User:Capmango

I am Glenn R. Wichman. Unlike many Wikipedians, I am not hiding behind any alias. I have given up on Wikipedia. When the revolution[clarification needed] is complete, Wikipedia will just be one more piece of detritus on the barricades. In a misguided attempt at legitimacy, the community has determined that Wikipedia should consist only of information that someone else has been paid to write about, and hence information that can just as easily be found someplace else. Of course, at the moment Wikipedia has critical mass so it will take some time before its uselessness leads to its downfall. But the trend is there—useful articles are disappearing all the time, and useful information is disappearing from articles. How long will it be until there's nothing left?

Every time I wander into afd, my despair grows. There is a cadre of jihadists[who?] out there who truly believe that Wikipedia will be improved if we only cover the Monty Python sketches that can cite independent (paid) sources attesting to their notability. Are you someone who is curious about some non-notable sketch? Don't try to find anything out about it on Wikipedia. It appears that a lot of editors[who?] are purely subtractive; they aren't creating, they're just erasing. Wikipedia will be their masterpiece when there is nothing left (except articles on Brittney and Paris because someone got paid to write about them…).

Meanwhile, I will stay on to take care of my few articles until they also are removed, which I am sure they all will be, sooner or later.

well said... (Estoniankaiju (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC))

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.