DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

We would like everyone to be bold and help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. How many times have you read something and thought—Why doesn't this page...

should be like the others. Grutness...wha? 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC) per WP:BEBOLD, I went ahead and just did it. This page is really more for deletions, not...

(AR) (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC) @MaryMO (AR): I encourage you to WP:BEBOLD and fix these concerns yourself. Afterwards, a more experienced editor can...

feedback on the article. The best way to get an article improved is to WP:BEBOLD and make the edits yourself. Let me know if you need any help! If you want...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy close in accordance with WP:BEBOLD. Nominator blanked the page minutes before listing here. Article has existed...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and close this early. Missvain (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC) [Hide...

redirected the page to the notable Drummond Cricket Club Ground per WP:BEBOLD, I've also included a sentence about the club playing there. AssociateAffiliate...

any support! Best wishes--Neufund (talk) 17:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD is the relevant policy here. You should just do so, and if no one objects...

Redirecting non-notable albums to artists is pretty standard. Next time WP:BEBOLD. GMGtalk 20:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC) Redirect to Nothing More. Been uncited/poorly...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I am going to WP:BEBOLD and close this early. I even did a Google search and was like "whoa" when...

Merge - you don't need to take this through the deletion process,, just WP:BEBOLD and merge it. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)...

as a speedy redirect? Suttungr (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD... Bearcat (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...

Qwertyus 18:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. If it's not neutral WP:BEBOLD and fix it, not nominate it for deletion. It's clearly notable.Tokyogirl79...

subarticle talk pages are the proper venues for proposing merger, or just WP:BEBOLD. See also WP:ATD. postdlf (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

the delete rationale. If anyone wants to do a redirect, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and propose it or do it via the appropriate pages. Thanks everyone for participating...

to gain consensus and attention to the issue there than here. Or just WP:BEBOLD and add the content in yourself; I very much doubt anyone would oppose it...

Merge though this doesn't really need an AfD as far as I can see. Just WP:BEBOLD and do it. Keresaspa (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Merge. Obviously...

notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Why not WP:BEBOLD and do it yourself? Niteshift36 (talk) 01:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete...

list. GABgab 01:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Speedy delete as nonsense. Admins, BEBOLD! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Delete- obviously...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

27 March 2018 (UTC) "I believe the article can be expanded." ....... WP:BEBOLD –Davey2010Talk 19:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC) I've asked the question about...

you feel that the notability template doesn't apply, you can always WP:BEBOLD and remove it yourself. In any case, the general consensus seems to be that...

to be bold. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 22:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I know, WP:BEBOLD in editing pages. That's not the same as a dispute. dffgd 00:06, 23 June...

for "self-reporting", if you are the main contributor, you could just WP:BEBOLD and carry out the merge without AfD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

actually very little supporting the notability of the separate books. I'll WP:BEBOLD and userfy them to my userspace, and then merge the important info into...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

length. GPL93 (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Rockchalk717 I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and tag for a speedy delete per WP:G4 then create a redirect, which I'll...

could have been handled with {{MergeFrom}} and {{MergeTo}} templates, or WP:BEBOLD. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

deletion bureaucracy where there is a clear alternative to deletion, just WP:BEBOLD and merge/redirect it yourself. Can we withdraw this pointless AFD now?...

parent list would be a good solution. Thameslinkrail, you can always WP:BEBOLD and try that yourself, or at least raise the question on an article talk...

WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Delete as non-sense. Admins, WP:BEBOLD. We should not waste community time in debating over this user's multiple...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I was going to WP:BEBOLD and redirect it to Herkenrode Abbey which seems to be associated with this...

deletion. Catfurball (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC) @Catfurball: WP:BEBOLD 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 20:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC) Delete. Inflammatory...

acceptable on Wikipedia and is not a violation of any rules. In addition, WP:BEBOLD, WP:IAR, and WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY doesn't require a discussion to take place...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

redirect to the main series page. As a matter of fact, I'll go ahead and WP:BEBOLD and do that right now. However that said, I don't see where we need a separate...

Health: Same reasoning as the nominator. Could have just been done per WP:BEBOLD ~RAM (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Given the amount of edit warring...

this page and it can be redirected. Could have probably been done per WP:BEBOLD ~RAM (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Keep or merge with List of films...

SemiHypercube ✎ 15:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Redirect per nom. As noted above, BEBOLD is definitely becoming order of the day, with Talk first if reverted and...

about a possible rename can occur on the article talk page or you can just BEBOLD. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

while it's being helpful. If you just personally feel it needs expansion, bebold. — LlywelynII 03:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC) The policy is that: Encyclopedic...

undermanned, if anyone thing this should have been published earlier, WP:BEBOLD and help TS team to wrap things up more quickly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

doesn't pass notability. TheNewMinistry (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD Metallurgist (talk) 23:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC) Keep already passes WP:GNG...

the PRODer's go-ahead. Jergling (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:59, 15 November...

(just when Ashtul data is stale?), knowing everything there is about out WP:BEBOLD-policy, and without further discussion does exactly what Ashtul argued for...

FAR: FARC/FAR is a collaborative process. We encourage all editors to WP:BEBOLD and fix article concerns posted at FAR. We also need reviewers to list concerns...

23:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Merge I don't see the point of this AfD, WP:BEBOLD, just go a head and merge the articles together to form a new article to...

FAR: FARC/FAR is a collaborative process. We encourage all editors to WP:BEBOLD and fix the concerns posted at FAR. We also need reviewers to list concerns...

org/blogs/not-to-be-missed/bebold-with-echoinggreen. * Links added in this diff: www.socialedge.org/blogs/not-to-be-missed/bebold-with-echoinggreen (23, 15...

bring it back to afd again because it hasn't been cleaned up. Instead {{bebold}}. Hiding T 16:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Keep Character seems to have been...

FAR: FARC/FAR is a collaborative process. We encourage all editors to WP:BEBOLD and fix the concerns posted at FAR. We also need reviewers to list concerns...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

FAR: FARC/FAR is a collaborative process. We encourage all editors to WP:BEBOLD and fix the concerns posted at FAR. We also need reviewers to list concerns...

could be improved, but no one actually does it? I swear, AfD causes WP:BEBOLD to go right out the window. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:54, 11...

have been a much more useful thing for everyone concerned. Feel free to WP:BEBOLD and redirect things. If someone undoes the rd, then take it to AfD/RfD....

Excellent. In that case Merge to that. In fact, I'm going to go ahead and BEBOLD and start changing that from an indiscriminate list into a better list....

September 2020 (UTC) Nigej, same as my point to the other editor below. WP:BEBOLD and cull the segments that need to be culled. An AfD is an expensive process...

redirect target than wiktionary if someone adds it there with reference. WP:BEBOLD! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:31, 8 August 2023...

you find sources that show notability for an article you should always WP:BEBOLD and add it yourself. Never assume someone else will do the work for you...

