DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

well-known professional researcher, or writer. Shortcut WP:ABOUTSELFWP:ABOUTSELF Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

questionable sources as sources on themselves", often cited with the shortcut WP:ABOUTSELF. For a refresher, it reads as follows: Self-published and questionable...

something is not self-serving, ABOUTSELF merely allows it to be included; it does not require it. Even in valid ABOUTSELF cases, the WP:DUE weight of something...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ABOUTSELF Darkstar1st (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

to reference the article). This was carried out in accordance with WP:ABOUTSELF. In summary, the article in my opinion passes both WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV...

media-repetitions of what he says on social media, in WP-terms way to much WP:ABOUTSELF, and what he says has been turned into WP-voice. Ekpa himself is notable...

magazine that should be avoided outside of very limited exceptions (e.g. WP:ABOUTSELF). Taki's Magazine, called Takimag for short, is an online magazine of...

directly to the organization itself, they can violate the restrictions in WP:ABOUTSELF, since their wording is often unduly self-serving. While these statements...

sources, and our article is replete with WP:ABOUTSELF references. It was created in 2011[1] with three ABOUTSELF references, presumably with the intention...

about, or featuring Azuz are already covered by WP:RSPYT, WP:RSPTWITTER and WP:ABOUTSELF. Please help improve this source assessment table if you can....

reporting, as it is a publication of Sinn Féin. Under the conditions of WP:ABOUTSELF, An Phoblacht is usable for attributed statements from Sinn Féin and some...

biographical details are not WP:V, with an excessive dependence on WP:ABOUTSELF. A number of details are already on the One America News Network article...

uncontroversial descriptions of itself and its own content according to WP:ABOUTSELF, but not for claims related to living persons. Guido Fawkes is a right-wing...

usable for attributed statements from Hezbollah under the conditions of WP:ABOUTSELF. It may also be usable for non-controversial topics on Lebanese culture...

update with this detail, did tweet about her divorce. This is suitable WP:ABOUTSELF – but we can't expect every notable person to read Wikipedia guidelines...

php/topic,49846.0.html Koozali Foundation announcement 2013 here are some WP:ABOUTSELF non independant sources: - http://distro.ibiblio.org/smeserver/contri...

a time capsule." Wikipedian Hayden Schiff replied to her that, per WP:ABOUTSELF, her tweet should be sufficient. But Mandel had been (mis-)informed by...

biography Please note that Facebook is (usually) not a reliable source per WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:SPS. I have removed the Facebook refs in the article. Fierysea13...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG. Sources are mainly WP:ABOUTSELF or WP:NOTRS, and a search for news items and scholarly literature shows...

under WP:NACTOR. Worse, the only source cited by the article is a WP:ABOUTSELF source – not good enough. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 04:33, 6 February...

Don't be afraid to boldy remove mass swathes of text that have this error. Wikipedia:Existence does not prove notability WP:SELFPUB and WP:ABOUTSELF...

with using a primary source as a reference for staff? Seems like a WP:ABOUTSELF situation to me. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Yes, but...

written by the entity itself, and falls under WP:SELFPUB, WP:NPOV & WP:ABOUTSELF - the article appears to be a promotion piece and seeks self-exposure...

February 2025 (UTC) This article heavily relies on primary sources; WP:ABOUTSELF wouldn't apply here, as it says such sources can be used for info about...

always follow the specific exception criteria described at WP:SPS or WP:ABOUTSELF; see also WP:USESPS. This list is not a complete list of companies currently...

the asset page on their site, because it seems to me to fall under WP:ABOUTSELF -- but I'd be fine with taking them back out, since everything sourced...

(talk) 22:59, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Speedy Delete: Per WP:G11 and WP:ABOUTSELF. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 13:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...

Delete: does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST. Most available sourcing is WP:ABOUTSELF. Safehaven86 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) Delete non-notable artist...

article appears to be sourced to the brand's own website in violation of WP:ABOUTSELF. --Tdl1060 (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

found on the talk page, which explains that they are allowable under WP:ABOUTSELF. These paragraphs/references have an important bearing on the discussion...

same corp and a minimal list of other ventures (if verifiable per WP:ABOUTSELF) needs to be preserved into the Business Recorder article. --lTopGunl...

than widely covered in RS articles (WP:ABOUTSELF related)? If yes, when does this change from a reasonable "aboutself" to self unduly promotional/self serving...

stand-alone article, but it'd be a useful search term to keep, and there is WP:ABOUTSELF content that can be used at the Carnegie Mellon article. Leviv ich 00:41...

However, I don't believe the BBC profile works, it may be a case of WP:ABOUTSELF seeing as she worked at the BBC. Pride of Pakistan uses profiles that...

website, which meets WP:ABOUTSELF. SerChevalerie (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Delete No SIGCOV, cited or otherwise. WP:ABOUTSELF only applies to reliablity...

Excelencia#Former Members section which I could not find any WP:RS or sufficient WP:ABOUTSELF. If Extraordinary Writ or Hatman31 can find any refs to support this section...

identifies which text that is sourced to company materials breaches WP:ABOUTSELF. It would be difficult to write a comprehensive company article without...

For more details on usage of self-published sources, see WP:SPS, WP:ABOUTSELF, and WP:BLPSPS. Only the writers mentioned in this table are considered...

an issue for a BLP, with the bulk of content sourced to videos. Per WP:ABOUTSELF "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

even if it only comes from the university’s own sources, is OK as per WP:ABOUTSELF Samboy (talk) 04:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Wikipedia in an article about some notable aspect of Wikipedia passes the ABOUTSELF threshold. However, in the "real world", that is to say, outside of Wikipedia's...

CityBreakingDown: Servir ao Povo de Todo Coração can be used in the article (see WP:ABOUTSELF), but it does not count when measuring notability. Notability is measured...

which cannot be used for confirming notability (see WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:ABOUTSELF). — Alex26337 (talk) 19:12, 15 November 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 417#Can Instagram be used as a WP:ABOUTSELF if it is the person’s Instagram account? WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive...

30 October 2025 (UTC) Delete: Per general notability, WP:SPS, and WP:ABOUTSELF, but OP beware that WP:NSOFT is an essay and not a policy. x2step (lets...

the standard of reliable sources used by notability. For example, WP:ABOUTSELF allows the use of self-published primary sources to verify trivial facts...

neutral, and the company itself can give us details about itself under WP:ABOUTSELF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 09:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

2022 (UTC) BOvcharenko: While Twitter can be used in some cases (see WP:ABOUTSELF), it is not a reliable source, which mean it does not count towards notability...

the content entirely lacks independent secondary verification. Per WP:ABOUTSELF, a subject's own statements are strictly disallowed from forming the primary...

purpose of purging a Wikipedia article of its legitimate criticism. WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:PRIMARY: even if third-party reliable sources are generally negative...

comment added by Dani0rad (talk • contribs) Dani0rad please review WP:ABOUTSELF and Wikipedia:Third-party_sources to see how wikipedia defines 3rd party...

this is his official page. the fact and refs fits WP:ABOUTSELF 3. http://www.bfm.my/wavelength-the-journeyman-m-nasir.html http://www...

that list. (A first-party source is enough sourcing here, see for WP:ABOUTSELF.) I think it is on the good side of the "due weight" line, but I understand...

WP:NOTE: no independent sources address the subject directly. Issues with WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:42, 9 December...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) wp:promotion ap:aboutself Darkstar1st (talk) 08:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

mentioned in the article.[1] Almost all biographical details are cited to WP:ABOUTSELF information (and a weird blog that only seems to host one glowing article...

coverage here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 6 October 2024 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF: This source is written by William H. Carey, who himself was a founder...

source assesments: 1 - Facebook page of the person, seems like a WP:ABOUTSELF use. 2 - Reliable, PhilStar is one of the largest publication in the Philippines...

may be used for information on itself, subject to the conditions in WP:ABOUTSELF (see also WP:SPS and WP:BLPSELFPUB). An external link to the source can...

published products, and its documentation is sufficiently reliable per WP:ABOUTSELF. In the absence of controversy, why would we need anything beyond the...

06:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Delete Completely promotional failure of WP:ABOUTSELF, when the first claim of significance is cited to an article you wrote...

source (press releases) and should only be used for non-controversial WP:ABOUTSELF claims. There is a lack of medical sources presented here. You can search...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBIO. The sources are a mish-mash of WP:ABOUTSELF bios and self-congratulatory appointment press releases. There is not...

runs the university, and the Japanese university article only has a WP:ABOUTSELF source citing when the building was built, and that it was host to some...

are talking about. Content about the speaker themselves should abide by ABOUTSELF and WEIGHT. TedX content has no quality standard or editorial oversight...

article may just be copy-pasted from their "about us" page, but is basic WP:ABOUTSELF material if not, for the most part, so it could be okay. It's just not...

own section.) The single citation to PR Newswire looks fine to me as WP:ABOUTSELF since it's just supporting an award nomination. The International Business...

the department's website, which, IIRC, can be used as a source under ABOUTSELF. James500 (talk) 13:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC) There is nothing on department's...

endorsement list when independent coverage is absent, or do WP:ENDORSE and WP:ABOUTSELF strictly require reliable independent coverage? Similarly, is Substack...

notability and could have been used from the official source under WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:FILMPLOT if it had been properly attributed. Schmidt, Michael Q...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Only source is WP:ABOUTSELF. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

convince Bilby of my idea to add {{Cite court}}. I then consider using WP:ABOUTSELF for the plea of no contest, but then, on further reflection, I decide:...

Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC) Doesn't apply. If David...

basic information. - WP:ABOUTSELF does apply here with regards to a government press release (see also WP:PRSOURCE). ABOUTSELF applies to each source individually...

asserted notability, the "official website" is okay for WP:V under WP:ABOUTSELF, and I was unable to determine the substantial Sinhalese source as duplicating...

similar [8] [9] - though such sources should be used with caution as per WP:ABOUTSELF. Nfitz (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL...

(The only thing from a reliable source is the Facebook post [per WP:ABOUTSELF], but all that says is that there is a third film, without a name. That...

sources. However material cited to the organization itself is usable per WP:ABOUTSELF. That is besides the point here though, and if you no longer favor deletion...

12 July 2019 (UTC) An interview in a major newspapers is not WP:ABOUTSELF. ABOUTSELF refers to self-published and questionable sources - not one of the...

perfectly valid citations to back up the fact that he wrote the books per WP:ABOUTSELF, they do not seem to do anything to demonstrate notability). jp×g 12:21...

probably be used for verifiability but not if used alone, per #5 of WP:ABOUTSELF. Wikipedia is not a memorial. There is an astonishing amount of non-encyclopedic...

into "news" articles. We don't use social media posts (except for WP:ABOUTSELF in very specific and limited uses) or user-generated internet comments...

remove all of this information, but most of it was not appropriate. The WP:ABOUTSELF policy specifies that articles should not be based primarily on sources...

version and a shift to all-local content--informative and reliable under WP:ABOUTSELF but obviously not relevant to notability. I also note a bio on a different...

Thailand; the fourth is a self-published source, which should be fine for WP:ABOUTSELF matters. Only the last one is questionable. I have no idea what "bogus...

WP:ABOUTSELF (e.g. who a company's VP of marketing is, or why a game designer chose to make a particular character one-eyed and green), per WP:ABOUTSELF...

article is currently sourced to the author's own website, which meets WP:ABOUTSELF. We can discuss the source and content on the article Talk page, but that...

similar [8] [9] - though such sources should be used with caution as per WP:ABOUTSELF. Nfitz (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

those, we have JCR and Scopus for notability. And we have a lot of WP:ABOUTSELF-permitted sources for other content. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:10, 20...

station's immediate vicinity. The article itself appears mostly unsourced/WP:ABOUTSELF. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 17:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC) Keep I agree with Edison...

interview with Robinson and I'm exclusively using his words here; WP:ABOUTSELF should apply. Skyshiftertalk 18:32, 2 July 2024 (UTC) There's a review...

use of testimonials that have no independent verification. As per WP:ABOUTSELF this is material that is self-serving and involves claims by third parties...

territory of Original Research and Synthesis, and we can't even include ABOUTSELF in this biography. The nominally "self statements" are supplied by someone...

(well, as of 2016) and that she's back to using Lee (seems to satisfy WP:ABOUTSELF). Should probably be moved to Jeannette H. Lee.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< ...

While the use of Discord and Twitter as sources may be fine as per WP:ABOUTSELF, basing the article around such sources is bad. We could maybe swap out...

@Dentsinhere43, the additional citations tag is not necessarily needed for WP:ABOUTSELF statements such as operating hours. Nonetheless, I agree the sourcing...

and as per our guidance on self-published sources (specifically at WP:ABOUTSELF): "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

08:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) I mean, the citations are WP:ABOUTSELF so, I didn't really count them. Allan Nonymous (talk) 15:02, 28 April...

organisation, with it instead all inappropriately sourced from themselves WP:ABOUTSELF. Would redirect but believe the name is too generic to be appropriate...

Even with permission, the subject's own words are of limited use (WP:ABOUTSELF) and do not contribute to WP:Notability / WP:GNG. I'd focus on getting...

site" which is likely wp:undue in most cases. But, it may be OK to use as aboutself in some cases for the fringe right wing topics that it represents. (FYI...

upon as fact. While this might just about be "OK" in the context of WP:ABOUTSELF, it is not "OK" (certainly not in establishing notability) that effectively...

2020 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF is an extremely restricted exception with five conditions, and any uses of self-published sources under WP:ABOUTSELF must still constitute...

sourcing being from self-published sources (mostly their own) so violates WP:ABOUTSELF. Checks on scholar show no notable academic discussion of the group. No...

non-independent sources being used are doing so in compliance with WP:ABOUTSELF. It would be better to have more independent coverage, but that is not...

dropped, the diacritic, then Wikipedia will do so as well; see also WP:ABOUTSELF and MOS:IDENTITY. Check the sources; do not make assumptions. For example...

purely sourced from its own website and then International (CWI) (WP:ABOUTSELF violation). Attempt to find reliable sources showed no notable coverage...

that the subject had published there (ABOUTSELF), an interview with the subject (again ABOUTSELF), multiple ABOUTSELF sources here. Each of those edits is...

a source, inappropriate per WP:PRIMARY, in a way that goes beyond WP:ABOUTSELF and gives the article serious WP:NPOV issues. We cannot merely cut the...

citations need to be closely evaluated against the five criteria in WP:ABOUTSELF. Points 1 ("the material is not unduly self-serving") and 5 ("the article...

as a source, while potentially useful for verifying basic facts per WP:ABOUTSELF, does not contribute towards establishing notability under WP:GNG. GNG...

something not established by press releases. Those are only used for WP:ABOUTSELF uncontroversial claims and have no impact on notability whatsoever. If...

topics (including medical topics), or such is the consensus here. WP:ABOUTSELF exception applies. (non-admin closure) Szmenderowiecki (talk) 01:41, 15...

are fine to use for the breed standard and registration figures per WP:ABOUTSELF, when it comes to stuff like history they shouldn't be used in a good...

of it. Primary source are used as the source, which is typically fine aboutself references, but not for notability in a standalone. If you think that...

groups. This is a fundamental breach of WP:SELFPUB and more importantly WP:ABOUTSELF on the grounds that an article must not be primarily based on self-published...

sources are used to support information that does not fall under the WP:ABOUTSELF criteria. Did you find any such information? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:00, 12...

organization is reliable for saying that it gave an award to person X, per ABOUTSELF)... the problem is DUE WEIGHT (why should we mention that the organization...

suggesting that her Facebook page is proof of notability. Doesn't WP:ABOUTSELF specifically permit the use of a subject's official Facebook page as a...

biographies at places he is involved with, so their use is limited to WP:ABOUTSELF, but do not create notability. The article is tagged as promotional because...

the nom. Looking at that article, there's only one source and its WP:ABOUTSELF, so I think the nom is still good, at least. Allan Nonymous (talk) 19:43...

PR pieces and announcements. With the rare exception of a couple of WP:ABOUTSELF, they're from independent newspapers all over the world, who are serving...

WP:ABOUTSELF. WP:ABOUTSELF sources cannot be used for controversial contexts. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 09:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC) It's only WP:ABOUTSELF if...

errors of fact might be just about "OK" (relative to WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF), basing an entire article on such sources is highly questionable (relative...

songs. We know the songs got radio-airplay, but in this case it was WP:ABOUTSELF airplay, which is not good enough methinks. WP:NOTEWORTHY means somebody...

(blether) 11:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC) And the policy basis for this is WP:ABOUTSELF (and WP:BLPPRIMARY if still living). The candidate is not actually in...

the subject's Facebook account, which violates both WP:PRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF. Ref#4, while from the Manila Bulletin, only offers a passing mention...

Most of the news references are primary/self published. It sound like WP:ABOUTSELF. Rtpaz (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC) Delete - for lack of significant...

Los Pobre (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC) His campaign site is WP:ABOUTSELF and does not contribute to WP:GNG because it is not independent of the...

a living person, as SPS are never OK to use in a BLP except in an WP:ABOUTSELF manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikehawk10 (talk • contribs)...

subject of discussion", which could be interpreted as: WP:ABOUTSELF applies. The idea that WP:ABOUTSELF is the only important exception -- so not opinions in...

