User talk:MappingWiki
bad sources
A courtesy note to let you know tat planespotters.net is not a reliable source - see WP:PLANESPOTTERS. The same is also true of simpleflying.com - WP:SIMPLEFLYING. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:31, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fly Khiva (December 11)

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fly Khiva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- It is not clear which sources do not qualify. Please clarify. MappingWiki (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- The first two references are just single line mentions of the history, and of course one is a primary source (the airline's website). The third, airlinehistory.co.uk is a self-published fansite WP:SPS it is no way a reliable source. ex-yu is also a self-published site - just look at the about-us which states "EX-YU Aviation News is managed singlehandedly, which includes all news content, comment moderation, as well as web design." Cirum is behind a registration-wall so I cannot see what is on that reference. So that's zero references which meet the criteria listed above. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- To be honest, your approach unfairly targets and discriminates against those in developing countries. The number of sources that meet your specific standards in developing countries is approaching zero, as someone who specifically works in these countries.
- Very unfortunate approach. MappingWiki (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
- And just to add I have previously removed both simpleflying.com and planespotters.net from your draft. Neither is reliable and the former has actually be deprecated. See WP:SIMPLEFLYING and WP:PLANESPOTTERS. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- The first two references are just single line mentions of the history, and of course one is a primary source (the airline's website). The third, airlinehistory.co.uk is a self-published fansite WP:SPS it is no way a reliable source. ex-yu is also a self-published site - just look at the about-us which states "EX-YU Aviation News is managed singlehandedly, which includes all news content, comment moderation, as well as web design." Cirum is behind a registration-wall so I cannot see what is on that reference. So that's zero references which meet the criteria listed above. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello, MappingWiki!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MediaKyle (talk) 03:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
|
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.