This user may have limited availability due to real world events.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2025 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:Timothyjosephwood and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

@GreenMeansGo Hi thank you for reviewing and moving the draft to mainspace. I appreciate the quick help and the clean technical move. I’m still learning page processes, so this was very helpful. Thanks again for your time...(: Non-Veg Craft (talk) 15:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey no. Thanks to you. We get so many new folks who want to create an ad for their business or an article on their garage band, it's nice to see someone who's just interested in niche topics. GMG^talk 15:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GreenMeansGo Thanks I really appreciate that. I’m still learning, but I enjoy working on technical and science-based topics, so I’ll keep improving as I go. Thanks again for the support. Non-Veg Craft (talk) 15:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been around for a while. So feel free to stop by if I can be of any help. GMG^talk 15:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GreenMeansGo I was wondering how you have such a well-done user page. do tell if possible Hyper Active child (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly having too much time on my hands and no articles I wanted to work on at the time. GMG^talk 23:12, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2025! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2025. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:Timothyjosephwood and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Iljhgtn (talk) 08:00, 27 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Iljhgtn: To you also. All the best. GMG^talk 12:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year
	Happy New Year! May 2026 be your best year yet! BD2412 T 00:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: You too. All the best. GMG^talk 12:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Is the user User:GreenMeansNoGo you? – LuniZunie_(talk) 20:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Given the fact they were globally locked, I will assume not :p – LuniZunie_(talk) 21:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@LuniZunie: Seems to be merely one my adoring fans. GMG^talk 12:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are making positive changes in the topic of the Russian Federation. Is it possible to add the figure of 235,000,000,000 Euros? : USSR and Russian investments. Confiscated and frozen in the European Union. A few words. Russian-language media are silent. : What investments? Which companies, stores, enterprises? : Where will the frozen income from frozen investments go? Six generations of semi-slaves of the USSR and the Russian Federation worked. : Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, the Army, Georgia... To them, what, nothing at all? Putin's opinion? Belousov's opinion? Admiral Kostyukov's, General Bortnikov's opinion? : The figure is astronomical/fantastic: 235,000,000,000 Euros! Thank you in advance. With respect and attention to your publications. (Even if in archive) P.S. Ah, yes. Military action from Ukraine. Because of these 235,000,000,000. To the esteemed Mr. President Putin. 91 drones, 182 drone pilots. Several officers with air defense radars, radars, etc. Excited Süget. Russia secrets. They obviously want to give away these 235,000,000,000. Well, eee, m, even Wikimedia is in need. ~2026-13753-7 (talk) 14:07, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you're going to have to break this down into something much more simple. I'm not an expert on Russia. I mostly just think history is interesting. GMG^talk 14:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are making positive changes in the topic of the Russian Federation.

Is it possible to add the figure of 235,000,000,000 Euros?

USSR and Russian investments. Confiscated and frozen in the European Union.

A few words.

Russian-language media are silent.

What investments? Which companies, stores, enterprises , bank's ?

Where will the frozen income from frozen investments go?

Six generations of semi-slaves of the USSR and the Russian Federation worked.

Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, the Armamia, Georgia...

To them, what, nothing at all?

Putin's opinion? Belousov's opinion? Admiral Kostyukov's, General Bortnikov's opinion?

The figure is astronomical/fantastic: 235,000,000,000 Euros!

Thank you in advance. With respect and attention to your publications. (Even if in archive)

P.S.

Ah, ye!

Military action from Ukraine. Because of these 235,000,000,000.

To the esteemed Mr. President Putin. 91 drones, 182 drone pilots.

Several officers with air defense radars, radars, etc.

Excited Süget.

Russia secrets.

They obviously want to give away these 235,000,000,000. Well, eee, m,

P.S.

Does anyone have anything to add or complete this .

Can we discuss discounts or adjustments for Wikimedia .

Yes! We should consider the lack of completeness.

Yes?

der HerrCher- wants to give away these investments anyway.

~2026-13753-7 (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This usually goes something more like: "Can we add the fact that Hippos are really fast according to this source." So, 1) very specific thing you would like changed, 2) a source that backs up the change.

What you have here is a little disorganized. GMG^talk 14:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

why you remove my question, my shower is full of disgusting liquids and you no care. you are very mean woman. i will report you to your boss and get you sent back to equatorial guinea in no time. ~2026-25311-8 (talk) 19:40, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is beautiful. Truly, a work of art. Bravo, you have made my day. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:53, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Killing of Alex Pretti shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Mikewem (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk archive is very long. Are you aware of the 2 contentious topics that apply to this article? Mikewem (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DTTR. See also notice at top. Gain consensus for the content or don't. It doesn't matter to me. But nit picking and templating aren't helping you make any headway in that direction. GMG^talk 16:39, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DS is kinda sorta different from CT, or maybe it’s not, but I guess this could work for WP:AWARE. Could you just clarify and say whether or not you actively choose to ignore CT? Mikewem (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) GMG's notice -even in image form- would extend to CTOP. I would also like to point out that you seem to be displaying a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality here and would advise you to tone it down a bit. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:20, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If someone behaves as a matter of course in a way that would get them blocked from CTOP articles, and only puts on their best behavior for subjects where it's easier to get blocked, then that person is a jerkwad. So yes. I am aware and I choose to ignore them. GMG^talk 17:34, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

…that the Washington State Lottery has adopted “Green Means Go” as a catchphrase in their campaign to tax people with poor math skills.

You should sue. Qwirkle (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your edit to the page Nate Morris, an unregistered account deleted the citation earlier today for the sentence you removed - the deleted citation is below:

https://eu.courier-journal.com/story/News/politics/elections/2026/03/09/nate-morris-senate-campaign-fundraiser-erika-kirk-arizona/89069952007/

Please could you revert your edit and add the above citation? Many thanks. Bram880 (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As I indicated in my edit summary, I'm not entirely sure it's super relevant information to begin with. She's kindof a professional "showing up at places" person. And anyway, she isn't "joining him". He's travelling half way across the country to be at an event she is also at. GMG^talk 22:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GMG, I'm hoping you remember me from WP:TFA and other Main Page work. I was looking around for active Commons admins and your name kept showing up, so I'm here to request IPBE for Commons (and I can make the request over there if you prefer). I usually use VPN at home, and always when I go to the local library, because their wifi is on a VPN. Can you help? (I tried the "email the WMF option", and wasn't happy with the response I got there, I'd prefer to deal with someone who knows my history on en.wp.) - Dank (push to talk) 21:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Being honest, I don't mess with much that has any technical aspect to it because I'm kindof a luddite. You may want to reach out to someone who better know how to computer. GMG^talk 19:48, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Luddites unite! Thx anyway, keep up the good work. - Dank (push to talk) 19:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You ordinary boring luddites can unite all you want. We lysdexics will continue to untie. Qwirkle (talk) Qwirkle (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]