirely insufficient amount of in-text attribution, see Wikipedia:Intext. ToeSchmoker (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC) Every paragraph has an adequate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320
Selasa, 2023-08-22 07:45:43

with Kutner's article. Should her conclusion be treated as an opinion with intext citation (as in "According to Sarah Kutner, the Proud Boys is a fascist...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrive+
Selasa, 2025-11-18 22:09:33

soapbox. His contributions show several attempts to link his product as intext spam in several articles such as Hangover and Ampelopsin. Ochiwar (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2008 May 29
Jumat, 2026-01-23 16:55:02

much Bilby and Fuhgettaboutit -- the problem arising from Harvard style intext citations is that the article tends to get those and no refs at the end...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Squall Leonhart/archive1
Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:38:16

do you find non-neutral about it? Is it that you would rather we use WP:Intext-attribution to cite the "his design (including his scar)" part? If so, it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Rongorongo/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 17:24:15

citation/referencing', at the moment there's a mixture of Harvard-style intext cites (Smith 1990:123) and embedded cites/ext links, like so: [1]. The latter...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/June 2013
Senin, 2013-07-01 02:50:46

Yes, almost. Just need to explicitly mention IGN in the sentence (per WP:INTEXT) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Otherwise quite solid. — Crisco...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Title TK/archive1
Senin, 2023-02-27 22:39:04

coming from? I think we need WP:INTEXT attribution. It was SchroCat who proposed this structure. But regarding, WP:INTEXT attribution, I can't do it, so...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of dinosaur genera/archive1
Selasa, 2021-08-24 07:27:26

List", clarified both in the lead and references list. It completely lacks intext citations, which is a requirement for featured lists. Mattximus (talk) 23:02...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 January 3
Rabu, 2023-02-08 12:38:35

crater references (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) breaks intext citations. — Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 10:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC) The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A Canterlot Wedding/archive2
Jumat, 2022-02-25 07:05:36

bit messy, because there are two quotes from Daily News. I guess, per WP:INTEXT, "It is preferable not to clutter articles with information best left to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bazy Tankersley/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 03:05:14

impression that in-text attribution was on e of those red lins, and WP:INTEXT seems to say so. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 06:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC) You raise...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 129
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:22:16

someone tells you that All Editors Agree™ that such text must always have WP:INTEXT attribution to tell the reader that it was imported rather than written...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 88
Selasa, 2023-06-20 19:12:17

17:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC) Some editors believe that such uses require WP:INTEXT attribution as well as license-related attribution, i.e., that you say "According...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 85
Senin, 2023-04-03 12:28:57

uniform. The phrasing of statements can accommodate such issues via WP:INTEXT attribution, e.g. "An unnamed official cited by CNN ..." Tijfo098 (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 87
Senin, 2026-03-23 20:24:16

Magic? For that matter, how will I know that it doesn't contain any WP:INTEXT citations? If you typed "According to the June issue of Famous Magazine...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (all)
Sabtu, 2022-06-11 18:09:49

theses but I can appreciate that for local history sourcing is limited. WP:INTEXT citation might be called for here. It's difficult to assess reliability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 163
Jumat, 2024-05-10 12:54:52

probably fine just like it is, and it does not need to be re-written with WP:INTEXT attribution. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC) For recent...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 February 9
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:55:48

And as this category is being used it is being applied to people with no intext support based on observing pictures. Anyway, we lack an article Dominican...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Temple-Wood
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 20:36:17

Competition (with several exceptions contingent on actual notability). Putting intext:"emily temple-wood" daterange:245161-2456730 (searching only from March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Balfour Declaration/archive1
Sabtu, 2017-07-29 16:36:57

Rechte der Juden des Ostens" Such a long foreign name should be translated intext.  Done Oncenawhile (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC) The 1922 white paper...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Herman Vandenburg Ames/archive1
Sabtu, 2018-08-25 07:05:49

a "brilliant, fervent, and impressive" Congregational preacher": Per WP:INTEXT, quoted text needs attribution in the text, not just in the footnote. updated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Slug (song)/archive3
Jumat, 2023-02-10 04:46:56

it is a portrait of a "desolate soul"[1] during", and throughout: See WP:INTEXT. Quoted material has to be attributed in the text (or paraphrased, i.e....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 72
Kamis, 2022-12-15 15:07:48

more thinking of customary intext WP:EL, my mistake perhaps. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Intext EL? Is not the rule "External...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rex Ryan/archive2
Kamis, 2022-05-26 03:18:30

commentators?] for their defensive capabilities…" And the following quote needs intext attribution. "Rex then moved with her to Toronto, Canada": Minor point,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/Monty Hall problem/archive3
Kamis, 2025-09-04 20:45:42

version as canonical. I think it's a minor issue of wording and perhaps WP:INTEXT attribution. Instead, at least two long term contributors hold the intelligibility...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Requiem (Reger)/archive2
Selasa, 2025-09-23 19:37:54

technique, and material is apparent".—this requires in-text attribution, per WP:INTEXT done --GA and as a result he was excommunicated—should mention he was Catholic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Genetically modified organisms
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:13:32

feel the strength of sources is strong enough to say this as fact (see WP:INTEXT), but giving the controversial nature of the issue here and in the general...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati/archive2
Minggu, 2023-01-29 00:38:44

embrace his journey ... and release his spirit to find new vigor."": Requires intext attribution. "to the love of a pre-determined life, in this case, Mulder's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:06:56

Competition (with several exceptions contingent on actual notability). Putting intext:"emily temple-wood" daterange:245161-2456730 (searching only from March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1079
Jumat, 2024-09-27 23:22:45

exists in Hebrew. David notMD (talk) 21:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC) I added intext citations to the following: How can I get someone to look at the edited...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Satoru Iwata/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 04:42:02

NFC picture in the article; I've worked to build up both rationale and intext description to point out that Iwata holding the bananas with all seriousness...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spredfast (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-12-01 12:51:46

engineering." Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC) As per WP:INTEXT, "In-text attribution should be used with direct speech (a source's words...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 28
Sabtu, 2021-06-05 23:58:15

"Dictator" is a value-laden WP:LABEL which is to be used only with WP:INTEXT attribution. This list instead puts it in WP:WikiVoice, which is unacceptable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 March 23
Selasa, 2022-10-18 07:44:34

material to the article. Needs cleanup. Haven't plugged all the sources into intext citations yet but they are listed in references. M-BMor 16:25, 27 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 352
Selasa, 2021-09-21 11:07:45

to make sure the facts are totally veritable and trustworthy. I suggest intext attribution or just excluding this until we can find more reason to state...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 May 12
Rabu, 2022-10-19 03:26:07

culture cat? Julia Rossi (talk) 02:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC) PS added cats and "intext citations needed" tag. Within the delete box there's something about deciding...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2008 September 9
Rabu, 2023-03-08 16:21:35

happens. IE thinks for a moment, and then does nothing. The links to and from intext citations, and to other parts of the site work fine as far as I've seen...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:32:26

