Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kepler-70, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''' 'The one and only' ''' [[User: Wikiediter2029 |A simple...Wikiediter2029]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wikiediter2029|stalk my edits] (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors are watching the page. Don't be part of the edit war or you may end up being blocked as well. Instead, comment at Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Contaanonimao5bre4o54. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will avoid reverting edits during this discussion. Malgosha 18:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Revert your last edit there as that represents your fourth in 24 hours or else you may be blocked. No matter how justified you think you are, participating in an edit war is disruptive. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I self-reverted my most recent reversion. Malgosha 18:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Someone else can take care of fixing the article. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Malgosha, the External links section is not limited to reliable sources and is the main reason for the YouTube template.

This template is used to create an external link to YouTube in the ==External links== section. It may also be used for other YouTube links such as those in {{External media}}.

WP:EL also specifically mentions YouTube links being used in the External links section as long as the linked video is not in violation of copyright law.

Linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work casts a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as Scribd, WikiLeaks, or YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates copyright.

~2026-32624-48 (talk) 06:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I undid my edit reversion. Malgosha 06:09, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your reversion. Fish bowl (talk) 06:39, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What was the nowiki tag for? Malgosha 06:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOWIKI, to separate the apostrophe from the surrounding italic formatting. Fish bowl (talk) 06:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I already undid my reversion, thank you. Malgosha 06:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start examining edits before reverting them to prevent more mistakes like this. Malgosha 06:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Spam one more warning template on my talk page and I will report you ~2026-29785-65 (talk) 00:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Malgosha, this is not vandalism. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 00:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Malgosha 00:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that removing content from your own talk page is permitted by policy. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 00:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

So it's okay to remove content from your talk page, understood. Malgosha 00:11, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is also not unexplained content removal. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 00:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Malgosha 00:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Does unexplained content removal only apply if the edit summary is very short or empty? Malgosha 00:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it applies whenever the edit summary doesn't explain the content removal. Nonsense edit summaries qualify under unexplained content removal (when the edit removes content) no matter how long they are IMO. But that removal was pretty clearly explained. Maybe it should be reverted anyways, but not as an unexplained content removal. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 00:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look out for edit summaries not explaining the content removal instead of reverting every content removal. Malgosha 00:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mrs Malgosha how are you doing??? I only add possible deity categories that make sense since valkyries are also liminal deities acting as psychopomps they cross the boundaries between life and death. There are many liminal deities that wikipedia has not added yet. ~2026-32695-95 (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I never reverted your edit about liminal deities, the warning was about an unrelated edit. Malgosha 14:23, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you. Ive just want to add all liminal deities in their categories. Could i add some household and tutelary deities in liminal deity category as well??? ~2026-32695-95 (talk) 14:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(it’s in Portuguese Brazilian) ola tudo bem meu nome é Ravi e eu usei fontes sobre a fórmula 1 no Brasil que é o país que mais acomapnha formula 1 e as fontes são dos principais jornais brasileiros. Ribeiroravi1 (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

First, I added sources from Indian governemnt. Second, I explained every edit.

It would be good if editors would keep the focus on the page. The article is about indians in Japan, not about indians in Malaysia, Singapore etc.

There's already another artcile about Japan-india relations.

India–Japan relations - Wikipedia

Everyhting about historical connections etc (if it doesn't concern migrants) should be on that page, not here.

An example of something which doesn't belong on this page as all follows here:

"Some scholars further argue that the sudden introduction of wet-rice agriculture and bronze metallurgy in Japan was catalyzed by these southern maritime routes, which moved technology from the Austroasiatic and Austronesian spheres of influence toward the Ryukyu Islands and Kyushu"

That is about a possible ancient trade route, involving Austroasiatic and Austronesians. Why it's on this page is a mystery. Please be careful not to go out of scope.

Wikipedia:Out of scope - Wikipedia

Also

WP:TOPIC

Stay on topic. Irrelevant material will be removed ~2026-32988-60 (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

. ~2026-32988-60 (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My warning about edit warring applies to you, not this user who reverted your edit one time. See Wikipedia:3RR FlammablePizza (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The substack I cited belongs to Silvia Carenzi, an academic who has published multiple articles related to pos-Assad Syria and has visited the camp in question. The information that I cited was given to her by the director of the camp. Rizamax24 (talk) 23:13, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A blog/web-host isn't a reliable source, please check the sources to make sure they are reliable. Malgosha 23:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]