Week" is a string of galas-- this source is fine reliability-wise as WP:ABOUTSELF, but it doesn't actually state that the Grammy Week involves multiple...

is irrelevant.) A citation of the YouTube terms of service, as an WP:ABOUTSELF source regarding YouTube, would use |work=YouTube. List of templates automatically...

in materials with a Latin-based alphabet, is sufficient, per the WP:ABOUTSELF policy and MOS:IDENTITY guideline. So is use of them in reference to that...

not), it would not be allowed under WP:ABOUTSELF. Ditto for self-serving or exceptional claims. Also per ABOUTSELF, the article should not be based primarily...

pageant official social media accounts may be an allowed under the WP:ABOUTSELF exception, but independent RS are preferred. Note that an article primarily...

Twitter (again, self published and dependent primary sources). While WP:ABOUTSELF allows for these types of sources for factual information, they cannot...

undue weight; opinions in the Mail on Sunday can still be used under WP:ABOUTSELF, or if they gain weight by receiving coverage in actual reliable sources...

the subject as a self-published source. The exception for statements ABOUTSELF is covered at Wikipedia:Verifiability § Self-published or questionable...

the cottage doesn't contribute to notability but can be used as an WP:ABOUTSELF source [6]. There's just barely enough here to write a policy-compliant...

facts about the subject's personal life. This fits with our policy WP:ABOUTSELF, where many categories of people's statements about themselves are acceptable...

WP:ABOUTSELF. Using the example from the NPOVN discussion, the article that Katie Hopkins published in the Daily Mail qualifies under WP:ABOUTSELF as...

appropriate weight to controversial issues. faluninfo.net [195], usable for ABOUTSELF claims about Falun Gong but otherwise unreliable per a July 2020 RSN discussion...

entirely on primary sources–and if it's just interviews, entirely on ABOUTSELF sources. – Levivich 15:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC) Keep - Somehow missed...

use to verify facts, except possibly in an WP:ABOUTSELF fashion. (And, even with respect to ABOUTSELF, I'd use it with caution given its issues vetting...

making a statement of fact with some photos. Maybe it is true, but WP:ABOUTSELF may be relevant here. Wikipedia works off of WP:VERIFIABILITY. Ramos1990...

Twitter/Youtube. WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:ABOUTSELF are equivalent. This gives insight into why these policies were created: WP:ABOUTSELF is a synonym for WP:SOCIALMEDIA...

published by Dageago on his own account, I think it would fall under the WP:ABOUTSELF policy, which allows Facebook links for uncontroversial statements about...

Goes against multiple P&Gs otherwise, including WP:DUE, WP:PROMO and WP:ABOUTSELF ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 21:54, 31 July 2026 (UTC) Note for closer...

Tarawa herself, they shouldn't be used in the article except in limited aboutself uses, let alone go to notability. Ref 5, supplied piece from the festival...

libelous like that, and also the video statement doesn’t seem to violate WP:ABOUTSELF so the deletion on those grounds seems unwarranted (Although I agree that...

"Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves" (same as WP:ABOUTSELF), but I feel it should obviously go to the section "Self-published sources"...

guess it is written by herself (if it isn't, it would run afoul of WP:ABOUTSELF). One is a Facebook post. When I try to access it it says the access is...

May 2025 (UTC) Keep - The sources are definitely not self published (WP:ABOUTSELF). Any source that begins with ISBN, ISSN or DOI is not self published...

sources on the article are: An essay by Kaufmann, used for uncontroversial ABOUTSELF An Indian newspaper from 2008, giving Kaufmann a bare mention in a list...

site is clearly allowed as a source on its own activities, as per WP:ABOUTSELF. I have told him this in the edit summaries, in the article talk, and...

to publish. It satisfies WP:ABOUTSELF. Humanengr (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2019 (UTC) It passes the RS cliff via ABOUTSELF - however is probably UNDUE as...

sources are the AllHipHop article and these sources, which both pass WP:ABOUTSELF but ultimately don't count towards notability IMO; otherwise, I don't...

of self-published sources found in the article are appropriate per WP:ABOUTSELF. There are concerns about excessive detail which IMO are valid, but those...

WP:USERGENERATED, and WP:SELFPUB". Or would it in fact have been okay per WP:ABOUTSELF even if we didn't have the secondary source? Dmcq (talk) 19:39, 14 August...

analysis of their works and then augmenting basic facts as allowed by WP:ABOUTSELF. A single notable work would be WP:BIO1E except in cases where it is,...

is also not very pertinent as a reason to delete. I agree that per WP:ABOUTSELF we can say in the New York Times article that they describe themselves...

April 2026 (UTC) The point is not whether an ABOUTSELF source is required in this case, but whether an ABOUTSELF source would ever be required. Quite clearly...

use of tweets is fine for attributed statements of opinion or per WP:ABOUTSELF. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 13:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)...

used to describe his own views, which is exempt from the SPS rule per WP:ABOUTSELF. I ask AQFK to concede that his accusations of "BLP" violations made in...

(talk) 09:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Strong keep. Meets WP:N. Under WP:ABOUTSELF it is acceptable as a source for facts under WP:V. The references mentioned...

example CNN:s YT channel is as reliable as CNN elswhere. YT can be WP:ABOUTSELF, like Twitter and FB, it depends. See WP:RSPYT. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk)...

Nick-D (talk) 07:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Do you suggest we re-write WP:ABOUTSELF? -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 07:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Keep Notable enough...

books, reviews and radio broadcasts that serve a general audience. WP:ABOUTSELF applies to some of the citations: self-published sources may be used as...

an extensive enough program to be a keep. This is in keeping with WP:ABOUTSELF policy on Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves...

primary and autobiographical ones. There's a bit more detail over at WP:ABOUTSELF if you are interested. :) - Bilby (talk) 03:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Hey...

you say that "Somaya Reece is not VH1," what you're describing is WP:ABOUTSELF, not independence, at least not any definition of "independent source"...

in the PhD dissertation he wrote about his own books (to be used as WP:ABOUTSELF of course, not for notability); this piece on library lending has some...

Some of the self published personal details are probably okay per WP:ABOUTSELF, but it's not appropriate for them to dominate the article's sourcing...

independent or reliable. I would not even recommend such a source for ABOUTSELF claims, as the ad on the whole is self-serving, but it's also not even...

however, several of these biographical details come from appropriate WP:ABOUTSELF sourcing, the subject's own materials widely used in promoting his career...

applying to self-published claims by article subjects are covered at WP:ABOUTSELF. I would clarify though, are those screenshots of the disappearing stories...

those 4 paragraphs like the photo are copyright Studley) they are WP:ABOUTSELF WP:UGC "with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as...

individual works altogether?) Wriphe (talk) 00:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC) sometime but not always, see WP:ABOUTSELF. QiuLiming1 (talk) 00:43, 13 July 2022 (UTC)...

retracted your claim o be the "59th descendant of Jesus" may be to use WP:ABOUTSELF. And given some sources, this page might allow you to explain that you...

the ABOUTSELF defence is relevant. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC) Great, and thanks for that and pointing me toward WP:ABOUTSELF. Appreciated...

Looking at the page, the references currently listed are almost entirely WP:ABOUTSELF citations, which pose significant and obvious conflict of interest problems...

non-english language sources), as for the second, it's probably OK under aboutself, as long as other sources corroborate that the Miiverse Miiting happened...

reporting on the names of its own governing body would usually fall under WP:ABOUTSELF: the claim isn't exceptional or surprising, we would expect a university...

collection of republished press releases, so it cannot be used except for WP:ABOUTSELF content. Most of the others seem like commercial websites and thus generally...

subject's youtube channel can be used in limited ways described by WP:ABOUTSELF. Victor Schmidt (talk) 09:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC) The draft contains no...

(talk) 20:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC) The edit was a clear violation of WP:ABOUTSELF/WP:SELFPUB. Crazy to think that this was an appropriate edit. I'd invite...

customer. To your question about the film's production company, Read WP:ABOUTSELF. It can be used to cite facts not in contention, but it does nothing to...

claiming that this is "promotional" material. It would seem to me that WP:ABOUTSELF applies to an org's membership numbers. Oftentimes, the organization itself...

of first party sources since the use seems to conflict with #5 of WP:ABOUTSELF. Afro (Nice Beaver) 07:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Changed the first party...

the camp that it doesn't count because it's primary, non-independent/aboutself, routine (lots of players get Q&A interviews in the local media when they...

statement about a third party (and therefore never covered by WP:SPS or WP:ABOUTSELF.) Such statements always require a high-quality reliable secondary source...

notability, but it could be used (and is used in the article currently) for WP:ABOUTSELF purposes were he notable. However, a WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing...

proposal. This would bring things more in alignment with how we use ABOUTSELF. Per ABOUTSELF we don't take the claims to be factual (Mr Patel is for equal rights...

03:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC) No, that's not correct, you're confusing WP:ABOUTSELF with WP:SECONDARY. A secondary source is a source that's based on other...

And for using Forbes, LinkedIn and YEC, I used these sources as per WP:ABOUTSELF because he is a member of these organizations. Hissamelriys (talk) 06:19...

Notability standards, only the core Verifiability policy. For example , WP:ABOUTSELF (part of WP:V) specifies that sources published by an article's subject...

article using mostly the third-party sources and perhaps a little bit of WP:ABOUTSELF sources. 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:D480:5FD5:9310:3BA4 (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2023...

stuff originates from club websites, needs to be seriously cut per WP:ABOUTSELF. A WP-article about AFC Crewe is supposed to be a summary of independent...

Herald Sun article is an interview with Hastie and so I think it passes WP:ABOUTSELF. TarnishedPathtalk 12:12, 24 July 2026 (UTC) "media criticism about his...

searches. The edit summary which removed these articles was "WP:VANISPAM, WP:ABOUTSELF" which is misleading as some of the sources and content were critical...

2022 (UTC) It's primary, so you can use it without attribution for WP:ABOUTSELF, and anything that might be self serving of contentious should be attributed...

(Talk to me | See what I have done) 01:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC) See WP:ABOUTSELF. "unduly self serving" is often black and white, but there's grey area...

Therefore, his recent work can at best be used within the limits of WP:ABOUTSELF, provided that the specific claim is WP:DUE. Any editor is free to launch...

with adding a section on techniques based on Smith (1983) and the WP:ABOUTSELF sources Mittring (2004) and Lemaire and Rousseaux (2009). Preimage (talk)...

a time capsule." Wikipedian Hayden Schiff replied to her that, per WP:ABOUTSELF, her tweet should be sufficient. But Mandel had been (mis-)informed by...

their own sources for facts about what is in them, in the spirit of WP:ABOUTSELF, but we need independent reliable sources to show that they are notable...

requirements seen at restrictions on using self-published sources" (WP:ABOUTSELF) Back to what you say about needing 3-5 sources (which is contradicted...

19:40, 28 May 2014 (UTC) In certain circumstances Wikipedia does allow WP:ABOUTSELF. Him editing his own article is very similar. I will advise him on his...

addition; it would certainly be easy to verify the recording claim through ABOUTSELF, but not the rest; wondering if a modernised recordings section would...

Excelencia#Former Members section which I could not find any WP:RS or sufficient WP:ABOUTSELF. If Extraordinary Writ or Hatman31 can find any refs to support this section...

used as a reference here is for her birthday, which is viable per WP:ABOUTSELF. benǝʇᴉɯ 16:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

pushing. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NNC - and an encyclopedic article requires more than just a criticism...

Some of the content that is not independent is in compliance with WP:ABOUTSELF and can be appropriately kept. Others should be weeded out as inappropriate...

even if there are reliable sources describing them as such, thanks to WP:ABOUTSELF. And yet, in this specific case, we have an English language internal...

connected to AFC Crewe talking about it. Such sources can have some WP:ABOUTSELF use, but they don't help the case for WP:N. I hope you'll be able to make...

referencing Fjordman's self-published text extensively, in violation of WP:ABOUTSELF.  Cs32en Talk to me  13:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC) I think the RSs shows that...

purposes. The Twitter announcement of his retirement is permissible per ABOUTSELF (especially since it's verified), but not "high-quality", so a better...

expressed in this AfD, including removing some content related to WP:ABOUTSELF, WP:ORIGINAL, WP:VERIFY etc. I went over every section except the Dashkin...

(RSP entry) are often used for uncontroversial self-descriptions (WP:ABOUTSELF). When there are enough valid uses of these sources, the inconvenience...

attributed opinions and views of the films subjects, per WP:RSSELF and WP:ABOUTSELF, as long as those claims are not contentious. As far as I can see from...

accordingly as well. The LinkedIn sources were used as part of the WP:ABOUTSELF policy under which self-published sources from the subject may be used...

strictly a reliability issue per se, but is there any reason to use an ABOUTSELF source instead of a secondary source here? Can't find a secondary source...

usable for attributed statements from Hezbollah under the conditions of WP:ABOUTSELF. It may also be usable for non-controversial topics on Lebanese culture...

has previously been published by reliable third-party publications", WP:ABOUTSELF, "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

will be respected. Devilmanozzy (talk) 22:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF trumps WP:UGC "sources". The end.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  22:35...

title=Template_talk%3APrimary_sources&diff=630909608&oldid=591067565#WP:ABOUTSELF.2FWP:BLPSELFPUB_caveat I oppose policies being updated without consensus...

278 § Avatar317 removing WP:ABOUTSELF material My reading of the RSN discussion was that the use of ABOUTSELF material is excessive and that the...

missing. The ABOUTSELF is important also because regardless of the notability question, there's no issue with expanding an article with ABOUTSELF claims. --Habst...

by information gleaned from OpEdNEws site itself under the policies WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NEWSBLOG. Again, thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:38, 7 May 2014...

December 2011 (UTC) Keep - Formspring is only used as a source, per WP:ABOUTSELF. Other than some editors failing to read the sources, this article has...

to reference the article). This was carried out in accordance with WP:ABOUTSELF. In summary, the article in my opinion passes both WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV...

Jonathan A Jones (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Haven't heard of WP:ABOUTSELF, Jonathan? You deny someone is a climate change denier when they tweet...

experts and the citations are being used in a way where they satisfy ABOUTSELF. (The citations are to sentences that describe the cross-site leak exploits...

been written by the subject himself. They might be allowable within WP:ABOUTSELF (except item 5 stipulates "the article is not based primarily on such...

biographical details like his birthday are fine to source to him under WP:ABOUTSELF and will not be excessive once the fluff is removed. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 15:28...

which I found a third-party source, and which could be defended as WP:ABOUTSELF) and this where I was able to find numerous alternative reliable sources...

distinguishing it from editorial reporting; resulting in frequent WP:ABOUTSELF concerns and a lack of reliable editorial oversight. [39] Musician Guide...

the Dictionary of National Biography).) but to treat the entry per WP:ABOUTSELF If Wikipedia can't distinguish between the two then I think WP:IAR applies...

uses in WP:ABOUTSELF. The articles on Michael Flynn or Slavoj Žižek are examples of RT being used in a manner consistent with WP:ABOUTSELF. As a side...

socialist authors", so it is definitely a biased source bordering on ABOUTSELF. The book mentions workingmens' parties of various countries in great...

would just use the better source. I would use attributed quotes per WP:ABOUTSELF but otherwise I would never use such a site for speaking in Wikipedia's...

previously been published by reliable third-party publications") and WP:ABOUTSELF (which says: "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources...

continuously insisting youtube is never a reliable source, even for WP:ABOUTSELF. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catch_%28Allie_X_song%29&...

ALPRS that permits the use of ABOUTSELF. If ALPRS overrides normal RS, why wouldn't it override it subclause ABOUTSELF? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...

Some editors seem rather zealous about third-party sources despite WP:ABOUTSELF indicating acceptance of first person (interviews, etc.) as minor sources...

was removed. Kim Dent-Brown made the following statement, " I think WP:ABOUTSELF gives us a little freedom of manoeuvre here. It says: Self-published and...

before"—removed the following content (which I had contributed, sourced per WP:ABOUTSELF, on 21 February 2020) from O'Brien's BLP relating to WikiLeaks founder...

for good. Does anyone else remember the Phillip Roth matter? While WP:ABOUTSELF covers self-disclosed material, if there is some evidence to the contrary...

we'd be wise to steer clear of the Golden Antlers about page even for WP:ABOUTSELF info haha. I've swapped to this feature from Scripps, which has the most...

World Socialist Website - Reconsideration of its use outside of WP:SPS/WP:ABOUTSELF Breakpoint / Colson Center / breakpoint.org / colsoncenter.org Earshot...

his birth date with a summary that "Baio in not reliable" (despite WP:ABOUTSELF, and your own acknowledgement six minutes later on the talkpage that a...

is. I only evaluated his edits in relation to WP:V in general and WP:ABOUTSELF. Tijfo098 (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC) He does seem to care a fair...