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A film (with no intext citations) that fails both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Peace be with Gautama Bonkers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1052
Minggu, 2025-07-13 22:43:34

them. Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 23:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC) In general, see WP:INTEXT: either there is consensus among the reliable sources and we report a thing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 263
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:06:46

organisation.Slatersteven (talk) 09:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC) It's fine to use it and intext citation should not be used for facts, unless there is doubt about them...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wisp (Sonic)/archive1
Senin, 2023-03-13 17:06:11

Sonic Color manual's phrasing and structure. To remedy that concern (per WP:INTEXT), I'd tack on the words "According to the Sonic Colors Manual..." near the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 293
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:43

better than Russia Today for some topics, but see the next point. 3., use WP:INTEXT attribution for contentious topics (e.g. Xinjiang re-reducation camps),...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Rossbach/archive1
Minggu, 2017-10-01 06:08:55

note itself from its citation (if I've read it right--I could only see the intext change, not how it looked :( ). auntieruth (talk) 13:39, 25 September 2017...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Cleanup/Archive 4
Kamis, 2023-02-09 22:37:03

three different methods of sourcing. Needs to be converted to footnote intext references for entirety of article. Sections may need to be merged or reorganized...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ranks and insignia of Starfleet
Jumat, 2023-02-10 04:34:16

Bath. They made it to FAC pretty easily and without the type of indepth/intext citations you are talking about. Seems to be a lot of resistance over here...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 February 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:47:54

engineering." Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC) As per WP:INTEXT, "In-text attribution should be used with direct speech (a source's words...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 324
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 22:54:56

particular source be used for statement of fact, and to what extent is WP:INTEXT applicable or necessary? Thanks! - Location (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2020...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 335
Minggu, 2021-08-29 17:48:15

the source in such contexts, it should generally be accompanied with WP:INTEXT attribution. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC) The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 6
Rabu, 2022-05-18 17:48:04

indiscrimininate information. WP:BURDEN is policy. INCITE, WP:WHYCITE, WP:INTEXT, and Wikipedia:INTEGRITY are guidelines that we use to verify the subject...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:04:38

biased opinions by lifting editorials. This is an inappropriate use of an intext attribution : "The Moro National Liberation Front published an open letter...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 295
Kamis, 2026-01-15 11:18:39

the facts, unless we're citing the opinion of a renowned expert and using intext attribution. I challenge what appears to be partisan criticism as the reason...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2012 October 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 13:59:21

presumably they use it or planned on using it for queries related to plus. The "intext:" prefix still forces the term to be included. 209.131.76.183 (talk) 19:11...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles/RFC on pharmaceutical drug prices
Minggu, 2025-06-01 23:06:48

in the WP:LEAD, in a separate section, somewhere else? Would you use WP:INTEXT attribution for the database (different databases will have different 'answers')...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mount Takahe/archive1
Minggu, 2020-06-14 07:06:18

Spelled out BP instead; I am not convinced that this is a situation where intext attribution is normally used or would help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:44,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285
Rabu, 2023-03-22 04:08:32

reputable. Opinion pieces on Balkan Insight or N1 need to be attributed intext by profession and name (ie "the historian James Bloggs considers...") and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/California State Route 67/archive1
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 23:56:21

article :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Seems I came late, but WP:INTEXT puts it explicitly: "In-text attribution is the attribution inside a sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 28
Sabtu, 2021-07-10 06:11:54

not familiar with it) is an ideal source for attributing "terrorism" WP:INTEXT (as mandated by MOS:LABEL) and contains useful information on and analysis...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:57:04

soapbox. His contributions show several attempts to link his product as intext spam in several articles such as Hangover and Ampelopsin. Ochiwar (talk)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174
Kamis, 2025-09-11 00:10:35

sentence without context alone. However the whole section should resort to intext attribution (according to <partisan source >) rather than portraying all...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/pe.com
Sabtu, 2008-05-10 00:43:28

Links: www.fibaeurope.com/cid_3-I9xIK,H52ZNfYSgahgJ0.inplayer_on.inteam_on.intext_on.infoto_on.search_Shammond%20Williams.x_0.y_0.coid_LYKms,WWHA2b5HbDYZOLe3...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Last Gasp (Inside No. 9)/archive1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 02:48:09

I've made the same point elsewhere, but checking WP:CITE (specifically WP:INTEXT) I see the sentence " An inline citation should follow the attribution,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitty May Ellis
Minggu, 2022-05-01 06:19:14

may want to use the format found int WP:CITE and cite.php in regard to intext citations.) Franz Hunt Coe appears to be deleted, so if this is the case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/I64
Rabu, 2026-06-03 20:38:24

Research J Intestinal Research J 11 11 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Intext ? Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Pub 1 1 1.000 Wikipedia (J·M·T) Google (J·M·T) Intexto...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 111
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:20:27

answer that is generally applicable but it does resolve this example. WP:INTEXT does support the idea that a close paraphrase is a point of concern, as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242
Minggu, 2025-02-23 22:12:11

opposition group. That info should be in the article in doubt with a specific intext attribution ("according to .."). I'm kinda neutral whether is needs to be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 307
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:28

originated at the site called "MissingPortraits.info" with of course an WP:INTEXT link to that site. Pinging DESiegel Bus stop (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2020...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 19
Kamis, 2025-05-15 21:16:16

reported in a reliable-for-general-news source, then we accept it and give WP:INTEXT attribution: "Shirley Temple announced that she had breast cancer during...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 101
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:29:55

sentence. At absolute minimum, I think that sentence must be attributed WP:INTEXT as Busky's opinion, rather than being presented as if it were a simple fact...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 273
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:18:38

2019 (UTC) Comment. This question is irrelevant and incorrect, because WP:INTEXT is used. BeŻet (talk) 11:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC) I've suggested that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294
Jumat, 2026-02-13 03:04:15

conspiracy that is plausible, notable and verifiable, aka PNV. Again - intext attribution - but consider whether or not it is compliant with DUE, RECENTISM...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313
Selasa, 2020-10-20 18:19:00

agencies) and can't be assessed collectively. Most should only be used with WP:INTEXT attribution, shouldn't be directly used for outright statements of fact...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 102
Kamis, 2023-07-27 21:36:09

claims, especially if on a disputed point, should typically be given WP:INTEXT attribution: "According to the Flat Earth Society, the Earth is shaped like...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 334
Rabu, 2025-09-24 03:59:16

information as fact, but quote unnamed sources. In those cases we should use intext citation, for example, "according to unnamed sources speaking to the Washington...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 280
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 02:47:55

verifiability and POV, specifically WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV, WP:EXTRAORDINARY, WP:INTEXT, WP:YESPOV. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC) So when...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 118
Jumat, 2023-03-24 20:05:44

not "all JW have this dread of demons" but "These three people, named WP:INTEXT, say something about JW and demons". WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:38, 18 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 152
Kamis, 2023-02-09 03:28:08

reference list, how do you make intext footnotes with the same number? I have been using the following format. Intext: . Then when I want to use the same...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 312
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:07:50

information or uncontroversial cultural highlights. It should generally be WP:INTEXT-attributed and should not be used for anything remotely contentious. — MarkH21talk...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jesus/archive1
Kamis, 2025-09-04 20:43:07

