• Sapnajainchaturvedi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-33426-03 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ELEK8! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1233 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters with no punctuation or markup, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-33389-22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-32440-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 189 five times in the last 5 minutes (BLP vandalism or libel, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-33199-15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) persistent unsourced BLP additions and vandalism JLN2026 (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• I eat crayons im a dino nuggy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Sheldon Cooper: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-33104-41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Disruptive editing. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 04:25, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  pblocked ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 06:47, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• ~2026-32383-40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Clearly WP:NOTHERE based on [this edit summary. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. I've warned them regarding the personal attacks. Please re-report here if they continue. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 07:16, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• 67kinghahajk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On User:Helloguyssss555/sandbox (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 07:09, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Jyl hunno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Vandalism past final warning: See filter log. TurquoiseGoose (talk) 08:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-32192-59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Plug-in electric vehicles in China: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Block evasion, please check page history. Tim (talk) 09:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• BigBoyNewbie67 (The New Account of BigBoyNewbie69) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Toki Pona: Persistent addition of unref material; previously warned and temp banned for same behavior. TurquoiseGoose (talk) 09:39, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• ~2026-33483-85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – repeated addition of inaccurate details across numerous articles. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 11:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• PhiIip Knight (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – LTA, see username and filter log. Mesocyclonic93 ^(t)_(c) 12:13, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• Vinu08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account. Already blocked before for creating hoaxes, and is back to create the same hoax. jolielover♥talk 12:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 78 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 5 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• JHON poop (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Poop" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Morganleprix (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: prick. Violating string: morganlepricks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• ContactCenterGuru (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• D J's Vidz Is Back (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "\b(is|are) ?back\b" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usually when a username contains "is back" it's a sockpuppeteer trying to be obvious -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Leviofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Loganepicstuffschool (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 10:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Specific Leakage Entertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• NIFGlobalJaipur (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See contribs. Lynch44 11:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Kremercollection (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 12:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user, since they have edited constructively. Their draft article appears to be about a notable topic and isn't horribly promotional. Let's give them a chance to change their name first; if not, then a softblock would be appropriate. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Got it. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 18:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Chandraprakash kmt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Cabayi (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

  This is a name. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 23:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Westemgr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username implies role ("manager") account; edits related to Westmeath county football team. tony 17:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
• Baskin Roberts (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional (play on Baskin robins). Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 04:16, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 11:22, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tanawat holdings limited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 04:39, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• FREOR LT, UAB (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:FREOR. Annh07 (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• Tilkly (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See contribs. Lynch44 12:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• Cffunnelstemplates (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See also filter log. Cicada1010 (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Sofia the First: Royal Magic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaa^talk 12:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tim Payne (footballer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – go longer this time. Toketaa^talk 13:21, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Done Anarchyte (talk) 11:05, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• 2026 SAFF Women's Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Mostly by IP users, deliberately removing, adding, changing stats. Drat8sub (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Economy of the Arab League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Annh07 (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Indian Army Public Schools (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaa^talk 15:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Bocconi University School of Law (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:40, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Babymonster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaa^talk 17:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• All-time World Games medal table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Staraction (talk · contribs) 20:44, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Dani Carvajal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 00:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Alfred Douglas Price (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bouncing IPs removing ethnicity (which is from reliable sources, and part of notability). One of the IPs has stated a COI. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Senate of the Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warring. HueMan1 (talk) 02:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• International recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection to prevent IP and new user disruptive editing + possible sockpuppetry. Several temporary, single-use accounts created on the same day to add an outdated map that contradicts with the article. All accounts are tagged "Visual edit, Mobile edit, Mobile web edit" and the reverts are within hours of one another.

• ~2026-33185-07: Updated image of the nations that recognize the SADR.
• ~2026-33110-38: Updated image of the International recognition of SADR *Bolivia still requires to be painted red*
• ~2026-33292-59: This image is still the correct one as Bolivia, Peru, Syria, Libya and Mauritania have Derecognized the SADR.
• ~2026-33381-82 This image will still be changed until it is updated as Bolivia, Peru, Mauritania, Libya, Syria and Uruguay revoked their recognition of Western Sahara.