Bowser: Considering the lack of edits by others, I think its ok for you to WP:BEBOLD and make edits yourself. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC) I'll...

as an alternative to Sofixit or its more obvious alternatives such as {{Bebold}}. – Fayenatic London 12:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC) So why not speedy nominate...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

very, very weak, and many others are deficient as well. I contemplated WP:BEBOLD and just blank/redirect, but decided to start a discussion. A weak alternative...

high bar for what can be included on WP by ignoring WP:NOTPAPER and WP:BEBOLD that are essential for building up WP as an encyclopedia and not tearing...

prior deletion discussion, that would require a consensus and not just a BEBOLD. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

home page: Education Program:School of Open/WIKISOO (February 2014) WP:BEBOLD! start editing. for others' ideas to improve the article, go to the article's...

unreliable simply because "I know Russian!" Is this not, I ask, a cause to WP:BEBOLD and add into the article what you consider to be non-biased sources? I reiterate:...

renamed. I would suggest the same outcome here. It's been 10 years, just WP:BEBOLD and move it and nuke the unencyclopedic cruft. But many sources cover the...

notice and FUR. Cnilep (talk) 20:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Keep but ditto. WP:BEBOLD? — BQZip01 — talk 01:21, 8 April 2010 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

May 2015 (UTC) Note: These were originally bundled, but I decided to WP:BEBOLD and split them. Tavix | Talk  05:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Keep 2100s (decade)...

way. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Oh puh-leeese. I WP:BEBOLD changed an overlong heap of fancruft back into a redirect. Than is not vandalism;...

Athaenara ✉ 17:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC) WP:DOITYOURSELF; This is Wikipedia, WP:BEBOLD and write the missing bio yourself. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2020...

Peridon (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Weak Keep - In the interest of WP:BEBOLD I went ahead and stubbified the article. The main claims to notability are...

the most prestiguous kickboxing tournament in the world. Users should WP:BEBOLD and try to improve pages instead of nominating them for deletion on first...

Request at all. It was a comment, made in earnest, in the spirit of WP:BEBOLD, supported by actual diffs.—Biosketch (talk) 08:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)...

16 June 2019 (UTC) Moved. This hardly needed a TfD discussion; just WP:BEBOLD. Useddenim (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

29 June 2020 (UTC) @AlejandroLeloirRey: WP does encourage editors to WP:BEBOLD, but a thorough WP:BEFORE would have shown this company is notable. Not...

(UTC) @Hog Farm and WhatamIdoing: While some editors have wanted me to WP:BEBOLD, there have been times in the past when I follow that advice I am critised...

term people might use. Instead of doing the AfD, I think you can just WP:BEBOLD and do the merge and redirect yourself? (I don't see any way the school...

before I created the article? Sure, but it was not needed if following WP:BEBOLD. The editor who believe this should be nominated for deletion with questionable...

these accounts should be clearly identified IAW WP:SOCK. I went with WP:BEBOLD and added them on the pages for this new user for his ease. If you disagree...

what pop is for you. Maashatra11 (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC) So WP:BEBOLD and take The Who off the list if you don't think it belongs. Kate (talk)...

articles haven't been found and nominated for deletion. If you want to WP:BEBOLD and nominate them for deletion or point them out here so someone else can...

an article on the reaction of the phrase and all associated products, WP:BEBOLD and create one. No one is stopping you. If consensus is that this article...

to be actively justified. --Trovatore (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD is policy (technically a guideline) and "this is an improvement to the article"...

February 2013 (UTC) Wrong place to suggest this, but the answer is simple: WP:BEBOLD and WP:SOFIXIT. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:35...

should be like the others. Grutness...wha? 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC) per WP:BEBOLD, I went ahead and just did it. This page is really more for deletions, not...

August 2013 (UTC) Be bold campaign (edit, talk, history, links) — http://bebold.ca/. MadmanBot reporting at 02:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Charles McConnell...

individual talk pages, and then if there's no response, make the edit. WP:BEBOLD. If anyone disagrees, you'll eventually find out. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)...

Thanks in advance. Cessaune [talk] 16:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC) There's WP:BEBOLD - "Fix it yourself instead of just talking about it." - and this about tagging...

version is right, but stated I was ignoring WP:BEBOLD. I don't see how a user can hide behind WP:BEBOLD, which doesn't allow a user to assert his version...

entries below, which suggest you are aware of such material. Please WP:BEBOLD and put it in, otherwise it makes no sense to plead keep when there's nothing...

including icons. This spewing of Musicbrainz icons might be an example of BEBOLD but should be reverted as BRD. They are a departure from existing practice...

agree that there are too many Bangladeshis, but I would suggest you WP:BEBOLD and distribute the spots fairly. I'm afraid I may have contributed to the...

isn't a violation of wikipedia policy to have an opinion, in fact as WP:BEBOLD, editors are in fact expected to do so. ICB has decided by himself, which...

2009 (UTC) I am reporting myself for breaking 3RR rule on Souliotes. WP:BEBOLD cannot work every time. Just block me.Balkanian`s word (talk) 20:16, 6 March...

article not be merged, may i suggest you follow your own advice and WP:BEBOLD instead of instructing others to do so? WookieInHeat (talk) 13:51, 23 November...

same reason [200]. Middayexpress (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD. What? i can't add information to any page you "own"? I added texts and...

It should also be noted that bold behavior is encouraged on here per WP:BEBOLD. United States Man (talk) 00:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Reporter - Update...

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC) Keep after AngusWOOF's WP:BEBOLD addition. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC) The...

that I have abided by WP:NPOV. It is not a crime to also sometimes be WP:BEBOLD. IZAK (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC) That you've been here 17 years and...

discussion probably didn't even need to be opened, someone could have WP:BEBOLD and just removed the redirect and created an article on the dinosaur. But...

Since there's not a shadow of a call for admin action, I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and close this as no admin action needed. I hope that's not against the...

problem was there either. I think they need to read WP:3RR, WP:NOTVAND, WP:BEBOLD, and WP:REVEXP. 88.217.152.166 (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC) I agree...

enough. :) Thanks. 88.111.213.55 (talk) 23:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD ...the community does not consider any namespace special.--02:02, 11 September...

home page: Education Program:School of Open/WIKISOO (February 2014) WP:BEBOLD! start editing. for others' ideas to improve the article, go to the article's...

new content to the project helps attract new editors. Should we amend WP:BEBOLD to include "Be bold unless your account is less than 4 days old and has...

January 2018 (UTC) @Pigginator1: Sorry, misunderstood. I refer you to WP:BEBOLD, WP:SOFIXIT even  :) but I'll have a look. Incidentally, this is not the...