{{Details}}", what does that mean? Also, the inline citations are substituted for intext citations of the bible, and the gospels are expilicitly cited as the main...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 92
Sabtu, 2023-02-25 01:06:36

material is correct (and not a copyvio), one standard approach is to use WP:INTEXT attribution: "Broken Rites Australia says that..." However, you don't want...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 96
Senin, 2024-11-18 14:14:33

I'm not quite sure what the actual problem is regarding Dr. Who, just use intext attribution if your confidence in the daily mail on the subject is not that...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 296
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:06

credibility. starship.paint (talk) 06:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC) I would use WP:INTEXT attribution and otherwise leave it alone until/unless a new secondary source...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sjafruddin Prawiranegara/archive1
Selasa, 2026-03-10 07:36:35

unrealistic expectations of the military in this case. Any advice? Per WP:INTEXT "In-text attribution should be used with direct speech", re. the quote about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control/Evidence
Selasa, 2023-12-26 00:01:57

the reader. I'm less sure about whether the study should be attributed intext- although for the moment I've referenced and wikilinked the Small Arms Survey...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 260
Minggu, 2022-03-27 01:56:45

is/are chosen, MOS advises us how best to handle contentious labels using WP:INTEXT. Atsme✍🏻📧 17:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC) I oppose in-text attribution here...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 122
Jumat, 2023-03-03 05:33:21

any of the sources named would be adequate for a plain statement with WP:INTEXT attribution that "____ says he was nominated for a Nobel Prize". But as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189
Rabu, 2026-02-25 14:32:22

voice of the encyclopedia. There is nothing wrong in such cases with wp:INTEXT attributing the characterization. It in no way diminishes the accuracy of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:48:26

thoughts, per WP:RS, would be: It may be considered biased and requiring intext attribution. I think it should not qualify as purely user-generated content...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105
Kamis, 2023-06-15 19:54:54

want to present his arguements as authoritative statements, not merely as intext attributions. Michael Roberts was educated at St. Aloysius College, Galle...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 March 7
Jumat, 2026-01-23 20:12:15

Strong keep, this template is extremely helpful to motivate users to add intext citations, especially when a group of editors are trying to get an article...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jonathan Agnew/archive2
Kamis, 2022-03-10 04:03:03

The only remaining issues I have are with the Tyson ref and use of WP:INTEXT, while I've replied with further points to a few of the other things. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 211
Sabtu, 2023-01-28 23:41:47

facts without editorial comment. If we want to add opinons, then they need intext attribution. In reply to your original question, it is valid to provide...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 303
Senin, 2026-03-16 09:38:15

pundits as opinion pieces, avoid stating opinions in Wikivoice and use intext attribution as applicable. The Fox News website maintains a form for requesting...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 253
Minggu, 2025-11-02 21:08:19

should have guidelines for using investigative journalism as a source. Maybe intext citation should be required in most cases. TFD (talk) 22:57, 24 December...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Pomona College/archive1
Selasa, 2026-03-24 02:05:41

added a brief description. I'm not convinced it's really needed—the WP:INTEXT guideline says It is preferable not to clutter articles with information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story/archive1
Selasa, 2020-09-15 07:06:42

(talk) 06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Also about Themes - I note that WP:INTEXT generally recommends not to mention publishing information in text, such...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 376
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:12:59

the Ukrainian Ombudsman's claims of war crimes, be them true or false. WP:INTEXT attribution may be required till the ICC makes a ruling on these cases....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 289
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:14:21

actual censuses or news media reporting the data. Also, you should use intext citation (that is, mention the source in the text), which is what the publications...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 359
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:45

anyone here would claim otherwise. That means, though, that WP:WEIGHT and WP:INTEXT have to be applied accordingly. Crossroads -talk- 03:56, 9 November 2021...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/John Gielgud/archive1
Selasa, 2023-03-14 04:12:12

stuttering! Redrawn. Tim riley (talk) 12:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Do we need intext attribution for the long Huggett quote? Also, I'm possibly being dim but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Medicine/Workshop
Minggu, 2022-03-27 14:23:47

price and which form, strength, and quantity is being priced; using WP:INTEXT attribution to the survey; naming the countries to which this price applies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 212
Minggu, 2023-03-26 01:50:39

reliable for reporting on official statements, but for nothing else without intext attribution on the understanding that it is a biased source. Even in such...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 114
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:51:47

published source before, although it's probably a good reason to use WP:INTEXT attribution. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC) I like the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 357
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:02:50

geopolitical arenas. And it's definitely not independent, so the usual WP:INTEXT attribution considerations apply. MarioGom (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2021...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 129
Rabu, 2023-10-04 05:06:23

1 August 2012 (UTC) I also believe this is a problem best solved by WP:INTEXT attribution and a fair representation of all significant viewpoints. That...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2021
Jumat, 2021-10-01 05:53:42

in-text attribution. See the Lancet example at WP:INTEXT. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC) INTEXT also says "In-text attribution should be used...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:24:36

and are certainly not useable for anything more than a statement with WP:INTEXT attribution: "Alice Expert writes that the Moon is made of green cheese"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:09

findings are being widely reported, any reports need to be proscribed by WP:INTEXT attribution. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC) Not a reliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362
Sabtu, 2022-03-26 16:31:47

(UTC) Option 4 reliable for their own opinion only. This implies use of WP:INTEXT attribution; e.g., "..and according to a member of Tghat,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Inuit clothing/archive1
Minggu, 2021-08-08 19:06:22

not sure it's necessary to cite her by name or to quote her directly. WP:INTEXT suggests caution about when to use in-text attribution, and this material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of Lake Providence/archive1
Kamis, 2024-10-03 07:05:51

02:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Hmm. I think, but am not positive, that INTEXT attribution should be used or perhaps additional sources to corroborate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 279
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 03:44:56

carefully contextualized statements". It may be best to use it with WP:INTEXT attribution. It may not be the best possible source for general information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive219
Jumat, 2023-04-21 21:58:32

to WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV; do you see where the first line tells you to See: WP:INTEXT for proper use of in-text attribution? If you'll look at the examples in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 146
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:50:59

When a source is politically biased, it is often useful to include WP:INTEXT attribution. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC) More likely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136
Rabu, 2026-03-11 21:14:15

teaching materials were "anti-Semitic" is a matter of opinion, and would need intext attribution. However that makes the issue one of neutrality, and it would...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 317
Sabtu, 2021-06-26 18:12:43

WP:MREL with specifics given in the WP:RSP entry and is not deprecated) then intext attribution and/or {{better source}} and/or {{citation needed}} is appropriate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Anti-Imperialist Platform (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-05-02 04:30:23