I now recognize that I had a much more liberal interpretation of WP:ABOUTSELF than the community and I continued to argue after it was clear the consensus...

--WaltCip (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC) Oppose / content dispute per WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:ELMAYBE. An external link may be justified if it contains valuable...

doesn't use the diacritics, is a better source for her as a BLP, per WP:ABOUTSELF policy) was way back in May 2012. That article has has five RMs and one...

on the liner notes) and the photo showed it, I'd say it is ok under WP:ABOUTSELF since that particular info is not promotional etc. 4a) As a separate matter...

Institute for Research Middle Eastern Policy, it would fail criteria #2 of WP:ABOUTSELF. To be honest, self-published sources should be avoided, especially for...

paper is not same as "that's what he worked on", and isn't covered by WP:ABOUTSELF. I know it's not WP:CLEANUP, however the sheer number of problems with...

work and speaking to its notability. As I understand the rules here WP:ABOUTSELF, the sources you find unreliable are actually in the category of Questionable...

label him a conservative Chodakiewicz in tysol (op-ed by Chodakiewicz, WP:ABOUTSELF would apply): (google translate): "After my publications, the followers...

2022 (UTC) I can replace it, but in this case it is reliable (per WP:ABOUTSELF). Other than that, the MTV News issue is similar to my comment regarding...

page in question? As to the rest while I agree they relied to much of WP:ABOUTSELF in this situation I don't think it goes far enough to warrant a topic...

these sources on numerous grounds. They are not WP:RS Violate WP:BLP WP:ABOUTSELF - These sources make claims about Jung's biography which are contested...

extreme, going so far as to remove persondata and data that is okay per WP:ABOUTSELF. [97] Misleading edit summaries to axe large amounts of content. [98]...

complain). Also, in content, a user can clearly argue about how much WP:ABOUTSELF is allowed - also, the deletion did not go anywhere and the user says...

(1) is a WP:PRIMARY source usable only within the narrow confines of WP:ABOUTSELF but not suitable for satisfying WP:NBASIC, and (2) clearly does not satisfy...

faked might be DUE to mention in a bio article about that author (per WP:ABOUTSELF)… but completely UNDUE to mention in our articles on the Apollo 11 mission...

written by the subject of a different article. Those are certainly valid ABOUTSELF links. The site is used as a refernce for game concepts, rules, stuff...

revision 543682096 by Mitredestructor2 (talk) Fails criteria #4 at WP:ABOUTSELF; plus you're WP:EDITWARRING") 20:03, 12 March 2013 Edit war warning NonRS...

saying, "Please see WP:ABOUTSELF information at http://www.facebook.com/someName/somePageID ... but please leave this aboutself-link HIDDEN like it is...

conclusion absolutely doesn't, and says - without qualification other than WP:ABOUTSELF - that its use it is actively discouraged. But if you can quote the actual...

should be enough to satisfy verifiability (although not notability) per WP:ABOUTSELF. And WP:BURDEN has literally nothing to do with templates, so I don't...

that I did not post With regards to #88 and #89 they are sourced per WP:ABOUTSELF and come from Corbyn's website. I cannot understand how #90 would need...

side(s). AiM may or may not be authoritative about anything, but per WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:PRIMARY they are the authoritative source for what their own opinion...

(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ABOUTSELF Darkstar1st (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Automated comment: This...

Tweets, introduced in the John Bickley article were Tweets by him, per WP:ABOUTSELF. However, they have been removed. I accepted their removal. That is a...

and certainly didn't mean to out anyone here, merely to provide a WP:ABOUTSELF link to an article. The link, to a page which contains no outing information...

cautious to closely paraphrase or literally quote the WP:PRIMARY, WP:ABOUTSELF source. -- Yae4 (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC) My behavior is nothing...

81.103.37.86 (talk) 23:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC) (edit conflict)x2 WP:ABOUTSELF says we can use pages from the Vegan Society to describe facts about themselves...

wild and I would never do that. Even if for nothing else theres still WP:ABOUTSELF so its really hard to see a situation in which that would be the right...

perhaps problematic, but arguably allowed and maybe even preferred under WP:ABOUTSELF–the kind of thing, in my view, that is the proper subject for discussion...

these are allowed for simple facts in biographies, as detailed at WP:ABOUTSELF. However, none of that contributes to notability. Mike Turnbull (talk)...

I now recognize that I had a much more liberal interpretation of WP:ABOUTSELF than the community and I continued to argue after it was clear the consensus...

while others are automatically generated. In the former case it's WP:ABOUTSELF, but in the latter case it's unreliable. This google maps page provides...

website, was unreliably sourced and self-sourced. I removed undue WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:PROMO content, aligned the descriptions to the WP:BESTSOURCES available...

room for misinterpretation. We allow press releases and such under WP:ABOUTSELF. You could even use the company's official website for a sentence like...

into place partly due to my liberal interpretation of WP:PRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF sources, perhaps the most important principle I have adopted is immediately...

had a much more liberal interpretation of WP:PRIMARY and especially WP:ABOUTSELF than the community at large. On the three (1, 2, and 3) occasions since...

sources and reliable non-independent sources, specifically including WP:ABOUTSELF sources. These are not unreliable sources, even if he dislikes them. WhatamIdoing...

always citable as opinions." is not true or sufficient. For example, WP:ABOUTSELF says that self published sources, like facebook, can't make contentious...

is used only in the appropriate way for an unreliable source (e.g. WP:ABOUTSELF). Now please log back into your usual account and comment so we know who...

repeating what the subjects say about themselves which falls under WP:ABOUTSELF from a verifiaility standpoint. Again, this content shouldn't be self-sourced...

the section of WP:V about individuals being experts on themselves: WP:ABOUTSELF. There's nothing wrong with saying WP favors self-designation for certain...

whether there was ever a reasonable doubt as to its authenticity (per WP:ABOUTSELF criterion 4), but calling Bilorv a liar over that is going too far. There...

easily. In specific, the celebrity might find it helpful to look at WP:ABOUTSELF. If I was a celebrity who wanted to have my birthdate added to a Wikipedia...

himself. If I'm wrong about that, that's due to me misinterpreting WP:ABOUTSELF, not the desire to "demonize". Similarly, on the Gina Carano talk page...

to it. It does no fact checking. It can't even be acceptable under WP:ABOUTSELF because it's not necessarily the BLP publishing the information (it could...

controversial policy he proposed to combat racism, and significant WP:ABOUTSELF info that can be used to build the article into something more than just...

are in violation of WP:Verifiability. a) Behringer source violates WP:ABOUTSELF because there IS reasonable doubt as to its authenticity as shown in the...

08:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Per the player himself (permissible per WP:ABOUTSELF) - [LinkedIn - he was semi-pro, working as an accountant concurrent with...

using a source in specific contexts according to exceptions such as WP:ABOUTSELF; but if an editor acknowledges that a source is unreliable in the specific...

allowed", they can be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions under WP:ABOUTSELF, even in biographies of living persons. Reliable secondary sources are...

(talk) 07:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC) There are some exceptions to that per WP:ABOUTSELF, but such sources will not help demonstrate notability. 199.208.172.35...

(UTC) Reply. The Barbed Wire piece I believe gets disqualified under WP:ABOUTSELF given the dubious "senior advisor" claim would be material is neither...

Guns is a suitable sources in the article on The Truth About Guns: WP:ABOUTSELF and qualifications. I don't think that any lessons have been learned....

the erroneous claim that doing so is always prohibited except for WP:ABOUTSELF seems imprudent and not narrowly tailored towards preventing disruption...

online. My understanding is that this is acceptable per the criteria at WP:ABOUTSELF. Each of those entries contains a separate citation supporting the notability...

ask this question. It can only in very limited circumstances, see WP:ABOUTSELF. Basically, if you are quoting or paraphrasing something the person says...

news division is unreliable. The whole site can still be used for WP:ABOUTSELF, but not about others, especially politics and science. Because most of...

tag is for.Slatersteven (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC) WP:SPS and WP:ABOUTSELF between them cover just about any situation in which I'd think it logical...

their CV, it shouldn't necessarily be in the WP-article. See also WP:ABOUTSELF. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC) This isn't my...