We have a guideline called WP:BEBOLD. If Wester was unaware of another consensus, then he appropriately followed WP:BEBOLD but made a mistake. This should've...

this case, and it's complete and utter lack of reliable sources - dare I BEBOLD and remove all unreferenced information? Methinks I'll wait until this other...

articles should wait to be improved, especially when its creators fulfilled WP:BEBOLD yet are no longer as active. (7) Bottom line, it would not help Wikipedia...

misunderstanding of WP:AGF and WP:Consensus. Wilford is operating under WP:BEBOLD--v/r - TP 02:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC) I agree with NeilN. Calling good faith...

had any opinion, and there was no opposition to "Shi'a", so I figured WP:BEBOLD and made the spelling of a minority of articles/cats conform to the majority...

this. — Maile (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC) I think the policy is WP:BEBOLD? Can we make it a collapsable template, defaulting to collapsed, though...

DocFreeman24 (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Comment. I decided to be WP:BEBOLD and went ahead and merged the contents of the Priargunsky mine article in...

need to be discussed first before applying them to an article. See also WP:BEBOLD. This user has effectively created a blockade to a very sensible change...

would propose them. Could you tell me the typical process? It is just WP:BEBOLD?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC) @ThatMontrealIP: Catgorization...

18:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Reply We are sometimes supposed to be bold, see WP:BEBOLD. If there is a a problem with the artcle title it can be moved easily enough...

September 2008 (UTC) DONE.—Chris! ct 20:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD, {{sofixit}} Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:11, 30 September...

accusation of murder...literally) and has been rightly banned from WP. WP:BEBOLD applies in this case. If you feel I have done anything wrong, you are welcome...

ask permission or seek consensus when creating a new article (see also WP:BEBOLD). I, too, agree with @Incnis Mrsi that this article has all the merits to...

and remind them of Wikipedia's higher values of WP:GOODFAITH and to WP:BEBOLD. Personally I don't think I now bother again for awhile. I know I reverted...

suggest that you can simply complaining about wp:i don't like this, & that wp:bebold applies here; as per a user's right to write their own comments. if you...

global consensus is the opposite, per WP:PAGEDECIDE and WP:NOTEVERYTHING. WP:BEBOLD doesn't just apply to content creation, it also applies to content curation...

you did not need "prior discussion or consensus" to make the change. WP:BEBOLD and whatnot. And just to be clear, I'm not saying you're wrong in your edits...

is the way we do things here in Wikipedia. All my actions fall under WP:BEBOLD and WP:AGF. Below is the confusing deletion and move log: (Deletion log);...

page move (subsequently resolved by Muboshgu, so no longer needed). Per WP:BEBOLD, Ssolbergi's actions were unwise but not in bad faith. I would not support...

unsourced edits. Sometimes the only pillar a new user understands is WP:BEBOLD. Hopefully they will amend their ways. They've 47 edits since August 31...

can not imagine achieving using the search function, and then I would WP:BEBOLD.  The editing did not drop off even as the Portal visibly stagnated for...

see no reason why articles involving currency should be exempt from WP:BEBOLD then it is open to anyone who is not content to revert and discuss: WP:STATUSQUO...

that a discussion had begun on the talk page, and I stated that I would WP:BEBOLD and work on an edit that day. I began a section asking for collaboration...

spending community time in debating and discussing edits of this user who took BEBOLD seriously whereas we cant? Their talk page is full of notices and I see...

else to have to answer to their own brain-dead fuckups rather than using BEBOLD and/or SOFIXIT to address the effects and not the cause, I guess. In this...

There is no requirement to seek consensus before deleting content, per BeBold." 04:55, 3 May 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1021148853 by SunDawn (talk) “Unexplained...

established credibility is the furthest thing from starting an edit war. Read WP:BEBOLD, and read the RSN discussion I actually linked to in the edit summary I...

be locked into an inflexible regime of defaults that you suggest and WP:BEBOLD guideline details this "carte blanche" to innovate as one sees fit. Your...

April 2022 (UTC) I believe the redirect should be deleted, but there's WP:BEBOLD. Especially given her recent casting as the first trans actress in a Lucasfilm...

article. jolielover♥talk 02:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Please do so (WP:BEBOLD)! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I added :) jolielover♥talk...

be held. If, after a couple of weeks, you get no response, you could WP:BEBOLD and simply replace it with what you believe to be a fairer and better article...

article's talk page. -- Hoary (talk) 07:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC) See WP:BEBOLD. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Most articles do...

concerns? --Damiens.rf 18:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC) You could always WP:BEBOLD and replace this photo; I won't bite (or put it back) ;) DragonflyDC (talk)...

observance)? I'm not sure if I buy that argument. Editors are supposed to WP:BEBOLD and add content and let others iron out the wrinkles that they don't know...

instead of starting a TFD discussion it might have been easier to just WP:BEBOLD and change the target. Speedy retarget per nom. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist...

now is a good idea? Thryduulf (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC) Keep WP:BEBOLD and add a section, a blurb, something about the Monster Thickburger on the...

September 2008 (UTC) DONE.—Chris! ct 20:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD, {{sofixit}} Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 20:11, 30 September...

Teahouse. To answer your first question: yes, you are encouraged to WP:BEBOLD and remove content that has become unsourced. If for some reason you are...

proposal could potentially remove them from bridge categories. Just, WP:BEBOLD and fix the articles individually. But please, make sure they stay in a...

must always remember that the only rule many new users understand is WP:BEBOLD. We must 1) give new editors a chance to do their best to bring new articles...

way. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Oh puh-leeese. I WP:BEBOLD changed an overlong heap of fancruft back into a redirect. Than is not vandalism;...

Template:Badusername Template:Barnstar point Template:BBCmemberwelcome2 Template:Bebold Template:Beer welcome Template:Beer Welcome Template:BeerWelcome Template:Behave...

the rest sortable, and always sort by default by pop?) I understand WP:BEBOLD but I'm hoping someone with mad bot skillz could adopt this proposal (or...

January 2022 (UTC) @Ethicsblogger: in the nature of WP:NOTBUREAU and WP:BEBOLD I've just made the correction myself and promoted it to mainspace, congrats...

that a merger would be warranted in this instance, you could always WP:BEBOLD and institute the change yourself (since no one has commented despite your...

have consensus to make this change (and since this is a policy page, WP:BEBOLD doesn't apply). Guideline & Policy Wonk (talk) 02:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)...

that they are mistaken. --RexxS (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Just WP:BEBOLD and do it unilaterally, as I did here and here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:50...

would recommend the following steps for dealing with these problems 1) WP:BEBOLD and remove the offending template yourself. If it stays away forever, congratulations...

objections than large scale changes to a page. It's a process. That said, WP:BEBOLD is thing on Wikipedia: you should be bold and just change things. But be...

buck here. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Found, just WP:BEBOLD and change the infobox. I'm not familiarized with these topics so I put...

14:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC) @Ymblanter: Per my comments below, I would WP:BEBOLD and attempt a merger. Number 57 12:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC) I'd say national...

to be actively justified. --Trovatore (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD is policy (technically a guideline) and "this is an improvement to the article"...

open to new types of articles that were introduced be editors following WP:BEBOLD, and even WP:IGNORE if need be, so that many articles were quite awkward...

