User:SweetNightmares
|
| “ | Even if all the formatters quit the project tomorrow, Wikipedia would still be immensely valuable. For the most part, people read Wikipedia because it has the information they need, not because it has a consistent look. It certainly wouldn’t be as nice without one, but the people who (like me) care about such things would probably step up to take the place of those who had left. The formatters aid the contributors, not the other way around.
Wales is right about one thing, though. This fact does have enormous policy implications. If Wikipedia is written by occasional contributors, then growing it requires making it easier and more rewarding to contribute occasionally. Instead of trying to squeeze more work out of those who spend their life on Wikipedia, we need to broaden the base of those who contribute just a little bit. Unfortunately, precisely because such people are only occasional contributors, their opinions aren’t heard by the current Wikipedia process. They don’t get involved in policy debates, they don’t go to meetups, and they don’t hang out with Jimbo Wales. |
” |
| — Aaron Swartz, Who Writes Wikipedia? | ||
Recommended reading
The following essays, while extremely pessimistic, offer valuable insight into Wikipedia and its ills.
- Nine reasons why women don't edit Wikipedia (in their own words) by Sue Gardner
- There is a cabal
- Why Wikipedia is not so great (vs. its opposite)
- Discovered reasons given for leaving Wikipedia
- A 2006 interivew with Jimbo Wales in which he denies that Wikipedia is victim to astroturfing, although recent evidence points to the contrary
- A guide to ethically editing Wikipedia for businesses
To do
- Reorganize and revitalize WP:QC
- Clean up/streamline "to-do"
- Create auxiliary features, namely a welcome template
- + Economy, geography, expand history
- Bas-Saint-Laurent
- Improve Red River of the North and translate it into French
- Translate Lennoxville into French
- Translate Chic-Choc Mountains
- Translate the many articles in L'Islet from French
- Complete translation of Montmagny, Quebec
Tasks
Tools
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.