28 December 2022 (UTC) Falls afoul of the "unduly self-serving" in WP:ABOUTSELF. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC) Agreed...

churnalism on science journalism (COI?) He rejects any edits with links to WP:ABOUTSELF even if they make sense, or even with links to externals sites with whois...

response, Alaexis.--FeralOink (talk) 02:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF specifies that in order to be included: the material [must be] neither...

straightforward in the credits as implied, those should be suitable for an WP:ABOUTSELF primary-source reference. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:15...

established research or some such. I would treat them as any other WP:ABOUTSELF source: reliable only for reprinting the opinions and statements of the...

started a talk page discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:KSI#WP:ABOUTSELF_sourcing_for_fact_in_infobox. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 11:40, 19 September...

of the festival, even if not a source to convey notability, under WP:ABOUTSELF it is acceptable as a source for facts under WP:V. More, a little WP:BEFORE...

non-independent sources never be used is out of the question because of ABOUTSELF. James500 (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC) What do you actually want...

article-subject's control, it also fails WP:ABOUTSELF -- even the subject's facebook page qualifies for WP:ABOUTSELF in some cases, but IMDB is too much of...

should avoid vagueness in the lead when it's possible to do concisely, WP:ABOUTSELF makes the reference fine, and WP:CALC covers the basic addition. {{u|Sdkb}} talk...

club. It's run entirely by fans. I've only ever used them for Wikipedia:ABOUTSELF interviews in the past, since anything else from them is just unreliable...

at. Similar to a personal blog, it *may* be possible to use under WP:ABOUTSELF (although no one so far has cited any cases where it would be useful,...

Project is a factual claim, not an opinion, and in any case fails WP:ABOUTSELF because the description is of a third party on an article (The Lincoln...

thing to hang the statement on. This is a case where I'm not sure WP:ABOUTSELF sources are great, because we need some external measure of whether the...

is acceptable as non-controversial self-published information per WP:ABOUTSELF. The most reliable source about a school's colors is the school itself...

on its outlandish editorials, which should never be used outside of WP:ABOUTSELF regarding its authors. Their factual reporting also has major issues and...

Slatersteven (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC) Per the above, WP:SPS and WP:ABOUTSELF applies to someone's verified twitter account. This seems uncontroversial...

recognized as reliable, for example. Rando web pages don't qualify. WP:ABOUTSELF, the other option for such sources, is even more restrictive (it says...

twitter account belongs to that person", then IMO that "works" for WP:ABOUTSELF purposes. However WP:SPS is quite strict here: "Never use self-published...

that it is perfectly acceptable to source from company websites, per WP:ABOUTSELF. I tried their main site but could not find the current information. If...

remove most of our PAG because they're OR? Or I suppose people could argue ABOUTSELF here. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:14, 24 July 2022 (UTC) It depends on what it...

analysis of their works and then augmenting basic facts as allowed by WP:ABOUTSELF. A single notable work would be WP:BIO1E except in cases where it is,...

heavily on ABOUTSELF sources ends up reading like an advertisement, even if the prose itself is neutral. Hence the 5th prong of WP:ABOUTSELF. --Dr. Fleischman...

"something something WP:ABOUTSELF", even though the subject never said anything like that. How in the freakin' world can WP:ABOUTSELF apply, when the subject...

Moi 22:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Ditto for the tweets Personally, I use WP:ABOUTSELF to craft my judgment on this one. Obviously, if there were better published...

This is a (largely verbatim) regurgitation of this press release; see WP:ABOUTSELF. Moot as clearly non-independent. This is a regurgitation of a press release...

I'm completely wrong here just tell me, but I thought WP:ABOUTSELF would apply here) ABOUTSELF would be fine if the cited content is overall used sparingly...

against using the content of interviews in BLPs. The strictest rule is WP:ABOUTSELF which allows such material. Zerotalk 14:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC) Your a...

non-negotiable. Voceditenore (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC) (edit conflict) WP:ABOUTSELF says, "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources...

approach of attribution is mentioned at WP:RSOPINION, which also links to WP:ABOUTSELF, the rule that social media posts may be used as sources for facts about...

he said (WP:ABOUTSELF #4). But another factor must be considered – what is the subject of his comment? This is needed because ABOUTSELF #2 restricts...

are sometimes (albeit rarely) appropriate to use, for example in an WP:ABOUTSELF manner, and while you could hazard a guess that if the name of the source...

Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. A self-published reference can both pass WP:ABOUTSELF and advocate for genocide. For example, Media of Rwanda contains references...

this document written by the IAC fails WP:SPS, and, specifically, WP:ABOUTSELF. The organization, India Against Corruption (website here, note that midway...

online. My understanding is that this is acceptable per the criteria at WP:ABOUTSELF. Each of those entries contains a separate citation supporting the notability...

of WP:SPS ("run-of-the-mill YouTuber reporting") is appropriate per WP:ABOUTSELF. Ultimately, the the threshold for deletion is intrinsically subjective...

(talk) 17:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC) I think this would be allowed under WP:ABOUTSELF, but reliable secondary sources are still preferred. — Newslinger talk...

Merge. Are we looking at the same sources here? Setting aside the one ABOUTSELF source and the xkcd reference, we have two from right when it happened...

number of entrants and the location, which seems to be covered by WP:ABOUTSELF. I tried to use better sources, where at all possible, in the lead. The...

but self-published sources are allowed for basic information. See WP:ABOUTSELF, to wit "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources...

hypothetically warrant inclusion? I agree that its interviews are usable per WP:ABOUTSELF like most other outlets, but you didn't address my main issue which is...

developer, or whatever fits the scenario. This is all WP:PRIMARYSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF material. It can be used, with caution, but only for certain kinds of...

afaict, but with the museum website it'll make a fine WP:EL. See also WP:ABOUTSELF (about using the museum website as a source). The book looks ok. cyprusinsider...

of first party sources since the use seems to conflict with #5 of WP:ABOUTSELF. Afro (Nice Beaver) 07:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Changed the first party...

organization ~ See WP:ABOUTSELF ✘ No "POINT OF INQUIRY podcast: Dec. 12, 2019" Published by parent organization ~ WP:ABOUTSELF Not going to listen to...

school was founded by the church: in any case, it's WP:PRIMARY and WP:ABOUTSELF. Even then, the mention of the church is trivial. The Sessional Papers...

October 2025 (UTC) Reviewed Special:Permalink/1314778349 Reliability WP:ABOUTSELF sources (Emmy, Peacock) are used appropriately All other sources are generally...

the Daily Mail a usable source of opinions that are not used under WP:ABOUTSELF? — Newslinger talk 12:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC) Nosish I think they are...

ZoeShanks (talk • contribs) 20:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC) @ZoeShanks: See WP:ABOUTSELF. A LinkedIn profile is just what that person says about themselves so...

Yes, I agree that WP:ABOUTSELF still applies in rare cases. If blacklisted, uses of Nairaland that are covered under WP:ABOUTSELF can be added to the spam...

2020 (UTC) As a CCP mouthpiece, it is probably reliable only in an WP:ABOUTSELF stylee for attributed statements about the CCP. As a source of fact, I...

right one. He certainly seems to be notable based on the evidence. Per WP:ABOUTSELF, we do generally allow some autobiographical information to be included...

simpler way, such as "Don't use WP:SPS for WP:BLP content unless it's WP:ABOUTSELF." Levivich 19:21, 15 January 2022 (UTC) ^ This. That's basically what...

well-known professional researcher, or writer. Shortcuts WP:ABOUTSELFWP:ABOUTSELF WP:SELFPUBWP:SELFPUB WP:TWITTERWP:TWITTER WP:SOCIALMEDIAWP:SOCIALMEDIA...

php/topic,49846.0.html Koozali Foundation announcement 2013 here are some WP:ABOUTSELF non independant sources: - http://distro.ibiblio.org/smeserver/contri...

being used for occasional attributed statements from Kernaghan, so WP:ABOUTSELF should apply. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:02, 15 August 2025 (UTC) "speculative...

MJ's has reliably described the PU source videos. To avoid PROFINGE and ABOUTSELF issues I would suggest removal of the specific MJ summaries. The questionable...

(source numbers are for revision [1]): Sources 2,3,4,5,12,13,14 are WP:ABOUTSELF Sources 1,8 are from Steve Bannon (as an interview/podcast respectively)...

should allow exceptions for WP:BLPs (per MOS:IDENTITY, WP:SPNC, and WP:ABOUTSELF) who have affirmatively stated that they use the comma, provided that...

sourced to the program itself. This would be a textbook violation of WP:ABOUTSELF that requires that the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an...