Health: Same reasoning as the nominator. Could have just been done per WP:BEBOLD ~RAM (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Given the amount of edit warring...

to Follow (disambiguation). MrLinkinPark333, in the future, you can WP:BEBOLD and retarget it yourself. Only take it to RFD if you aren't sure or it has...

actually very little supporting the notability of the separate books. I'll WP:BEBOLD and userfy them to my userspace, and then merge the important info into...

27 March 2018 (UTC) "I believe the article can be expanded." ....... WP:BEBOLD –Davey2010Talk 19:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC) I've asked the question about...

post on Talk:Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic. I think you should just BEBOLD and make the changes you want and if anyone has any concerns they will let...

a citation style (you may have seen this), so I assume it's safe to WP:BEBOLD and choose your preferred style in a new article. Template:Cite_book#Examples...

Sure, but isn't that what we -- or at least used to -- encourage with WP:BEBOLD? If we look at RE96's edit from a year and half ago, we see the addition...

of the case as soon as the case was decided. (Yes, you saw a link to WP:BEBOLD with different link text in that diff. I know what the rules are here.)...

least). You can then edit semi-protected articles directly. You may then BEBOLD and edit the page directly if you wish. Does that make sense? Nick Moyes...

the most prestiguous kickboxing tournament in the world. Users should WP:BEBOLD and try to improve pages instead of nominating them for deletion on first...

that guideline to any article. It's a no brainer. You're supposed to WP:BEBOLD, remember! Otherwise, the claim that you are applying any neutral criteria...

this is a legacy article from 2009 when there was greater emphasis on WP:BeBold than WP:Verifiability. So mostly unsourced for 11 years. Back when, I thought...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

believe), so I don't really have a reference point. Oh well. It's good to WP:BEBOLD, eh? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Technical Review Fix...

and communication is often abrupt and easily taken the wrong way. See WP:BEBOLD Nick Moyes (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC) Thank you, Nick! I think that...

sensible. Then, if nobody disagrees, after a week you could go ahead and WP:BEBOLD and make the change. Either way, check out what existing sources the article...

WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC) Delete as non-sense. Admins, WP:BEBOLD. We should not waste community time in debating over this user's multiple...

this MfD should rightfully fail. ɱ (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD. Rather than complaining about how someone else didn’t do something, you...

where that has been contentious though. The best suggestion would be WP:BEBOLD, followed up with WP:BRD. In less technical terms, make your change, and...

before I created the article? Sure, but it was not needed if following WP:BEBOLD. The editor who believe this should be nominated for deletion with questionable...

help in fixing these errors. You can help by editing wikipedia. Please WP:BEBOLD and also consider creating an account to keep track of your edits. -- Magioladitis...

29 June 2020 (UTC) @AlejandroLeloirRey: WP does encourage editors to WP:BEBOLD, but a thorough WP:BEFORE would have shown this company is notable. Not...

'talk page' of the article concerned, or you could simply go ahead (and BEBOLD) and make the change yourself (providing the factual interpretation in your...

Excellent. In that case Merge to that. In fact, I'm going to go ahead and BEBOLD and start changing that from an indiscriminate list into a better list....

unprotected templates without prior discussion (of course they can per WP:BEBOLD), then you're not furthering the discussion. --RexxS (talk) 15:05, 20 February...

acceptable on Wikipedia and is not a violation of any rules. In addition, WP:BEBOLD, WP:IAR, and WP:NOTABUREAUCRACY doesn't require a discussion to take place...

could also formally propose a move (see WP:RM) on the talk page, or just WP:BEBOLD and move it if you are confident in the name. Meters (talk) 06:45, 6 August...

bring it back to afd again because it hasn't been cleaned up. Instead {{bebold}}. Hiding T 16:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC) Keep Character seems to have been...

September 2020 (UTC) Nigej, same as my point to the other editor below. WP:BEBOLD and cull the segments that need to be culled. An AfD is an expensive process...

could be improved, but no one actually does it? I swear, AfD causes WP:BEBOLD to go right out the window. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:54, 11...

DocFreeman24 (talk) 22:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Comment. I decided to be WP:BEBOLD and went ahead and merged the contents of the Priargunsky mine article in...

02:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Consensus for creation is not required per WP:BEBOLD and WP:NOTPAPER. If this comes to no consensus it would mean that the people...

as a speedy redirect? Suttungr (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD... Bearcat (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is...

if there is no response after a week or so, you could be justified to WP:BEBOLD and add it yourself. If the majority view of responders is that it would...

and see what other editors say. But you'd be justified, I feel, to 'WP:BEBOLD' and move it first and see if anyone objects, and then you could discuss...

this page and it can be redirected. Could have probably been done per WP:BEBOLD ~RAM (talk) 21:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Keep or merge with List of films...

entries below, which suggest you are aware of such material. Please WP:BEBOLD and put it in, otherwise it makes no sense to plead keep when there's nothing...

oppose primarily because it is a self-nom seems contrary to the spirit ofWP:BEBOLD. delirious & lost ☯ TALK 17:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Although editors...

notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Why not WP:BEBOLD and do it yourself? Niteshift36 (talk) 01:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Delete...

If the so-called "Harper government" articles are kept, I'm just gona BEBOLD and change them to "X policy debates during the Harper era in Canada", because...

you feel that the notability template doesn't apply, you can always WP:BEBOLD and remove it yourself. In any case, the general consensus seems to be that...

than poo-pooing this article you should be encouraging WP editors to be WP:BEBOLD and add new material even about subjects that may not interest you but are...

the delete rationale. If anyone wants to do a redirect, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and propose it or do it via the appropriate pages. Thanks everyone for participating...

redirected the page to the notable Drummond Cricket Club Ground per WP:BEBOLD, I've also included a sentence about the club playing there. AssociateAffiliate...

unreliable simply because "I know Russian!" Is this not, I ask, a cause to WP:BEBOLD and add into the article what you consider to be non-biased sources? I reiterate:...

subarticle talk pages are the proper venues for proposing merger, or just WP:BEBOLD. See also WP:ATD. postdlf (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC) List of Kenan...

for "self-reporting", if you are the main contributor, you could just WP:BEBOLD and carry out the merge without AfD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|...

the PRODer's go-ahead. Jergling (talk) 22:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:59, 15 November...

understand the differences between different segments of Islam. Following WP:BEBOLD I'm going to go chop out the non-authoritative references, to include, unfortunately...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I am going to WP:BEBOLD and close this early. I even did a Google search and was like "whoa" when...

while it's being helpful. If you just personally feel it needs expansion, bebold. — LlywelynII 03:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC) The policy is that: Encyclopedic...

Thus, their inclusion per se is not a topic suitable for sanctions. WP:BEBOLD and WP:BRD apply. @all: "integral" - the cruise control example is a good...

