Is here K7V (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Google Search, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 08:27, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Google Search. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop doing this. The article is about the search engine, and you have already been undone once. See WP:BRD Meters (talk) 02:55, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you restored your changes to Google Search after they were reverted. While Google has integrated AI features, reclassifying the entire service as a "generative AI chatbot" in the lead sentence is a significant change that isn't supported by the broader consensus or the majority of reliable sources. Per the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle, since your edit was challenged, it should be discussed on the talk page rather than repeatedly restored. Changing the primary definition of the subject requires a high level of proof from secondary sources. Could you provide the sources you're using to justify this reclassification? Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 02:55, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Nixleovel I'm the owner comprised by other

claimed Dewa779 (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I cant sign my other account resolusi photos has been changed Dewa779 (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Dewa779 I'm sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 01:24, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]