It is a primary source so it should be used with WP:PRIMARYCARE and WP:INTEXT. The "Dakar" source seems to have been added in error, since the WAP's declaration...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rwandan Civil War/archive1
Rabu, 2026-01-21 15:39:49

explicit. 66: Seems like the content is adequately supported. 90: Why is there INTEXT attribution here? Also, I don't think we need a reference after each sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:List of doomed but actively referenced BBC links
Minggu, 2011-04-17 10:45:32

uk/cult/doctorwho/episodeguide/season6b.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/otr/intext/Smith4.5.97.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/simpsons/episodeguide/season6/page10...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 224
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:06

opinionated and thus should be dealt with according to WP:BIASED, i.e., with WP:INTEXT at the least, although in regard to the details I would point to WP:ONUS...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132
Sabtu, 2022-06-04 18:55:22

(UTC) I think the citations are reliable, so long as they are attributed WP:INTEXT as being what the citation says. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:14, 14 September...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 23:56:09

fairly minor source is probably not DUE, and I'd certainly want to see WP:INTEXT attribution if it were included. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:02, 1 March 2012...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 198
Sabtu, 2023-07-29 00:46:52

that would routinely be included in an article, and I would use it with WP:INTEXT attribution. (Would you cite Wikinews? This is very similar.) WhatamIdoing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 337
Senin, 2026-02-09 08:33:21

the source is biased on those matters, and so editors should probably use intext attribution. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC) In...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 51
Jumat, 2024-10-18 00:45:45

it's not OR. Instead it is an NPOV issue and the relevant guideline is WP:INTEXT. Opinions, especially those likely to be contentious, should be attributed...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344
Minggu, 2024-04-07 22:48:36

with Terjen that we should quote the most reputable scientists with WP:INTEXT attribution, giving their expert opinions, whatever they may be. CutePeach...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 109
Senin, 2023-02-27 22:58:16

fact that Snell made certain statements? Keep in mind WP:RSOPINION and WP:INTEXT. If so please state the basis in one sentence. --Bejnar (talk) 19:48, 31...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 647
Rabu, 2022-03-23 03:25:04

Stratford-upon-Avon: Second Quarto Publishing. OCLC 252806. See also WP:INTEXT. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Thank you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 3
Minggu, 2026-02-22 05:12:03

information spread across multiple handouts right now. I definitely agree that WP:INTEXT is important for students to grasp, and I'll definitely be including it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 309
Selasa, 2025-09-23 18:44:04

hits on google scholar. Ultimately if Chabad is to be used it should be WP:INTEXT attributed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Option 2 Option...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 264
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:57

inline citation is used, whereas when it is used as a primary source, intext citation is used. In this case, Mueller has made a number of conclusions...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Irataba/archive2/archived discussion
Kamis, 2025-12-04 23:48:00

(UTC) I think that you received good advice, quotes should generally have intext attribution. Better though is not to quote, unless there is some reason...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive227
Minggu, 2023-01-29 02:37:45

with Camile Paglia. --BoboMeowCat (talk) 19:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC) WP:INTEXT attribution just means "according to X." Bias should be attributed, but...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:26:27

otherwise reliable sources that they're wrong. Id suggest consulting WP:INTEXT and WP:BLP for guidance beyond the scope of this noticeboard. By the way...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:10:31

very least, if anything is to be used in an article, it should require WP:INTEXT attribution, as well as being open to being challenged or discussed on the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:10:47

theories and fake news, however, it may be usable for attributed opinions (WP:INTEXT). ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 20:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC) The following...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Józef Piłsudski/archive1
Rabu, 2024-10-02 03:18:33

quotes should go to Wikiquote, so I moved the entire section there, and intext replaced Condrad with Mościcki (1935) and Sejm (1995).--Piotr Konieczny...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 73
Senin, 2024-08-12 01:43:44

that using INTEXT attribution in this case would make it seem like this is a minority point of view. What do you think? Should we use INTEXT attribution...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 327
Sabtu, 2021-02-27 05:12:00

them unreliable overall. The bottomline is and always been for us to use INTEXT ATTRIBUTION, and not say it in WikiVoice. It's actually pretty simple. Atsme...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive292
Rabu, 2019-10-23 09:58:55

its source, in addition to an inline citation after the sentence." per WP:INTEXT. That means we (Wikipedia) cannot call someone a TERF or transphobe in our...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 July 7
Selasa, 2022-04-05 15:39:19

may want to use the format found int WP:CITE and cite.php in regard to intext citations.) Franz Hunt Coe appears to be deleted, so if this is the case...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of the Second Temple period/archive1
Jumat, 2024-10-25 03:26:46

( diff). Ptolemaic Kingdom The heading has "301 BCE – 199 BCE" but the intext span is "301–200 BCE". Any reason for the discrepancy? "Book of Ecclesiastes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 342
Jumat, 2026-01-23 21:12:01

and my understanding is that they should almost never be cited without WP:INTEXT attribution and should not be used as a source for statements of fact in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 144
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:27:58

audiovisual sources. I think the sources are probably okay, but I think that WP:INTEXT attribution would be appropriate and expected by our readers. WhatamIdoing...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 66
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 00:23:33

stated on the label's article. Moreover, beliefs change. It appears the WP:INTEXT provision of WP:LABEL was intended to partly solve this problem but it apparently...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/October 2010
Rabu, 2010-12-01 06:04:46

"converted intext variations into inline", followed by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) "refs, minor ce", followed by Bob Castle "converted single intext ref",...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 59
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:01:32

waste your time. Being a founder isn't a big deal. The first diff uses WP:INTEXT attribution to the group to introduce a direct quotation, which is how you're...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive196
Kamis, 2023-03-16 19:40:26

four words to make it more encyclopedic.Bob the goodwin That would need WP:INTEXT attribution to not be synthesis, but before being used it should also be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 49
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:01:12

DUE or UNDUE is by firstly assuming WP:BIASED for everything, applying WP:INTEXT attribution, and carefully parsing the details of the source. Much information...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 48
Rabu, 2022-04-13 22:07:42

that? See Wikipedia:Footnotes for information on how to put references intext, and have them formatted correctly in the References section. Ansell 22:34...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/List of video games
Minggu, 2026-02-15 00:58:23

cited as the best (not second-best, one of the best, or similar), with WP:INTEXT attribution for each entry. This would resolve issues with WP:OR and WP:POV...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 36
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 20:30:39

reported on rather than copied verbatim as it was This means observing WP:INTEXT and WP:ASF. As the statement does not actually explain the reasons for the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Red panda/archive1
Jumat, 2022-04-08 07:05:52

Removed. LittleJerry (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC) And about the WP:INTEXT comment for the first two sentences of this section? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:16...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2024 East–West Line disruption/archive1
Minggu, 2026-05-03 06:05:30

provided for free." - I don't think we need to attribute Chee here, per WP:INTEXT, unless for some reason this was controversial, or the buses were not in...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-09-14
Senin, 2025-06-02 09:55:43

