DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

the notability of hypothetical or candidate objects. Shortcuts WP:DWMPWP:DWMP WP:AST2000WP:AST2000 Before 2012, when this notability guideline did not...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:44, 2 May...

This should be redirected to List of minor planets: 472001–473000 per WP:DWMP. The single reference found on Google Scholar [1] only mentions the object...

suggest deleting the article. -- Kheider (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC) DWMP/NASTRO say nothing of the sort, and you should not be editing other editors...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Redirect to Kepler-23 as per WP:DWMP. Subject fails to meet notability for astronomical objects. Did WP:BEFORE...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:34...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: non-notable based on paucity of sources. Praemonitus (talk) 15:53, 18 May...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources available to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. North America1000 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Not much found on Google scholar. Appears non-notable per WP:GNG. Praemonitus...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability; insufficient reliable sources available...

discussions. North America1000 10:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no suitable sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

isn't enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. There was a follow-up study,...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there just aren't suitable sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus...

discussions. North America1000 07:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Nothing much found on Google Scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2015...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there's a mention of it being s slow rotator,[1] but not much else. Unable...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:51, 2 May...

discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 20:17...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. This one gets a number of mentions in journal studies, but nothing substantial...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: not much found on Google scholar; unable to establish notability per WP:GNG...

discussions. North America1000 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient references available to establish notability per WP:GNG. Praemonitus...

9 June 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 13:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing found on Google Scholar. Unable to establish notability. Praemonitus...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability due to paucity of suitable sources. Praemonitus...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 03:03, 2 May...

discussions. North America1000 21:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: just a brief mention found in one mass study.[1] Praemonitus (talk) 16:02...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Insufficient sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)...

notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 15:44...

discussions. North America1000 23:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:52, 2 May...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 19:03...

discussions. North America1000 09:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Single photometry study found,[1] which does not contain enough information...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:47, 2 May...

WP:NASTCRIT) and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   15:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability; insufficient reliable sources available...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:44, 2 May...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. One photometric study...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. North America1000 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unfortunately the results are conflated with a widely cited work by author...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; this one appears as data entries in several scholarly articles, but most...

Redirect as above. Neutralitytalk 05:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. There was a very low velocity...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   15:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. This one was more...

discussions. North America1000 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: I see one photometry study and a pair of possible mentions in a couple of...

deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉   20:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:41, 2 May...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:43, 2 May...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. Just one study found;[1] nothing much else of substance. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:48, 2 May...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Agree with D. Eppstein. Unable to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: concur with above. Praemonitus (talk) 19:04, 11 May 2015 (UTC) The above...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:50, 2 May...

discussions. North America1000 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: the results on Google scholar were pretty meager; there's mention in a light...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Weak redirect per WP:DWMP. This object does receive some minor attention as a member of the Hilda family...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. There's one photometric study...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; one photometric study found Praemonitus (talk) 17:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect...

discussions. North America1000 18:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. All I found are data entries with no substantial coverage. Praemonitus (talk)...

planets 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 17:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 22:42,...

notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient source material available to establish notability. Does not...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:49, 2 May...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:48, 2 May...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there are a few small scraps of information available including a probability...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   14:59, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Just one light curve...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no suitable references found. Praemonitus (talk) 19:04, 11 May 2015 (UTC)...

discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

Redirect as above. Neutralitytalk 05:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:55, 2 May...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Single photometry study found, which had little more than data.[1] Non-notable...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉   20:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:45, 2 May...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:49, 2 May...

Redirect as above. Neutralitytalk 05:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:52, 2 May...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. Esquivalience t 13:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP; it gets a few mentions in scholarly articles, but probably not enough. Praemonitus...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: not enough sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus (talk) 16:12, 15 June...

discussions. North America1000 21:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to find suitable sources on Google Scholar to satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: little available on Google Scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2015...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there just isn't enough reliable content to establish notability. Praemonitus...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Single photometry study with some data and no description.[1] Praemonitus...

deletion discussions. ― Padenton|✉   20:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:42, 2 May...

discussions. North America1000 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing found on Google Scholar, other than a bunch of references to a 1995...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:50, 2 May...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:18...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient reliable sources available to build an article of decent length...

discussions. North America1000 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 21:39...

discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: One photometry study found,[1] consisting of a rotation period and amplitude...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC) The...

article. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 20:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 15:30,...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources. Praemonitus (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2015 (UTC) The above...

discussions. North America1000 22:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: a single light curve study with little more than a rotation period. Most...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:47, 2 May...

13 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: minor mentions on Google scholar, but nothing substantial. Praemonitus (talk)...

CAT:NN. -- Kheider (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: there have been a couple of light curve studies (the second is referenced...

discussions. Esquivalience t 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Borderline Redirect per WP:DWMP; it appears briefly in a few studies, but the net total appear insufficient...

