DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

apply in some cases. Shortcuts WP:BLPUNDELWP:BLPUNDEL WP:BLPRESTOREWP:BLPRESTORE WP:BLPREQUESTRESTOREWP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE To ensure that material about...

after April's Fool day and the failure of the community to execute WP:BLPRESTORE. Given this was my statement on gamergate case, and the statements by...

advisory council development Added 18 January 2026, archived 11 March 2026 BLPRESTORE: Meaning of "deleted" Added 17 February 2026, archived 19 March 2026 LLM-assisted...

WP:BLPPRIMARY violation. Restoring it without consensus would violate WP:BLPRESTORE. More broadly, I would imagine that most people who BLPREQUESTDELETE do...

editor restored the content, which I then removed again ([105]) citing WP:BLPRESTORE. The IP editor restored it a second time, for which I issued an edit war...

disputed BLP present [6], removes protection [7] when referred to WP:BLPRESTORE policy A DHeyward changes target of attack page [8] A Gamaliel reverts...

of Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ariel_Fernandez_&_BLPRESTORE Darren-M talk 16:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC) They were at already at 3RR...

how these edits violate it 05:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC): violation of WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:BLPSPS, straight revert of what was a good faith claimed BLP violation...

and there is an edit/wheel war over the disputed material ignoring WP:BLPRESTORE. I request admin intervention and page protection of the article while...

is that in fact MicroSupporter is in violation of both WP:3RR and WP:BLPRESTORE here. I had hoped giving them this advice on my talk page would lead to...

put it in your watchlists, and warn the editors who are violating WP:BLPRESTORE. Might help to have a message on the talk page that begins, "As an uninvolved...

called it a BLP violation to begin with, explicitly, then sure, per WP:BLPRESTORE EEng should not have restored it. But she didnt. I dont think the slightly...

August 2022 (UTC) Unless I'm misunderstanding the situation... per WP:BLPRESTORE, in situations where BLP does apply, the default when there is a conflict...

block by Mitchel lwas overturned. MarkBernstein topic ban is irrelevant. BLPRESTORE does not apply as it was not an admin and was sourced as a direct quote...

(UTC) A: Discuss it with the administrator and express my concerns around BLPRESTORE and the content while there is on-going good faith discussion on BLPN...

Special:Diff/1354655501 and Special:Diff/1354663821 appear to be incompatible with WP:BLPRESTORE unless there was a consensus for re-adding these words. If there was,...

redirect, but instead we got Take it to BLPN! (showing ignorance of WP:BLPRESTORE) and It's an evil gamergate plot!! And had Gamaliel's wiki friends stepped...

The user was correctly enforcing WP:BLPCRIME. Your reverts violated WP:BLPRESTORE; I will leave a warning on your talkpage in a moment. -- Tamzin[cetacean...

WP:BLPPRIMARY violation. Restoring it without consensus would violate WP:BLPRESTORE. More broadly, I would imagine that most people who BLPREQUESTDELETE do...

goes against WP:BLPRESTORE as the content removal was justified by several policies. I asked the editor to self-revert per BLPRESTORE however they have...

now extending to Peter S. Beagle, where I'm reverting as well due to WP:BLPRESTORE. Cross-posting to the BLP noticeboard. ~ Rob13Talk 04:36, 1 August 2016...

is not just a suggestion but a very clear part of the policy. See: WP:BLPRESTORE. In other words, it's a very bad thing to do and would not look good for...

integrate the endorsement into the article is to gain consensus per WP:BLPRESTORE. The non-primary media you refer to are also opinion pieces rather than...

minutes between the edit and your revert to check if it complies with WP:BLPRESTORE? Because I doubt any of the Huggle users did, and I can't find a talk...

of Administrators" section, the BLPRESTORE section wasn't targeted in particular. 5 sections were moved, and BLPRESTORE probably was too because it partially...

their quality. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC) See WP:BLPRESTORE. Zaereth (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC) That does not say anything...

inserting contentious matters like caste into the article per WP:BDP and WP:BLPRESTORE. Consensus can be obtained on the article talk page through an WP:RFC...

times without attempts to discuss on the talk page as required under WP:BLPRESTORE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC) What's the problem...

