User talk:Yesitis07

Hi There, I'm new editor here on Wikipedia

I'm here to edit and contribute.

Thank You.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Chattopadhyay (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Chattopadhyay (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This article is too short than a dictionary definition that doesn't provide sufficient context. Please review Template:Infobox person for future references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yesitis07! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Chattopadhyay (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No lead roles found.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 22:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Chattopadhyay (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not meeting WP:ACTOR.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you wanted me to talk to you?

I'm salimfadhley from IRC chat. How can I help? --Salimfadhley (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Yesitis07 (talk) 11:22, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you Publish this Article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Debjani_Chattopadhyay ....pls Yesitis07 (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to fix the problems with the article first. Did you look at the comments that the other reviewers put on your draft? --Salimfadhley (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Yesitis07 (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing wrong Yesitis07 (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it ... Please Publish it Yesitis07 (talk) 11:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't add any sources since the article was last declined. I don't think you have understood the reasons why the article was declined. --Salimfadhley (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok what it need ??? Yesitis07 (talk) 11:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.