DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

to take a break or leave Wikipedia at any time. Shortcuts WP:BADIDEAWP:BADIDEA WP:NOTSTUPIDWP:NOTSTUPID Wikipedia is not a lot of other things as well...

articles, including cities and towns. Merging this to 2021 in India is a WP:BADIDEA. 2021 in India is a list of the most significant 2021 events in the entire...

WP:PAGE  WP:YOU  WP:USE  WP:FREQUENTly, WP:IT  WP:IS probably WP:A  WP:BADIDEA  WP:TO  WP:MAKE  WP:A  WP:POINT  WP:OF  WP:USING these WP:TLAs  WP:IN ...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

contains graphic image content of genitals Delete per WP:WEBHOST and WP:BADIDEA. Wikipedia isn't the place to show how "big" your dick is. That's why there's...

Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC) Delete - WP:BADIDEA The article only has one source, which is Yahoo news. This appears to be...

which would only include a few entries and would definitively be a WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

not appear to meet WP:NLIST; and additionally because this would be a WP:BADIDEA as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

nothing like these lists here); and additionally because this would be a WP:BADIDEA as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

find any evidence of this); and additionally because this would be a WP:BADIDEA as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

ry-converted-into-basic-English-text is not an "article", and fails WP:BADIDEA - if we had articles about every person who is mentioned in some database...

at all, other than as a railroad stop. Seems that this article was a WP:BADIDEA from the get-go; just because there are records doesn't mean it's notable...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

Overall, it is an unnecessary provocation to editors, which is indeed a WP:BADIDEA. Forbidden User (talk) 16:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Comment - You've labelled...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

but I do believe that BADIDEA does apply and it helps to look at similar guidelines to gather an understanding of why BADIDEA applies. WP:GAMEGUIDE states...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

without adding any context. This falls foul of WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:BADIDEA. I would support the inclusion of a list of CBEs and above somewhere, because...

neatness of our articles.) and is full of WP:TRIVIA and WP:DIARY and WP:BADIDEA information, it should be deleted or merged/moved into an article that...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

WP:NPOV, so keeping any indication that this was here is just provoking WP:BADIDEAs. Lesser Cartographies proposed good target for this title to redirect to...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

(UTC) But WP:LISTCRUFT does a solid job of explaining why this would be WP:BADIDEA. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 00:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC) The title...

there is not a specific entry in WP:NOT, I would definitely call this a WP:BADIDEA. Having an extensive article on one month in the history of one country...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

is the only way I refrained from voting delete with a capital D. Per WP:BADIDEA, this is "some new bad idea that had not previously been anticipated"....

Indian adaptation in the It article and renaming it It (franchise) is a WP:BADIDEA for reasons I've explained in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie (franchise)...

Chrism would like to hear from you 17:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Delete: WP:BADIDEA, turning an amalgamation of data sorts into an article. Vrac (talk) 01:59...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

find any evidence of this); and additionally because this would be a WP:BADIDEA as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

Karlsson (ice hockey), and the existance of this title is provoking WP:BADIDEAs. Keep Don't delete Matthew Mistele: he is mentioned in the target article...

13:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia:CREEP, WP:BEANS, WP:BURO and WP:BADIDEA. We don't list every possible thing that's a bad idea. Long term hosting...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

violate redirect policy? --NYKevin 01:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC) It violates WP:BADIDEA and (in spirit, not letter) WP:R#KEEP criterion 4. Otherwise it's policy-compatible...

the list and the associated argumentation? It now just seems to be a WP:BADIDEA that isn't working. Warden (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC) The value of...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

contains many sections which oppose this including WP:BATTLE, WP:BURO and WP:BADIDEA. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:18, 12 September 2010 (UTC) Oppose for many of...

romanization of foreign language title is only feeding novice editors with WP:BADIDEAs. Although this redirect is old, its usage is below noise level, so its...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA, as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

is just a well of WP:BADIDEAs. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 21:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC) I'll just expand a bit on "BADIDEAs": These redirects aid...

contacted directly about this as I do not check this page -- kzeese@##BADIDEA##. Kevin Zeese — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.3.87.4 (talk •...

2021 (UTC) Support Site ban as per WP:NATIONALIST, WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:BADIDEA as per the ample online evidence provided above. Furthermore, even after...

suggesting that any references to religion are redundant seems more like a WP:BADIDEA than a desire to improve the content of the article. Perhaps I have misunderstood...

disambiguation pages for misnomers are firmly into the territory of WP:BADIDEAs. 61.10.165.33 (talk) 09:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC) WP:DAB "important aspects...

Wikipedia is not does not anticipate or specifically address every WP:BADIDEA out there. I'm not saying this kind of information does not belong online...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

neatness of our articles.) and is full of WP:TRIVIA and WP:DIARY and WP:BADIDEA information, it should be deleted or merged/moved into an article that...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

(UTC) I don't know that there is a tailored section of policy but see WP:BADIDEA and WP:SENSE. In short, this is obviously not a good idea and I would bet...

geot→Peugeot and wski→list of Polish people. Just don't feed editors with WP:BADIDEAs. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 03:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC) the difference...

