DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

whether they have been paid to edit Wikipedia. Shortcut WP:EXTERNALRELWP:EXTERNALREL While editing Wikipedia, an editor's primary role is to further the interests...

plenty of better source material to show notability, but because WP:EXTERNALREL I did nothing more than minor edits to clean up. eg: Award: https://issuu...

(talk) 15:34, 22 May 2026 (UTC) Jgee10 (talk) 00:55, 24 May 2026 (UTC) WP:EXTERNALREL is probably very relevant here as this WP:SPA self-declares that he/she...

person due to the fact that it appears to have been uploaded by a WP:EXTERNALREL user (based on his edit history of that article). If it actually is the...

success or failure of the project but I am user. I have reviewed the WP:EXTERNALREL policy and I do not think that would exclude me as contributing to the...

nd-why-this-matters-for-your-bran.html - Lakoenig and I do have a WP:EXTERNALREL to Wilde, but are neither paid nor connected to each other. I have no...

Erik II (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Furthermore, WP:EXTERNALREL says, "While editing Wikipedia, an editor's primary role is to further...

relationship with you as a "source," this is an external relationship (WP:EXTERNALREL). Same if it's someone you just "discuss" your stories with. But since...

because of the entries in the Current Accomplishments section but from WP:EXTERNALREL. It's widely known that upper-caste Indians often proudly display their...

David, pointing out to administrators that you may be involved in WP:EXTERNALREL is not an ad hominem; it is a fact that you contributed to the Springer...

that the policy mentions religion, I'm guessing you're referring to WP:EXTERNALREL, but I'd like to be sure before I respond.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk)...

ban due to WP:COI, and then broke that self imposed topic ban. See WP:EXTERNALREL, I do not claim they are a paid editor, but a WP:COI editor. Tutelary...

being paid is not required to create an external relationship, per WP:EXTERNALREL. What I don't understand is why, after disclosing this, you took the...

attacked off-wiki and have been drawn in to the point where it's nearly WP:EXTERNALREL if not past that point. They need a break if only to stop the external...

topics relevant to their professional activities. On the contrary, WP:EXTERNALREL states: Subject-matter experts (SMEs) are welcome on Wikipedia within...

COI actions should be taken, that was misclassification on my part. WP:EXTERNALREL, the relation between an attended and a school isn't too drastic. Their...

on-wiki conduct bears on problems like TE and ADVOCACY, not COI. Per EXTERNALREL and the recent RfC clarifying same, COI arises from an editor's external...

disclose any connection they have with the subject, in accordance with WP:EXTERNALREL, as a preventive measure. Please understand that you are under no obligation...

are computer science professors) whether the two editors have an WP:EXTERNALREL: Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic,...

David, pointing out to administrators that you may be involved in WP:EXTERNALREL is not an ad hominem; it is a fact that you contributed to the Springer...

David, pointing out to administrators that you may be involved in WP:EXTERNALREL is not an ad hominem; it is a fact that you contributed to the Springer...

should reframe how we talk about the subject). IMO this belongs at WP:EXTERNALREL. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC) Disregarding...

David, pointing out to administrators that you may be involved in WP:EXTERNALREL is not an ad hominem; it is a fact that you contributed to the Springer...

Preceding undated comment added 11:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Please read WP:EXTERNALREL and the following. Long story short: if you are paid for editing WP,...

they're connected with. A hired advocate would certainly fall afoul of WP:EXTERNALREL (which, BTW, is a guideline, not a policy—and that's probably wise, too)...

success or failure of the project but I am user. I have reviewed the WP:EXTERNALREL policy and I do not think that would exclude me as contributing to the...

Preceding undated comment added 11:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Please read WP:EXTERNALREL and the following. Long story short: if you are paid for editing WP,...

User:Horse Dancing neglected to disclose his conflict of interest. WP:EXTERNALREL "Any external relationship – personal, religious, political, academic...

plenty of better source material to show notability, but because WP:EXTERNALREL I did nothing more than minor edits to clean up. eg: Award: https://issuu...

User:Horse Dancing neglected to disclose his conflict of interest. WP:EXTERNALREL "Any external relationship – personal, religious, political, academic...

possible to maintain a neutral, objective POV in these circumstances. WP:EXTERNALREL states: "Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic...

Erik II (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:40, 20 August 2015 (UTC) Furthermore, WP:EXTERNALREL says, "While editing Wikipedia, an editor's primary role is to further...

disclose any connection they have with the subject, in accordance with WP:EXTERNALREL, as a preventive measure. Please understand that you are under no obligation...

article about a political candidate I want to see succeed or fail? Per WP:EXTERNALREL, "How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern...