This image will still be changed until... indicates an intention to continue disruptive editing. Another temporary account, ~2026-33142-39, made an edit without providing a source. I'm unsure if an SPI is more appropriate, though from my understanding that is a lengthy process. Nice4What (talk · contribs) ♥ 03:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. IPs blocked, should cover the single user causing the disruption. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:29, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! Nice4What (talk · contribs) ♥ 04:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Esmeralda Pimentel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive edits by temporary accounts. Not following MOS:CONTEXTBIO. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 03:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• 2026 TCS Nashik workplace grooming case (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of move page vandalism Pintosamuel35 (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Donovan Patton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 05:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Calum McFarlane (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced disruptive editing and possible sockpuppetry by multiple IP users. EdhyRa (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Snow White (2025 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Continuous arbitrary edits by an unregistered user (using different IPs), whose actions other users must continually undo BrookTheHumming (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• List of polar explorers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by repeated re-adding of Top Gear presenters. THMWikiAcc (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• IPhone 11 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 08:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• IPhone 12 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 08:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• IPhone 11 Pro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 08:59, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Miss Cosmo 2026 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued addition of unsourced / unreliable information by IP users. Sciencefish (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Balen Shah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Extension of page protection is requested for Balen Shah who is the Prime Minister of Nepal due to persistent, disruptive editing and unconstructive modifications by inexperienced users, which compromise the neutrality and factual reliability required for a high-profile political article. Elison Pokhrel ^TALK 10:18, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 10:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• 2026 Colombian presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Targeted and extensive sockpupppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dirceu Mag. This should be applied until after the counting finishes and also extended to other articles targeted by the sock such as 2026 Peruvian general election and Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election. Borgenland (talk) 11:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

ip edits have to be reverted and page protected https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albirex_Niigata_Singapore_FC&diff=prev&oldid=1357767295 (revert)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026%E2%80%9327_AFC_Challenge_League&diff=prev&oldid=1357875577 (vandalism despite latest sources presented)

• Jujutsu Kaisen (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Toketaa^talk 12:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Attack on Pearl Harbor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rereporting after another vandal edit. Page has been protected 15+ times, can we finally indef this?. Toketaa^talk 12:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• List of Airbus A220 orders and deliveries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content by an editor who has received numerous warnings about sourcing. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 12:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Phunk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Unprotect to create a redirect; a disambiguation is also possible if RfD'ed. Web-julio (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirect where? ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

PHUNK Web-julio (talk) 04:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Done. Redirect made. Anarchyte (talk) 10:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tim A. Peters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Protected by jclemens 1½ decades ago without setting a time limit. Subject of this article is not popular so why the first, and current, protection is indefinite? WP:TRYUNPROT now?~2026-33236-94 (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

You failed to follow the instructions above. The protecting admin is active, so why didn't you contact the admin first? That said, I wouldn't object to downgrading to PCP, which I believe didn't exist at the time. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 01:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

It did, but this would have been protected during the "stop this fake-ass trial" RfC. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Object Class: Drygioni} 01:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Given the amount of BLP nonsense that went into that article, in hindsight my only regret is not suppressing or oversighting it, which I held permissions to do at that time. I have no recollection of why I got involved in BLP cleanup on that article, but I suspect it might have been an OTRS ticket. I have no opinion on what happens to this now. Jclemens (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Done Anarchyte (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Paul Lafond (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Does not meet WP:BLP, which was the reason it was supposedly protected. Subject of article is deceased long ago.~2026-33236-94 (talk) 02:34, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Nowhere in that page's logs is WP:BLP mentioned. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Object Class: Drygioni} 02:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Not done As noted, BLP had nothing to do with why the article was protected. It was protected as Pending Changes because of straight-up vandalism like this, which had been going on for over a year heavily; the change from PC to semi appears to have been during the 2011 brouhaha over PC. Ordinarily, given the amount of time it's been since this was protected, I'd be willing to give it a try, but the fact a TA has suddenly found it and asked for unprotection, using a wrong rationalization, makes my antennae twitch, given the sheer amount of vandalism by IPs that led to the protection. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:46, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Draft:DJ Natural Nate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: I am requesting the unprotection of this title to allow for a new submission via Articles for Creation. A neutral, well-sourced draft has been prepared at User:Tnewaz84/DJ Natural Nate which addresses previous concerns regarding notability and promotional tone. The updated version includes significant, independent coverage that was absent from previous versions, notably:

• A verified #43 global ranking in the Breakspoll Awards 2011 (Top 50 Breaks DJs in the World).
• Editorial documentation of the subject's role as a pioneer of live DJ video streaming through his co-founding of The-Lost-Art.com (2009).
• Biographical details and career retrospectives from Electric Kingdom and Electronic Rhythm.

I am committed to following WP:COI guidelines and have formally disclosed my professional relationship with the subject on my user page. Tanvir Newaz (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Max Verstappen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Hello, I would like to request a trial unprotection of the article Max Verstappen. In recent times, the page has not been edited as frequently as before, and the level of attention surrounding the subject appears to have decreased compared to previous seasons. Given the lower level of activity, I believe it may be worth testing whether the current protection is still necessary. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Buldok465 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: Pinging protecting admin. Anarchyte (talk) 10:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

• BhikhariInformer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello folks! Till date, I have created about 45 mainspace articles; mostly films, web series, biographies, places of worship and a historical landmark (my most recent creation). I would love to have the Autopatrolled rights; and it might help prevent the piling up of the NPR backlog, even just by a bit. And I believe I am qualified for this. If I am judged ineligible, I would be happy to work upon myself if my shortcomings are pointed out. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@BhikhariInformer Could you explain why you used [1] in Basu Bati. Sohom (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Although it's not equivalent to a major newspaper or journal, I used it cuz it appeared to be a specialised history publication rather than a personal blog. They publish bylined articles, and from what I could gather, the authors appear to be real people with relevant academic backgrounds. And this article contained detailed information about Basu Bati's history. If there are concerns regarding the source's reliability, I'd be grateful if you could point 'em out, as I used it in good faith and would like to improve my source evaluation. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:03, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

{{not done}} @BhikhariInformer (CC @Sohom Datta): it's a brand website. See the very bottom of the page: "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings that blend modern design with traditional Indian craftsmanship. Responsibly sourced from over 11,000 artisans, our products reflect authenticity, sustainability, and fine craftsmanship. Discover the beauty of India with Peepul Tree." I'm sure you used the source in good faith, but this indicates to me that NPP review is still necessary. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:21, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Voorts I'm sorry, but I do not really agree with your analysis of that source; Sanjana Ray is in fact an established journalist specialising in lifestyle and probably culture. While PeepulTree appears to be "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings...", I think the website for that branding and whatever is mostly peepultree.world and not livehistoryindia.com; the latter is a website where they publish well-researched articles relating to their niche. In fact, I find the piece to be a well-researched publication by a subject-matter expert, and in livehistoryindia credit, I consider it an excellent, high-quality editorial platform for history enthusiasts, students, cultural explorers, you name it. This is entirely my own opinion and I hope it helps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

I'll let another admin review it. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 05:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Mill 1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Good morning/day/evening my fellow Wikipedians. After 15 years, 200k+ edits and creating a lot of stuff here I think it is time to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have created about 200 list articles and 150+ other main space articles, mostly biographies. Although I love all my children I'm especially proud of next WIR contributions:

Currently I am focussing on Wikispecies-related topics so the last 350+ 'pages' are soft redirects to Wikisecies. As you can see in the logs there haven't been any major issues. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Mill 1 (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I recommended to @Mill 1 that they apply for autopatroller. They mentioned that new NPP's nominating their soft directs to deletion (which I am also guilty of doing), and it would save everyone time if they were granted autopatroller. They've created over 8000 pages, and only 72 have been deleted.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, What is the status of my application? It has been a week already and I had to remove speedy deletion tags from new soft redirect pages yet again. I believe this was NPP-er number 5 or 6. Kind Regards,Mill 1 (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• OlympiaBuebird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

79 articles created, zero deleted. Creations look excellent. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @A412!