Results will contain pages with the highlighted text inside the page URL. intext: Results will contain pages with the highlighted text inside the pages body...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 333
Rabu, 2025-09-24 01:47:54

rumors have been used for WP:EXTRAORDINARY claims. I would rather use WP:INTEXT attribution for it. --MarioGom (talk) 14:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC) Unreliable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive338
Senin, 2024-04-29 13:08:51

DUE in the Litvinenko section. If we can't make these claims even with WP:INTEXT attribution, we will have to delete them also from the Alexander Litvinenko...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sega 32X games/archive1
Jumat, 2023-02-10 06:12:29

Yes, almost. Just need to explicitly mention IGN in the sentence (per WP:INTEXT) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Otherwise quite solid. — Crisco...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/January 2020
Jumat, 2025-10-17 04:44:29

sense here. – Sca (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC) @Sca: Refer to WP:INTEXT. If it's a general fact, we don't write "XYZ says", because it does leave...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/June 2011
Sabtu, 2011-07-02 11:22:07

version as canonical. I think it's a minor issue of wording and perhaps WP:INTEXT attribution. Instead, at least two long term contributors hold the intelligibility...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2016
Senin, 2016-06-27 00:44:02

technique, and material is apparent".—this requires in-text attribution, per WP:INTEXT done --GA and as a result he was excommunicated—should mention he was Catholic...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 96
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:10:08

NPOV? Perhaps a more updated re-write that covers it with more facts and intext attribution for anything deemed opinion. We should also include some of...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2016
Sabtu, 2016-07-30 11:59:01

copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) "have a "minimalist appearance".": Per WP:INTEXT, attribute it or paraphrase it. Support on prose per my standard disclaimer...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive148
Senin, 2022-05-16 04:49:11

beyond motherhood". @Roscelese: I stayed very close to the source per WP:INTEXT. So the fact that it's almost a direct quote isn't a problem because I began...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Argosy (magazine)/archive1
Kamis, 2023-12-07 07:05:21

circulation" – this phrasing ("must") sounds argumentative, and there is no WP:INTEXT attribution. I don't think this is (as much of) a problem for phrasings...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/Alice Tangerini/archive1
Sabtu, 2026-05-16 03:05:30

should be directly attributed in the prose (and this is also supported by WP:INTEXT). I think that the quote is helpful as it provides context for Tangerini's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:List of articles with doomed BBC links
Kamis, 2023-05-11 10:51:01

Beale : http://www.bbc.co.uk/otr/intext/19991121_film_1.html Republican Movement (Ireland) : http://www.bbc.co.uk/otr/intext/19991128_int_1.html John Maples...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 78
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:22:54

not violate WP:POV. This is despite what WP:YESPOV, WP:WIKIVOICE and WP:INTEXT state. Popcornduff has tried to enlighten Partytemple to the fact that a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2005
Jumat, 2011-07-29 00:20:08

Harvard form, and link externally, whereas there is a preference on WP for intext notes that link to references, as I understand it. This is not very difficult...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2016
Jumat, 2016-08-26 23:13:34

it is a portrait of a "desolate soul"[1] during", and throughout: See WP:INTEXT. Quoted material has to be attributed in the text (or paraphrased, i.e....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/December 2007
Kamis, 2008-01-03 02:01:42

HTF did this become a FA? Although it is accurate, it has virtually no intext referencing. The prose is repetitive, clunking, full of over-detailed trivia...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2015
Jumat, 2015-05-01 06:39:29

"Nevertheless, the 1915 Beulah film was "considered a sequel" to St. Elmo.": See WP:INTEXT. Reworded this to avoid the direct quotation, which wasn't necessary anyway...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2008
Senin, 2008-09-01 03:31:51

guideline in mind. The only reason I can see to add the publisher to the intext cite would be to aid in identifying the particular source if there was no...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2012
Sabtu, 2012-12-01 12:12:02

commentators?] for their defensive capabilities…" And the following quote needs intext attribution. "Rex then moved with her to Toronto, Canada": Minor point,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2016
Minggu, 2017-01-01 06:15:56

copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) Hi GAB, welcome to FAC. First up: See WP:INTEXT. All quotes need to be attributed to whoever said them, with a short (sometimes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/October 2020
Kamis, 2024-08-08 21:09:38

added a few missing citations, but there are a few sections that need more intext citations. TJMSmith (talk) 04:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Support - As above...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 42
Minggu, 2024-10-20 07:09:58

wrong. In that case, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view applies which requires intext citation and attribution. TFD (talk) 21:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Your argument...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2017
Minggu, 2017-04-30 19:44:59

March 2017 (UTC) "The Nine Stones circle has been described": WP:INTEXT violation. INTEXT has been disputed a bit, but I think we can live with it. If it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2018
Kamis, 2018-08-30 04:20:00

a "brilliant, fervent, and impressive" Congregational preacher": Per WP:INTEXT, quoted text needs attribution in the text, not just in the footnote. updated...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2013
Sabtu, 2013-06-01 19:38:15

article :)--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC) Seems I came late, but WP:INTEXT puts it explicitly: "In-text attribution is the attribution inside a sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2015
Sabtu, 2015-10-31 13:29:57

attribution per WP:INTEXT. Um, howzabout the the cite immediately following the quote?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC) Per INTEXT, "in addition...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2013
Senin, 2013-12-30 17:40:05

studio art by sketching and painting directly from nature”.”: Do we need intext attribution here for the quote? Have identified it as from the ADB. hamiltonstone...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2012
Kamis, 2012-03-01 05:02:00

The only remaining issues I have are with the Tyson ref and use of WP:INTEXT, while I've replied with further points to a few of the other things. I...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/November 2012
Jumat, 2020-10-16 03:48:47

hamiltonstone (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, sorry! I meant WP:INTEXT; i.e. saying who said it in the text: "According to X...". However, not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive291
Jumat, 2024-01-26 18:25:55

time you stopped doing that) and we have handled them properly by using WP:INTEXT. It seems to me that quite a lot of editors have now explained all these...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 76
Minggu, 2026-04-19 17:18:37

necessaarily represent the views of the Jerusalem Post and should be attributed to intext to the author. But that rules out its use in the info-box. Equally importantly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2015
Sabtu, 2015-08-29 19:19:02

I've made the same point elsewhere, but checking WP:CITE (specifically WP:INTEXT) I see the sentence " An inline citation should follow the attribution,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2019
Kamis, 2019-01-31 19:30:32

explicit. 66: Seems like the content is adequately supported. 90: Why is there INTEXT attribution here? Also, I don't think we need a reference after each sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2020
Selasa, 2020-06-30 21:00:42

Spelled out BP instead; I am not convinced that this is a situation where intext attribution is normally used or would help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:44,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2017
Minggu, 2017-10-01 05:31:50

note itself from its citation (if I've read it right--I could only see the intext change, not how it looked :( ). auntieruth (talk) 13:39, 25 September 2017...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/May 2005
Sabtu, 2010-03-13 23:40:55