Redirecting non-notable albums to artists is pretty standard. Next time WP:BEBOLD. GMGtalk 20:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC) Redirect to Nothing More. Been uncited/poorly...

high bar for what can be included on WP by ignoring WP:NOTPAPER and WP:BEBOLD that are essential for building up WP as an encyclopedia and not tearing...

renamed. I would suggest the same outcome here. It's been 10 years, just WP:BEBOLD and move it and nuke the unencyclopedic cruft. But many sources cover the...

jokes; it's just a copyediting suggestion for the rules for fools page; WP:BEBOLD.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  07:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC) While we should...

notability and an editor cannot find sources, it is reasonable for them to WP:BEBOLD and redirect to an article as opposed to putting it through the deletion...

23:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Merge I don't see the point of this AfD, WP:BEBOLD, just go a head and merge the articles together to form a new article to...

(UTC) Agree. It is so obvious that you can go ahead and do it under WP:BEBOLD. Constant314 (talk) 13:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved as...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and close this early. Missvain (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC) Soup's...

length. GPL93 (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Rockchalk717 I'm going to WP:BEBOLD and tag for a speedy delete per WP:G4 then create a redirect, which I'll...

open to new types of articles that were introduced be editors following WP:BEBOLD, and even WP:IGNORE if need be, so that many articles were quite awkward...

02:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC) Consensus for creation is not required per WP:BEBOLD and WP:NOTPAPER. If this comes to no consensus it would mean that the people...

have been a much more useful thing for everyone concerned. Feel free to WP:BEBOLD and redirect things. If someone undoes the rd, then take it to AfD/RfD....

could have been handled with {{MergeFrom}} and {{MergeTo}} templates, or WP:BEBOLD. Regards, RJH (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

term people might use. Instead of doing the AfD, I think you can just WP:BEBOLD and do the merge and redirect yourself? (I don't see any way the school...

guidelines and policies. Sometimes, the only thing new editors understand is "bebold". It also gives their articles time to develop and improve. I try to check...

that guideline to any article. It's a no brainer. You're supposed to WP:BEBOLD, remember! Otherwise, the claim that you are applying any neutral criteria...

Merge - you don't need to take this through the deletion process,, just WP:BEBOLD and merge it. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2013 (UTC)...

what pop is for you. Maashatra11 (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC) So WP:BEBOLD and take The Who off the list if you don't think it belongs. Kate (talk)...

an article on the reaction of the phrase and all associated products, WP:BEBOLD and create one. No one is stopping you. If consensus is that this article...

Peridon (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Weak Keep - In the interest of WP:BEBOLD I went ahead and stubbified the article. The main claims to notability are...

short even though he has lots of experience. I was encouraging him to WP:BEBOLD and I was not contradicting myself because I agree with him that it's an...

article not be merged, may i suggest you follow your own advice and WP:BEBOLD instead of instructing others to do so? WookieInHeat (talk) 13:51, 23 November...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy close in accordance with WP:BEBOLD. Nominator blanked the page minutes before listing here. Article has existed...

parent list would be a good solution. Thameslinkrail, you can always WP:BEBOLD and try that yourself, or at least raise the question on an article talk...

18:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC) Reply We are sometimes supposed to be bold, see WP:BEBOLD. If there is a a problem with the artcle title it can be moved easily enough...

short even though he has lots of experience. I was encouraging him to WP:BEBOLD and I was not contradicting myself because I agree with him that it's an...

be handled WP:HOUND WP:DR WP:TALK WP:BRD WP:AGF WP:ANI WP:AGF WP:OWN WP:BEBOLD: Please note that I've redirected Wikipedia:Requests for comment/BQZip01...

because you don't like such overlap. This is Wikipedia, we are driven by WP:BEBOLD and an editor was bold created these categories for whatever the hell reason...

wp:dontbitethenewcomers and let them edit instead of jumping on them? I was wp:bebold by doing edits that I thought were bettering the wiki community. Also on...

(re: WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM) would be to either fix the problem yourself (WP:BEBOLD) or simply tag the areas that need improvement so that other editors can...

deletion bureaucracy where there is a clear alternative to deletion, just WP:BEBOLD and merge/redirect it yourself. Can we withdraw this pointless AFD now?...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I was going to WP:BEBOLD and redirect it to Herkenrode Abbey which seems to be associated with this...

this is a legacy article from 2009 when there was greater emphasis on WP:BeBold than WP:Verifiability. So mostly unsourced for 11 years. Back when, I thought...

promised to correct the errors in the "works references" as well. I will WP:BEBOLD and do it myself later today. The 7 current main references are enough for...

SemiHypercube ✎ 15:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Redirect per nom. As noted above, BEBOLD is definitely becoming order of the day, with Talk first if reverted and...

promised to correct the errors in the "works references" as well. I will WP:BEBOLD and do it myself later today. The 7 current main references are enough for...

Qwertyus 18:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Speedy keep. If it's not neutral WP:BEBOLD and fix it, not nominate it for deletion. It's clearly notable.Tokyogirl79...

work or has been vandalized. If you see such articles, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and pitch in some help yourself rather than chastise me for things that...

work or has been vandalized. If you see such articles, feel free to WP:BEBOLD and pitch in some help yourself rather than chastise me for things that...

Merge though this doesn't really need an AfD as far as I can see. Just WP:BEBOLD and do it. Keresaspa (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC) Merge. Obviously...

be nominated. As to the content - this is definitely not the forum - WP:BeBold and improve the article. Generally, I'd WP:AGF, but this is the users sixth-ever...

you find sources that show notability for an article you should always WP:BEBOLD and add it yourself. Never assume someone else will do the work for you...

it of course means in Wikipedia there will be. Whatever happened to WP:BEBOLD on something so obvious as copyediting this horrid text? Barney the barney...

articles haven't been found and nominated for deletion. If you want to WP:BEBOLD and nominate them for deletion or point them out here so someone else can...

want to modify it to explicitly mention this, fine. Let's change it (WP:BEBOLD, WP:RFC, whatever), but it isn't explicitly spelled out. Buffs (talk) 21:15...

20th Tryer ⚡✀ 21:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC) The article Be BoldWikipedia:BeBold makes it seem editors can fearlessly and boldly edit. Yet this is not the...

dead links, but instead tag them so someone can find an archival copy. WP:BEBOLD. John from Idegon (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC) @SebastianGałecki: I...

and decided to report on talk pages, when somebody noted that I could WP:BEBOLD and WP:DIY; —which I did.  —71.20.250.51 (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)...

think of it, merging is a way better idea now. Maybe I should've just WP:BEBOLD and merged it instead of RfA'ing this here... CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!)...

reverted. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia works by WP:BEBOLD. Requiring talk page consensus to change the template would be infeasible...

leaves here, seems we aren't going to end with delete, so I decided to WP:BEBOLD and start tinkering with the article. Here's my thinking: discussion seems...

be nominated. As to the content - this is definitely not the forum - WP:BeBold and improve the article. Generally, I'd WP:AGF, but this is the users sixth-ever...

actions i.e. I tend towards inaction over a possibly wrong action, despite WP:BEBOLD etc. (not that I don't make mistakes, either despite or because of this)...

redone. Sergecross73 msg me 02:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC) In the spirit of WP:BEBOLD I will see about cleaning it up as this is clearly implying that if it was...

