User:Coder Dan
|
Hi, my name is Dan. I used to contribute to Wikipedia in a variety of ways, but I've given up because ignorant or malicious editors have resisted or undone so much of my work.
For newbies
- Wikipedia:Cheatsheet
- Tony1's writing tutorials
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Style guidelines for film articles
- How to write a plot summary
Plot summaries
Wikipedia has a quality problem
Wikipedia is plagued with problems in grammar, writing style, and organization. Too many editors lack the skills, and in some cases the maturity, that should be required to contribute to an encyclopedia. This is especially a problem with anonymous editors, but it also applies to registered wikipedians, including administrators.
Bad English
See User:Coder Dan/Bad English.
Bad style
Categories
- no common parent category for combined "Anime and Manga" categories
- deletion of Love Me Tonight from 1930s musical films category with no subcategory to replace it
- Categories for countries and species are named as sets but treated as topics. Each of these should be divided into two categories, a set with a plural name and a topic with a singular name. For example, Category:Dog should be created as a parent of Category:Dogs, and all topical content should be moved from cat:Dogs into cat:Dog.
- There's a widespread confusion between categories (abstract sets) and category listings (Wikipedia web pages). Many editors seem to think that articles cease to be members of a parent category when they are "diffused" into child categories. This reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of what categories are.
- trying to implement software changes through editing processes (awkward and unreliable)
- Categories as associations
- Leprechaun films: Horror, science fiction, and comedy; serial killer films
- Redundant, multidimensional "by" categories
- Multidimensional "by" categories defeat the purpose of the category system, which is to organize articles by content. They contain the same articles as ordinary single-issue "by" categories, but in a flatter, less organized structure.
Extremes and inconsistency
Editors often work at cross purposes. Sometimes they prefer opposite extremes over reasonable compromises.
- Names of starring actors listed in the lede of film articles:
One editor adds redundant first names in the plot summary
while another removes the names altogether.
Churning
Sometimes editors replace high-quality text with text in their own personal writing style, which in many cases is worse than the original.
- complete rewrite of The Incredibles plot summary (rewritten by an administrator, much worse than the previous version)
- complete rewrite of Kim Possible: A Sitch in Time plot summary (anonymous editor, gratuitous changes, incoherent, too many details and quotations)
Excessive detail in plot summaries
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.