User talk:MasterQuestionable/6

[Suggestion] Feedback on talk page design

    Original: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:X2ezvev04hktfycc



Inefficient topic management by Archives

    As demonstrated in [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style?oldid=1108339662#Hyphen-Traumas ], topics on the same thing scattering everywhere and probably would be again and again restated (thereby even worse fragmentation).

    Probably my experiments on [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MasterQuestionable ] would be worth referencing. (hierarchical management of aggregated topics)



Rationality of no difference edits (mere commenting in edit history)

    As demonstrated in this example [ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/RV?action=history&offset=20220908072918&limit=3 ]:
    For certain comments: rather than presenting in some remote talk page rendering the context less apparent, directly presenting in the edit history seems more reasonable.

    Also a related problem: latest revision confusion. (caused by such no change edits or edit reverts)
    .
    To address the problem, the distinction of "current" and "effective current" should be made.
    And the timestamp of both "last edited" and "last changed" should be provided.
    .
    Background research on the related implementation limitation: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MasterQuestionable/8 ].



Comments

    PLACEHOLDER

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.