Martin's controversial views to be presented from his own POV and claims (WP:ABOUTSELF), when WP relies on reliable independent sources instead (not the claims...

should presumably be rare but might sometimes be appropriate under WP:ABOUTSELF. —Granger (talk · contribs) 20:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC) B/C/D. There...

territory of Original Research and Synthesis, and we can't even include ABOUTSELF in this biography. The nominally "self statements" are supplied by someone...

circumstances (similar to how even the Daily Mail can be cited in an WP:ABOUTSELF fashion), but otherwise we should only be citing the content of the stories...

distinct possibility, as the current approach is much indebted to WP:ABOUTSELF --Francis Schonken (talk) 07:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Dear policy experts:...

unreliable in most situations, there are plenty of valid uses per WP:ABOUTSELF. Outright banning these sources contradicts policy and is unnecessary...

source for who’s the CEO for PragerU, I tried disputing this using wp:ABOUTSELF and telling him it’s used as the source itself but he told me I have no...

itself ~ WP:ABOUTSELF Irrelevant given it's non-independent ✘ No London Mint Office LMO's support page is not independent of itself ~ WP:ABOUTSELF Irrelevant...

the quote is relevant and we're not claiming their contents as fact. WP:ABOUTSELF doesn't address such a thing specifically yet. Without revealing my personal...

Ludwig von Mises Institute as a cult. Gene-callahan.blogspot.com fails WP:ABOUTSELF. The source is unreliable for use within Wikipedia. -- Jreferee (talk)...

definition not WP:INDY and is not a reliable source for anything but WP:ABOUTSELF claims (e.g. what they say their breed standard is, how many cats are...

controversial or exceptional claims. You can read more about this at WP:ABOUTSELF. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Regarding upcoming release...

) 14:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC) Ultimately this is a MOS:IDENTITY and WP:ABOUTSELF matter. If atheists themselves say they have no religion and object to...

issues w/ copyright, etc.) but subject to BLP, especially BLPSPS and ABOUTSELF. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC) @BigDwiki:...

November 2022 (UTC) There is also a more specific RfC, on the use of ABOUTSELF sources for rebuttals/denials here. Additional input would be helpful...

making an aboutself statement about his own motive for completing a communications degree. For 4, I'm arguing that Jericho is making an aboutself statement...

worthless as there is nothing an anonymous source is going to say WP:ABOUTSELF, and everything else they would publish falls under WP:EXCEPTIONAL claims...

of OR and UNDUE with the use of primary sources, per the WP:SPS and WP:ABOUTSELF sections of WP:Verifiability, in the case of Icke, the only time an Icke...

Wikipedians, we may actually remove some of this personal detail per WP:ABOUTSELF, but atm I'm taking the WP:BLPKIND route. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:17...

in Questionable and self-published sources, see WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF in particular. As an encyclopedia we are interested in documenting how...

stats are), isn't that something we accept as a reliable source per WP:ABOUTSELF? Corporate profits are overstated and manipulated but we still provide...

details, I think you're probably right, possibly it could have some WP:ABOUTSELF use, but you can't use it to argue WP:GNG. Also, your username seems to...

(push to talk) 23:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC) The social media sources are WP:ABOUTSELF, most appropriate thing we could use for single designation in absence...

shouldn't be here. ABOUTSELF is still fine. Void if removed (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC) That isn't true at all. And ABOUTSELF trumps all, it's...

diffs, not VM's assertions) Chodakiewicz discussed in June 2018 AE. WP:ABOUTSELF situation. Wildstein: WikiArticle Gontarczyk: sources further up in thread...

social network for grass-roots film discussion"), like reddit (see WP:ABOUTSELF); we've already been through Horse Nation ("an obscure publication about...

get away with using interviews as a primary sources (in the vein of WP:ABOUTSELF) for what the interviewees say but probably not for anything else, and...

(talk) 15:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC) @Elemimele,that looks ok to me per WP:ABOUTSELF. If she wrote, "btw, I'm married", that'd be fine too (but per same policy...

deletion. Generally though, see WP:ABOUTSELF. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Thanks, WP:ABOUTSELF is useful. I've really been struggling...

to "[subject] received media attention", and then it's fine due to WP:ABOUTSELF. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC) Thanks, I was hoping for...

So we're not talking about being wikivoyage here. Furthermore see WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:PRIMARY... the first link I gave satisfies both on top of core...

unsure about Boston Common (ref 25) This is an interview so I guess WP:ABOUTSELF applies? The person credited as the author also seems to have contributed...

Musk directly controls it as CEO and majority owner. I would apply WP:ABOUTSELF, with specific attribution to the Musk Twitter account and taking particular...

Yarros criticized Lum. Lum 1888 is used a single time for a basic WP:ABOUTSELF for which political philosophy he described himself by; people can generally...

subject is speaking only for themselves and only about themselves (see WP:ABOUTSELF). --Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC) delete First...

self-written or staff-written for a Radio City presenter Maybe as a WP:ABOUTSELF? i suppose so ✘ No http://www.key103.co.uk/on-air/station-schedule/ sure...

source "retired" to (per our WP:BLP rules). In this particular case, a WP:ABOUTSELF source like your Facebook (it has the blue checkmark) would work, so if...

self-published Mixcloud link is only a good source in rare cases defined by WP:ABOUTSELF. If Scrufizzer used social media to say he likes cheese sandwiches, we...

(UTC) No I brought your indiscriminate removal of sources, including ABOUTSELF links and sources not Counterpunch but removed because you are editing...

text from WP does not "poison" it as a source for other facts.) See WP:ABOUTSELF for a guide to when it is appropriate to cite the subject's own bio. (It...

Read that through many times... it is you who seem to be ignoring WP:ABOUTSELF stipulations on Questionable sources. Being mentioned in Vogue demonstrates...

'official' blog rather than via his wikipedia username of course -- see WP:ABOUTSELF, although of course once again (as with the 2008 blog-reviews) we have...

support of article content as long as it's done so in accordance with WP:ABOUTSELF or WP:BLPSELFPUB, but it would be considered a WP:PRIMARY source and you...

Ruslik_Zero 12:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC) @Netanya9 Generally not, see WP:ABOUTSELF. The default WP-attitude is "If no independent WP:RS bothered to write...

published source, but affiliated with the party and so may qualify under WP:ABOUTSELF ✘ No "American Party of Labor (U.S.)" It's a self published blog that...

2020 (UTC) Hello, Jiffy.morton and welcome to the Teahosue. As per WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:SELFPUB, such self-published sources can be cited for non-controversial...

doubt that Sosa really wrote that book? This would be allowed under WP:ABOUTSELF, unless the claim is considered exceptional by reputable entities. Think...

2021 (UTC) Per policy at WP:V, deprecated sources can be used for WP:ABOUTSELF statements. BilledMammal (talk) 11:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC) I agree...

12 July 2019 (UTC) An interview in a major newspapers is not WP:ABOUTSELF. ABOUTSELF refers to self-published and questionable sources - not one of the...

–dlthewave ☎ 13:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC) I think this is okay under WP:ABOUTSELF, since Monckton is the author of the column, and the source is only being...

give background on the formation of the website and could be used per WP:ABOUTSELF. Location (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC) The standard textbook used...

to folks upon request. Waggie (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC) WP:ABOUTSELF. --Ronz (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC) So what? We know that's a...

yet to find chapter-and-verse WP policy; the closest I could find is WP:ABOUTSELF, which isn't really applicable. —Comments or suggestions?   ~Thanks, ~E:71...

g. numbers of schools, content of the curriculum, etc.), in line with ABOUTSELF. A currently disputed source, as a concrete example, is: Carlo Willmann...

particular case, a statement by Jimbo on his usertalk could qualify as a WP:ABOUTSELF source. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC) I would like...

to Woodroar's advice: We have to be careful with the WP:ABOUTSELF characterization. WP:ABOUTSELF is only applicable to Roger Arrick writing about what he...

the sort of stuff WP:ABOUTSELF is fine with) and their personal experience within the detrans community (again, see WP:ABOUTSELF). But none of this but...

we believe them. That's not the "unduly self serving" material that WP:ABOUTSELF warns us about. --GRuban (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Strong keep...

03:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC) No, that's not correct, you're confusing WP:ABOUTSELF with WP:SECONDARY. A secondary source is a source that's based on other...

- Flexman (talk) 08:30, 14 July 2022 (UTC) On your first point, a WP:ABOUTSELF source, if available, could work. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:23, 14...

upload them to googledrive or something like that, see WP:RS. Per WP:ABOUTSELF you can, to a limited extent, use something like the university's official...

Agreed if the interview contains material that's relevant and due then WP:ABOUTSELF applies, regadless of the publication(unless belief the publication made...

not a reliable source that I can see but that might be okay under WP:ABOUTSELF but really I think. Really though what's the problem about waiting a day...

used for basic, uncontroversial information about that subject. See WP:ABOUTSELF. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Also, a source that...

subject of an article can be used in a limited set of situations, see WP:ABOUTSELF for the details. 192.76.8.94 (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC) This is...

other Chinese national organizations & a magazine), so it's more of an WP:ABOUTSELF source. The second is a local newspaper for Changxing County. They're...

to the sun except those used in a small number of situations (like WP:ABOUTSELF, see this search for the last 20 [1]), it is highly discouraged as a reference...