Smileykaye you do not have to get prior approval to remove non-RS sources. WP:BEBOLD (t · c) buidhe 18:15, 17 February 2022 (UTC) @Buidhe:Thank you for answering...

(re: WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM) would be to either fix the problem yourself (WP:BEBOLD) or simply tag the areas that need improvement so that other editors can...

to do isn't going to get the best reaction. If an edit needs doing, wp:BeBold and do it yourself. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:51, 26 December 2019 (UTC) What...

search. I also am unfamiliar with this topic area, so I am hesitant to BEBOLD in a FA and add info without getting it checked by a more experienced editor...

cleanup the mess you (and others) left behind." is too aggressive. [7] "WP:BEBOLD. Read it." is borderline curt. [8] "Actually, I think it is me that has...

without saying, but I suppose that was too big an assumption on my part. WP:BEBOLD is terrific advice for the reticent editor who needs encouragement to fully...

If the so-called "Harper government" articles are kept, I'm just gona BEBOLD and change them to "X policy debates during the Harper era in Canada", because...

people are commenting without endorsing a particular action. Please WP:BEBOLD and come out with a clear opinion for the closing admin.4meter4 (talk) 12:06...

If you’re asking for permission to make an edit, and nobody responds, WP:BEBOLD and make the edit and it can always be reverted if there’s a problem with...

tend to hold a different view, that admins should have more freedom to WP:BEBOLD and close discussions contrary to consensus where they think it appropriate...

enforcement" may wish to note this in the enforcement log. You should WP:BEBOLD and either edit the article to improve it or WP:PROD it or WP:AFD it. Off2riorob...

understand the differences between different segments of Islam. Following WP:BEBOLD I'm going to go chop out the non-authoritative references, to include, unfortunately...

I was looking for experience and Wikipedia encourages new users to WP:BEBOLD (Interstellarity's discussion had been left unclosed for a week after the...

Other sports section. KnightLago (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD? I've got it, but if it is a simple fix, you are welcome to change it yourself...

(non-student) editors. And alternatively, you are absolutely free to WP:BEBOLD and revise the pages for tone etc. But please don't feel like you are obligated...

first, or are citations? This needs to be standardised. I've decided to WP:BEBOLD and put notes first. Z1720 (talk) 04:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) I reordered...

about Wikipedia is to be publicly and spectacularly wrong (see also WP:BEBOLD). Trust me, there will seldom if ever be any shortage of people lining up...

unreliable. --George Ho (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Alright. WP:BEBOLD and remove them. What do you mean by analyzed? JFHJr (㊟) 04:51, 23 February...

that you could just start adding the category to relevant articles (WP:BEBOLD maybe?), but of course there is no guarantee that the category would remain...

Yorker, too. I think this was the trigger for the revert. #therearenorules #bebold Is there anyway to call attention to this unruly and uncivil behavior? I...

active and have a strong opinion. And if they're not, or they don't, then WP:BEBOLD and make changes you think will improve the encyclopedia. If someone disagrees...

Panromantic Days. Note that this would have been a good opportunity to WP:BEBOLD instead of listing it at WP:RFD, especially since the nominator is the redirect's...

alert more interested parties. There's also a Wikipedia rule-of-thumb WP:BEBOLD. If you think you have a change that's clearly an improvement, go ahead...

may well not be notablle enough for a wikipedia BLP or you can either WP:BEBOLD and click on the redlink Doe Exee and start the article or request assistance...

remove large amounts of content outright. It's also usually alright to WP:BEBOLD and try to make what you feel are uncontroversial improvement to the encyclopedia...

missing something that could potentially be harmful, then you need to WP:BEBOLD and fix it or at the very least, be more specific about what I'm getting...

244 (talk) 18:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:NOCITE and also WP:BEBOLD - If it's uncited and your search reveals no confirmation you can either...

prose: if I think there is other off-topic information to remove I'll WP:BEBOLD and make note of it here. Others are invited to copyedit the article at...

weigh in. This is one of those situations where you should probably just WP:BEBOLD, work out a solution, and if anyone disagrees, discuss with them on the...

time's better spent fixing it than arguing it should be removed. See also WP:BEBOLD. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Zx your argument falls into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS:...

good job. You've done nothing wrong. You followed Wikipedia's policy WP:BEBOLD, which is correct. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC) one...

notability and an editor cannot find sources, it is reasonable for them to WP:BEBOLD and redirect to an article as opposed to putting it through the deletion...

(obviously I do not have one on the article talk page) or can I just WP:BEBOLD? Can you think of any guideline I'd be violating? You'll find more discussion...

have a version that the community can hone based on the principles of WP:BEBOLD and consensus? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC) Because...

the report, you are of course welcome to remove such edits yourself, WP:BEBOLD - happy editing. Off2riorob (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC) Kevin Federline...

unprotection. Auto-confirmed does not work if a determined user with more BEBOLD than experience persists in creating a page than has been interminably recreated...

from an IP address, file an SPI, and then we will get this sorted out. WP:BEBOLD and file the SPI, instead of making comments here, it's a lot more helpful...

- please consider, wikipedia policy and guidelines encourages you to WP:BEBOLD and consider removing the violating addition yourself. Youreallycan (talk)...

details. In this kind of situation WP allows, even encourages, editors to WP:BEBOLD and Wikipedia:Ignore all rules and write up an article about Louis Mangione...

been fixed. The problems you describe should be fixed; in the future WP:BeBold and fix them. Blue Rasberry 14:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Two users (primarily...

believe), so I don't really have a reference point. Oh well. It's good to WP:BEBOLD, eh? --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Technical Review Fix...

first I tried manually fixing (with dubious results); then I decided to WP:BeBold and WP:DIY and ran Checklinks. I believe I may have fixed some things, but...

here. If you think this article needs attention and proper sources, WP:BEBOLD and do the editing you think is required. Do your research, find appropriate...

for new editors to answer edit requests then I apologize. I wanted to WP:BEBOLD and expand a stub, and did my best to be thorough and critical with a work...

those events to fill out an article then by all means, be my guest. WP:BEBOLD. The fact that nobody has written articles on those events doesn't mean...

campaign, is absurd. I didn't revert the changes because regardless of WP:BEBOLD this is something that clearly cannot be resolved with just another revert...

good reply from Blaze The Wolf. You can read more about Being bold at WP:BEBOLD. It is never nice having one's bold edit reverted, but if that happens it...

is a primary topic. Mathguy2718 (talk) 14:48, 18 January 2026 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD and do so. Probably no need for a discussion for this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)...

going to say this and hope it is the only time I have to. Please review WP:BeBold and WP:Own. It is not your article- you don't have to approve all changes...

government. --LaserLegs (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC) Feel free to WP:BEBOLD, Template:U, and add it yourself. Article quality aside, you appear to have...

