Archives (index)

2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Please remember to add non-diffusing tags when you create WP:EGRSD categories, as well as the relevant sort keys. For example, Category:19th-century women courtiers didn't have either. Thanks! ^SMason_Garrison 19:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 March 14 § FOOth-century ladies-in-waiting on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 19:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Did you forget to add a source? 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:17, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That is in all the sources as well as the articles of the other language versions. I forgot to write it when first created the article.--Aciram (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well currently the article is sourced to a database entry where this information is clearly not stated, so it should include whatever references from other language versions you have used. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:18, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just letting you know I mentioned you in my evidence during an ongoing ARBCOM case [1]. You don't need to do anything, and don't worry, it doesn't reflect badly on you at all. Happy editing, Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 11:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I can not give any comment on this topic whatsoever. However: a heartfelt thank you for your message, and for allerting me about an issue I am reading about with interest. You do important work for wikipedia. Many well wishes, truly!--Aciram (talk) 19:58, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the issues R Prazeres identified in reverting it, Special:Diff/1345723986 is a violation of your interaction ban with M.Bitton. Please take more care to observe the IBAN, as further violations are likely to be enforced with blocks. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning. I was not aware that this edit was breaking the ban. The reason was as following: I did not in fact changed the content of my post. In my post, I referred to three previous discussions. Naturally, when doing so, a user should link to them. I always assumed I had done so. Do to so, does not, in fact, actually change the content of the post. I wrote no words whatsoever. Therefore, I assumed this would not be acting against any sort of ban. I did not, after all, write a new post; nore did I change the content of a previous comment. But if the rules say otherwise, I appologise and will not context that my edit is reverted. It was not done with harmful intent, nor was I aware it was a violation. If I should be blocked, I accept that with not protests whatsoever. --Aciram (talk) 21:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean with this comment [2] "this removes nationality from the category lady-in-waiting" because I diffused by century into the category tree you created.^SMason_Garrison 22:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I made a mistake: I think I assumed she was placed in "Brazilian ladies-in-waitings", but I see now I was wrong and it was only "Ladies-in-waiting". You are correct.--Aciram (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks! that's helpful. thanks for clearing that up~ ^SMason_Garrison 22:19, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:6th-century BC women by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 00:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aciram,

Thank you for creating Gavia Severa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I have de-orphaned this article by linking to it from Pompeii. Please expand this stub if possible and also provide ISBN for the printed source material.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:53, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Unmiashtart, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. el.ziade (talkallam) 22:09, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea it was a hoax. The name was in fact already in wikipedia in the article about the Phoenicians, and I assumed it needed its own article. In short, it was created in good faith. If it is indeed a hoax, then of course it should be deleted. --Aciram (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article Unmiashtart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is a misspelled duplicate of the existing article on Amoashtart (also known as Ummiashtart), which already covers the subject accurately and in full. The title represents an incorrect rendering of the queen's name, and the article's content contains factual errors, notably a false association of Amoashtart with Bodashtart and Yatonmilk based on a misreading of Moscati. As a redundant and inaccurate duplicate, this article serves no encyclopedic purpose and should be deleted.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. el.ziade (talkallam) 15:05, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Slavery in Panama indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 § "Somalian" to "Somali" across the board on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 17:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, François Galaup de Chasteuil, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- HungryHighway🛣️ 08:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has the following policy: an article is never complete. It is open for every user to edit, and improve, as log as it excists. That is a constructve policy. It means that millions of people can conctribute to it, and correct any faults it might have.

To move an article do draft space, however, is an inefficent policy. That means, that the correction of flaws in the article is left for one single person to correct, if they should have the time, or wish, to do so. That is inconstructive and inefficient.

In this case, it means that ths article will remain in draft space until it is deleted. It is a shame, since it is evidently relevant in its context - a famed criminal of one of the biggest crime cases of a century - but I have neither time or energy to make it perfect. Such a shame that the article is not open to more people to edit, than a single one. If it had, it could have been saved. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Maître Pierre (poisoner). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -- HungryHighway🛣️ 21:28, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has the following policy: an article is never complete. It is open for every user to edit, and improve, as log as it excists. That is a constructve policy. It means that millions of people can conctribute to it, and correct any faults it might have.

To move an article do draft space, however, is an inefficent policy. That means, that the correction of flaws in the article is left for one single person to correct, if they should have the time, or wish, to do so. That is inconstructive and inefficient.

In this case, it means that ths article will remain in draft space until it is deleted. It is a shame, since it is evidently relevant in its context - a famed criminal of one of the biggest crime cases of a century - but I have neither time or energy to make it perfect. Such a shame that the article is not open to more people to edit, than a single one. If it had, it could have been saved. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 00:47, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Aciram, I wanted to notify you that there are a few editors, including myself, trying to REVIVE Wikiproject feminism. We recently sorted through the old members' list and found that you were still active! If you want to help Revive Wikiproject feminism we'd love to have you! Also if you have anyone in mind who you think would be willing to join the project please leave them an invitation on their Talk page Goetia [She/They] (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Jacqueline du Roure, vicomtesse de Polignac. Another editor, Bogger, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Remember to include the Template:translated page template for translated articles on the talk page. -

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bogger}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bogger (talk) 12:29, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]