DOSEN PROFIL LENGKAP

themselves reflect negative assumptions about others. Shortcut WP:AOBFWP:AOBF Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form...

closed yet Unscintillating (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, They were...

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Let'srun (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF IronKnuckle (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Notable as a gun control...

resolution, inaccurate colors) and does not deserve to be featured. Also WP:AOBF.--Craigboy (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC) It's not an exact duplicate; you...

February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF How about you give a policy based reason to Keep(if you can find one, I cant...

very first edit by this editor. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Coal-fired power station (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Still, interesting...

it as you see it because maybe you do not see it clearly please read WP:AOBF. When i nominated the article there were no references whatsoever and just...

destroy it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Comment - See WP:AOBF, please desist from such accusations in future. Here is for discussing the...

reply on Marshall's talk page[2] to stick to the content and stop doing WP:AOBF. From what i See this is clear case of Lying by SMarshall opposite to WP:AGF--DBigXray...

people here not only fail to WP:HEAR but also don't mind indulging in blatant WP:AOBFs against community consensus.--DBigXray 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)...

appreciate this clear breach of WP:AOBF". I NEVER made any such claim. To say I did is a clear breach of WP:AOBF. If insider had his way, all controversy...

nominator-specific with the point of voting right at the end. Perhaps WP:AOBF is more direct? – The Grid (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted...

Edison (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC) You missed the whole point of WP:AOBF. Don't think such is common, when some one adds a ref, you've to assume they've...

4 July 2015 (UTC) Human3015, that is pure accusation of bad faith / WP:AOBF, that too not based on action rather inaction of mine towards another sock...

Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Arguments_to_the_person and WP:AOBF. I am not going to reply to your rant above for fear of derailing the discussion...

name change. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC) sed contra WP:AOBF--Jahaza (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Your bad faith is well substantiated...

Once their initial WP:AOBF was addressed, they either should have provided the evidence (sources) asked for, or stopped WP:AOBF. They did neither. —SridYO...

(talk) 07:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC) I shouldn't have to remind you of WP:AOBF. YM has been asked about this before, and failed to deal with the issue....

and of acting in bad faith – the appropriate guidelines were provided (WP:AOBF and WP:NPA), but User:Dervenagas continued to make accusations – User:Dervenagas...

May 2020 (UTC) It is inflammatory to accuse an editor of bad faith. See WP:AOBF. I request you strike that comment and amend it to something civil before...

what needed work here and we are still trying to fix. Also please seeWP:AOBF and lets look at things on a case by case basis and if there are differences...

editors have accused me of acting in of bad faith. Wiki policy states at WP:AOBF "Making accusations of bad faith can be inflammatory and hence these accusations...

to administrators for your disruptive attitude since you're trying to WP:AOBF me now." April 2019 "Clearly, you're a confused user." "As I told you before...

fear their influence will wane if this article is deleted. *eyeroll* See WP:AOBF. My reason for proposing an early close—which is to say, urging User:Nstock...

editwar whether you are discussing on talk or not. You should really read WP:AOBF. None of the diffs I gave were reverts to a sock I think. DBigXray has further...

then following up with evidence for it, is not personal attacks. See WP:AOBF I am still not wrong about you being a sock to Alaskalava and have provided...

into trouble to support your case the way you should do according to WP:AOBF,-as I tried to do-, but you assumed bad faith from the beginning, and this...

toward improving an article...."), WP:Assume good faith (particularly WP:AOBF: "accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the form...

not be enough for sanctions, but I should be enough for a discussion. WP:AOBF "Without clear evidence that the action of another editor is actually in...

19 February 2025 (UTC) @The Bushranger: But that kind of thought is an WP:AOBF assumption, anything can happen, even to those that disagree with the message...

(talk) 14:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC) As referred from WP:Wikiquette_alerts#WP:AOBF_issue_with_IP_address_94.193.135.142. Rapido (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2010...

repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal attack. WP:AOBF. These are basic stuff, didnt think I had to explain how that count as personal...

WP:DISRUPT, WP:HARASS, WP:UNDUE, WP:NPOV, WP:UNSOURCED, WP:CHALLENGE, WP:AOBF, WP:DISCUSSCONSENSUS, WP:NOTCSD, WP:PRESERVE. PLUS ULTRA CARLOS appears keep...

upset about that WP:PA, and instead am going to encourage you to read WP:AOBF. I've also responded to your second post to my talk page, but I (edit conflict)ed...

author Geo Swan had asked from CSD G7[50] started deletion review with WP:AOBF towards Bushranger for closing the discussion and deleting the article. After...

(UTC) I hope the admins will take a note of such propaganda editing, WP:AOBF and block-shopping by Mar4d --DBigXray 09:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC) You seem...