Template:Archivetop Template:ITN candidate Template:Reply I suppose WPO:BEBOLD and WP:WRITETHEARTICLEFIRST come to mind  ;) —SerialNumber54129 paranoia...

June 2021 (UTC) Welcome to the Teahouse, Notacoworcat. Whilst you can WP:BEBOLD with your editing, as you're very new to Wikipedia please don't be too bold...

failures of WP:NALBUM, and it now meets those guidelines - I'm tempted to WP:BEBOLD and bypass AfC and move it myself. It might take several weeks before another...

Other sports section. KnightLago (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD? I've got it, but if it is a simple fix, you are welcome to change it yourself...

category. If that is not what the nominator envisions, they are welcome to WP:BEBOLD and do it themselves until there is an objection. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)...

"BeBold" This User is Bold....

editors should have autonomy to make edits freely as they choose per WP:BEBOLD. You cannot strictly police every edit like this, that would not comply...

Bowser: Considering the lack of edits by others, I think its ok for you to WP:BEBOLD and make edits yourself. Z1720 (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC) I'll...

WP:EDIT WAR. User:Ahnoneemoos made significant changes to the article per WP:BEBOLD and WP:AGF but User:Mercy11 is reverting the whole article to a previous...

to gain consensus and attention to the issue there than here. Or just WP:BEBOLD and add the content in yourself; I very much doubt anyone would oppose it...

Based on WP:TOOSOON (and as you quoted WP:Fringen, I would support to WP:BeBold and delete the page. Nanosci (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC) That's not...

If she's apologised and it's stated in the given source, you should WP:BEBOLD and add this information in. But we're neutral. We don't exercise editorial...

discussion probably didn't even need to be opened, someone could have WP:BEBOLD and just removed the redirect and created an article on the dinosaur. But...

(UTC) Easy retarget, I don't see why this even needed to be an RfD, WP:BEBOLD. The U.S. Navy is not the only navy which has ever existed. --Slowking Man...

being proposed here). If you disagree with the plan of the page, just WP:BEBOLD and change the structure of the article as you see better fit. Ain92 (talk)...

prose: if I think there is other off-topic information to remove I'll WP:BEBOLD and make note of it here. Others are invited to copyedit the article at...

first, or are citations? This needs to be standardised. I've decided to WP:BEBOLD and put notes first. Z1720 (talk) 04:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC) I reordered...

buck here. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:11, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Found, just WP:BEBOLD and change the infobox. I'm not familiarized with these topics so I put...

2025 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing my request. May have been a bit bold (WP:BEBOLD) on some of my earlier edits and presentations. I sincerely apologize in...

not sure a template needs positive consensus for use in mainspace -- WP:BEBOLD and all that. We might well seek consensus if we were going to replace existing...

search. I also am unfamiliar with this topic area, so I am hesitant to BEBOLD in a FA and add info without getting it checked by a more experienced editor...

(talk) 18:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC) Kvinnen (talk · contribs), I take WP:BEBOLD to heart, as one of the 5 funding principles of Wikipedia. This has caused...

the bold-revert-discuss cycle to the technical areas of Wikipedia? A: WP:BEBOLD is a good principle for general editing, but needs to be weighed against...

added by WikiConDraft (talk • contribs) 12:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Per WP:BEBOLD and WP:BRD, if you are able to identify a problem (particularly unsourced...

discussion on the talk page of the article before escalating here. Please WP:BEBOLD in this situation and talk page your edits. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 02:05, 13...

idea lab is for, try discussing it first on the article talk page, or WP:BEBOLD. See WP:GNG Kowal2701 (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2025 (UTC) try discussing...

article. jolielover♥talk 02:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Please do so (WP:BEBOLD)! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:10, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I added :) jolielover♥talk...

-- asilvering (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2025 (UTC) It's one thing to WP:BEBOLD, but doing this without a prior workshop was a big mistake. In my !vote...

they say. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 17:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD is a guideline, and you need no ones approval to edit. Only if someone objects...

- not small, exactly, but hey, no time like the present to learn to WP:BEBOLD. You don't (or shouldn't) need to do any research to fix these articles...

you see something that doesn't match up with the result of discussions WP:BEBOLD. Also editors need to update the entry with the result of any RFC, it doesn't...

too. Wait a week or two for any feedback or comments. If no, simply WP:BEBOLD with a nice clear WP:EDITSUMMARY explaining the revision coming from your...

right after we have some kind of consensus here is better not done via WP:BEBOLD.) Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 00:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC) If I dig deep for some connotation...

lakana there does not work and should not have been done. I'll just WP:BEBOLD and just restore it. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 05:27, 13 February 2026 (UTC) You...

of opting out must exist.—S Marshall T/C 22:16, 11 August 2025 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:48, 16 August 2025 (UTC) I've already got one...

very, very weak, and many others are deficient as well. I contemplated WP:BEBOLD and just blank/redirect, but decided to start a discussion. A weak alternative...

redirect target than wiktionary if someone adds it there with reference. WP:BEBOLD! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:31, 8 August 2023...

(talk) 19:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC) @Frostyibex Whilst you can just WP:BEBOLD and make a change, now that you've posted a suggestion and sought feedback/consensus...

(talk) 02:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Put the commentary in the infobox. WP:BEBOLD BarntToust (talk) 02:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC) In that case the image needs...

than poo-pooing this article you should be encouraging WP editors to be WP:BEBOLD and add new material even about subjects that may not interest you but are...

week -possibly a lot longer for rarely visited pages. You could simply WP:BEBOLD and delete the unsupported statement with a clear edit summary explaining...

rather than addressing the substantive issue, whatever that might be. WP:BEBOLD is also an important principle and we should not create (and this would...

thread is a distraction from you doing your duty as an editor to discuss and BEBOLD. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC) I've looked at the...

2024 (UTC) If you feel that way, don't just bemoan it. Propose a split. WP:BEBOLD. BarntToust (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Endorse More time wouldn't...

prior deletion discussion, that would require a consensus and not just a BEBOLD. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

pointed out that doing this to templates was clearly frowned upon per WP:BEBOLD #Template namespace, which states "Before editing templates, consider proposing...