Really appreciate the "creations look excellent". Wish I could say that about my cupcakes when I decide to do some baking.

Saw this nomination in my alerts and was pleasantly surprised. If others feels this user right is a good thing to have, great! If not, fine, too! Whatever helps those editors who do the diligent, and thankless, work behind the scenes works for me.

OlympiaBuebird (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Doctorow (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I think I should already be confirmed - I've been editing WP for decades. However, I can't make edits to this protected article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nowy_S%C4%85cz_Ghetto), which has numerous style/syntax issues. There's a helpful admin there who's offered to make my edits, but there are probably hundreds of small edits that need to be made and this extra step would be a lot of pointless work for both of us. Doctorow (talk) 07:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot ^talk 07:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

@Doctorow: I think you meant to request extended confirmed. However, the article you want to edit is not allowed to be edited by any editor with less than 500 edits per a decision of the Arbitration Committee, so even if I granted you extended confirmed, you still wouldn't be allowed to edit the article directly. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

@Doctorow We can count contributions made on other accounts (or without an account) towards the 500 edits. For example, I'm guessing this [3] was you back in the day? That would add another 60 edits to your current 177. If you have any other accounts or IP contributions lying around that could get you over the 500-edit mark that restriction wouldn't apply to you and we could grant extended confirmed. If you don't feel comfortable announcing your IP addresses publicly, you can also email the Arbitration Committee with further details. Toadspike [Talk] 07:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Voorts, the language you mention has been amended: the current requirement is WP:APLECP, which only requires the EC right. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

• Justin Paramount (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm requesting permissions to edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFC_Freedom_250, which has factual inaccuracies about how to watch. Namely, it is not available to watch on CBS and is exclusively available to watch on Paramount+. I can cite multiple public and official sources for this.

You can see from my confirmed email that I'm affiliated with Paramount and intend to correct the facts about how to watch the event. Justin Paramount (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done @Justin Paramount: you can make an edit request on the talk page using the edit request wizard. Please also review our paid editing guideline. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @Voorts - I'll follow those processes. Appreciate the help! Justin Paramount (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Hike395 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}
• Experience: Template editor, 23 years, 100K+ edits
• Reason: involved in page renames and moves, e.g., Talk:Zanskar district. Would like to be able to do page swaps. — hike395 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

  @Hike395 I see lots of participation in move discussions, but no closes and minimal experience at WP:RM/TR. I wouldn't object to another admin assigning the permission, but I'd personally want to see more activity in those areas to demonstrate a need. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Allblessed (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am requesting pending changes rights, I want to use the rights to approve or disapprove pending changes, especially, for unsourced edits, Thank you. Allblessed (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 04:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Cl00m)Red (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I already do antivandalism work on the Recent Pages Patrol using UV and Twinkle and being a pending changes reviewer would be helpful for antivandalism. Cl00m)Red -|talk|- 22:55, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• AriuCH (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’ve been active in anti‑vandalism work, issuing warnings and reverting disruptive edits, especially on BLPs. I try to follow policy carefully and keep pages stable.

I’d like to request Pending Changes reviewer rights. AriuCH (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([4][5]). — MusikBot ^talk 23:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done I have a very liberal view on granting PCR, but looking through your talk page, I would encourage you to improve your understanding of our content policies and work more in main space. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Wikipedian12512(alt) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello. I'd like to request the ability to accept or decline pending changes on both of my accounts (User:Wikipedian12512 and User:Wikipedian12512(alt). I've read the relevant policies (BLP, Vandalism, Copyright Violations, etc.), and think that I could do a reasonable (to start, I'd probably get better over time) job. Thank you! Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

To be clear, this would be for both my accounts. _{In solidarity}Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 17:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Rht bd (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to review pending changes protected edits in articles as I have proper knowledge of rules and policies of Wikipedia. Sometimes I see edits in PC protected article which I can revert if it goes against WP rules, but can not accept if the edit is constructive. Hopefully, I can help to build a clean encyclopedia I am granted this right. Thanks. Rht bd (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Pyrrhic victor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I often do anti-vandalism and during the course of that task I often come across pending changes, I belive myself capable with aiding in this task, and wish to help out. Pyrrhic victor (what did I do) 16:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