(UTC) We also have this wonderful shortcut that I just discovered today WP:BADIDEA, which apparently is policy, and applies in droves here. As a side note...

frequent and non-encyclopedic short-term changes. As I said, it's a WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC) Again, "no...

directly useful on this are WP:UNDUE, WP:INDISCRIMINATE and possibly WP:BADIDEA. I'd also point to the essay, Wikipedia:Relevance of content).--Fuhghettaboutit...

but I do believe that BADIDEA does apply and it helps to look at similar guidelines to gather an understanding of why BADIDEA applies. WP:GAMEGUIDE states...

some such example). ౪ Santa ౪99° 20:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Delete — WP:BADIDEA WP:NOTSCANDAL inconsistent garbage with WP:BLPGOSSIP specious purpose to...

find any evidence of this); and additionally because this would be a WP:BADIDEA as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

without adding any context. This falls foul of WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:BADIDEA. I would support the inclusion of a list of CBEs and above somewhere, because...

ends up as the key for the message I used. In this case, that's {{BOTREQ|badidea}}. I'm sorry that it came across as demeaning, that wasn't my intention...

not under WP:NOTDIRECTORY or as indiscriminate material, then simply WP:BADIDEA. There may be a few exceptions. 90210 might be able to support an actual...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

give another means of accessing the topics.) If not, would it be a WP:BADIDEA, in the sense that it would violate one of the WP:rules? If it's not a...

14:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Delete -WP:NOTBESTIARY likely falls under WP:BADIDEA, "Almost everything on this page made it here because somebody managed...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

(UTC) We also have this wonderful shortcut that I just discovered today WP:BADIDEA, which apparently is policy, and applies in droves here. As a side note...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

your point. Pass a Method talk 16:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC) delete WP:BADIDEA / WP:POLEMIC / WP:NOTBATTLEGROUND / WP:OTHERCRAP etc. -- TRPoD aka The...

(UTC) But WP:LISTCRUFT does a solid job of explaining why this would be WP:BADIDEA. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 00:50, 16 December 2014 (UTC) The title...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA (as evidenced by the fact people keep citing the existence of these lists...

Indian adaptation in the It article and renaming it It (franchise) is a WP:BADIDEA for reasons I've explained in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie (franchise)...

encyclopedic merit."); and furthermore, because having this is definitively a WP:BADIDEA, as Wikipedia is not a philatelical catalogue and there is no indication...

which would only include a few entries and would definitively be a WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

ry-converted-into-basic-English-text is not an "article", and fails WP:BADIDEA - if we had articles about every person who is mentioned in some database...

articles, including cities and towns. Merging this to 2021 in India is a WP:BADIDEA. 2021 in India is a list of the most significant 2021 events in the entire...

is the only way I refrained from voting delete with a capital D. Per WP:BADIDEA, this is "some new bad idea that had not previously been anticipated"....

there is not a specific entry in WP:NOT, I would definitely call this a WP:BADIDEA. Having an extensive article on one month in the history of one country...

14:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Delete -WP:NOTBESTIARY likely falls under WP:BADIDEA, "Almost everything on this page made it here because somebody managed...

WP:NPOV, so keeping any indication that this was here is just provoking WP:BADIDEAs. Lesser Cartographies proposed good target for this title to redirect to...

Chrism would like to hear from you 17:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Delete: WP:BADIDEA, turning an amalgamation of data sorts into an article. Vrac (talk) 01:59...

It's the delete camp that lacks policy support. Kww made an appeal to WP:BADIDEA but did not present any evidence to support his subjective opinion. PBP...

Wikipedia is not does not anticipate or specifically address every WP:BADIDEA out there. I'm not saying this kind of information does not belong online...

It's the delete camp that lacks policy support. Kww made an appeal to WP:BADIDEA but did not present any evidence to support his subjective opinion. PBP...

article. Lastly, WP:NOT itself ends with some wise words in the form of WP:BADIDEA; In general, "that is a terrible idea" is always sufficient grounds to...

lawyer-like reading of it would suggest. This is also supported by WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC) It is fundamentally...

contacted directly about this as I do not check this page -- kzeese@##BADIDEA##. Kevin Zeese — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.3.87.4 (talk •...

lawyer-like reading of it would suggest. This is also supported by WP:BADIDEA. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC) It is fundamentally...

should neither to be construed as "the community has said this is a WP:BADIDEA and you should really think twice before bringing this concept up again"...

at all, other than as a railroad stop. Seems that this article was a WP:BADIDEA from the get-go; just because there are records doesn't mean it's notable...

Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC) Delete - WP:BADIDEA The article only has one source, which is Yahoo news. This appears to be...

clear violation of WP:NOTHOWTO. Failing that, the article is just a WP:BADIDEA. The consensus is currently for the page to stay, so for now, possibly...