2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1237127569 by PerSeAnd (talk) Please see WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:ONUS. Continued reversions will also mean you are in breach of...

preemptively improved a BLP. There's really no reason to rush to restore, and WP:BLPRESTORE is clear that, when challenged, the material needs consensus to reinsert...

have reverted back to a decent version and request editors to respect WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:BLP itself in regards to this content. Wikipedia:Pending changes...

negatively link a BLP subject to an organization. As I've invoked WP:BLPRESTORE reverting the restoration of that material I'm bringing it here for review...

([prior discussion]) This seems to be a clear breach of WP:3RRNO and WP:BLPRESTORE. Contentious BLP material challenged in good faith must have consensus...

ONUS is being flipped on its head, and doubly so in BLPs that have WP:BLPRESTORE requirements too. Until there is a consensus for inclusion, it stays out...

the article that there is no BLPvio that would necessitate invoking WP:BLPRESTORE, so in the interest of not splitting discussion, I'm closing this to keep...

without having found a consensus on the article's talk page first (WP:BLPRESTORE). If there is something you would like to remove, you can do so now. If...

where they've been reinstating contested BLP content in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE, I've indefinitely topic-banned them from WP:CT/AP as an arbitration enforcement...

on Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, restoring content in contravention to WP:BLPRESTORE despite being warned by multiple editors on their talk page and in edit...

right and BLPRESTORE would apply. But editors have worked hard to make sure that the material is added in a manner that is WP:DUE, and BLPRESTORE would appear...

changes to an article while it is being discussed here unless there are WP:BLPRESTORE concerns. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC) The...

minimum, given the BLP concerns, you would need consensus on talk per WP:BLPRESTORE. If the text seems uncontroversial, the text could be left with a fact...

Tax, you've been here for almost a year now; please lead by example. WP:BLPRESTORE exists and the talk page was last edited over a month ago. At the very...

talk:Biographies of living persons § RfC: BLPRESTORE for an RfC about whether the word "deleted" in WP:BLPRESTORE should refer to the removal of text or...

reverted and warned that as it was a BLP issue so needed consensus per WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:BLPCT. Apache disregarded that warning and reverted again. As I...

(talk) 21:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Additionally, I have now enforced WP:BLPRESTORE and created a discussion at Talk:Naseem Hamed § British / British-Yemeni...

who was the editor who most recently restored it to self-revert on WP:BLPRESTORE grounds three times ([20], [21], [22]) and they have refused once ([23])...

version is to be preferred in Wikivoice. Both sides have pointed to WP:BLPRESTORE, but a quote seems much safer on BLP grounds, and that the claim supported...

a logged warning under WP:NEWBLPBAN for violating WP:BLPCRIME and WP:BLPRESTORE. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC) I recently...

edit summary: "two editors have raised good faith BLP concerns. Per WP:BLPRESTORE please establish consensus before restoring. Any further reversions without...

talk:Biographies of living persons § RfC: BLPRESTORE for an RfC about whether the word "deleted" in WP:BLPRESTORE should refer to the removal of text or...

WP:BLPRESTORE, but you should be careful with labels like "SEALION" when Joshua Jonathan – apart from reverts that formally indeed violate BLPRESTORE –...

February 2023 (UTC) MBlaze Lightning continues to edit war ignoring WP:BLPRESTORE without addressing the actual OR issue.[6][7] Morbidthoughts (talk) 10:19...

while removing more reliable English-language ones in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE (once a good-faith objection was known) and WP:BLPSOURCES. Claims that...

remove. Not to add new material. Not to restore disputed content (WP:BLPRESTORE forbids this even for a single revert). Not even if you are 100% sure...

consensus for removal, which is in stark contrast to BLP policy per WP:BLPRESTORE, WP:BLPUNDEL and WP:ONUS. The editor has been exhibiting WP:OWN behavior...

Policies that actually prefer specific revisions are WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN, WP:BLPRESTORE. Perhaps there are more but these three seem to be the most relevant....

September 2025 (UTC) "/* Promotion / résumé */ new section" Comments: WP:BLPRESTORE applies. The user had been informed about this in addition to the regular...

07:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Page protected. Catjerine needs to read WP:BLPRESTORE and WP:ONUS. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Page: Terence...

be undeleted and unsalted. I T B F 📢 09:39, 29 August 2025 (UTC) WP:BLPRESTORE is clear that To ensure that material about living people is written neutrally...