• Ari 1600 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I'd like to request the pending changes reviewer right. I'd like to use this to make sure no vandalism occurs and to help around. Thank you! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 01:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• BhikhariInformer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello folks! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer rights. I wish to deal with the concerned pages — accepting or refusing pending changes, particularly, to handle the unsourced edits and COI vandalism. Thank you! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• JoBoGamer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 15:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 11:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@Pppery: Up to you. Katie^talk 22:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I would describe my action as procedural, and it really should be up to HJ Mitchell who granted the first trial. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:25, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell your presence is requested here.

JoBo Gamer 09:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

• TurquoiseGoose (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I've been patrolling recent changes and filter logs for about a month using UV and Twinkle. I am familiar with warning users and submitting ARV and UAA reports. I'd like to try out more efficient tools like AntiVandal and WikiShield. TurquoiseGoose (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done for one month. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:46, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Hamimh2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am applying again after my request got denied. I have been actively reverting vandalism and bad unconstructive edits more than before. I always 100% of the time let the user know why I reverted their edit. And I would like to use Huggle, WikiShield, and Interceptor to revert vandalism even faster. And now I have 397 edits in the mainspace, so I have much more experience. I am honestly a great vandal fighter and would benefit from rollback rights. Thank you for reading! Hamimh2 (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot ^talk 18:40, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:44, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• HarvardJock (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I've been a pending changes reviewer for a little while now and I've also patrolled recent changes undoing vandalism for quite some time. I've spent the last while spending time reviewing recent changes and pending changes, on top of contributing to articles and discussions as I normally do. I am an active editor that regularly makes constructive edits to a variety of articles and topics, having improved and expanded a lot of pages. I have a very deep understanding of site policies and regularly bring up policy in Talk discussions before anything else. I think having rollback rights would help me expand my patrolling contributions, notably in preventing vandalism, and result in a net benefit for Wikipedia. Thanks for considering! HarvardJock🏫 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

 Not done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:34, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• AZenit3 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot ^talk 01:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

• Scoria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

My temporary rollback permissions will expire soon. Throughout the "trial" for rollback, I have been utilizing Interceptor, Wikishield, and manual RB for counter-vandalism tasks. And I would like to still have access to those tools for much easier patrolling.Scoria (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 08:20, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:42, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• TheNerdzilla (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retro music11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been using Twinkle for reporting potential SPs, creating deletion discussions and for notifying new users of unsourced edits. I'm requesting permission to the rollback tool as it'd assist me in reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Retro music11 (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you kindly! Retro music11 (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Welovecontributors! (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to try to apply again! I created two articles since and I finally have 200 mainspace edits! Welovecontributors! [talk] 02:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot ^talk 02:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

I didn't see many counter-vandalism contributions of yours. Maybe you can learn to fight vandalism first? Additionally, it looks like that you are collecting hats, or in other words, asking for this right as a symbol of your contributions getting appreciated by the admins or the community. -- Least Action (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done I don’t see any harm in granting this. The articles they created were decent and Twinkle is just as good as rollback, so we’re not really gate keeping much but access to Huggle. If they don’t use that there’s virtually no damage, and if they do use it and have issues, rollback isn’t hard to remove. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Least Action (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been doing vandalism partol recently, and I want the rollback flag to be able to revert vandalism quickly and more efficiently. However I may be a bit less experienced, so maybe I can have it temporary first to learn to use it and improve my counter-vandalism skills. -- Least Action (talk) 12:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 98 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 14:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

My explanation for this is that most edits I see when patrolling RC are not vandalism, and I also deal with promotion in user and draft spaces. See my CSD log. -- Least Action (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 98 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:36, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• AlterSkye (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to request rollback rights to help me fight vandalism more efficiently via Recent Changes patrol. I am an active editor and familiar with the guidelines AlterSkye (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 17 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 21:30, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 5 June 2026 (UTC)