(they're all to a database of asteroids). This should be redirected per WP:DWMP. Renerpho (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC) That is also true for the...

discussions. North America1000 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: it does receive brief mention in a few scholarly articles, but the content...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: sources are insufficient to build a decent article about this object. It...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing useful found on Google Scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:52, 18 May...

deletion discussions. Esquivalience t 13:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

article on. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. I have to concur with David Eppstein; at present this object does not satisfy...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:51, 2 May...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:43, 2 May...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient source content available, hence non-notable. Praemonitus (talk)...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Nothing found. Nothing at all. I had to double-check with the JPL SBDB to...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Unfortunately, even the single photometry study is not accessible so there...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: only positional reports and lightcurve opportunities reported. Nothing substantial...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: non-notable object. Praemonitus (talk) 17:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect...

notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: the photometry study didn't have much information. It looks like the minor...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: All I could find were position reports and photometric opportunities; nothing...

on the object. ― Padenton|✉   21:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect' per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: One photometric study with a paragraph of text found. Not much else. Praemonitus...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect...

light-curve image. -- Kheider (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: it only has one photometry study, and that provides little useful detail...

Thanks, North America1000 01:05, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: one paper is dedicated to the topic; the other has a paragraph. Not much...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no suitable references found to satisfy Wikipedia notability requirements...

system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Weak redirect per WP:DWMP: being a Mars resonating asteroid, it was also a data point on a study of...

discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing found on Google Scholar. I suppose this one was AfD'd because there...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to satisfy notability requirements based on existing sources. Praemonitus...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:36, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect...

Thanks, North America1000 00:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: two photometry studies found, but all they contain are data points with...

Thanks, North America1000 01:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: There is one photometric study with a paragraph of information.[1] Not much...

recently expanded. -- Kheider (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there are insufficient sources to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources; non-notable. Praemonitus (talk) 17:32, 17 May 2015...

discussions. North America1000 09:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)...

discussions. North America1000 09:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. Insufficient sources. There is a photometry study that I can't access; the...

of these. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available; just one photometry study. Praemonitus (talk)...

asteroids. Neutralitytalk 18:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: A somewhat difficult call; it's on the edge in terms of Wikipedia notability...

allowed to develop. ― Padenton|✉   20:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: only one photometry study found; there's insufficient references to build...

a numbered minor planet in the asteroid belt, you should be following WP:DWMP @ NASTRO. -- Kheider (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Only delete or redirect...

object has been analysed in detail. This is given as a specific example in WP:DWMP and so indicates that the object actually passes WP:NASTRO. Nothing is said...

grant notability to 1374 Isora. ― Padenton|✉   17:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC) WP:DWMP is what you should probably be looking at as it deals more specifically with...

those conditions. Tigraan (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no substantial sources found. It fails to satisfy the WP notability requirements...

discussions. North America1000 00:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Reluctant Redirect per WP:DWMP: it's a Trojan, but the two available scholarly references appear to be group...

Geogene (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Delete As per the spirit of WP:DWMP, whereby it is understood that we don't need an article about every tiny...

necessary. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient reliable sources. Praemonitus (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)...

necessary. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: I couldn't locate suitable references; there are a few mentions, but nothing...

necessary. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: it's difficult to investigate this one because 1940 Whipple appears in a...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: the meager sources available aren't enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Praemonitus...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: the one study doesn't even comment of this object. It's just a data entry...

15:31, 27 September 2025 (UTC) I suggest to redirect to that list, per WP:DWMP. That guideline would have allowed me to redirect it without discussion (as...

Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: Reluctantly I concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 17:42, 17 May...

notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: quite a few ghits, but nothing substantive. Unable to establish notability...

(UTC) Redirect to List of unnumbered trans-Neptunian objects: 2003, per WP:DWMP. The only promising references that can be found are [1] (a 2011 study about...

family. -- Kheider (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: it gets a few brief mentions in some papers, but nothing substantial. I...

Thanks, North America1000 19:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: While it was the subject of a light curve study,[2] and is mentioned in...

WP:NASTCRIT) and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   15:14, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

database entry. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: It doesn't meet Wikipedia criteria for notability, even though it is of...

non-notable ones. -- Kheider (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; single photometry study found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2015 (UTC)...

clearly indicate that deletion is not appropriate. The specific guideline WP:DWMP expects these lists to exist as an alternative to lots of separate pages...

object has been analysed in detail. This is given as a specific example in WP:DWMP and so indicates that the object actually passes WP:NASTRO. Nothing is said...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing useful found on Google Scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:52, 18 May...

astronomical objects. This is precisely what our list of TNOs is for; see WP:DWMP. Renerpho (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC) '''Keep''' enough reliable sources...

WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. ― Padenton|✉   20:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:44, 2 May...

this does not necessarily mean that object is notable". Its subsection WP:DWMP states "For asteroids numbered above 2000, if an article of questionable...

the system.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: sources are insufficient to build a decent article about this object. It...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:34...

discussions. North America1000 19:20, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources found to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 21:39...

discussions. North America1000 07:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Nothing much found on Google Scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2015...

discussions. North America1000 21:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: just a brief mention found in one mass study.[15] Praemonitus (talk) 16:02...

notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

Redirect as above. Neutralitytalk 05:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP; unable to satisfy notability requirements. Praemonitus (talk) 02:52, 2 May...

article on. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. I have to concur with David Eppstein; at present this object does not satisfy...

deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: unable to establish notability; insufficient reliable sources available...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Insufficient sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)...

discussions. North America1000 22:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: a single light curve study with little more than a rotation period. Most...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect: per WP:DWMP. No suitable sources to demonstrate notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:18...

13 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: minor mentions on Google scholar, but nothing substantial. Praemonitus (talk)...

stop spamming a million pages with bot ideas that will never work. See WP:DWMP in particular. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC) Moved...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there are a few small scraps of information available including a probability...

notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Unfortunately, even the single photometry study is not accessible so there...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: there just aren't suitable sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus...

clearly indicate that deletion is not appropriate. The specific guideline WP:DWMP expects these lists to exist as an alternative to lots of separate pages...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: Agree with D. Eppstein. Unable to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

discussions. North America1000 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: it does receive brief mention in a few scholarly articles, but the content...

Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: Reluctantly I concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 17:42, 17 May...

scholar. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no suitable references found to satisfy Wikipedia notability requirements...

discussions. Praemonitus (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: nothing found on Google Scholar. I suppose this one was AfD'd because there...

Thanks, North America1000 19:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: While it was the subject of a light curve study,[4] and is mentioned in...

a numbered minor planet in the asteroid belt, you should be following WP:DWMP @ NASTRO. -- Kheider (talk) 19:01, 22 May 2015 (UTC) Only delete or redirect...

discussions. North America1000 00:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Reluctant Redirect per WP:DWMP: it's a Trojan, but the two available scholarly references appear to be group...

Geogene (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC) Delete As per the spirit of WP:DWMP, whereby it is understood that we don't need an article about every tiny...

discussions. North America1000 10:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: no suitable sources found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)...

asteroids. Neutralitytalk 18:26, 28 April 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: A somewhat difficult call; it's on the edge in terms of Wikipedia notability...

notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient source material available to establish notability. Does not...

discussions. North America1000 18:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP. All I found are data entries with no substantial coverage. Praemonitus (talk)...

on the object. ― Padenton|✉   21:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect' per WP:DWMP: insufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk)...

family. -- Kheider (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC) Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: it gets a few brief mentions in some papers, but nothing substantial. I...

enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: the one study doesn't even comment of this object. It's just a data entry...

this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC) Redirect per WP:DWMP: insufficient reliable sources available to build an article of decent length...

GABgab 14:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Clerk note: Also noting that I blocked DWMP Radio (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...

opposite - redirect a bunch of articles on minor planets into lists; see WP:DWMP: "Before 2012, when this notability guideline did not yet exist, approximately...

about a minor-planet and its discoverer?, that happens rarely (compare WP:DWMP), and often, we just leave the discoverers unlinked. Renerpho (talk) 01:53...

history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – DWMP radio, MMDA radio, 180.191.159.180 sockpuppets of Bertrand101. Carl Tristan...

unless there are good reasons to create them. For all other cases, we have WP:DWMP, plus the deliberately high standards of NASTRO as a whole. As for how trimming...

This should be redirected to List of minor planets: 472001–473000 per WP:DWMP. The single reference found on Google Scholar [8] only mentions the object...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Redirect to Kepler-23 as per WP:DWMP. Subject fails to meet notability for astronomical objects. Did WP:BEFORE...

(they're all to a database of asteroids). This should be redirected per WP:DWMP. Renerpho (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC) That is also true for the...

this does not necessarily mean that object is notable". Its subsection WP:DWMP states "For asteroids numbered above 2000, if an article of questionable...

astronomical objects. This is precisely what our list of TNOs is for; see WP:DWMP. Renerpho (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC) '''Keep''' enough reliable sources...

15:31, 27 September 2025 (UTC) I suggest to redirect to that list, per WP:DWMP. That guideline would have allowed me to redirect it without discussion (as...

unless there are good reasons to create them. For all other cases, we have WP:DWMP, plus the deliberately high standards of NASTRO as a whole. As for how trimming...

about a minor-planet and its discoverer?, that happens rarely (compare WP:DWMP), and often, we just leave the discoverers unlinked. Renerpho (talk) 01:53...

(UTC) Redirect to List of unnumbered trans-Neptunian objects: 2003, per WP:DWMP. The only promising references that can be found are [56] (a 2011 study about...

ak5YNe/eCJyv6iMQybVaCwEuMUsBHOxWnEQ5vjVk+7Ngc2AOVfyTBNJkybZiCW8k+Khq5g7GgDWmpBK+UtdX6MInNTZ882T9eIl/PSAu4Fxm1TZvnspjpmJuzeQxQD7auvD4WJ7tiYlMQReaMLoxgs...