Wikipedia:EXPLNOTE

Search Results: Wikipedia:EXPLNOTE

Redirect to:

Help:Footnotes#WP:EXPLNOTE

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

To a help page: This is a redirect from any page inside or outside of help namespace to a page in that namespace.
- The above category link leads to a list of redirects from inside help namespace. For redirects from outside help space, see Category:Redirects to help namespace.

To an embedded anchor: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to an embedded anchor on the redirect's target page.
- An {{anchor|anchor name}} or {{visible anchor}} template, an HTML element with id="anchor name", or an |id=anchor name parameter can be placed at the beginning of a paragraph, substituted into a section header, or inserted within a table. Anchors may also be old section headers that have since been renamed, in order to preserve existing internal and external links.
- Although section headers of the form ==(Header name)== act as anchors by default, with them use {{R to section}} instead.

From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.

Wikipedia:Peer review/RMS Titanic/archive1

Kamis, 2011-11-24 17:01:06

that way it is still available to the reader, but not in the body. See WP:EXPLNOTE for options on how to present explanatory footnotes vis-a-vis citation...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2012 June 13

Jumat, 2023-03-03 15:43:05

style of the article? Achim1999 (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC) See WP:EXPLNOTE. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 00:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Your footnote was not...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/June 2021

Senin, 2021-06-28 07:26:03

references, so they should be listed separately (see WP:REFGROUP and WP:EXPLNOTE for how to do this). See next. Ref. 14 ("I have found no evidence...")...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/August 2012

Selasa, 2012-08-28 22:08:08

note. Actually, it's an "explanatory note", and according to the MOS (WP:EXPLNOTE, it's appropriate to use them with citations. The Washington Times has...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2016 April 2

Selasa, 2026-03-10 00:04:35

in reply. --Thnidu (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2016 (UTC) I think look at WP:EXPLNOTE, you use reflist groups with custom numbering crh23 (talk) 18:17, 2 April...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2013 April 4

Jumat, 2023-02-10 00:31:02

by a superscript Note 1 which links to the footnote. See method D at WP:EXPLNOTE, it is the most commonly used method to sort references and explanatory...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 360

Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:50:42

problem is that this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes#WP:EXPLNOTE says that {{efn}} supports | name= and | group= . I don't think I asked...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Macedonia (ancient kingdom)/archive1

Minggu, 2023-01-29 01:44:37

footnotes, I'd recommend splitting them into a separate section. See WP:EXPLNOTE. Should the Encyclopædia Britannica appear in further reading or external...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Spaceflight before 1951/archive1

Senin, 2025-04-14 18:19:46

references, so they should be listed separately (see WP:REFGROUP and WP:EXPLNOTE for how to do this). See next. Ref. 14 ("I have found no evidence...")...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Maya Angelou works/archive1

Sabtu, 2021-12-25 15:17:55

note. Actually, it's an "explanatory note", and according to the MOS (WP:EXPLNOTE, it's appropriate to use them with citations. The Washington Times has...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/July 2017

Selasa, 2017-08-01 06:24:56

footnotes, I'd recommend splitting them into a separate section. See WP:EXPLNOTE. Should the Encyclopædia Britannica appear in further reading or external...

Click to read more »

Wikipedia:Peer review/November 2011

Minggu, 2012-01-01 03:59:21

that way it is still available to the reader, but not in the body. See WP:EXPLNOTE for options on how to present explanatory footnotes vis-a-vis citation...

Click to read more »