Bath. They made it to FAC pretty easily and without the type of indepth/intext citations you are talking about. Seems to be a lot of resistance over here...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Structure of Literature/archive1
Kamis, 2024-02-29 07:06:09

no doubt from the above that "biased statements of opinion" have to have intext attribution. Simple statements of opinion, I would argue, do not have to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 65
Sabtu, 2022-04-09 09:11:22

however, be aware of any quotations or opinions in the paragraph per WP:INTEXT. So, if there are six sentences and they are all derived from the same page...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2018
Selasa, 2018-07-31 21:00:08

June 2018 (UTC) "During the "Run to the North",": My interpretation of WP:INTEXT is that either the quote marks need to be dropped (and possibly some text...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 37
Minggu, 2023-03-19 05:44:34

your implication wasn't that they invented it - then why bother with WP:INTEXT? No other music genre lead uses in-text attribution to explain a genre's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Rupert Bruce-Mitford/archive1
Senin, 2026-02-23 06:52:23

subject of the paragraph). A guideline that actually is relevant is WP:INTEXT, which expressly sanctions the attribution inside a sentence of material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive315
Senin, 2023-09-25 02:10:31

Wikipedia should never be repeating verbatim charges of racism without WP:INTEXT attribution. Any such claims should be kept out of Wikivoice. This applies...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/June 2007
Kamis, 2008-05-22 05:34:34

like it needs inline citations. ShadowHalo 20:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Added intext ref. Thanks for the feedback M-BMor 21:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC) Please see...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/July 2006
Kamis, 2020-12-24 01:45:18

quotes should go to Wikiquote, so I moved the entire section there, and intext replaced Condrad with Mościcki (1935) and Sejm (1995).--Piotr Konieczny...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 475
Kamis, 2025-05-08 00:41:04

tradition view being stated and then the experts opposition being used with intext attribution. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:48, 20 April 2025...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2017
Senin, 2018-01-01 06:59:43

who are you quoting, and could none of these be paraphrased? See the WP:INTEXT guideline. - Dank (push to talk) 21:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC) I've paraphrased...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2015
Minggu, 2015-03-01 04:55:44

request above for in-text attribution ... WP:CITE says that's needed (at WP:INTEXT), and Chicago recommends that too, but AFAIK, generalized attribution is...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/September 2020
Senin, 2020-09-28 22:36:19

(talk) 06:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC) Also about Themes - I note that WP:INTEXT generally recommends not to mention publishing information in text, such...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/September 2020
Minggu, 2020-09-27 03:44:28

the numbers are anyways not that impressive. The lead does not need WP:INTEXT attribution to Twitter platform, and saying he "was listed as" a graduate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/April 2021
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 08:26:31

fiction (?) literature of the time mentioning them is OK, but only with intext attribution. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Sure but there...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 34
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:09:40

any suggestions about how to present these, or similar, quotes (box or intext). Personally if we are going with quotes I would like to keep them short...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/September 2014
Rabu, 2014-11-12 18:48:46

do you find non-neutral about it? Is it that you would rather we use WP:Intext-attribution to cite the "his design (including his scar)" part? If so, it...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2017/Failed
Minggu, 2017-12-24 02:30:11

"Bengal's rice output in normal years was barely enough" (and other quotes): WP:INTEXT has been disputed a bit, but I think we can live with it. If it isn't important...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 467
Sabtu, 2025-02-22 08:16:57

Option 2 (intext attribution) WP:RSBIAS and WP:RSOPINION cover most of the points here. Jacobin publishes opinions peice that should have intext attribution...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Guallatiri/archive1
Jumat, 2024-10-18 00:43:45

technically difficult (grade F on the IFAS scale) but I spelled it out intext. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) "it has a cemetery, a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive312
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:08:31

here don't work as well as the RfC arguments at Talk:Joe Biden, we use WP:INTEXT, which is what we should be doing anyway for all WP:REDFLAG, WP:LABEL and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/August 2012
Jumat, 2012-10-05 11:06:43

July 2012 (UTC) Thanks, good comments. I'm not too sure how to handle the intext attribution to academics, in the past I've done things like "Susan Raine...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/April 2022
Minggu, 2022-05-01 04:37:28

Removed. LittleJerry (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC) And about the WP:INTEXT comment for the first two sentences of this section? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:16...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 466
Minggu, 2025-11-16 13:24:20

Kowal2701 (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC) Yup… a classic case where INTEXT attribution should resolve the issue. Western scholars say X, Somali tradition...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/March 2008
Kamis, 2016-02-11 09:30:47

citation/referencing', at the moment there's a mixture of Harvard-style intext cites (Smith 1990:123) and embedded cites/ext links, like so: [16]. The...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 187
Minggu, 2024-01-21 11:57:24

2023 (UTC) According to WP:INTEXT, "in-text attribution" includes use in Wikivoice. I do not understand this statement. WP:INTEXT describes in-text attribution...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2022
Selasa, 2022-03-01 04:41:50

bit messy, because there are two quotes from Daily News. I guess, per WP:INTEXT, "It is preferable not to clutter articles with information best left to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/August 2005
Jumat, 2008-10-24 00:27:54

Harvard form, and link externally, whereas there is a preference on WP for intext notes that link to references, as I understand it. This is not very difficult...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/August 2021
Rabu, 2021-09-01 06:38:20

not sure it's necessary to cite her by name or to quote her directly. WP:INTEXT suggests caution about when to use in-text attribution, and this material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 100
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:40:43

to take these interpretations as facts is disturbing. They deserve a WP:INTEXT treatment at best. Per WP:CONTROVERSY, I just want fair coverage from both...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 453
Jumat, 2024-10-25 00:17:44

another modeler has made comments in a reliable source, the best option is intext attribution. So make clear it's Nate Silver commenting rather than a fact...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mother Solomon/archive1
Rabu, 2025-06-18 07:06:00

sentence in particular need attribution? See the third example pair of WP:INTEXT. Removed attribution. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 04:20, 20 May 2025 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/May 2014
Kamis, 2014-05-29 19:28:50

Sonic Color manual's phrasing and structure. To remedy that concern (per WP:INTEXT), I'd tack on the words "According to the Sonic Colors Manual..." near the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/December 2005
Selasa, 2020-12-22 07:13:34

{{Details}}", what does that mean? Also, the inline citations are substituted for intext citations of the bible, and the gospels are expilicitly cited as the main...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/July 2005
Rabu, 2008-02-20 18:50:23

especially where you have quoted specific numbers and quotes, some already have intext references, but others like the bombing of the Algiers airport claimed 9...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Grey Literature
Selasa, 2024-12-31 10:48:11

discussion is the best option. Such sources might be biased, but that (and intext attribution) is already covered by WP:RSBIAS. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 208
Selasa, 2021-08-10 12:56:32

participant in a dispute, and therefore requiring double-quotes and WP:INTEXT attribution. Excerpts: Just because one author or one journal makes a scholarly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/March 2022
Jumat, 2022-04-01 05:54:36

unrealistic expectations of the military in this case. Any advice? Per WP:INTEXT "In-text attribution should be used with direct speech", re. the quote about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/July 2005
Kamis, 2020-12-03 06:49:23

for research? Meelar (talk) July 7, 2005 16:34 (UTC) There are alot of intext sources--Imfinite 8 July 2005 00:59 (UTC) Then they should be properly formatted...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 508
Rabu, 2026-03-04 00:36:43

listed should probably be attributed for anything controversial, see WP:INTEXT, if their opinion is due inclusion. But if the are just used to support...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 24
Selasa, 2022-03-22 13:20:42