We're both familiar with WP:BLPRESTORE, and that revert goes against that part of the policy. The whole point of BLPRESTORE is that it applies to any good...

revert due solely to "no consensus" is an essay not a policy, but WP:BLPRESTORE is a policy, and part of BLP policy to boot. It says if someone feels...

controversial material and cite BLPRESTORE and ask this be taken to talk. [19] Fred Zeppelin reverted this, I reasserted BLPRESTORE and asked it be taken to...

mean heck, even more clear-cut BLPRESTORE violations don't generally lead to sanction if the editor stops when BLPRESTORE requirements are made clear to...

is very undesirable when that outcome is a lack of consensus. Even WP:BLPRESTORE, which we have to have due to the high risk of harm, has caused this problem...

repeatedly that defames the subject in violation of WP:BLP and especially WP:BLPRESTORE.— Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 23:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC) Already blocked. Page...

citation from the article as not being from an acceptable BLP source per WP:BLPRESTORE. JeffSpaceman (talk) 00:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC) Seems like there may be...

consensus on those favoring inclusion of the material (WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN, WP:BLPRESTORE et cetera). If there is a debate about whether something should be in...

disputed and reverted, multiple times. You are also editing against WP:BLPRESTORE, do not restore it unless you can get consensus for doing so. -- LCU...

disputed material about living persons that was re-added in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE. You may be right about the issues identified with Thedayandthetime's...

Altruisticmeta and Realtent, you have been edit warring there and WP:BLPRESTORE is a thing. It should be easy to find a consensus for inclusion if the...

wouldn't do so before a talk page discussion (attempt) exists due to WP:BLPRESTORE, but if I had intended to enforce this strictly and technically, I'd have...

section. MeltingDistrict restored it and I reminded them of ONUS and BLPRESTORE. At this point they removed all the information I added about the case...

material's relevance/neutrality, it shouldn't be re-added (WP:ONUS / WP:BLPRESTORE). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC) Thank you very much for...

there yet. However, I see and have undone at least one violation of WP:BLPRESTORE from the reporter. Find a consensus on the talk page before restoring...

be remove-on-sight. If anyone has restored it in contravention of WP:BLPRESTORE, I'd suggest taking them to WP:AE immediately. It's a blog with no reputation...

04:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC) VolatileAnomaly, please have a look at WP:BLPRESTORE and seek a consensus on the talk page before restoring the disputed content...

23:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC) This is a bit more complicated than "WP:BLPRESTORE". The disputed content in this case is context for the rest of the section...

The IP insisted on re-adding the material three more times (against WP:BLPRESTORE) just in the time it took me to compose this filing! Newimpartial (talk)...

this does look like edit warring behavior. I will note, though, that WP:BLPRESTORE may be relevant for this sort of thing. RFA (WP:GREL) is reporting about...

ToBeFree (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Filer informed about WP:ONUS/WP:BLPRESTORE; closing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC) Page: Saving...

Bridge), you'll need a third opinion or an RfC, not further reverts. WP:BLPRESTORE applies and the content may not be restored without consensus. Page protected...

discuss before reinstating per WP:BRD, but elsewhere I believe that WP:BLPRESTORE applies. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2025 (UTC) Mmm - Classic Rock...

among other things. I suggest editors open an RfC per WP:ONUS and WP:BLPRESTORE since it's pretty clear this is a contentious topic and there is no clear...

InSneider with them when I did. I only removed when I was unable to do so. WP:BLPRESTORE makes it clear that the onus to restore material removed for BLP issues...

(UTC) Yeah. Nothing will change until we start enforcing the policy. WP:BLPRESTORE violations should be strictish-liability things, like WP:3RR. 24-hour...

it was challenged. Here [14] you (partially) restored against ONUS and BLPRESTORE despite an active RfC which would find against inclusion, even though...

the anonymous user. This user edit-warred repeatedly in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE (diff diff diff diff diff) even after a warning (permalink), showing a...

