User talk:Rtkat3

Welcome to my Talk page! If you have any comments or questions, send them here. Below is my archive pages.

Nomination of List of Batman Beyond characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Batman Beyond characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Batman Beyond characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Animalympics, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Doniago. In my defense, the cast list of Animalympics were restructured so that each of the characters not mentioned in the synopsis would have their bios listed and what animal each of them are. Plus, the alligator in question didn't have his competitor that he gave up a medal for listed and the intro listed examples of the characters sounding like certain sports-related characters. Did I leave anything out? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You left out the fact that you can't claim that a character in the film is based on a real individual without citing a source that supports that claim. DonIago (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is my reply to @Doniago. It might take some time to find the worthy sources for the individual base-off, but do you still not want the animal descriptions there? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I had a problem with the rest of it, though I'd recommend you review WP:FILMCAST to ensure you're not bloating that section with non-principal roles. I didn't look too closely because the claims I mentioned above jumped out at me. DonIago (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is my reply to @Doniago. Of course each of the characters did have a part in each of the segments. If you have seen this movie, perhaps they can be separated into their own plot sub-sections at some point. If you haven't seen this movie, I'm sure one of the streaming services might help you out. What do you think? Rtkat3 (talk) 03:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen the film, and your comment makes me concerned that you may feel a need to list every character rather than focusing on the main roles. DonIago (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is my reply to @Doniago. That thing is noted, but all of the characters are voiced by four actors. If you want to restore the bios for those that you would consider major, you can do that. Rtkat3 (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think the voice cast listing as it currently stands is satisfactory in that regard, though I'd be open to seeing it reformatted to add a bit more information, such as sourced content regarding who the characters are based on. You might benefit from asking this at the article's Talk page rather than here. Also, there's no need to @ me every time you reply. This page is on my watchlist. DonIago (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Supergiant (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supergiant (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supergiant (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:33, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Order (comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Order (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Order (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ebony Maw for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebony Maw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony Maw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A fox for you!

Thanks for that revert on List of characters in the Zootopia franchise! I didn't want to risk edit-warring...

Obsidian the Fox 01:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Obsidian the Fox. You're welcome. Now you know. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fabian Stankowicz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fabian Stankowicz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabian Stankowicz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amygdala (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amygdala (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amygdala (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 18:59, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a proper list/discussion about what websites are reliable sources for comic books?

I've been trying to find something like WP:VG/S for the comic book end of things, but I couldn't see anything of that sort actually cooked up. It's made things an interesting ordeal, because while I can argue stuff like AIPT and to a lesser extent Comic Book Resources, I see stuff like Comics Watch cited frequently, which looks more like a fan site than anything. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:18, 13 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is my reply to @Kung Fu Man. I don't know if there is something like that. You should ask any administrators that work in those part of this website. Rtkat3 (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm SleepyRedHair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joker (Jack Napier), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 16:13, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.