Wikipedia to attack Hayes again at his article. This is covered under WP:EXTERNALREL which says "Any external relationship – personal, religious, political...

not in the "yes" section because I think it largely overlaps with WP:EXTERNALREL. I have no problem with an acupuncturist writing about the history of...

behaves like the owner & curator of the page. The external relationship WP:EXTERNALREL is probably academic. Could an admin make a quick search on Wikipedia...

possible to maintain a neutral, objective POV in these circumstances. WP:EXTERNALREL states: "Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic...

It is apparent that EEng has an apparent COI, specifically under WP:EXTERNALREL, due to great personal and academic involvement in the Phineas Gage article...

alleged conflict? — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 13:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC) WP:EXTERNALREL is relevant. "Any external relationship—personal, religious, political...

potential COI. In terms of COI policy I feel compelled to point some out; WP:EXTERNALREL: "Any external relationship — personal...—can trigger a COI." I believe...

thereof. It has to do with external roles and relationships. See WP:EXTERNALREL, WP:COIBIAS and WP:COI#What is wrong with conflict of interest?. That...

February 2014 (UTC) It's still there, just in a different form. Read WP:EXTERNALREL, where it states, "But subject-matter experts are welcome to contribute...

or her husband's page, which is a clear violation of WP:COIEDIT, WP:EXTERNALREL, and WP:COISELF. Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 00:48, 28 August...

told Dlthewave, I think I am following the COI two guidelines: a) = WP:EXTERNALREL Subject-matter experts (SMEs) are welcome on Wikipedia within their areas...

(UTC) It actually is specifically mentioned in the COI policy (in WP:EXTERNALREL). That said, this is kind of a corner case, and they say they are not...

because of wikipedia's COI guidelines (the relevant part would be WP:EXTERNALREL) are judged to have a conflict they need to declare. It has generally...

page's article has a significant COI; specifically WP:COISELF and WP:EXTERNALREL. I'm not sure who to email with external evidence as I obviously can't...

a situation like mine. At least I don't think so? The language at WP:EXTERNALREL is vague enough and includes religion as a potential COI, so I'm seeking...

Pickle: I do not think this is a COI that requires a declaration. WP:EXTERNALREL says, "While editing Wikipedia, an editor's primary role is to further...

the conflict of interest guidelines still do. As you will find at WP:EXTERNALREL, "Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic...

religious beliefs is inherently a COI that needs to be disclosed per WP:EXTERNALREL. I think there needs to be a higher bar than "you're editing this article...

essentially a Wikiproject that happens to be organized off-wiki. Per WP:EXTERNALREL and WP:COINOTBIAS, that is not a CoI violation. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib)...

religion to out themselves gets sticky, though it does factor in to WP:EXTERNALREL without much clarification. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 01:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)...

doesn't need to be being paid to have a conflict-of-interest per WP:EXTERNALREL and that even a WP:APPARENTCOI can possibly be problematic, DN27ND posted...

info and link. given all the above, it appears that Mr Goggin has a WP:EXTERNALREL concerning Mike Bushell and/or "Arthur the Stoat" which is giving rise...

ignoring the key point here, which is that you obviously have a COI per WP:EXTERNALREL. Being someone's former manager and beneficiary of their estate is an...

that the user indicated. For the record, the distinction is given in WP:EXTERNALREL as follows: How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes...

because of the entries in the Current Accomplishments section but from WP:EXTERNALREL. It's widely known that upper-caste Indians often proudly display their...

(talk) 15:34, 22 May 2026 (UTC) Jgee10 (talk) 00:55, 24 May 2026 (UTC) WP:EXTERNALREL is probably very relevant here as this WP:SPA self-declares that he/she...

Wikipedia. The only reason I'm in any doubt is the exact boundary of WP:EXTERNALREL is a bit fuzzy: Any external relationship—personal, religious, political...

run in opposition to furthering the interests of the encyclopedia? WP:EXTERNALREL falls short; the terms of use doesn't explicitly require a disclosure...

has merit. Fram (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC) I've read Wikipedia:EXTERNALREL. What has been said is a COI, I view as being a subject matter expert...

the site". Please do not misquote me, I only meant users who have WP:EXTERNALREL which serves their purpose, I never recalled admins involved in COI....

legitimate interest in making the company articles look "nice". As WP:EXTERNALREL says, how close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern...

Being paid is not the only criterion for conflict of interest. See WP:EXTERNALREL. I think the fact that you have a working relationship with this person...

Being paid is not the only criterion for conflict of interest. See WP:EXTERNALREL. I think the fact that you have a working relationship with this person...

Wikipedia in their area of expertise. See the final paragraph of WP:EXTERNALREL, which specifically encourages subject-matter experts to edit their area...

it becomes a concern on Wikipedia is governed by common sense. Per WP:EXTERNALREL. If I'm paying to be a student at a university then I certainly would...