(UTC) @Hog Farm and WhatamIdoing: While some editors have wanted me to WP:BEBOLD, there have been times in the past when I follow that advice I am critised...

message for this article. Chubbles (talk) 06:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD It seems you have a good understanding of the policies around WP:BLPCRIME...

redone. Sergecross73 msg me 02:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC) In the spirit of WP:BEBOLD I will see about cleaning it up as this is clearly implying that if it was...

pretty bad, and has been tagged as such for over 9 years. Please either WP:BEBOLD and do some editing, or specify what should be discussed here for removal...

time's better spent fixing it than arguing it should be removed. See also WP:BEBOLD. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Zx your argument falls into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS:...

alternative opinions to doing a MOVE? After a week or so of no reply you can WP:BEBOLD and make the changes, but always ensure with synonyms that there is a trail...

both times. I see no attempt at discussion on the article's talk page. WP:BEBOLD in adding content that is missing or open a discussion on the talk page...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.69.137.70 (talk • contribs)  Done - WP:BEBOLD and clean up yourself. GiantSnowman 19:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC) More eyes...

details. In this kind of situation WP allows, even encourages, editors to WP:BEBOLD and Wikipedia:Ignore all rules and write up an article about Louis Mangione...

those events to fill out an article then by all means, be my guest. WP:BEBOLD. The fact that nobody has written articles on those events doesn't mean...

about a possible rename can occur on the article talk page or you can just BEBOLD. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Renault Grand Prix (edit |...

articles you encounter fall into such a category, and you can always WP:BEBOLD and merge scattered information into more cohesive articles. CMD (talk)...

make arguments to support status quo - that is the entire opposite of WP:BEBOLD or WP:5P5. You're just wrong - ignoring WP:RS is not in line with WP:PILLARS...

under the "in popular culture" section, would this be allowed? Should I BEBOLD and do it? Best regards, UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 14:26...

it there, ask another editor, or trust your judgement of a source and WP:BEBOLD and use it. TLAtlak 02:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Google Scholar is also a useful...

citations such as images where the information is visual. Usually, I'd WP:BEBOLD and have added and cited the info already, but this is such an unusual scenario...

2023 (UTC) @Rrsimone, welcome to the teahouse. I would suggest that you WP:BEBOLD: find WP:Reliable Sources about the information of Stevens Institute of...

people are commenting without endorsing a particular action. Please WP:BEBOLD and come out with a clear opinion for the closing admin.4meter4 (talk) 12:06...

leaves here, seems we aren't going to end with delete, so I decided to WP:BEBOLD and start tinkering with the article. Here's my thinking: discussion seems...

example, nationality and year of death. If you think so too, you could WP:BEBOLD and go for it or suggest it on the talk page to see if you get any other...

recommendation is that, if you're deciding whether or not to violate a rule, WP:BEBOLD and just do it, as long as you feel that it is in the spirit of improving...

that it can pass a GA review performed by someone else. Wikipedia says WP:BEBOLD and so that's what I was doing; I generally am not shy about that, although...

are almost exclusively flattering about the subject. I attempted to WP:BEBOLD multiple times, but there is one editor that is reverting edits from multiple...

IP User (talk) 01:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Nope! You're allowed to WP:BEBOLD and edit the article yourself. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:48, 5 February...

pretty seriously and should be removed and revision deleted ASAP. And WP:BEBOLD does apply here: the harm done by an accidental copyright template is much...

20 January 2023 (UTC) Welcome to Teahhouse @ScipioAfricanusAtZama! WP:BEBOLD. If you are worried that some terms have technical significance, you can...

any mistakes and make improvements. It's a delicate balance between WP:BEBOLD and finding WP:Consensus. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:28, 22 September...

draw the attnetion of editors who monitor such requests. Or, you could WP:BEBOLD and make the edit yourself. You might want to read WP:REFBEGIN to learn...

time. -- asilvering (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC) A few options: - WP:BEBOLD and edit it yourself! - add some WP:MAINTENANCETAGS which lets readers know...

Leave it a week to get any feedback, and, if nothing comes of that, yes, WP:BEBOLD applies. Now, you could work on a rewrite in your sandbox and invite other...

doesn't pass notability. TheNewMinistry (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD Metallurgist (talk) 23:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC) Keep already passes WP:GNG...

How would I achieve consensus about portal creation? Or can I just WP:BEBOLD and go for it? If I just go for it, it would be too much to do in one session;...

advise you change the content yourself and cite a reliable source per WP:BEBOLD PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 21:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC) The article never...

if no one responds? ThaesOfereode (talk) 16:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD if no one responds. You can always rename it again later either by "moving...

suggested anything BUT this, in clear defiance of WP:BEBOLD? I think secretly everyone hates WP:BEBOLD. While your suggestion is noted this is because the...

Turnbull (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2025 (UTC) Ahh, I really need to learn to WP:BEBOLD Kingsacrificer (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2025 (UTC) Other issues not withstanding...

indeed! As it wouldn't impact any transclusion of the template, you can WP:BEBOLD and change it yourself, or ask on the talk page if anyone objects. Personally...

(talk) 00:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC) "there was no discussion" goes against WP:BEBOLD, but one is free to merge it back if they have specific reasons.—Bagumba...

Ignoring the massive discussion, the facts are abundantly clear. I went WP:BEBOLD and invoked WP:IAR: [70]. WP:BRD if you feel I'm in error. Buffs (talk)...

need to strike any of my forthright arguments that are in the spirit of WP:BEBOLD. IZAK (talk) 04:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC) NOTE: The original discussion...

is to have a consensus about how to handle this as its one thing to WP:BEBOLD with one or two articles, but when dealing with this many it would clog...

nobody sees a problem. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2025 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD and go for it. Bremps... 02:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC) Thanks, but I don't...

to do so. wizzito | say hello! 03:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC) Go ahead—WP:BEBOLD. Yo.dazo (talk) 08:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Support - I think the article...

be controversial should be discussed first. Moves is one aware where WP:BEBOLD is definitely not encouraged. So it doesn't matter how much editors think...

make a comment on the talk page first Wikipedia encourages editors to WP:BEBOLD so making a bold edit that an editor thinks improves the page is also an...

the appropriate forum, I just saw the recommendation and decided to WP:BEBOLD and do it myself. skarz (talk) 04:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I’m still a new...

talk, he was mostly not receptive. If you have an issue with content, WP:BEBOLD. He then engaged me in a revert war against consensus that eventually ended...

action towards this editor, as their actions seem to reach the realm of WP:BEBOLD. I would caution محرر البوق that pages regarding Horn of Africa are designated...

Based on WP:TOOSOON (and as you quoted WP:Fringen, I would support to WP:BeBold and delete the page. Nanosci (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC) That's not...

isn't blocked. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC) WP:BEBOLD Kowal2701 (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2025 (UTC) After formal warning and even...

not sure a template needs positive consensus for use in mainspace -- WP:BEBOLD and all that. We might well seek consensus if we were going to replace existing...

lakana there does not work and should not have been done. I'll just WP:BEBOLD and just restore it. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 05:27, 13 February 2026 (UTC) You...

war and support for Israel. Edit summary acknowledges TBAN, but claims WP:BEBOLD and WP:AGF overrule it. This was subsequently edited several more times...

2024 (UTC) If you feel that way, don't just bemoan it. Propose a split. WP:BEBOLD. BarntToust (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC) Endorse More time wouldn't...