15 March 2021 (UTC) @PearlSt82, primary sources don't always require WP:INTEXT attribution. Consider the example about a painting in Wikipedia:Identifying...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2015/Promoted
Minggu, 2015-12-27 08:06:50

and you've got your 3 supports, so I'll just leave some comments. See WP:INTEXT. Quoted statements need at least a clue in the text as to where they came...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 484
Rabu, 2025-07-23 00:33:27

back in time the details the more you should be using acadey sources. WP:INTEXT attribution is useful if any of the details of contentious. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 197
Rabu, 2026-03-25 22:39:17

edit for page ABCD B/ Intext warning appears "You are not logged in. Your IP address ..." Alternate Pre Edit/ Change the intext warning a prompt (switchable...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/2006
Senin, 2009-10-05 11:56:06

easily. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 19:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC) It needs more intext citations. "The Marines' most famous action of this period occurred in the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/June 2016
Minggu, 2016-06-26 16:18:12

coming from? I think we need WP:INTEXT attribution. It was SchroCat who proposed this structure. But regarding, WP:INTEXT attribution, I can't do it, so...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 487
Rabu, 2025-09-10 00:32:43

organization. Raladic (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Reliable with WP:INTEXT attribution, whether any particular report is due for inclusion may depend...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/July 2016
Sabtu, 2016-07-30 11:58:29

feel free to revert my copyediting. "a treat to witness" (x2): See WP:INTEXT. Anything in quote marks needs to be attributed in the text ... or paraphrased...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 479
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 15:05:30

those points derive from other guidelines or from general good practice (WP:INTEXT, and the general principle that statements which aren't factual or widely...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486
Kamis, 2025-08-21 00:27:45

Previously briefly mentioned in archive 379. Probably reliable with proper intext attribution, although whether it's due would depend on secondary sources...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 428
Rabu, 2024-02-28 14:26:11

[27] . ManyAreasExpert (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC) I've added intext attribution to clarify where the lower and upper bounds are coming from...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489
Minggu, 2025-10-05 00:23:37

WP:BLP obligations to remove the content as long as it is attributed (WP:INTEXT) and other Wikipedia policies and guidelines are met (e.g. WP:UNDUE). --...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 474
Jumat, 2025-04-25 00:34:19

statement could be an error, or it could be an opinion, in which case WP:INTEXT attribution might be needed for inclusion, assuming WP:ONUS is met. —Bagumba...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gaza Health Ministry qualifier
Rabu, 2024-09-25 00:55:13

2024 (UTC) Oh my eyes. You are altering guidelines to fit your stance. WP:INTEXT only requires a statement to be attributed, not the attribution itself....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive489
Sabtu, 2025-01-25 19:24:45

goes against our guideline on WP:CITATIONS, particularly the section on WP:INTEXT attribution of references. @XDanielx: and I have been trying (to little...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 235
Senin, 2023-09-04 13:05:35

above is not possible to find, remove or include with WP:Attribution -> WP:INTEXT Many newspapers copying each other, does not automatically qualify WP:EXCEPTIONAL...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/December 2012
Sabtu, 2013-02-02 07:17:17

embrace his journey ... and release his spirit to find new vigor."": Requires intext attribution. "to the love of a pre-determined life, in this case, Mulder's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Galileo project/archive1
Senin, 2025-05-05 13:43:00

Smithsonian Institution.": this quote should be attributed in the text. WP:INTEXT: " In-text attribution may need to be used with direct speech" but "should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/November 2011
Minggu, 2012-01-01 03:59:21

book is on the giraffe. The page numbers for the specific claim are given intext. LittleJerry (talk) 02:04, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Comments from Cryptic C62...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Abraham Lincoln/archive4
Minggu, 2025-07-27 08:16:36

2025 (UTC) There are a couple of quotations which need to be attributed intext, per MOS:QUOTE: see They settled in an "unbroken forest" in Little Pigeon...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Peer review/February 2012
Kamis, 2012-04-05 10:24:38

"demonstrating "outstanding ability."": This needs in-text attribution per WP:INTEXT. "he began to have difficulties reading the blackboard": Perhaps too specific;...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 79
Selasa, 2024-10-08 21:38:49

tags from 2011. Many sources listed in the bibliography are not used as intext citations. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Delist. Repeated use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/4
Rabu, 2026-05-13 15:02:18

Sneider's self-published reports as a source, they must be accompanied with intext attribution, especially concerning reporting on casting of productions,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 480
Senin, 2025-06-16 00:29:24

Then maybe you need to find other sources to balance out the situation. Intext attribution can also help, make sure claims and positions are stated as...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 437
Senin, 2024-07-22 00:41:37

this edit[18] when one of those sources was OKO.press. There are times WP:INTEXT attribution should be used and there are times it shouldn't but that's an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 459
Kamis, 2025-02-20 07:42:20

claim (the Archaeologists and skeptical writers) should be fine imo, per WP:INTEXT. If there are any alternative POVs to that, they should also be added for...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 10
Rabu, 2025-06-18 13:23:10

remains an entirely insufficient amount of in-text attribution, see Wikipedia:Intext. ToeSchmoker (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC) Every paragraph has an adequate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149
Rabu, 2025-09-24 00:55:43

necessarily then, but also in subsequent edits) that it was important to use WP:INTEXT attribution to explicitly show where the estimate comes from and to not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 464
Sabtu, 2025-07-05 03:58:35

We can attribute this to the organization following WP:ACCORDINGTO/WP:INTEXT guidelines, which was the original attempted edit. PCORI gets into cases...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 477
Jumat, 2025-05-30 00:29:57

May 2025 (UTC) That has nothing to do with gauging WP:RS?? Attributing text is not novel or unique WP:INTEXT. Polygnotus (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2025 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 495
Kamis, 2025-11-27 00:37:56

you have multiple sources saying the same thing, you shouldn't give WP:INTEXT attribution to just one of them. Another thing to consider is whether there...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 104
Senin, 2023-06-12 11:50:43

acknowledges it is a biased source, and so its claims must be supplemented with WP:INTEXT attributions, not presented in WP:WIKIVOICE. Oktayey (talk) 21:17, 19 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 114
Selasa, 2025-02-25 19:04:39

ago, and the result was to not mention these various news orgs inline. WP:INTEXT attribution was brought up then, too. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 02:14,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 452
Minggu, 2024-10-13 00:19:07

