I was essentially blocked for making suggestions on Talk Pages. Bold Edits are legal. If I was reverted, I never re-reverted or edit warred. Considerable voting to block me was done before I knew about the "court." The blocking is essentially the act of a bully who cannot even tolerate suggestions on Talk Pages if they are contrary to his POV. For example, he took umbrage at a talk page suggestion that like a divorced man seeking to see his children would be better called a divorced man seeking to see HIS children, while the article said "her" children. He used slur words to attack me, instead of rational argument, and never cited any violation of a Wikipedia rule. (PeacePeace (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

That is not the reason for your block, you are blocked as a result of a community consensus for a site ban, and that could only be overturned by an appeal to the community. Such an appeal would need to address all of the problems raised in the ban discussion, which you have not come close to doing here - just arguing that the ban/block is wrong, and making personal attacks on other editors, will not suffice. If you do decide to make a proper appeal, it would be very unlikely to succeed just two days after the ban was imposed, and you were told to wait at least six months - which would give you time to think about it properly and work out a plausible response to the ban. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]