DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

of a notes section, see the article Tezcatlipoca. Shortcut WP:GENREFWP:GENREF A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content...

general references, as per WP:GENREF. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC) I am not quite sure how to implement WP:GENREF. Perhaps if I changed the...

form of referencing is allowed. It's called a general reference (see WP:GENREF). I have added URLs to those papers, and one of them can be downloaded....

hangup here for an inline cite for every word, general references per WP:GENREF still remain a valid method for verifiying article content. So in short...

relevant to the topic. Normal Op (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC) See WP:GENREF which explains that "A general reference is a citation that supports content...

WP:FNNR. They are not external links, they are general references (see WP:GENREF). The notes above are the inline citations (see WP:INLINECITE). —Godsy(TALKCONT)...

The main thing I'm actually commenting to note is that none of the (WP:GENREF) sources given are actually Primary sources. There are two modern sources...

real life has gotten busy. For your question about listing the sources, WP:GENREF gives more information about this. While listing references that are not...

(UTC) You are confusing "inline citation" with citation-in-general. See WP:GENREF. "A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content...

preferable, there is no requirement saying that they must be inline (WP:GENREF). – Margin1522 (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Keep - the article in...

it lacks inline references. But general references are also allowed (WP:GENREF). • That the sources are offline. But according to WP:PAPERONLY that doesn't...

want to add a general reference then using a <ref> tag is not ideal: WP:GENREF explains two ways to do that. If you have more questions or you want someone...

save the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC) WP:GENREF, which are indeed perfectly acceptable, are almost always listed at the...

order is more intuitive. Just making sure before I change them. See WP:GENREF "are usually sorted by the last name of the author or the editor." Gog the...

being discussed. I'll talk it out, but the reality is WP:V supersedes WP:GENREF. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 05:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC) @Gloss:, with regards...

CassiantoTalk 19:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC) No, not really purely subjective. See WP:GENREF. "A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content...

Inline references are generally preferred over general references (see WP:GENREF), especially for a source like Buden where individual pages should be cited...

the subjects sourced to the general references might I suggest using {{genref}}? I created this template a while ago for this kind of situation, where...

case anyone else wants to use the same trick, I moved the code to Template:Genref so it can be used in any article. –Grondemar 03:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)...

don't like the use of "General references", for the reasons laid out in WP:GENREF. Harrias talk 09:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Read the prose in detail – looks...

WP:FNNR. They are not external links, they are general references (see WP:GENREF). The notes above are the inline citations (see WP:INLINECITE). —Godsy(TALKCONT)...

I've never done a general reference before, so stupidly, I'd never read WP:GENREF. Learning! Elemimele (talk) 17:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Hi. I have never tried...

being discussed. I'll talk it out, but the reality is WP:V supersedes WP:GENREF. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 05:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC) @Gloss:, with regards...

citations / footnotes are preferred by most editors, but in this scenario a WP:GENREF would have been perfectly acceptable. nil nz 11:09, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Only...

comments there are based on my understanding of relevant Wikipages such as WP:GENREF, WP:MINREF, and WP:Notability. I would appreciate discussion about whether...

relevant to the topic. Normal Op (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC) See WP:GENREF which explains that "A general reference is a citation that supports content...

guidelines or example page where general references are used would help. WP:GENREF explains what they are, but not how to do them. Amirah talk 21:26, 14 November...

hangup here for an inline cite for every word, general references per WP:GENREF still remain a valid method for verifiying article content. So in short...

it lacks inline references. But general references are also allowed (WP:GENREF). • That the sources are offline. But according to WP:PAPERONLY that doesn't...

preferable, there is no requirement saying that they must be inline (WP:GENREF). – Margin1522 (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Keep - the article in...

was the prime. US or U.S.? Consistency needed. The distinction between WP:GENREF and "Additional sources" is not usually seen on well-developed articles...

(UTC) You are confusing "inline citation" with citation-in-general. See WP:GENREF. "A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content...

form of referencing is allowed. It's called a general reference (see WP:GENREF). I have added URLs to those papers, and one of them can be downloaded....

ordered by where they appear in the article. Unless you're talking about a WP:GENREF section, in which case I agree romanized spellings should be easier for...

Inline references are generally preferred over general references (see WP:GENREF), especially for a source like Buden where individual pages should be cited...

case anyone else wants to use the same trick, I moved the code to Template:Genref so it can be used in any article. –Grondemar 03:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)...

don't like the use of "General references", for the reasons laid out in WP:GENREF. Harrias talk 09:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC) Read the prose in detail – looks...

the subjects sourced to the general references might I suggest using {{genref}}? I created this template a while ago for this kind of situation, where...

WP:TNT'd appear to have always had support via secondary sources in WP:GENREFs (e.g. the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's page on the Cosmological...

use GENREF only? I mostly see them when people translate from the German Wikipedia. I somewhat fear that we'll see more people translating a GENREF article...

contribs) 10:16, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Hi BLG1952. You might want to look at WP:GENREF because some of the sources cited in that article are general references...

article rather than being cited inline, they are not disallowed, see WP:GENREF. Unless you have other reasons to believe that the references do not, in...

order is more intuitive. Just making sure before I change them. See WP:GENREF "are usually sorted by the last name of the author or the editor." Gog the...

WP:TNT'd appear to have always had support via secondary sources in WP:GENREFs (e.g. the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's page on the Cosmological...

Holocene (4 edits): N limited creative text and not verified by the one genref, but all gone now MCE89 (talk) 08:18, 29 December 2025 (UTC) Dictionary...

general references, as per WP:GENREF. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC) I am not quite sure how to implement WP:GENREF. Perhaps if I changed the...

of the good article criteria, not a requirement for all articles (see WP:GENREF). We don't remove things from mainspace because they're imperfect. If we...

covered by a single source. Nobody needs a citation every line if a WP:GENREF suffices for the entire page or a specific section. For example, see Template:Section...

The main thing I'm actually commenting to note is that none of the (WP:GENREF) sources given are actually Primary sources. There are two modern sources...

(just as I will say to Skyerise that it's entirely possible to clarify WP:GENREF without calling another editor an idiot), including against the reportee's...

In which case, how do you square this new requirement with WP:MINREF, WP:GENREF, WP:LISTVERIFY, and WP:LEADCITE? What is a "third-party source"? Elsewhere...

save the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC) WP:GENREF, which are indeed perfectly acceptable, are almost always listed at the...

inline citations because they don't provide text-source integrity (see WP:GENREF). Working off of just one source isn't great either, as it does a poor job...

of WP:MINREF on that transcluded page any more than a bibliographic WP:GENREF would be, even if it was used as an inline citation on another page that...

@AkiyamaKana As far as I recall, general references aren't really needed (see WP:GENREF), so I think it's better to change them to appropriate inline citations...

so, and likely an overly strict interpretation of a single policy, as WP:GENREF allows for a single source to cite a large batch of material when its entries...

was the prime. US or U.S.? Consistency needed. The distinction between WP:GENREF and "Additional sources" is not usually seen on well-developed articles...

like general references either, but they're still accepted practice (WP:GENREF). Even if general references weren't allowed, you've violated WP:3RR. Thebiguglyalien...