Pakistani education and this source is credible. You might want to read WP:ABOUTSELF for a source's credibility on them selves (which is the worst case of...

reliable source for the truth of that stance. It is not. It is just a WP:ABOUTSELF-reliable source that the publication's editorial viewpoint is that viewpoint...

sources, and our article is replete with WP:ABOUTSELF references. It was created in 2011[46] with three ABOUTSELF references, presumably with the intention...

begin with. The real issues hasn't been simply WP:ABOUTSELF as a specific instance (is this site ABOUTSELF, yes/no)but more that they were introducing an...

published source for this kind of non-controversial information under WP:ABOUTSELF, so if your husband includes a "Biography" section on his personal web...

Nick-D (talk) 07:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Do you suggest we re-write WP:ABOUTSELF? -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 07:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC) Keep Notable enough...

libertarian party" which fully meets the opening sentence of WP:ABOUTSELF". WP:ABOUTSELF actually says "Self-published and questionable sources may be used...

and YouTube host". But in this case, it is merely being used as an WP:ABOUTSELF source, for confirming that TDW did, indeed, make that statement. The...

independent sources, when possible, is an expectation at the FAC level. WP:ABOUTSELF says that self-published sources even by non-experts "may be used as sources...

policy Verifiability has a section that can be reached at the shortcut WP:ABOUTSELF. Here is a quote: "Self-published and questionable sources may be used...

diffs new to old (there are other examples): 1) an AE filing 2) re WP ABOUTSELF 3) Alert (twice!) 4) Citation style Selfstudier (talk) 15:45, 12 January...

refereed journal process make this piece count as WP:RS rather than as WP:ABOUTSELF, despite one of the co-authors being Tompos of NTA. That said, I don't...

subject of a Wikipedia article can sometimes be used as explained in WP:ABOUTSELF, but there are limitations as to how it may be used and in general WP:SECONDARY...

that there is 9/20 YouTube sources isn't an issue; that's why we have WP:ABOUTSELF (and further, used in line with WP:PST). Note to the nom: bludgeoning...

12 July 2020 (UTC) Delete It's been reported both in WP:RS [1] and WP:ABOUTSELF sources like GNews [https://gnews.org/zh-hant/234991/] that Guo accused...

an interview, and I am strictly using Robinson's words, so I think WP:ABOUTSELF etc. applies here. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)...

business and status in the community. I think that this acceptable under WP:ABOUTSELF, especially given that the books cited were published by a major university...

retracted your claim o be the "59th descendant of Jesus" may be to use WP:ABOUTSELF. And given some sources, this page might allow you to explain that you...

inconclusive discussion ensued. Jul 2018 The conflict between deadnaming and ABOUTSELF, versus VERIFIABILITY and previous RfCs WT:BLP Discussed the sourcing...

(talk)/(contrib) 14:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC) @ETMonster A little, yes. See WP:ABOUTSELF. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC) can u pls tell me...

convince Bilby of my idea to add {{Cite court}}. I then consider using WP:ABOUTSELF for the plea of no contest, but then, on further reflection, I decide:...

use Sun for ABOUTSELF or whatever. I suspect one reason why this has never been resolved is because it's so rare it comes up because ABOUTSELF is already...

Notability standards, only the core Verifiability policy. For example , WP:ABOUTSELF (part of WP:V) specifies that sources published by an article's subject...

failed to do so and the article was almost exclusively based on misused WP:ABOUTSELF (per 1, and obviously 5) up until JzG's first pass in October 2020, and...

also [10][11], which per WP:SCHOLARSHIP can count as WP:RS (not mere WP:ABOUTSELF) despite having Braun listed as an author, since the publication-system...

17:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC) To add on, it’s probably useable in an WP:ABOUTSELF context for its owners and for the opinions of those who blog on the website...

example, our uses for Breitbart as a source are essentially limited to WP:ABOUTSELF, and the sources in question are not about Breitbart. Similarly, the Quinn...

these sorts of self-published sources under the criteria outlined at WP:ABOUTSELF: namely, for uncontroversial self-description. For instance, we could...

.. 05:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC) See WP:INTERVIEW, WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:ABOUTSELF for more information on citing interviews as a source and whether they...

22:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC) @Toofllab: Only in a limited way. See WP:ABOUTSELF RudolfRed (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC) fixed the link. RudolfRed...

(UTC) There can be some legitimate uses of WND as a source, eg per WP:ABOUTSELF or when an article they have published has been part of a controversy...

an issue for a BLP, with the bulk of content sourced to videos. Per WP:ABOUTSELF "Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information...

misreading of WP:ABOUTSELF on your part. The concern over misinterpretation is irrelevant to this particular detail: it's not part of WP:ABOUTSELF, but a general...

WP:BLOGS, the section immediately below that one, at the shortcut WP:ABOUTSELF and please also note Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:BOLD, revert...

typically, so I'd guess it's likely suitable only for supporting WP:ABOUTSELF material. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 00:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC) Sure thing. (https://soundcloud...

There is, 99.4% of the time, only local coverage (and sometimes only WP:ABOUTSELF coverage available online). I see mall-articles as serving a similar function:...

to be used very carefully as explained in WP:BLPSELFPUB, WP:BLPSPS, WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:SELFPUB. It's better to look for articles, books, etc. written...

possibly not as blog-ish wienermodels - not independent, might have WP:ABOUTSELF use, but no help for this discussion imago-images - webshop, doesn't help...

official webpage with some bio-info, you can use that a little per WP:ABOUTSELF, but you can't cite "he told me so". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:02,...

CityBreakingDown: Servir ao Povo de Todo Coração can be used in the article (see WP:ABOUTSELF), but it does not count when measuring notability. Notability is measured...

WP:ABOUTSELF, which is an explicit carveout for sources we don't even normally allow as reliable sources in the first place. If the WP:ABOUTSELF exception...

Wargames Journal. No. 4. Rebel Publishing. pp. 70–75. Interview. Good for WP:ABOUTSELF, but usually not considered independent. See the essay WP:INTERVIEW and...

Company websites can be used only in very limited ways, as described at WP:ABOUTSELF, but they do not contribute at all to showing their notability.--Gronk...

remove it when I come across it. There might be some instances where WP:ABOUTSELF could possibly be relevant but even in those cases there's probably better...

documentation on this issue is available at Manual of Style:Identity and WP:Aboutself. I hope this helps. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)...

is unreliable, but it can be considered since it was an interview per WP:ABOUTSELF. What do you think? ROY is WAR Talk! 02:26, 28 February 2025 (UTC)...

being syndicated by news sites are surely not exceptional claims. Per WP:ABOUTSELF, it's fine. —Wingedserif (talk) 13:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC) On Wikipedia...

by information gleaned from OpEdNEws site itself under the policies WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:NEWSBLOG. Again, thanks. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:38, 7 May 2014...

suggesting that her Facebook page is proof of notability. Doesn't WP:ABOUTSELF specifically permit the use of a subject's official Facebook page as a...

UN member nation or a government-in-exile. They can be reliable as WP:ABOUTSELF primary sources, but otherwise one would prefer a secondary source for...

article must not be primarily based on self-published sources. See WP:ABOUTSELF (the five conditions are cumulative). The removal was necessary, and the...

even worth mentioning, but lists like this fall under the sort of WP:ABOUTSELF umbrella; they are not reporting on external facts, they are merely opinions...

article. Would this material involve claims about third parties under WP:ABOUTSELF #2 and therefore be unusable as a source? For that matter, the same content...

Delete: does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST. Most available sourcing is WP:ABOUTSELF. Safehaven86 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2016 (UTC) Delete non-notable artist...

content, not contributor. At a glance, there seems to be a lot of WP:ABOUTSELF refs. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Thank you...

same corp and a minimal list of other ventures (if verifiable per WP:ABOUTSELF) needs to be preserved into the Business Recorder article. --lTopGunl...

used to substantiate claims related to Chossudovsky himself under WP:ABOUTSELF. This makes the CRG equivalent to a primary source for its descriptions...

times in article space per jihadwatch.org  . I that stripping out the non-aboutself references to this source is something that needs doing. Hemiauchenia...

weekend. Talk to SageGreenRider 14:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Comment WP:ABOUTSELF reads in part Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources...

the subject can speak about herself and background filled in through WP:ABOUTSELF without creating notability... THAT is found through verifibly meeting...

supports ABOUTSELF exceptions, which means we will be having multiple long discussions over whether or not an AI image qualifies for inclusion on ABOUTSELF guidelines...