User:Elinruby/Clustercase

93, rue Lauriston is a French made-for-television movie by Denys Granier-Deferre first broadcast in 2004 on Canal+.

Summary

During the Nazis occupation 93 rue Lauriston housed the headquarters of the French Gestapo [fr], known as the "Carlingue".

German authorities relied on French criminals for much of the routine police work. Provided with German credentials, these thugs were untouchable. Run by Pierre Bonny, a police inspector discharged for corruption, and Henri Lafont, a prison escapee, the Bonny-Lafont gang hunted Jews and Resistance fighters, extorted and racketeered, and provided Tout-Paris with black market and other services such as pimping.

The film begins with the early-morning arrest of Lafont and his acolytes on 30 August on a farm encircled by police. Through the lens of inspector Blot's investigation of Bonny and Lafont after their execution, the film comes back to the sinister activities of the Légion nord-africaine [fr] in southern France and the French Gestapo in Paris. The policeman put together a thick file that compromised some public figures who associated with the two. But France had already put the épuration behind it and nobody was interested in his accusations. The film ends with Blot's bitter words: "Ah! Que la France est belle…" (Ah, how beautiful France is!)[1]

Cast

References

  1. ^ Dans le ventre de la bête: Fiction. Avec l'audacieux 93, rue Lauriston, Canal Plus explore ce passé qui ne passe pas. (In the Belly of the Beast: Fiction. With the audacious 93, rue Lauriston, Canal Plus explores the past that doesn't pass), Humanité, 11 December 2004

on circular references

Once the disinformation is on wikipedia, and English wikipedia especially, it becomes an idée reçue and gets included in all sorts of materials as background facts that "everyone knows", such as "snow is white", "If it wasn't true it wouldn't be on TV", and "everybody does it".

Summary

1-editor receives a mild sanction for something he unquestionably has participated in 1-editor sanctioned for socking but not for unquestionably being part of the problem on an ongoing basis for years. This action should make it more unlikely that other editors feel pushed out of the topic area. 1-editor who edits on the war in Ukraine, American politics, topic banned from Poland 1-editor who edits on Russian topics, topic banned from Poland 1-editor who does not edit in either EE or HiP is sanctioned for being part of the problem in Poland five years ago. Also gets an i-ban with the American politics editor, ok, unknown if there was friction there. Both these editors are now topic banned from Poland, which can reasonably be expected to have approximately zero effect since that is the baseline from prior to the case, this editor found to have been part of the problem in Poland based on approximately zero evidence.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.