User:Kellen
Articles I've started
Business Lady
Braze-on
Captain Ahab
Collar pin
Forcefield
Death for Five Voices
Herakles
Marty Holland
Matt Brinkman
Mindflayer
Nectarivore
Red Aunts
The Feederz
Major work
I like citations. <3 vim.
get the wiki source of a specific article: wget "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=raw&title=Articlename"
kill whitespace inside templates: %s/\s*[\n]\=\s*|\s*\(\(\w\?[0-9A-Za-z_ -]*\)\w\)\s*=\s*/ |\1=/g
kill extra spaces before references: %s/\s\+<ref/<ref/g
move references outside punctuation: %s/\(\(<ref[^<]*<\/ref>\)\+\)\([.,!?;:"']\)/\3\1/g
find beginning of non-template formatted references: /<ref[^>/]*>[^{]
pull references into their own file: grep -o "<ref name=\"[^\"]*\">[^<]*</ref>" file > refs
and then replace the reference: :%s/<ref name="\([^"]*\)">[^<]*<\/ref>/<ref name="\1"\/>/g
and don't forget to :set encoding=utf-8
the most important pages on wikipedia
ouroboros, bakeneko, kitsune, tipu's tiger, cymothoa exigua
todo
| Multi-licensed into the public domain | ||
| I agree to multi-license my eligible text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under the GFDL and into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions in the public domain, please check the multi-licensing guide. | ||
References
- ^ ManicBrit. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I don't expect an ideologue to adhere to NPOV perfectly
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Viriditas. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
You originally eliminated the criticism section and merged this material into ethical concerns, only to now make the claim that it is "undue weight" and "hypotethical", obviously clearing the way for the elimination of all criticism of veganism.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Viriditas. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
does one have to be a practicing vegan in good membership standing with PETA in order to edit this article?
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Viriditas. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
It seems like you would like to remove all criticism of veganism from this article.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Abe.Froman. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
Kellen goes on an editing binge, and the Vegan article suddenly has little to no positive information in it. POV pushing, at its worst.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Abe.Froman. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
Why these were removed, while negative information, using similar sources, was retained, I can only guess.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Abe.Froman. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
The Health Effects Section of this article is written in a discriminatory tone against vegans. The POV tone, and oft-repeated information on nutritional deficiency and sexual defect seek to marginalize vegans as a class. This violated Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. The section on health effect should be condensed, and rewritten in a NPOV tone that does not cast all vegans as nutritional and sexual freaks.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Abe.Froman. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I think Kellen T needs to review WP:OWN.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Abe.Froman. "Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I see Kellen has been whitewashing any "benefits" out of the Vegan article, again.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Migospia. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I believe the health effects section in the veganism article is discriminatory toward vegans, and what you wrote seem to go against Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Migospia. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
at least try to write it in a different way other your POV and attacking vegans
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Migospia. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I am just baffled right now for a lot of reasons one is that there does not seem to be a lot of postitive wikipedian editors to the vegan article because Kellens edits were in there a while althouh I am not the only one to revert it.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Migospia. "Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
Way too biased, and mostly not true
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Nomenclator. "Talk:Veganism". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-01-07.
I think we have a conspiracy here to promote popular myths about veganism, rather than the truth, about veganism.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Sugarcubez. "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vegan foods". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-03-03.
Kellen I have seen your 'work' here on Wiki and find it hard believing you are a vegan.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ Sugarcubez. "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vegan foods". Wikipedia. Retrieved 2008-03-06.
I am not making a *personal accusation*, I am just stating what I have seen through the years Kellen has done, seems majorly anti-vegan. And I have to differ from what you say about that issue (diligent with making sure that whatever is in the article is cited, positive or negative- not!) very much. And in reality there could not really be anything negative that is a fact and has to directly do with veganism.
{{cite web}}:|author=has generic name (help)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.