(UTC) You need to gain consensus for disputed edits for inclusion per WP:BLPRESTORE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC) I would support including...

who attempted to strike their personal attack, and the one who violated BLPRESTORE to reintroduce content against GENDERID) and who "really want" to see...

title, which attributes every bit of trivia to the company owner. WP:BLPRESTORE applies to adding Musk's name back to the article title. I am not opposed...

with repeated attempts to re-insert the content rather than following WP:BLPRESTORE, and "consensus required" restrictions favor the content that was present...

2025 (UTC) Hi JFHJr, I'm a big proponent of WP:ONUS, WP:BURDEN and WP:BLPRESTORE. If the current revision had the disputed material, I would probably have...

@Raladic has exercized WP:BLPRemove. Raladic correctly surmised from WP:BLPRestore that the burden of proof is on those who wish to retain, restore, or undelete...

with the first being here. I had previously noted to the editor that WP:BLPRESTORE applied to this type of allegation, and the editor clearly went on to...

characteristic" is not about a living person, and so isn't covered by BLPRESTORE. It's a sentence in a BLP article with a poor citation, but it's not about...

bad faith. Zaathras (talk) 21:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC) I do not believe BLPRESTORE applies here, as the content is not damaging or damning to the subject...

removals are covered by WP:BLPRESTORE which was recently clarified here. EEpic (talk) 12:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC) BLPRESTORE is also not an exception to...

48+ hours, I am going to remove the sentence from the article per WP:BLPRESTORE and start a talk page discussion to establish consensus either way, per...

changes (I should have used a third opinion when I felt I was facing BLPRESTORE issues with regular editors of the article, and to my recollection I had...

there's clearly no consensus for any specific text on the issue. Per WP:BLPRESTORE, if an editor has expressed good faith BLP consensus, there needs to be...

Blocked for two weeks for edit warring on three pages in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE. If it continues after the block, please simply let me know on my talk...

(talk ☉) 22:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC) Hob Gadling failing to yield to WP:BLPRESTORE, apparently missing both the discussion and RSN link from the talk page...

up again. There was already a consensus that satisfied WP:ONUS and WP:BLPRESTORE under the previous RfC. The current RfC instigated by a bunch of sock/meatpuppets...

accusations up. —C.Fred (talk) 13:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC) I'll add that WP:BLPRESTORE requires consensus before restoring material removed "on good-faith BLP...

Valjean (talk · contribs) then reverted my removal apparently in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE. I then started a talk page discussion Talk:Julian_Assange#undue_text_in_heading...

TalkPage prior to removal and the edit summary pointing towards both BLPRESTORE for removed BLP content as well as ONUS, which was ignored before going...

of living persons/Noticeboard#Zehra Sayers. Despite being told per WP:BLPRESTORE the material cannot be added without consensus, they have restored the...

be undeleted and unsalted. I T B F 📢 09:39, 29 August 2025 (UTC) WP:BLPRESTORE is clear that To ensure that material about living people is written neutrally...

it was well sourced and not a BLP vio.[312] Nil Einne reverted, citing BLPRESTORE.[313] IP restored it again because it was well sourced.[314] I then reverted...

the restoration of content others have objected to in good faith, WP:BLPRESTORE (and thus a requirement to gain a consensus for those favoring inclusion)...

that if you warned Editorkamran bout edit-warning and pointed them to WP:BLPRESTORE, they wouldn't have backed down, or at least moved the discussion to talk...

"widely described as far-right". Seek consensus before restoring per WP:BLPRESTORE." https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Douglas_Murray_(author)&oldid=1207060141...

describing it even then though, and there is a risk of you violating WP:BLPRESTORE with these reverts. If this turns out to be a sockpuppet, please let me...

the edit summary Rolling back contested material. Please refer to WP:BLPRESTORE. 2) The argument that Platner has not received that much publicity is...

now?] 12:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the ping. The wording of WP:BLPRESTORE is If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must...

Persistent IP user(s) re-adding BLP info without consensus in violation of WP:BLPRESTORE. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Automated comment:...

Afus199620 restored was challenged on grounds of being poorly sourced. WP:BLPRESTORE is imperative to follow, and as the material was already challenged once...

multiple other editors over contentious BLP material in the face of WP:BLPRESTORE is clearly sanctionable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:13, 2 November...

appears to be a content dispute in already contentious topic area. WP:BLPRESTORE is worth considering as well. If so clear consensus can be found it can...