DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

This does not affect any other deletion process. Shortcuts WP:DPAFDWP:DPAFD WP:DELAFDWP:DELAFD Pages that do not fall in the above three categories...

present? pburka (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Procedural keep. WP:DPAFD requires that editors allow a reasonable amount of time before renominating...

(talk) 18:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Close discussion I misread the rules. WP:DPAFD explains that there shouldn't be another discussion right away. Ylevental...

for example. Andrew D. (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Too specific. WP:DPAFD and WP:ARTN : "If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia...

Mitchell Muncy to see if he wanted the article removed, since according to WP:DPAFD his opinion is decisive if no consensus is reached. He has in fact requested...

after never having been involved in any way, please read WP:DPAFD. And yes, per WP:DPAFD it is possible to stop people from involving themselves in this...

we have no consensus to delete the article, as a result of which (per WP:DPAFD) it is kept by default.  Sandstein  18:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC) The original...

run and run, but he didn't. Guy (Help!) 14:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC) WP:DPAFD Renominations: After a deletion debate concludes and the consensus is in...

that the article should not have been nominated in the first place per WP:DPAFD, which is a policy ("After a deletion debate concludes and the page is kept...

delete this page on notability grounds ought to go via WP:DRV as per WP:DPAFD, as continued AfDs on the same grounds with no change in substance are disruptive...

2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep 5 days ago a deletion discussion was closed. Per WP:DPAFD, After a deletion debate concludes and there is no consensus or the consensus...

being addressed, I am nominating this page at AfD as the next step per WP:DPAFD.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 23:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

June 2012 (UTC) From WP:AFDFORMAT, "The debate is not a vote". From WP:DPAFD, "These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants...

doing things), it should be deleted. I remind the closing admin that per WP:DPAFD, "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public...

September 2022 (UTC) First of all afaik I'm allowed to reply here per WP:DPAFD. I try to keep my replies at a minimum, and they are not "vacuous" replies...

hours prior with a strong consensus as keep. A renomination falls under WP:DPAFD and could constitute directly as disruption. Mkdwtalk 20:11, 27 March 2015...

December 2019 (UTC) The relevant policy is the deletion policy (quote from WP:DPAFD: After a deletion debate concludes and there is no consensus or the consensus...

the article. It's sad for you it isn't going the way you want but per WP:DPAFD, renominations are allowed and it does seem people here feel the previous...

death does duty end (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC) At the very least WP:DPAFD since - unbeknown to Fastily, as I have acknowledged - the speedy deletion...

there is no rough consensus, a page should be kept, so I say, "keep". WP:DPAFD 70.210.192.175 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC) (Note to admin: the above...

after never having been involved in any way, please read WP:DPAFD. And yes, per WP:DPAFD it is possible to stop people from involving themselves in this...

to very little serious discussion, and thus see no reason to ignore WP:DPAFD, where a reasonable amount of time has clearly not passed. Dylnuge (Talk...

is only granted to articles whose AFDs had resulted in 'Keep', as per WP:DPAFD. Further, I would propose that Oakshade’s view that the article be kept...

doing things), it should be deleted. I remind the closing admin that per WP:DPAFD, "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public...

Mitchell Muncy to see if he wanted the article removed, since according to WP:DPAFD his opinion is decisive if no consensus is reached. He has in fact requested...

present? pburka (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Procedural keep. WP:DPAFD requires that editors allow a reasonable amount of time before renominating...

run and run, but he didn't. Guy (Help!) 14:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC) WP:DPAFD Renominations: After a deletion debate concludes and the consensus is in...

hours prior with a strong consensus as keep. A renomination falls under WP:DPAFD and could constitute directly as disruption. Mkdwtalk 20:11, 27 March 2015...

(talk) 18:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC) Close discussion I misread the rules. WP:DPAFD explains that there shouldn't be another discussion right away. Ylevental...

December 2016 (UTC) Keep per the AfD on this article one month ago. Per WP:DPAFD "users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating...

for example. Andrew D. (talk) 11:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC) Too specific. WP:DPAFD and WP:ARTN : "If the subject has not been covered outside of Wikipedia...

that the article should not have been nominated in the first place per WP:DPAFD, which is a policy ("After a deletion debate concludes and the page is kept...

delete this page on notability grounds ought to go via WP:DRV as per WP:DPAFD, as continued AfDs on the same grounds with no change in substance are disruptive...

we have no consensus to delete the article, as a result of which (per WP:DPAFD) it is kept by default.  Sandstein  18:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC) The original...

September 2022 (UTC) First of all afaik I'm allowed to reply here per WP:DPAFD. I try to keep my replies at a minimum, and they are not "vacuous" replies...

December 2016 (UTC) Keep per the AfD on this article one month ago. Per WP:DPAFD "users should allow a reasonable amount of time to pass before nominating...

2020 (UTC) Speedy Keep 5 days ago a deletion discussion was closed. Per WP:DPAFD, After a deletion debate concludes and there is no consensus or the consensus...

there is no rough consensus, a page should be kept, so I say, "keep". WP:DPAFD 70.210.192.175 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2016 (UTC) (Note to admin: the above...

well. Looks like this will be a contentious debate for the 8th time. WP:DPAFD Lightburst (talk) 00:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC) Can we demonstrate WP:LISTN...

the article. It's sad for you it isn't going the way you want but per WP:DPAFD, renominations are allowed and it does seem people here feel the previous...

June 2012 (UTC) From WP:AFDFORMAT, "The debate is not a vote". From WP:DPAFD, "These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants...

refused but that doesn't mean that the subject is notable. Please read WP:DPAFD this should help you understand the deletion process, and try and keep your...

issue if you disagree with the outcome of any deletion as seen here WP:DPAFD. I have based this on the relevant policies governing the notability guidelines...

when the discussion had been open for less than 48 hours (contrary to WP:DPAFD) and before anyone but the nominator had !voted. The deleting admin has...

discussion? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The deletion policy, WP:DPAFD, reads in relevant part: "The discussion lasts at least seven full days;...

Disagreement over a policy or guideline is not dealt with by deleting it. "Per WP:DPAFD These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants are...

no consensus' the end result would be the same". Our deletion policy WP:DPAFD states: "The discussion lasts at least seven full days; afterwards, pages...

is only granted to articles whose AFDs had resulted in 'Keep', as per WP:DPAFD. Further, I would propose that Oakshade’s view that the article be kept...

discussion? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC) The deletion policy, WP:DPAFD, reads in relevant part: "The discussion lasts at least seven full days;...

no consensus' the end result would be the same". Our deletion policy WP:DPAFD states: "The discussion lasts at least seven full days; afterwards, pages...

when the discussion had been open for less than 48 hours (contrary to WP:DPAFD) and before anyone but the nominator had !voted. The deleting admin has...

refused but that doesn't mean that the subject is notable. Please read WP:DPAFD this should help you understand the deletion process, and try and keep your...

Disagreement over a policy or guideline is not dealt with by deleting it. "Per WP:DPAFD These processes are not decided through a head count, so participants are...

issue if you disagree with the outcome of any deletion as seen here WP:DPAFD. I have based this on the relevant policies governing the notability guidelines...

being addressed, I am nominating this page at AfD as the next step per WP:DPAFD.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 23:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

to very little serious discussion, and thus see no reason to ignore WP:DPAFD, where a reasonable amount of time has clearly not passed. Dylnuge (Talk...