Suddenly after it, he came on my talk page and attacked me for bad faith by WP:AOBF and without any differences. He even called me that I am kneejerk reverting...

dangerously close to finding yourself the subject of a BOOMERANG thread, per WP:AOBF. You're also far too experienced an editor to think you can get anyone banned...

see as consistent before that good faith is assumed. If you're going to WP:AOBF, you need to show diffs that indicate *clear* evidence of bad faith. Nor...

WP:AOBF. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC) The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. This is a bogus...

false accusations either an accusation of bad faith without evidence (WP:AOBF), or an attempt to Wp:SANCTIONGAME by mischaracterizing my actions; neither...

'having some kind of relations to the editors that I pinged' which is WP:AOBF and ad hominem and basically claiming, when they pinged some users for the...

possible with references to reliable sources. See WP:RS. Also see WP:AGF and WP:AOBF. Corinne (talk) 03:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ashoka...

wikihounded and I don't believe I should have to put up with it. From WP:AOBF, "repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal...

discuss edits at all. Repeatedly calling other editors biased? That's not a WP:AOBF violation? Bacondrum (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Bacondrum, Most editors...

actions and my honest motivations, warts and all. I'm tempted to cite WP:AOBF, but generally arguments of this nature aren't a good idea and defeat the...

his block etc) but also towards another editor (WP:ASPERSIONS, WP:NPA, WP:AOBF). And oh please, spare me those nice words and tips. The fact that you're...

Suddenly after it, he came on my talk page and attacked me for bad faith by WP:AOBF and without any differences. He even called me that I am kneejerk reverting...

non-action at another AE thread for you is not proof that Arcane, and again is an AoBF Reply to Further Bad faith Comments by DreamGuy: Your whole block of comments...

the trick. Qworty (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC) You might reread WP:AOBF:). I will assume good faith and give you a half-dozen, since you requested...

Grrahnbahr (talk) 21:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC) @Grrahnbahr, excuse me, but your WP:AOBF interpretation of my comment above demonstrates your ignorance of the subject...

nominations.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, it was...

nothing about bad faith there. If it's to be retargeted, it should be to WP:AOBF. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC) I disagree, that...

across this article, then? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. I also wasn't referring to that vote. Let'srun (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2024...

bias shows a certain degree of predetermination as well. According to WP:AOBF, making unsupported accusations of bad faith can be seen as a personal attack...

it as you see it because maybe you do not see it clearly please read WP:AOBF. When i nominated the article there were no references whatsoever and just...

February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF IronKnuckle (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Notable as a gun control...

closed yet Unscintillating (talk) 17:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, They were...

user, therefore, are not constructive. The continued claims of hoax and WP:AOBF are unhelpful and unneccessary. WP:AGF, WP:BITE--France2007 (talk) 02:18...

May 2020 (UTC) It is inflammatory to accuse an editor of bad faith. See WP:AOBF. I request you strike that comment and amend it to something civil before...

very first edit by this editor. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Coal-fired power station (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Still, interesting...

destroy it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC) Comment - See WP:AOBF, please desist from such accusations in future. Here is for discussing the...

the break down of cooperative editing at this article. Note that per WP:AOBF "repeatedly alleging bad faith motives could be construed as a personal attack...

author Geo Swan had asked from CSD G7[2] started deletion review with WP:AOBF towards Bushranger for closing the discussion and deleting the article. After...

resolution, inaccurate colors) and does not deserve to be featured. Also WP:AOBF.--Craigboy (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2015 (UTC) It's not an exact duplicate; you...

nominator-specific with the point of voting right at the end. Perhaps WP:AOBF is more direct? – The Grid (talk) 18:03, 31 December 2018 (UTC) Relisted...

where I'm not following WP:AGF. I'm happy to provide more evidence per WP:AOBF regarding Ludwigs2. --Ronz (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Support. I...

the trick. Qworty (talk) 22:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC) You might reread WP:AOBF:). I will assume good faith and give you a half-dozen, since you requested...

fear their influence will wane if this article is deleted. *eyeroll* See WP:AOBF. My reason for proposing an early close—which is to say, urging User:Nstock...

Joefromrandb (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:AGF (particularly WP:AOBF), you seem to have a critical misunderstanding of what "bad faith" means...

bias shows a certain degree of predetermination as well. According to WP:AOBF, making unsupported accusations of bad faith can be seen as a personal attack...

way to read the above comment that is consistent with WP:GOODFAITH and WP:AOBF and not having much luck. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)...

is hardly recent. —teb728 t c 00:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC) And please see WP:AOBF. —teb728 t c 06:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC) Also note that search engine optimization...

name change. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 15:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC) sed contra WP:AOBF--Jahaza (talk) 15:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Your bad faith is well substantiated...

user, therefore, are not constructive. The continued claims of hoax and WP:AOBF are unhelpful and unneccessary. WP:AGF, WP:BITE--France2007 (talk) 02:18...

