User:Geo Swan
| This user has been banned from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions · discussion) |

My essays
- Nothing is "obvious"
- "False Geber" and what a biography should contain related to The earliest sockpuppet to be unmasked...
- Aren't my efforts "helping terrorists"?
- An experiment -- are 90 percent of new articles junk?
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Applying POLITICIAN to individuals who don't meet the criteria of GNG
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Are you a genius
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Are you a genius...
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Certain tags require explanation on the talk page
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Coverage of ghostsingles is tongue in cheek
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Fair use and abuse at Florin Fodor
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Guantanamo captives aren't felons and aren't POWs
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Haroon Rashid Aswat and BLP
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/How often should material in article space be checked?
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/I've had one RfC started against me
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Minsk not Pinsk
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Minsk not Pinsk: Herman Khan's explanation of the dangers of outsmarting one's self
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/My concerns with DRV
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Nothing is really "obvious" -- a parable
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/On apologies
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/RUAGENIUS
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Regarding the article ... Controversies related to prevalence of Jews in leadership roles in Hollywood
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Remembering why we protect intellectual property
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Should the wikimedia software support additional kinds of links?
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Should we have some topic specific notability criteria for extrajudicial captives...
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Six degress of article separation
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/Teachable moments
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/The earliest sockpuppet to be unmasked...
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/The first RfC started against me
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/The frontiers of template policy
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/When RS coverage is tongue in cheek
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/You can't say that here!
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/editing Fahd al Jutayli while before Afd
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/every question, every disagreement, is a teachable moment
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/inspired by 'wikithreads are bad'
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/linkworthy
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/norobots.txt
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/nothing is obvious
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/on apologies
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/responsible use of maintenance wikitags
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/teachable moment
- User:Geo Swan/opinions/teachable moments
- User:Geo Swan/original Summary of Evidence memos published in 2005
- User:Geo Swan/plagiarized again
- User:Geo Swan/questions for Guantanamo GIs
- User:Geo Swan/rants/What is special about Holland?
- User:Geo Swan/the earliest sockpuppet
- User:Geo Swan/the first sockpuppet
- User:Geo Swan/the lessons of "tit for tat"?
Notes on subpages under User:Geo Swan
I have User:Geo Swan/An introduction to the notes on subpages under User:Geo Swan.
Useful
Opinions
Public Domain images I've uploaded
User:Geo Swan/Public Domain images I've uploaded
Possibly interesting links to check later
- User:Geo Swan/working/Possibly interesting links to check later
- This is a redlink
- "Reporters stuck at Guantanamo get flight out after top-level intervention". Canadian Press. 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-22. mirror
DYK nomination of TIC 168789840
Hello! Your submission of TIC 168789840 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ktin (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.