September 2024 (UTC) The problem is context is key. They could be reliable with intext attribution in the body of the article, such as "AccuWeather estimates the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/October 2024
Jumat, 2024-11-01 07:25:45

( diff). Ptolemaic Kingdom The heading has "301 BCE – 199 BCE" but the intext span is "301–200 BCE". Any reason for the discrepancy? "Book of Ecclesiastes...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 510
Selasa, 2026-03-17 00:40:07

biased but generally reliable, attribution is necessary for opinions per WP:INTEXT (same as any other reliable source). USEBYOTHERS otherwise swings my !vote...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 461
Kamis, 2025-01-02 00:13:42

WP:EXPERTSPS were to publish using the journal it could be reliable for intext attributed opinion, DUE would obviously apply. The anonymous pieces wouldn't...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 499
Jumat, 2025-12-19 00:36:56

don't try to confuse WP:INLINE citations which are always required and WP:INTEXT attribution which is when there is some concern that prevents using WP:WIKIVOICE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 78
Rabu, 2024-08-28 19:43:54

prose, and an overreliance on block quotes. Unreliable sources are used as intext citations and the "Cultural representations" section is full of one-sentence...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 October 31
Jumat, 2024-11-08 09:14:08

issues. Geschichte (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC) DELETE, NOT enough intext citations UzbukUdash (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC) Delete Lacks adequate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 24
Sabtu, 2025-05-03 00:11:17

It is a primary source so it should be used with WP:PRIMARYCARE and WP:INTEXT. The "Dakar" source seems to have been added in error, since the WAP's declaration...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/reliable
Minggu, 2025-09-21 16:01:33

Sneider's self-published reports as a source, they must be accompanied with intext attribution, especially concerning reporting on casting of productions,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 14
Jumat, 2024-03-22 09:02:19

addition, the Background section is massively padded with inappropriate WP:INTEXT, and language like "garnered significant attention from notable newspapers"...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/April Fools' Day 2023
Minggu, 2025-05-25 23:34:02

form of an inline citation after the sentence or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution when you copy or closely paraphrase another author's...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive360
Jumat, 2024-11-29 21:50:01

statements about living people. Their claims may be appropriate to include with INTEXT attribution iff they are reported in reliable secondary sources. If no such...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 211
Kamis, 2026-05-14 21:06:30

multiple sources claiming a person is dead. Loosely this can follow WP:INTEXT. CMD (talk) 07:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC) I agree that we should be saying...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1153
Kamis, 2024-06-13 10:50:11

2024 (UTC) No, but the solution could be "Let's put the dates in with WP:INTEXT attribution". The main point of this sub-thread, though, is to talk about...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2026
Sabtu, 2026-02-28 20:50:29

subject of the paragraph). A guideline that actually is relevant is WP:INTEXT, which expressly sanctions the attribution inside a sentence of material...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1201
Selasa, 2024-05-07 12:03:10

properly format a source on this article. Reference number 1 is linked to an intext citation in the infobox but I don't know how to fix it from being just a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1287
Selasa, 2026-03-24 02:33:50

subject, such as "Big Company has 15,000 employees", does not require WP:INTEXT attribution; in fact, in-text attribution in such cases could improperly...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1291
Jumat, 2026-05-01 02:45:28

reliable; FamousReporter's YT channel may not necessarily be, and may require intext attribution when cited, whereas FR@BBC only requires a citation. See WP:BIASED...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 269
Rabu, 2026-02-18 02:31:52

cited as the best (not second-best, one of the best, or similar), with WP:INTEXT attribution for each entry. This would resolve issues with WP:OR and WP:POV...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1290
Kamis, 2026-06-04 19:28:34

sources (which includes WP:RSBIASED), WP:Citing sources (which includes WP:INTEXT), WT:Neutral point of view or wherever you think the most appropriate venue...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1242
Senin, 2024-12-09 02:12:00

Draft:Fort Jadhavgadh - Wikipedia I request the editors to look at the intext citations and references in the draft . David notMD , you may as you have...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive341
Jumat, 2024-10-18 00:21:48

"Trans kids" was a term I used a current discussion about whether we need WP:INTEXT attribution for a statement that "children with comorbidities did not receive...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 218
Minggu, 2025-03-30 00:34:59

cause a hit to the expansion limit (and such cases should probably have intext comments to be clear that's why they are there). Izno (talk) 00:00, 9 February...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2023
Minggu, 2023-12-31 06:18:54

circulation" – this phrasing ("must") sounds argumentative, and there is no WP:INTEXT attribution. I don't think this is (as much of) a problem for phrasings...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/February 2024
Jumat, 2024-03-01 04:40:11

no doubt from the above that "biased statements of opinion" have to have intext attribution. Simple statements of opinion, I would argue, do not have to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2025
Selasa, 2025-07-01 04:05:17

sentence in particular need attribution? See the third example pair of WP:INTEXT. Removed attribution. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 04:20, 20 May 2025 (UTC)...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive364
Selasa, 2025-10-07 19:27:39

what your point is here. Loki (talk) 16:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC) There was WP:INTEXT: "The organisation has said". Based on attribution, it's not necessary to...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1173
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:02:10

strange. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 15:44, 1 December 2024 (UTC) See WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:INTEXT for examples of policy and guideline counter to your impression. ꧁Zanahary꧂...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1199
Selasa, 2025-09-23 20:50:43

presentation of those sources needs to be neutral, and sometimes that means WP:INTEXT attribution that identifies a partisan source as being biased or partisan...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1167
Sabtu, 2024-10-26 11:35:59

should have some standards. Maybe it could be used as a primary source using intext attribution, but then it would be a matter of due if the writings of the...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2024
Kamis, 2024-02-01 01:53:35

technically difficult (grade F on the IFAS scale) but I spelled it out intext. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC) "it has a cemetery, a...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1158
Senin, 2024-07-22 00:36:13

sourcing, i.e. only for not very controversial cases and with very clear INTEXT attribution for transparency, and for cases where there was at least some...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2024
Kamis, 2024-10-31 00:31:45

02:11, 24 September 2024 (UTC) Hmm. I think, but am not positive, that INTEXT attribution should be used or perhaps additional sources to corroborate...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/One giant table
Selasa, 2025-10-21 09:24:40

Sneider's self-published reports as a source, they must be accompanied with intext attribution, especially concerning reporting on casting of productions,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2025
Jumat, 2026-01-16 19:25:04

2025 (UTC) There are a couple of quotations which need to be attributed intext, per MOS:QUOTE: see They settled in an "unbroken forest" in Little Pigeon...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2024
Rabu, 2024-06-26 23:01:27

Smithsonian Institution.": this quote should be attributed in the text. WP:INTEXT: " In-text attribution may need to be used with direct speech" but "should...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/May 2026
Minggu, 2026-05-31 18:26:13

provided for free." - I don't think we need to attribute Chee here, per WP:INTEXT, unless for some reason this was controversial, or the buses were not in...

Click to read more »