- this is despite a recent previous request for them not to WP:AOBF. Regarding User:Foetusized, edit summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index...

Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Arguments_to_the_person and WP:AOBF. I am not going to reply to your rant above for fear of derailing the discussion...

can say the same about people having I capitalized. again, bad faith. WP:AOBF ″It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without...

February 2013 (UTC) Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF How about you give a policy based reason to Keep(if you can find one, I cant...

reply on Marshall's talk page[3] to stick to the content and stop doing WP:AOBF. From what i See this is clear case of Lying by SMarshall opposite to WP:AGF--DBigXray...

Joefromrandb (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:AGF (particularly WP:AOBF), you seem to have a critical misunderstanding of what "bad faith" means...

responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. While long-time...

attack. Comment by Arbitrators: Comment by parties: Comment by others: WP:AOBF. 173.228.123.193 (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC) 3) TBD Comment by Arbitrators:...

Edison (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC) You missed the whole point of WP:AOBF. Don't think such is common, when some one adds a ref, you've to assume they've...

perceived as a fan of Donald Trump by any stretch of the imagination. Per WP:AOBF "Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the...

nominations.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC) Please Do not WP:AOBF the nominator. All the AFDs were valid at the time of nomination, it was...

way to read the above comment that is consistent with WP:GOODFAITH and WP:AOBF and not having much luck. Holzman-Tweed (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)...

good faith. Pilaz (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Please note that WP:AOBF, as multiple editors have expressed was done by the appellant here, is also...

little strained to suggest Julian is manufacturing the work queues. The AoBF required to label as 'rude' his light hearted reference to a then current...

Resolved  – I would like to thank all those involved for taking such a mature attitude to this matter, particularly Queen, for being prepared to withdraw...

relevant to sock puppetry." Moksha88 (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC) Read WP:AOBF before accusing without proper evidence and directly calling someone as bad...

perceived as a fan of Donald Trump by any stretch of the imagination. Per WP:AOBF "Avoid accusing other editors of bad faith without clear evidence in the...

noidexing the stub and hiding any collected content. In light of this WP:AOBF-driven posting by Justlettersandnumbers, I will be pursuing mediation. Rgds...

aware that I have all right to blank my own page, and I chose to do so after AOBF and personal attacks from various parties. I would also be interested to...

shut people down and toss personal attacks at editors. In violation of WP:AOBF. You and Kzl55 view Wikipedia as a lanching pad for you own nationalistic...

when it can likely never be substantiated, it's just not helpful. see WP:AOBF. --neon white talk 05:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC) As this seems to be a long...

good faith. Pilaz (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC) Please note that WP:AOBF, as multiple editors have expressed was done by the appellant here, is also...

interventions were due to Andy Dingley's attacks on myself. A clear case of WP:AOBF. If someone were to look at edit histories, they would see Andy Dingley's...

not the form. Rd232 talk 02:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC) Relevant policy: WP:AOBF: "It can be seen as a personal attack if bad faith motives are alleged without...

1 September 2019 (UTC) Can you show I am acting in bad faith as per WP:AOBF? And for the record I have no user account but have edited Wikipedia previously...

what needed work here and we are still trying to fix. Also please seeWP:AOBF and lets look at things on a case by case basis and if there are differences...

here not only fail to WP:HEAR but also don't mind indulging in blatant WP:AOBFs against community consensus.--DBigXray 10:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Article...

not mean to be condescending. Grayfell (talk) 02:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC) WP:AOBF Czarking0 (talk) 02:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC) I honestly don't know what that...

against Wikipedia:Assume good faith, and I would point you to look at WP:AOBF by [posting] on their talk page Your edits on the page of Ry Armstrong indicate...

RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. Let'srun (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

accept... but to presume it was done in bad faith calls for support per WP:AOBF.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC) agreed Buffs (talk)...

against other editors without evidence in the form of diffs, see e.g. WP:AOBF. I'm specifically referring to this part of your comment I believe that im...

across this article, then? BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC) WP:AOBF. I also wasn't referring to that vote. Let'srun (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2024...

...

to be civil? Brusquedandelion (talk) 07:58, 24 February 2024 (UTC) See WP:AOBF and WP:AAGF; accusing other editors of incivility or bad faith without clear...

guys; work is not free. This accusation is WP:UNCIVIL, WP:ASPERSIONS, WP:AOBF. And this is not me what I am accusing, with my colleague editor AstrooKai...

attacked me twice during an RFC on a contentious topic, violating Wikipedia:AOBF in doing so, linked to those attacks here where plenty of Admins can see...

interpreting my attempt of clarification as manipulation shows that you are WP:AOBF. Cukrakalnis (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) @Cukrakalnis No really,...

distinct definitions and cannot be randomly mix-and-matched to win/punish. WP:AOBF's important here: Without clear evidence that the action of another editor...